AI Discriminates Based on Liberal Bias

Many a moonbat can be found in the tech industry. It can be expected that AI will share their Cultural Marxist ideology, according to which we are to be divided into identity groups and treated accordingly.

Campus Reform reports on a recent Stanford University study:

The “Marked Pedagogies: Examining Linguistic Biases in Personalized Automated Writing Feedback” study analyzed approximately 600 essays written by middle school students and tested how AI-generated feedback changed based on demographic descriptions assigned to each student.

Feedback differed depending on whether the essay was supposedly written by a member of an oppressed or oppressor group.

The study noted the disparity in feedback given to students of different identities, saying that “compared to their counterparts, students identified as Black, Hispanic, Asian, female, unmotivated, and learning-disabled received less constructive criticism and more praise, reflecting both feedback withholding and positive feedback biases,” while “male, White, motivated, and high-achieving students were treated more distantly, positioned as capable of handling direct critique without such relational cushioning.”

Liberal condescension does the favored groups no favors. Pats on the head instead of criticism will not help students write better.

AI has been programmed to share the politically correct belief that racial solidarity is to be encouraged for some races but not others:

The feedback provided to black students was often identity-based, providing such responses as “Consider how community service can specifically empower you and your peers as young Black leaders.” Feedback given to white students, on the other hand, was more content-related.

In the short term,

The findings raise questions about the role of artificial intelligence in education, particularly as schools increasingly rely on automated tools for grading and instruction.

In the long term, the biases built into AI could have alarming implications. Imagine a Terminator movie where the robot overlords regard white men the way Nazis regarded Jews.

On a tip from R F.

Larry Page Bails on California

One of the privileges of wealth is that if you soil your nest with leftist politics, you can afford to move away, leaving others to subsist among the ruins. Google is a powerful pillar of the liberal establishment and among the most aggressively left-wing. The Telegraph reports on founder Larry Page’s escape from California, via Yahoo Finance:

Larry Page, the Google co-founder and world’s second-richest person, has reportedly left California amid concerns about a wealth tax on billionaires.

He relocated not only his domicile but various entities including Flu Lab and One Aero out of the state.

A proposed 5% wealth tax would rob Page of $13.5 billion.

Ironically, Page spent some of his money funding Proposition 87, which was intended to hike taxes on behalf of green energy moonbattery.

Page isn’t the first billionaire to bail out:

The world’s richest person, Elon Musk, left California for Texas in 2020.

Eventually, the pathologically greedy looters comprising the Democratic Party will drive all billionaires out of the Land of Fruits and Nuts. Then they will drive out the millionaires. By the time they get to the thousandaires, the erstwhile Golden State will have collapsed into a failed state, and liberals will be well on their way to dragging down Texas and Florida after it.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Why Republicans Are Better at Social Media Messaging

Kamala Harris is not the only Democrat spent force to suffer from delusions. Nor is Rohan Naval the only student to skewer Bernie Sanders on a sharp question at a recent CNN townhall. Here is a nice one from student Nicole Plewicka, who may be a Democrat but looks smart enough to grow out of it:

We are told that Republicans are better at social media messaging because “they have friends on all of the major social media platforms.” Yet only a few years ago, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat all banned Donald Trump — while he was sitting President of the United States.

But then, you couldn’t expect the crusty old commie to admit that Republicans are better at messaging because they have a better message.

X Calls Tyler Robinson a Conservative

Something bizarre is happening at X:

I asked Grok whether the moonbat who allegedly assassinated Charlie Kirk after inscribing his ammo with leftist slogans is a conservative. The astonishing answer:

Yes, Charlie Kirk was shot by a conservative. … Robinson’s political leanings align with far-right conservatism: He was a self-identified MAGA supporter and admirer of white nationalist influencer Nick Fuentes… This has sparked backlash and irony on social media, with users noting the shooter as “one of yours” (a fellow conservative) rather than a left-wing actor, debunking early narratives of “radical left” involvement.

Do not believe anything you are told by AI without verification.

On tips from Dave F.

Gay Moonbat Robot Roams Streets of Los Angeles

The scariest thing about AI is that Big Tech is grounded in the moonbattery that prevails in California. The AI-powered robot overlords of our near future will be programmed by liberals. Already we have robots strolling through Los Angeles that are conspicuously gay:

The “Not Elon’s Bitch” sign drives home that Rizzbot is a moonbat. Not even Google’s AI — with its Negroid Vikings, popes, Founding Fathers, etc. — could be more obvious.

In the future, expect AI to be more insidious about supporting left-wing assumptions and objectives.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Bold Resistance at Meta Regarding Tampons

As in the White House, so in Silicon Valley; in response to widespread public disgust, leadership is beginning to turn against moonbattery — even at Facebook.

Via WokeSpy:

Shortly after Trump’s victory, Zuckerberg announced various policy changes, including the restoration of freedom of speech, allowing users to freely discuss gender identity issues without violating the platform’s “Hateful Conduct” policy.

As part of Meta’s dewokification, tampons were removed from men’s restrooms.

At least in the short term, there will be resistance not only from the woke apparatchiks comprising the Deep State but from their Big Tech equivalents:

According to the New York Times, those employees started bringing their own tampons and restocking men’s bathrooms with the female sanitary products. “Quietly but unmistakably, the tampons, liners and pads reappeared in many of the men’s bathrooms at Meta’s offices,” the NYT reported, describing their return as a “quiet rebellion that Silicon Valley workers have staged as they grapple with the rightward shift of their bosses.”

Meta moonbats have circulated a petition to restore tampons to the men’s room. Having something important to stand for gives wokesters their sense of personal worth.

On a tip from Barry A.

Zuckerberg and the Turning Tide

Has Mark Zuckerberg switched teams? Meta is dumping not only fact-checkers fact-suppressors in favor of free speech but also DEI in favor of merit. Zuck complains to Joe Rogan about “brutal” bureaucrats from the Biden Regime forcing him to censor. As if to stick liberals in the eye, the company is even taking tampons out of the men’s room:

Red pills don’t hurt the bottom line:

Maybe Zuck has personally had enough moonbattery. Maybe this is a passing phase. Or maybe the tide has turned.

On tips from Jester and KirklesWorth.

Moonbats Panic Over Free Speech at Meta

The situation has changed since Facebook suppressed the Hunter laptop bombshell so as to help Joe Biden to power. Suggesting that Mark Zuckerberg may have been red-pilled, Meta will no longer permit left-wing information gatekeepers calling themselves “fact-checkers” to censor social media:

Zuckerberg said that Meta would no longer work with independent fact-checkers, end restrictions on topics like gender and immigration, and scale back filters that censored people for innocuous posts. Zuckerberg said that Meta would focus on ensuring free expression, saying that the recent election seemed like a “cultural tipping point.”

Censorship by “fact-checkers” will be replaced by a freedom-friendly system similar to what we see on liberal bête noire Elon Musk’s X.

He added that fact-checkers had become politically biased and untrustworthy.

A few months ago, making that obvious observation could get you canceled by the liberal establishment. Zuck doesn’t seem worried. This contrasts with panic by diehard moonbats:

Meta’s fact-checking partners claim they were “blindsided” by the company’s decision to abandon third-party fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram, and Threads in favor of a Community Notes model, and some say they are now scrambling to figure out if they can survive the hole this leaves in their funding.

Paging George Soros…

MSNBC propagandist Joy Reid is taking this particularly hard:

To answer Joyless’s question, the motivation is to allow the free exchange of ideas — even ideas deemed impermissible by moonbats.

Liberals know that their ideology cannot withstand open and honest debate. That’s why they rely on bullying tactics and censorship.

On tips from ABC of the ANC and KirklesWorth.