moonbattery logo

Dec 19 2016

D.C. Public Schools Spokeswoman Wants to Abolish White Men

Just how toxic is the venom government schools are injecting into children’s minds? To get an idea, consider that the Director of Communications for D.C. Public Schools has announced she would like to abolish white men. Rick Perry, who has said he wants to do away with the Energy Department, was chosen to head that same agency. In response, Hilary Tone took to Twitter and Facebook to bark:

“If wanting to get rid of something qualifies you to run it, I would like to be Secretary of White Men.”

Ms. Tone is not alone in her radical views:

[T]he school district’s deputy chief of school turnaround and performance, Eugene Pinkard, favorited the tweet.

For now, this kind of rhetoric is supposed to be limited to the classroom and the teachers’ lounge, lest it raise alarm among the taxpayers who finance it. When Tone’s malevolent lunacy began to attract attention, she restricted her Twitter and Fakebook accounts. However, Daily Caller has screenshots:

Hilary-Tone-twitter

Hilary-Tone-facebook

Imagine the repercussions for her career if she had said this about a preferred group that is supposedly oppressed. Yet Tone is unlikely to face repercussions from the likeminded educrats of DCPS, who responded to the outrage by dutifully coughing up some boilerplate B.S. about how proud they are proud to be “an inclusive organization regardless of race, ethnic background, [blah blah blah].”

On a tip from Torcer.



93 Responses to “D.C. Public Schools Spokeswoman Wants to Abolish White Men”

  1. grayjohn says:

    When I am appointed Secretary of Bitches, you are gone.

  2. MAS says:

    Anyone want to wager against a pending promotion for her?

  3. 762x51 says:

    Abolish, when applied to a thing like a dept full of bureaucrats simply means to end or get rid of that thing.

    When applied to people, the correct term is GENOCIDE. “Getting rid of” either white males OR white females would literally exterminate the Caucasian race. That is genocide, the annihilation of an entire race, pure, plain and simple.

    When someone has stated their intentions to annihilate you, what is the proper response? You have but two choices, fight or die and watch your children die as well.

    This isn’t some BLM street thug on a street corner with a megaphone leading a mob chant. It is a bureaucrat, two actually, in leadership positions within a governmental agency. That makes it institutionalized racism, period.

    Most you have seen the pitched battles between the insect that calls itself ‘kirklesworth” and I. JerklesTwerp maintains that my prediction of civil war is fictional and it has a deep and abiding concern for the health and safety of Progressives, people like Hillary Tone and Eugene Pinkard(aptly named). This troll, and the many minions who think that same way are either fifth column enemy collaborators or are direct enemy combatants in this war.

    There is no middle ground with those who seek to annihilate you, unless there is some level of annihilation you are willing to accept. Say the annihilation of others, who you track and report to the authorities in order to save you own cowardly, miserable hide.

    There can be no question that Hillary Tone was advocating the killing of a specific group of people on the Internet. Someone call the bath house and see if BachaBaziMale is available for comment, or perhaps to “turn her in”.

  4. George Lortz says:

    She’s obviously a mudshark.

  5. Mack says:

    So did any of you vote in your last school board election?

  6. JackisBack says:

    Any White person with a Directors job in public education that posted about wanting to get rid of any race of people would immediately be fired. Sharpton and LaRaza would organize scorched Earth demonstrations and Whites would be beaten in the streets and their property destroyed. But let a racist brown bitch make a similar statement about the White race and she will be defended by media and politicians.

  7. Occam's Stubble says:

    I did.

  8. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Only every election since 1976.

  9. KirklesWorth says:

    Calling for me again? Sheesh. And don’t misquote me – I said you wanted Hillary elected to help start your “progressive”-killing civil war.

    What was ridiculous is you blaming me for it:

    762×51: I didn’t start this, the Progressives did and with them there is no room for reason. Hillary = Progressive. tRump = Progressive. Election of either one = civil war. Get used to it, you are making it happen.

    Which side will you be fighting on in this civil war?

  10. TrojanMan says:

    Does the word Hillary and its derivatives mean “Woman who is evil”?

  11. chuck_in_st_paul says:

    the welfare community has been raised on hate and discontent against white people by …. WHITE DIMOCRATS. The irony of the welfare plantation being run by the very people these black bigots rail against just amazes me.

  12. chuck_in_st_paul says:

    LOL

  13. TrojanMan says:

    “that my prediction of civil war is fictional” Civil wars follow ebbs and flows of civilization. They are inevitable. Humans are predisposed to violence, strife, and other various sorts of evil. Time, place, and cause are the only things to debate not whether it will happen or not. The strawman that a civil war is what i desire would be amusing if it was not down right sick.

    “This troll, and the many minions who think that same way are either fifth column enemy collaborators or are direct enemy combatants in this war.”

    I disagree. IMO his primary purpose seems to be nothing more than causing strife, slander, intimidation, to berate, and enrage those who do not share his opinions. IMO his posts and responses are designed to inflame and generate a negative response, which i indulged him in the past, but no longer. I could be wrong of course but going through all his posts from his disqus account it would seem to be this way. Of course he has the right to act any which way he desires. Every once in a while you will find an original thought, some of which i agree.

    Good day and GOD bless

  14. KirklesWorth says:

    Funny how somebody like me who supported the republican candidate for president against the “he-man Trumper-haters club” gets projected upon with “causing strife, slander, intimidation, to berate, and enrage those who do not share his opinions”. Did I “berate” you when I said this:

    TrojanMan: You claim to want to debate but you are really just a condescending bunghole troll. Its my fault for feeding your trolling. I will refrain from doing so.

    Oh wait, that was you. What about the time I said:

    TrojanMan: Everyone on this site who is in Trumps colon is a troll yes.

    Oh wait, that was you too.

    Your newfound piety is heartwarming. Maybe its a new trend starting off with our last conversation:

    TrojanMan: “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” Mt 5:44

    KirklesWorth: Romans 13:1 (KJV) Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

  15. TrojanMan says:

    Thank you for your opinions. Our long conversation can be found in the open thread. It need not be repeated here. I am sure everyone would appreciate a simple link to the other conversation vs rehashing it all in here.

    “Your newfound piety is heartwarming.” Thank you for the compliment.

    Good day and GOD bless.

  16. KirklesWorth says:

    Yes indeed, that’s why I thought the first two simple links from the Open Thread would suffice. I’m glad you agree. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to get on with my “causing strife, slander, intimidation, [to] berate, and enrage those who do not share [my] opinions” in the hopes that I may come up with an “original thought” to respond to those who want my responses by making disparaging comments in need of correction.

  17. TrojanMan says:

    Perhaps a bit off topic but: You may or may not find this hard to believe but i bet we share many of the same values. It would seem our main disagreement is with our president-elect. I think I have a good understanding of where you stand on him and i am sure you genuinely know where i stand on him, but alas that is where we part ways. I bet we could be mutually respectful to each others views moving forward, right? Even if you can’t i will do my best to respect your views. I have no illusions we will ever be “friends” but i am looking for mutual respect for each others opinions.

  18. KirklesWorth says:

    Wow…I had something prepared but you hit me from out of the blue. That is most reasonable and I concede to your wisdom.

  19. TrojanMan says:

    Being evil is easy, being righteous is not.

    That being said i will still criticize Trump when he deserves it and praise him when he deserves it.

  20. KirklesWorth says:

    And if Trump is the sole focus, I will probably agree with some or all of your criticisms.

  21. TrojanMan says:

    Fair enough….

    Good day and GOD bless.

  22. 762x51 says:

    The troll known as jerklesTwerp has accused me many times of “wanting” civil war, Just as it has accused us both as well as Torcer of working to get Hillary elected, an absurd accusation driven by extremely low intelligence as evidenced by it’s overwhelming desire to elect “Not Hillary”. The election has been over for weeks and yet it persists in its daily vomitus diatribe of proselytizing for Not Hillary. It is becoming comical watching it dance as it tries to deflect, avoid and dissemble the predicted globalist Progressive direction the tRumpian cabinet is taking.

    It is true that princess jerkles has as a primary goal “to be nothing more than causing strife, slander, intimidation, to berate, and enrage those who do not share his opinions. IMO his posts and responses are designed to inflame and generate a negative response,”, that is how Alinsky Progressives operate. While it’s actions are those of an A-hole, it’s beliefs and sympathies, are those of the Progressives, what Blount calls cultural Marxists. Just look at how incensed it becomes when I talk about civil war with the Progressives.

    So you are correct about its intentions, but I don’t see those intentions as conflicting with my assessment of it as an enemy collaborator, not a combatant because it is a sniveling coward, as evidenced by its repeated refusal to say it;s vile crap to my face, that just enjoys creating strife and watching others suffer as a result of its machinations.

  23. 762x51 says:

    Ohh jerkles, we have already had this conversation repeatedly! You do not possess the intellect to discuss the topic as your single focus on Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary demonstrates. Your premise that there will two sides is proof that you cannot comprehend the dynamics involved, just as you so epically fail at formal logic. Hey, how come you never post any of that stuff, princess?

    Even now, the civil unrest precursor I told you about, REGARDLESS OF WHO WON THE ELECTION, is happening, yet you will not address it just as you will not address the globalist Progressive cabinet that Not Hillary is putting together. Just as the Obama zombies have done for eight years, you are just like them and equally as despicable.

    Now GFY.

  24. TrojanMan says:

    It is irrelevant who but i have also been accused of “wanting” a civil war. Nothing is farther from the truth but not wanting civil war and realizing it is going to happen are two separate things. History is littered with examples. I am unaware of a civilization that has not had one or more civil wars. Everything runs in cycles and we appear to be heading in that direction regardless of who won the election. I don’t think a president Cruz could have done anything about it. I think much like Sodom the sins of this nation have become so great that GODs wrath will soon follow.

    No one on this site wanted Hillary to be president everyone knows that including them. No one here was campaigning for the criminal. If they want to claim not supporting Trump is tat amount to supporting Clinton, i could care less anymore. If they want to dwell in the past so be it. I know the truth and that is now enough for me.

    Your assessment of the situation may very well be correct.

    Have a blessed evening.

  25. Pimboster says:

    This story is an obvious example of Fake News. No one would lobby for a Department of White Men. Why would some bigot portray this lady as wanting to be a secretary in such a silly department? SARCASM HEAVY

  26. Mr. Hand says:

    She looks white in her picture.

    She’s wearing a shirt that says “dibs on Prince Harry”.

    Apparently he’s the only white man she is willing to spare.

    I know some sane Democrats. Why they allow these creatures destroy their own reputations is beyond me.

  27. Mr. Hand says:

    Her shirt says “dibs on Prince Harry”. Someone should tell her he’s white.

  28. Mr. Hand says:

    And white men who support the Democrat party wonder why we call them cucks.

  29. Ursulaamitchell says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !sr15c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !sr15c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash449HomePaperGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sr159c:….,……

  30. KirklesWorth says:

    I addressed the civil war issue with a question – which you cowardly avoided. Whose side did you say you were on? Did you say you were on the republican side along with Trump or not?

    Spare me your ridiculous condescension. You have nerve claiming others “do not possess the intellect” when you couldn’t “comprehend the dynamics involved” and demonstrated how to “epically fail at formal logic” when you said:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    What is despicable is your arrogance. Nobody needs to concern themselves with what a Hillary-helping wannabe “progressive”-killing loser “thinks”.

  31. KirklesWorth says:

    Poor baby accuses me of “causing strife, slander, intimidation, to berate, and enrage those who do not share his opinions” – you mean when I said this:

    762×51: I have a bullet with your name on it, any time you think you have what it takes to impose your fascist dreams, elitist f__ktard. Go f__k yourself. This comment has been deleted.

    Oh wait, that was you. But you sure know how to use your Alinsky tactics – except that you don’t have the restraint from incriminating yourself. In other words, you can’t spin worth squat. I don’t have to “accuse” you of anything – you’ve said it and are so moronic that you keep bringing it up for me to demonstrate what a deceiver you are. But lets start off with what you don’t want to answer:

    Whose side will you be on in this civil war?

    Let’s move on…how could I have possible come up with the conclusion that you want Hillary elected to start your “progressive”-killing civil war? Let’s start with how you’ve determined that “progressives” must die:

    762×51: Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.

    Next, lets review how determined you are about your civil war:

    762×51: Either way there is a civl war so cheer up, things are about to get much worse.

    762×51: Let’s see, I’ve answered that question at least five times, idiot. Civil war is inevitable now and not even your phony messiah, what another poster referred to as “Cheetos jesus” can stop it.

    762×51: I didn’t start this, the Progressives did and with them there is no room for reason. Hillary = Progressive. tRump = Progressive. Election of either one = civil war. Get used to it, you are making it happen.

    762×51: You overlooked the most likely alternative, civil war. Regardless of which “party” wins in Nov., there will be a civil war, it is inevitable now. The “sour grapes” argument is even dumber than the, “if you aren’t for tRump you are for Hillary” argument. It is all unprincipled people have though. Makes no difference to me, both sides are Progressives which means both sides are enemies of the Constitution, therefore both sides are targets. That I have to lead one a little more to the left than the other is irrelevant.

    762×51: It won’t be my first war, I just know what to expect and how to deal with it. Before pushing us into it, I suggest you consider that.

    And since you want to lure people into an ambush murder because you can’t debate worth squat, I’ll add the same response to your macho masturbations as I have in the past:

    In case I haven’t made this perfectly clear (which I have), nobody here takes orders, demands, requests, invites, etc. from you contrary to your violent fascist fantasies. Furthermore, nobody has any intention of getting within your firing range of your lying, loser, unintelligent, dishonorable, wannabe “progressive”-killing, Hillary-helping, wannabe “civil war” fighting, republican party defecting, progressive-helping, republican candidate hating, latent-homosexual, sadomasochistic, integrity-lacking, wife-insulting, so-called “conservative” face.

  32. 762x51 says:

    The offer is still open, princess. Poor baby is just too afraid to back up all its A-hole comments. That you are too much of a coward to say it to my face makes your BS meaningless, chickenTssscchhiiitttt!!

  33. 762x51 says:

    I have to laugh at these imbeciles who say, “it could never happen here” and the looks on their faces when I remind them it already HAS happened here. LMAO!!

    Time will tell whether I’m right or not but I see no evidence to the contrary at this time.

    As for the supporting Hillary thing, nobody says that to my face and leaves with all their teeth. I don’t say anything here I wouldn’t say to a mans face and back it up if that was necessary. Years of “taking it to the pit” will make you that way. Which is why princess UrkelJerk is so afraid of me. He knows I would annihilate him and there would be nothing he could to stop me. So he hides behind his keyboard, safe from the consequences of his remarks, the poster child for cowardice. .

  34. 762x51 says:

    See, I told you that could not grasp the dynamics of such a complex situation. What makes you think there will be a “republican side”, idiot? Who else will be on that “republican side”? You? Mitch McConnell?, Paul RyanO, John MCCain? John Boehner? Hey, maybe you can get Karl Rove and the Bush’s, on your “side”, they’re “republicans”, just like you, LMAO!!

    Will Mike Lee and Trey Gowdy be on the same “side” as McConnell, McCain, Boehner, et al? See stuipd, I told you all this has whistled right past you and you bearly saw it through the dust cloud.

    You can keep re-posting my comments until hell freezes over imbecile, I don’t care, but you must be boring everyone else to death, as usual. By the way, that comment contained no formal logic, it was a conclusion based on empirical data, not logic. Geeez, you are dumb.

    “What is despicable is your arrogance. Nobody needs to concern themselves with what a Hillary-helping wannabe “progressive”-killing loser “thinks”.”

    Come say it to my face, princess, see what happens to you.

  35. 762x51 says:

    ROTFLMFAO, a cultist boot licker like you? Fat chance.

  36. KirklesWorth says:

    For somebody so proud of its civil war prediction, why can’t you answer the simple question Whose side did you say you were on? None of your verbal diarrhea is going to explain away that you would fight against the right like the progressives.

    Sorry, anything spewed from a so-called “conservative” progressive-propaganda-swallowing anti-Trump Hillary-enabling-to-start-civil-war-to-kill-“progressives” who says…

    762×51: Hmmmm, looks like your cult leader has slipped another point in the polls – Post Debate. How can that be when he has you out here denigrating as many people as possible to try and force them to support him? Gee, maybe your strategy is FAILING as is everything else you do. Better fascist harder jerkles, looks like your boy mat turn out to be a LOSER, ROTFLMFAO!!

    …means squat.

    You don’t order me around contrary to your violent fascist fantasies. Your debating is as laughable as your self-important macho posturing.

    Just keep giving up the country to the progressives like you have been doing and let the adults do the real fighting.

  37. KirklesWorth says:

    Yep, I know you would ambush murder me, so we are in agreement. Just because you are incapable of debate doesn’t mean you get to assassinate whomever you epically fail against. You’ve made it perfectly clear about your murderous intent:

    762×51: Putting you in the ground will be a public service.

    762×51: Once again, there is no chance I will spare you, bitch. Should we meet on the battlefield, you will die. This branch of the thread was deleted.

    762×51: You don’t mean a thing to me, you’re just a target awaiting engagement and when that time arrives all I will feel is recoil.

    762×51: However, you still cannot impose your fascism without violence. Eventually, whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you.

  38. 762x51 says:

    “and let the adults do the real fighting” ROTFLMFAO!!!

    Princess, you are to “real fighting” what urinals are to fine dining, LMAO!!!! So on the one hand you turn tale and run, AGAIN, and then proceed to tell how YOU are the one doing “the real fighting”. That is hilarious.

    “Just keep giving up the country to the progressives like you have been doing”, ohhh you mean like Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary and his cabinet of Keynesian Progressives? Wait . . . that was YOU pushing your cult so that R flavored Progressives could rule, not D flavored Progressives.

    Anyway, I’d LOVE for you to show me some “real fighting” so whenever your balls grow in, if they ever do, let me know, princess.

  39. 762x51 says:

    Hey jerkles, tell us again what a “hero” you are for voting for Not Hillary. I love the part where you brave the Taliban mortar attacks, or was it RPG’s, to get to the polls and save the country. Brings a tear to my eye, LMFAO!!!

  40. 762x51 says:

    Mutual combat is not murder, stupid. You just can’t seem to grasp that. Or perhaps you can and just such a liar that you need it to perpetuate the justification of your cowardice.

  41. KirklesWorth says:

    Uh huh. A mile-away snipe is “mutual combat”. You are a ridiculous liar.

  42. KirklesWorth says:

    That’s it? You amuse yourself with that stupid conjecture? Pathetic. Just keep wetting your panties about Trump and planning your government takeover like a good progressive.

  43. KirklesWorth says:

    I’ll make it simple for even a simpleton like you. Just keep wetting your panties about Trump and planning your government takeover like a good little progressive and let the adults take care of moving the country right while you play GI Joe and fantasize about sniping people from a mile away. And make sure you keep giving us your comments so that the republicans know what not to do.

  44. 762x51 says:

    In fact it is. Mutual combat has no proximity requirement. Chris Kyle’s longest kill shot was 2,100yds. Was he a murderer, proggie scumbag?

    USMC Rules for Gunfighting:

    12. In combat, there are no rules, always cheat; always win. The only unfair fight is the one you lose.

    15. Use cover or concealment as much as possible. The visible target should be in FRONT of your gun.

    On the battlefield, we kill the enemy by what ever means is necessary and expedient, unlike your fantasy world. Would you prefer something more personal? Perhaps edged weapons are more to your liking? I know your weapon of choice is boring me to death, but that is so gay, which fits your mannerisms perfectly.

  45. 762x51 says:

    If the republicans want to know what not to do,they should start by not trusting a liar like you, maggot.

    I don’t have to “fantasize about sniping people from a mile away” if you’d like me to prove it to you, I’ll be happy to give you a demonstration.

  46. 762x51 says:

    Umm no, liar. I was referring to your claim to being a patriot and a hero just for voting for tRump. You are just sooo brave,princess. I wonder if you realize how lame you sound when accusing me of being what you demonstrate yourself to be, every day?

    Nahh, that tiny, little mind of your can’t grasp most of reality, why would it see that. You’re like a one man clown show, complete with the little cars and calliope music. It would be impolite not to laugh at you.

    I’m not wetting anything hairball, neither you OR your cult leader mean squat to me.

  47. KirklesWorth says:

    You are a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims progressives are for killing and that Hillary, Trump, and their supporters are progressives…therefore in two ridiculous claims you somehow justify the extermination of over 135,000,000 Americans – and those are just the ones who voted. Spare me your ridiculous lectures psycho.

  48. KirklesWorth says:

    This is going to be my standard response from now on:

    You are a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims progressives are for killing and that Hillary, Trump, and their supporters are progressives…therefore in two ridiculous claims you somehow justify the extermination of over 135,000,000 Americans – and those are just the ones who voted. Spare me your ridiculous lectures psycho.

  49. KirklesWorth says:

    My standard reply to a sub-standard idiot:

    You are a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims progressives are for killing and that Hillary, Trump, and their supporters are progressives…therefore in two ridiculous claims you somehow justify the extermination of over 135,000,000 Americans – and those are just the ones who voted. Spare me your ridiculous lectures psycho.

  50. 762x51 says:

    Hey tinkleTw*t, GFY, LMAO!!

  51. 762x51 says:

    LMAO, you, relevant?!? HAHAHAHAHAHA,

    No wonder you are an Alex Jones follower, you sanctimonious, A-hole. You wouldn’t know the truth OR reality if it hit you on the head, liar.

    GFY.

  52. 762x51 says:

    LMAO, you always say that tinkleTw*t because you either don’t agree or are just too stupid to understand my point. I don’t care what you think, jagoff, I have told you that many times. Even for an invertebrate you rank remarkably low in intelligence.

    So GFY.

  53. 762x51 says:

    Ohh come on jerkleTw*t, tell me all about those fierce firefights you were in while fighting your way to the polls to save the country.

    As I have said before, tinkles, I will lecture you as I see fit.

    ROTFLMFAO!!!!!

  54. 762x51 says:

    My standard reply to a toady chickenTsscchhhiiiittttt!!! A-hole

    GFY.

  55. 762x51 says:

    Poor baby, can’t back his smug arrogance so he has to hide behind his keyboard shivering in fear.

    So back it up you smug little A-hole. Have me arrested or you are a liar, GFY.

    Too bad your balls never grew in, princess.

  56. 762x51 says:

    Already confirmed I was right on those posts tinkles. You are really boring everyone with all the repeats. Please dig up some fresh ones for me to verify that I was correct then as well.

    In the mean time, GFY.

  57. KirklesWorth says:

    I don’t lie about how you are obsessed with murdering me – I just repost it. You’ve already explained how you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

  58. KirklesWorth says:

    Really, straw man? Pathetic. Please! “Lecture” me as much as possible laughing boy!

  59. 762x51 says:

    I’ve already documented that I was correct on these posts elsewhere and choose not to bore everyone whit yet another rehash of history, professional ex-wife jerklesTw*t

    GFY

  60. 762x51 says:

    LMAO, I’ve also exposed you deception ex-wife jerklesTw*t.

    This is the eighth time just in this exchange that you have re-posted those out of context. So that everyone can know what a dirty lying scrunt you are:

    762×51 KirklesWorth • 13 hours ago From 12/26/16
    ROTFLMAO!! So now you are re-posting your own edited re-posts of re-edited re-posts, of re-edited re-posts, of re-edited re-posts of re-edited re-posts, (whew) of my original posts and trying to present them as original fact. Your deceit is not in question but your ability to present it is.
    Here is the entire “re-post”:
    KirklesWorth 762×51 • a month ago
    As you shrieked at me: Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    No, what I said was the patriotic and heroic Americans who voted for Trump saved us from stupid people who believed things like this:
    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.
    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?
    The second re-post of my original, again out of context but presented as true fact:
    KirklesWorth 762×51 • a month ago
    And once again, you offer the opportunity for me to show what a hypocritical, disingenuous moron you are – and let me show my appreciation:
    “Everyone must obey the cult.Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    “everyone must worship tRump.”Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    “Everyone must submit to SS-Rottenführer jerkleTwerp as your political compliance officer.Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    There are, in fact 7 re-posts in this chain where you took one snippet of a post with no context and have re-posted it that many tines, probably more in other chains to try and make yourself out to be a some pathetic victim. One more duplicitous than the next.
    Here is the original exchange: 13 NOV 2016:
    KirklesWorth 762×51 • a month ago
    You complete and utter liar! Let’s start with how you wanted Trump defeated for Hillary to win to get your civil war to kill “prograssives”. What are you laughing at – your own stupidity?
    762×51: Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.
    762×51: I didn’t start this, the Progressives did and with them there is no room for reason. Hillary = Progressive. tRump = Progressive. Election of either one = civil war. Get used to it, you are making it happen.
    And you are a coward, but fortunately nobody is stupid enough to get cowardly ambushed by you.
    762×51 KirklesWorth • a month ago
    Oh do ” Let’s start with how you want the election overturned, Hillary instated”.
    PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    Your lies are all you have, that and your cowardice. Say it to my face, sissy.
    See CONTEXT. You act like you have no role here other than the innocent victim but in fact you are the one who generated the strife in the first lace all the way back to the first interaction I had with you. Ten years of no jerklesTw*t on MB then you roll in and start by “reporting” something you claim was “inappropriate”. Thus you are only here looking for trouble which you are too much of a coward to handle once you find it.
    I was wrong professional ex-wife jerkleTw*t, you aren’t just a liar, you are a liar who lies about his lies. As i said, you are a prolific liar, but you suck at it.
    Let me know when I break 100, GFY.

    Still looking for that magic 100, ex-wife jerklesTwerp, GFY.

  61. KirklesWorth says:

    Go ahead and copy-and-paste all you want! We will have this “exchange” as many times as you want to call me out to correct you. All you do is end up arguing with yourself.

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51: I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.

    You called Trump the “most un-electable candidate in American history”, claimed that Trump and his supporters “have done more to put Hillary Clinton in the White House than the Clinton campaign itself”, questioned my correct statement that “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary”, claimed “you have managed to lose this election”, announced “of course tRump can’t win, he never could”, suggested “Better fascist harder jerkles, looks like your boy mat [sic] turn out to be a LOSER, ROTFLMFAO!!”, claimed “It will be proven in Nov. when the 12 million Democrats who voted for tRump in the Primaries show up to vote for Hillary”, proclaimed “Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails”, blamed your errors on “polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it”, announced Trump is a surefire loser, the loss of the Senate, and maybe the House – all because of Trump supporters, and asked the ironic question “How long would it take to turn those states, and their legislatures even purple, much less magenta or red? Ten years? Twenty? More?”

  62. KirklesWorth says:

    You haven’t “exposed” squat except your disingenuousness, your own hypocrisy, and superiority complex. Why don’t you explain the “context” of this deleted comment:

    762×51: Once again, there is no chance I will spare you, bitch.

    You must mean in a verbal debate online, right? Or will the second sentence offer more “perspective”:

    762×51: Should we meet on the battlefield, you will die.

    I guess Dave Blount was just oppressing you, right? Time to whine about other peoples’ “vile rhetoric” while you post innocent “offers”, right?

    762×51: I have a bullet with your name on it, any time you think you have what it takes to impose your fascist dreams, elitist f__ktard. Go f__k yourself. This comment was deleted.

    So your “justification” is that Trump supporters are “fascists”, right? But contrary to your desire of an “offer”, no such thing was presented. That didn’t stop you from fantasizing about murdering me:

    762×51: I accept your offer though, a mile is a long shot, requires about 28 or 29 mils of hold over with my current load, depending on the density altitude, but I have the tools and training to accomplish it. When would you like to get this done? The sooner you are gone, the happier everyone, including your wife will be.

    Which you further acknowledged later:

    762×51: I don’t have to “fantasize about sniping people from a mile away” if you’d like me to prove it to you, I’ll be happy to give you a demonstration.

  63. 762x51 says:

    The context is that you are an asshole, but everyone already knows that, princess.

    Just out of curiosity, does being every man’s ex-wife pay well? You are very good at it.

  64. KirklesWorth says:

    You want context? I’ve got plenty of context!

    762×51 Threats of murder and violence

    Denies these are threats and claims statements are “offers” for “single combat”, “mutual combat”, “single mutual combat”, etc.

    762×51 -> Tom: Putting you in the ground will be a public service.

    762×51 -> Smith and Wesson and Me: You don’t mean a thing to me, you’re just a target awaiting engagement and when that time arrives all I will feel is recoil.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I have a bullet with your name on it, any time you think you have what it takes to impose your fascist dreams, elitist f__ktard. Go f__k yourself. This comment was deleted.

    762×51: No a__hole, I mean when we start killing you dirty Progressive motherfuckers. That clear enough for you?

    762×51: A candy ass like you wouldn’t last ten minutes but the laugh would be worth it. Some of it you wouldn’t be able to do, like when they have you on the waterboard and they shove the cattle prod up against your balls, since you have no balls, it just couldn’t be done. I’ll set it up with my C-Level Marine buddies and I’ll even go first. You won’t need a thing, we have all the equipment and no money changes hands, just my gift to you, and I promise you will learn things about yourself you didn’t know before. Come on tinkles, put your money where your mouth is for once in your life. Show everyone you aren’t just a blowhard Internet wanna be like we all know you are, or is that a professional ex-wife? You are just so effeminate it is difficult to tell, LMAO!!

    762×51 as kirklesworthFascistChickenShit -> KirklesWorth: For the thousandth time, imbecile, I’m not interested in any exchange with you outside of a straight up gunfight. There is nothing you have to say that interests me unless it is to accept my offer of single combat which you are too chicken to do.

    I just enjoy demonstrating your cowardice for all to see. We all know you don’t have what it takes to implement your fascist desires which is why you support an a__hole like tRump.

    Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I’m so happy you see it that way jerkles, it tells me you are as unprepared as I think you are, thereby guaranteeing your status as a casualty. The world will be a better place on that day. This comment was deleted.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I don’t “want” it dumbass, the Progressives want it and you have made it inevitable. The millions who are about to die are on you because you are too weak or too stupid or too Progressive to have have done the right thing. You have advanced the cause of evil and will soon pay the price for it, you are far too despicable a person for others not to have noticed, one of them will get you.

    Due process, LMFAO? It’s a f__king war idiot. Due process is a bullet, that is how war works. You kill the enemy, you don’t arrest them and read them their rights and ensure they have yard time, what a simpering douche you are. You wanted a a war which is why you have started one, now you will have to try and survive, you can’t, you don’t have what it takes. For the record, I’m anti-Progressive, I don’t give a shit about tRump other than what he, and by extension, you, has done to advance the Progressive agenda. Before this election he was just another NY turd in the punch bowl.

    Once again, there is no chance I will spare you, bitch. Should we meet on the battlefield, you will die. This branch of the thread was deleted.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: See you on the battlefield, maggot.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I don’t use charts and graphs in my line of work, I deal in lead and very soon now, I or some one like me will give you an up close and personal demonstration, proggie porgtard. I wonder who it will be? Some one out there has already identified you as a Progressive and selected you as a target, rest assured. You should be very careful from now on, no telling where it will come from. This comment was deleted.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Culprit, LMAO! You want civility in the middle of a war you started? Fat chance, douche bag. I just wish could see how long a prissy little f__k like you lasts when the shooting starts, minutes or seconds? You can walk around taking down information so you can turn others in later. Here’s a tip for you, if you suddenly feel very warm and can’t seem to draw a breath followed by deep, intense pain, you are hit. Unless you take the round in your cranial vault. LMFAO!! This comment was deleted.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Well, dumbass, the gun fight wouldn’t be on the internet. It’s a real world thing where people die.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I will never accept your cult and will oppose you until you die, obviously, one must die. Let’s find out who and get this over with.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: All that is left is a straight up gun fight, otherwise, you can; Go f__k yourself.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Meet me in single combat, that is all I am interested in from you. Otherwise; Go f__k yourself.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Yep, denial of the facts that have been presented. See no middle ground, no place for discussion. Just a fight. Go f__k yourself.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: However, you still cannot impose your fascism without violence. Eventually, whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Ok, just wanted to be sure it was a bona fide a__hole I was engaging. So junior, you think you are ready for a little game of “You Bet Your Life”?

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Meet me in single combat, that is all I am interested in from you. Otherwise; Go f__k yourself.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: All you get are insults because that is all you deserve. You are a piece of s__t and the sooner you are in the ground the sooner the world will be a better place. Go f__k yourself.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I accept your offer though, a mile is a long shot, requires about 28 or 29 mils of hold over with my current load, depending on the density altitude, but I have the tools and training to accomplish it. When would you like to get this done? The sooner you are gone, the happier everyone, including your wife will be.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: I don’t have to “fantasize about sniping people from a mile away” if you’d like me to prove it to you, I’ll be happy to give you a demonstration.

    762×51 as kirklesworthOnFire -> KirklesWorth: You have no idea the amount of fire you are playing with little boy.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: …Of course, drones are expendable which brings me to the logical conclusion of when are we going to get this gun fight started?

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Well, dumbass, the gun fight wouldn’t be on the internet. It’s a real world thing where people die. Your sexual desire for tRump is obvious. You figure it out,moron.

    762×51 -> KirklesWorth: Sorry, something more interesting than talking to you came up. It’s Ok now, I got paper towel and wiped it up. tRump has been documented for a year on MB as a Progressive. Like all Progressives you will not admit to facts which prove you wrong so there can be no further discussion. LOL, you can blame us all you want a__hole, we know who it was that supported a Progressive for the GOPee candidate. See, there can be no middle ground, you want to blame us for your mistakes, which you made after we pointed out the Progressive tendencies of your boy which you denied and we will not accept that blame. All that is left is a straight up gun fight, otherwise, you can; Go f__k yourself.

    762×51 as KirklesWorthisDishonest: Killing enemies of the Constitution is tons of fun.

  65. 762x51 says:

    See, context means you give the quote in its entirety and the rest of the conversation it was part of, you deceitful asshole. Not just more propaganda spin, douche.

    Lying, Progressive, bitchy, ex-wife, scum bag.
    GFY.

  66. KirklesWorth says:

    Obviously you don’t know how things work. When people cite something, they take the relevant part and put it into their article, comment, post, etc.. In the 21st century, you can embed the URL to take you to that post for people to review themselves and without having to say: 762×51 told Tom it would be a public service to put him in the ground.[1] Instead, I can cite it with:

    762×51 -> Tom: Putting you in the ground will be a public service.

    [1] Moonbattery, Sep. 7, 2016, “Why Conservatives Don’t Take Trump at His Word”, comment #2881921809 by 762×51 to Tom.

    Then, if somebody clicks the link, they can see all of your bloviations that have nothing to do with what I am commenting on:

    762×51 -> Tom: By we, I assume you mean you and the one or two other tRump trolls, so what? Then leave dumbass. No one is forcing you Trumpanzee filth to remain here and no one would be sorry to see you leave. But fascists can’t abide knowing that someone, some where disagrees with them You must subjugate us all or you just cant be satisfied.

    You may test your assumption of my accuracy anytime you think you ready, Brony Bitch.neutral ground in a remote location, there are several suitable places in the western U.S.

    Putting you in the ground will be a public service.

    See how much better that is? Of course you don’t – you just whine about every little thing like a baby.

  67. 762x51 says:

    Relevant is the CONTEXT of the comment, jackass. All you are doing is making an excuse for your lame ass propaganda.
    Including the comment I was responding is CONTEXT, asshole. You are such a tool, no wonder you are mistaken for every man’s ex-wife.

    Of course no one actually reads you crap so either is irrelevant I suppose.

  68. KirklesWorth says:

    Pointless Arguing: 1 “context”
    Name Calling: 3 “jackass”, “asshole”, “tool”
    Lies: 1 “lame ass propaganda”
    Lame “ex-wife” meme: 1

  69. 762x51 says:

    Actually, tinkleTw*t, “jackass”, “asshole”, “tool” were observations of FACT.

    “lame ass propaganda” – It’s literally all you do.

    “every man’s ex-wife”You don’t like. stop acting like one, bitch.

    Bottom line is, you disagree with everyone who will not accept your pronouncements, it’s all part of that cult mentality you exude constantly and one of the main reasons that no one else interacts with you, except for your master Lord fibtard of Swineherd. He only does it because he needs a lackey, a boot licker who goes along with his every edict and you are a natural born boot licker.

    Not being able to think for yourself is another trait you exude in spades which explains your follower mentality. Being a coward is also a follower trait, I think we’ve demonstrated that sufficiently for now.

    I hope these tips help you to address your shortcomings in the new year, if they don’t,then GFY. LMFAO!!!!

    Ohh, I’m still waiting on those re-posts where you criticize Comrade Chairman Obama. get that done today so I can cross it off my list of reasons why UrkelJerk is a Progressive.

  70. KirklesWorth says:

    Irrelevancies: 1 “Actually, tinkleTw*t, ‘jackass’, ‘asshole’, ‘tool’ were observations of FACT” (says the Hillary tool)
    Childish renames: 2 “tinkleTw*t”, “Lord fibtard of Swineherd”
    Lies: 2 “‘lame ass propaganda’ – It’s literally all you do.”, “Not being able to think for yourself” Prove it
    Insults: 6 “tinkleTw*t”, “jackass”, “asshole”, “bitch”, “natural born boot licker”
    Pathetic justifications: 1 “‘every man’s ex-wife’You don’t like. stop acting like one, bitch.”
    Lame “ex-wife” meme: 1 (see above)
    Hypocrisies / General Stupidity: 1 “Bottom line is, you disagree with everyone who will not accept your pronouncements,” dis·a·gree disəˈɡrē/ (verb): have or express a different opinion.
    “Cult” references: 1 “cult mentality”
    “Coward”: 1

    Ohh, I’m still waiting on those re-posts where you criticize Comrade Chairman Obama. get that done today so I can cross it off my list of reasons why UrkelJerk is a Progressive.

    Sorry, I’m not your errand boy. Try and make your case on your own. It was a lot easier to show how you wanted Hillary over Trump, The only “reason” you have for calling me a “progressive” is this lame excuse:

    762×51: Supporting a Progressive candidate makes you a Progressive.

    So you wanting Hillary over Trump makes you even more progressive.

  71. 762x51 says:

    Dodged the Obama criticism opportunity again I see Could it be that you just never have had anything bad to say about Comrade Chairman Obama? I know I don’t recall seeing any. Oh but wait, you are a one trick pony whose entire being is dedicated to Not Hillary. You probably never even heard of Obama, LMAO!

    BTW, Supporting a Progressive candidate DOES make you a Progressives, dumbass. It advances their agenda and you support it, therefore you are a Progressive. It was your choice, own it. Your Keynesian Globalist Progressive Elect and his cabinet do.

  72. KirklesWorth says:

    Not “dodging” anything. Make your claim – or are you afraid of me proving you wrong again?

    BTW, Supporting a Progressive candidate DOES make you a Progressives, dumbass.

    #1. Wrong. #2. Trump is not a “progressive”. #3. You defaulting to Hillary makes you way-more progressive than any Trump supporter.

  73. 762x51 says:

    #1 Wrong. #2. tRump IS a Progressive. #3. Claiming I “default to Hillary” is your fantasy, not reality. #4, GFY.

    Mocking you is so much fun, princess jerklesTw*t. Too bad you are such a coward.

  74. 762x51 says:

    YAY, charts and graphs, atta boy tinkles, I know you could do it. Of course it is the same tired old graphic you used months ago. Half point for effort.

    #1 I abhor Obama – you offer no proof otherwise.
    So tell me all about how you “abhor Obama”. You have never uttered an unkind styatement about him that I recall seeing, make one now. Here I’ll show you how. “Barack Obama is an enemy of the United States”. See, eazy peazy right?

    #2 Trump isn’t a progressive and you offer nothing.

    There has been tons of evidence documenting tRumps Progressive ideology and background posted on MB in the last 18 months, you simply refuse to acknowledge it, in true Progressive fashion because it doesn’t fit your narrative, also in true Progressive fashion. It is largely why no likes you or acknowledges your BS posts anymore, intellectual dishonesty.

    #3 You called Trump worse than Hillary, thus default.

    “thus default”, what does that even mean?

    #4 Constant “GFY” regurgitations.

    GFY, LMAO!!!

  75. KirklesWorth says:

    Typical leftist tactic – ignore and/or mock the facts. That graph was captured the day I posted it, but you are too stupid and lazy to check the provided link.

    #1 Thanks for the accusation – I can now demonstrate how you are a liar once again:

    KirklesWorth: And Carter handed over the Panama Canal, Obama handed over the Internet and let Iran have nukes…

    KirklesWorth: It’s either that or Soros pays BlackLivesMatter to go on another rampage so that Obama can declare martial law for that. Another reason Obama has been whittling away at cops for all this time.

    KirklesWorth: I can’t speak for the others, but my comments are not about Cruz but about those still mourning him losing. More power to him stopping Obama!

    KirklesWorth: Ted Nugent’s anti-Obama comments

    KirklesWorth: The principles will be sacrificed more if Hillary is not defeated. Under Obama, we have quickened our shift leftward even with the republican majorities. Punishing the country for Trump doesn’t exactly put the “conserve” (of rights and liberties) in conservative.

    KirklesWorth: All he needs is to start with enforcing the laws that Obama is ignoring.

    KirklesWorth: I think I asked you a question – not expected an order. But since you already explained the coming “revolution” below, I offered a “good luck” since Obama has been preparing for martial law.

    KirklesWorth: Posted Tea Party’s ALERT: Obama Is Trying To Force A Confrontation So He Can Declare Martial Law…

    KirklesWorth: What ridiculous word games. rul·er ‘ro?ol?r/noun: a person exercising government or dominion. Synonyms: leader, sovereign, monarch, potentate, king, queen, emperor, empress, prince, princess; crowned head, head of state, president, premier, governor; overlord, chief, chieftain, lord; dictator, autocrat. No need to speculate on what I “think” our government is. The law, the Bible, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, etc. didn’t prevent Barack Obama from doing his socialist agenda, did it? If Obama (or Hillary) invokes martial law, how well will those words stand up to military might?

    KirklesWorth: Yeah…republicans “held Obama in check” really well, didn’t they?

    KirklesWorth: Well said. The problem is that some of these anti-Trump-ers think that he is as much of a train wreck as McCain or Romney was. I didn’t vote for RINOs John McCain and held my nose for Mitt Romney, but I’m sure as hell not voting to let Hillary continue Obama’s catastrophic legacy or mutate it into her own evil empire. The illegal immigration alone would doom future republican chances.

    #2 You are obviously too stupid to comprehend this, but doing progressive things doesn’t automatically make someone a “progressive”. Your all-or-nothing “conservatism” leaves you with nothing – while everybody else can see shades of gray. Using your ridiculous opinions, Reagan would be a “progressive” because he nearly tripled the deficit, gave amnesty to 3 million illegal immigrants, raised the debt ceiling 18 times, expanded gun sale background checks and an assault weapon ban, signed at least 5 tax increases (Alan Simpson says 11 times), increased the Social Security tax rate, unemployment reached 10.8%, appointed liberal justice Anthony Kennedy, had “issues” with Israel, bailed out Social Security for $165 billion, failed to close newly-formed Department of Education, negotiated with and armed terrorists in the Iran-Contra Affair

    #3 You don’t know the definition of “default”? Too stupid and lazy to look it up? Here, let me Google that for you and refer you to the pertinent passage:

    5a : a selection made usually automatically or without active consideration due to lack of a viable alternative (remained the club’s president by default)

    #4 You easily amuse yourself laughing boy.

  76. 762x51 says:

    “Typical leftist tactic – ignore and/or mock the facts. ”

    Yes, that is ALL you do which is why I have no interest in any thing but mocking you, UrkelJerk. Unless your balls should suddenly grow in and you found the courage to face me.

    Otherwise, GFY.

  77. KirklesWorth says:

    You’ve got nothing per usual. Your childish taunts and so-called “mocking” are laughable. I just let you ridicule yourself:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

  78. 762x51 says:

    You’ve got one trick little pony, per usual.

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    You mean ridicule myself by being right? Only a liar would claim that when your cult leader as down more than 6 points when I posted that originally on 11 AUG 2016. Please dredge up some more history, ex-wife jerkleTw*t.

    Unless you are busy GFY.

  79. KirklesWorth says:

    You are so disengaged from reality, you dare to claim “rightness” for anything in this complete disaster of a claim:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    Nothing in that statement is right – regardless of Trump being “down more than 6 points when I posted that originally”. For comparison, I was right when I said to your buddy Torcer:

    KirklesWorth►Torcer: “Do you believe the polls?” Not particularly at this stage of the game. Haven’t I said that before? Liberals use them to sway public opinion pretty much the way you are trying to do here.

    Yet you didn’t seem to feel that way…why? Why were you so willing to swallow polls when it’s been known for years if not decades that they are biased and unreliable? You didn’t see me making claims about who was going to be elected, the Senate, the House, or lying about “Trumpanzee Progressives” – you did, and you were completely wrong.

    But if you insist on siding with the progressives, that’s your prerogative. You placed the bet and you lost – and nobody cares about what “insider information” you had at the time.

  80. 762x51 says:

    Spin it however you want jagoff, deceit is all you have. You wave off facts, reality, make outlandish, unsubstantiated, Alex Jones conspiracy theory claims like all polls everywhere are biased. Poor princess jerkleTw*t, everyone is biased against him and his globalist Progressive candidate. That and your support for the Progressive 5th column subversives in what was once the Republican Party.

    I see Keynesian Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary selected a long time Boehner aide for his head of WH personnel. You Boehner supporters are getting exactly what you wanted.

    GFY.

  81. KirklesWorth says:

    You mean the “spin” and deceit of yours that I repost – yeah, Disqus has those. You keep bringing up Alex Jones like it means something 1 2 3 4 5…especially when you are too stupid to note, as I pointed out, I was posting against an InfoWars story. And as you’ve said, since you seem incapable of accepting FACTS or reality but are intent on pushing an idiotic ideology, I’ll just leave it here. You are wrong, there is no question of it. You don’t like, I don’t care.”

    Yeah yeah yeah – straw man, your republican party hatred, all regurgitations. And too stupid to set up contradictory memes like “Not Hillary” and “Trump cultists” – but what can you expect from a moron who would be a Hillary surrender monkey?

    You don’t speak for me or “what I want” – you are too intellectually vapid and emotionally stunted.

  82. 762x51 says:

    I keep bringing up Alex Jones because you are a follower of his, according to Disqus. Your empty claim that you were “posting against an InfoWars story” is no doubt another of your many lies. or perhaps a half truth, something you have made a carrier of. Just as you have made a career of supporting Progressive RINO vermin like McConnell, Boehner, RyanO, McCain and Graham.

    You wouldn’t know a real Republican if one bit you on your oversized couch potato ass. You progtard RINO piece of shit.

    GFY.

  83. KirklesWorth says:

    Still too stupid to understand what posting against an InfoWars article means? Fine, I will school you. That means I am not a “follower of his” moron. Sheesh, your stupidity is mindboggling. I even posted the link you are apparently too stupid to confirm before shooting your fool mouth off.

    What do I care what your “evaluation” is about me and the republicans you despise? I supported the republican candidate and you were a Hillary surrender monkey – I am therefore a de facto republican and you are a fringe “conservative” (only taking it by your word and not your actions) loser. Go complain to your winning candidate – oh wait, you never had one.

  84. 762x51 says:

    GFY.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy