moonbattery logo

Oct 11 2016

Department of Social Justice: LEOs Can Be Criminals or Non-Citizens, So Long As They Aren’t White Guys

If you want a job in law enforcement, not being a criminal is okay, but the important thing is not to be a white man:

[Last] Wednesday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) released the “Advancing Diversity in Law Enforcement” report, which highlights hiring practices in the law enforcement community. In the report. the DOJ discusses problems associated with diversifying police forces, claiming racial diversity is more important than being a law-abiding citizen.

From the report:

Researchers and practitioners have also highlighted that the use of criminal background checks, which are a regular part of the screening process for many agencies, is likely to disproportionately impact racial minority applicants since, for a variety of reasons [actually, for one reason: they commit more crime], individuals from those communities are more likely to have contact with the criminal justice system.

Since the only real criterion is not to be a white male, and white males are less likely to have criminal records, then obviously checking into the criminal histories of potential law enforcement officers would be counterproductive.

If being a criminal doesn’t count against you, why should not being an American citizen? Also from the report:

Allowing work-authorized non-U.S. citizens to work in state and local law enforcement, particularly in jurisdictions with large immigrant populations, can enable agencies to more closely represent the diversity of their community. Especially as agencies work to serve communities with a large percentage of limited English proficient (LEP) residents, excluding officers who are not U.S. citizens may significantly limit the number of applicants who speak languages other than English.

Meanwhile, these same people are using Black Lives Matter riots and rhetoric to work toward federal control of local police. In the future, calling 911 will just get you robbed again.

loretta lynch
Openly discriminates against people who don’t look like her.

On a tip from Dragon’s Lair.




18 Responses to “Department of Social Justice: LEOs Can Be Criminals or Non-Citizens, So Long As They Aren’t White Guys”

  1. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Kind of echos what I said yesterday…not that I’m the first one to say it be any means. Non-criminal citizens will be far less likely to carry out illegal orders to crush innocent Americans. If Hillary wins, it will accelerate. If you are not a leftist urban elite, it’s time to worry. don’t want to believe it, but I’m very much afraid things are about to get really bad.

  2. Bully says:

    I’m fed up with aggrieved, angry Negros sticking their finger in my face, and so is everyone else I know. At least Holder kept his feelings and fingers under control. If you want more of the racist Loretta Lynch vote for Hillary.

  3. JackisBack says:

    White genocide by black beast

  4. JackisBack says:

    She is opening the door to Sharia police in Muslim communities paid for with our taxes.

  5. Kathy Parsons says:

    In the Greater Detroit Metroplex (Anything south of I-69 and East of US-23), you can also be a criminal and be a police officer, detective, or even in department management.

  6. MAS says:

    Welcome to third world police. Why just imagine this type of copper with military training and equipment…not good. The rest of the story though is that it will not take long for the mercenary police to figure out where the gold and power is concentrated. Why settle for a taste when you can just take it all? Be careful what you ask for “progressives” YOU probably will get it too.

  7. Eddie_Valiant says:

    For the first time in my wretched life, I’m developing a belief that this once great country will see a civil war again. It will take a different form from the Civil War of 1860 – 1865 but we’ll see the pitting of citizen against non-citizen at some point in the near future.

    I do hope I’m dead wrong about this, but with the election of Clinton almost in the bag, the Constitution will be relegated to the Congressional bathrooms.

  8. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    The best we can hope for is that widespread public outcry will keep Hillary and the progs in check for the most part. But there is a reasonable chance that Hillary won’t let the feelings of the little people she despises restrain her. The next best outcome for which we can hope is that a block of states stand up and refuse her illegal executive actions, which would have a reasonable chance of leading to secession. If that happens, I have two main hopes: 1) there will be minimal fighting between the two emerging countries, and 2) I won’t be stuck on the wrong side of the iron curtain.

  9. Mike_W20 says:

    They WOULD have to put up a wall to keep all productive people on the “progressive” side of the iron curtain, otherwise they’d be left with nothing but the dregs.

  10. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Certainly. The question is how quickly will they get it together? One could imagine a situation in which people cross back and forth pretty freely for a while, but you can bet at some point (perhaps sooner rather than later) people will be dying (perhaps literally) to get out of the blue states. At first, the productive. At some point, everyone who can walk, run, crawl, or drag themselves (except for the elite, who will of course be doing just fine).

  11. FrozenPatriot says:

    One more reason to view law enForcers as nothing more than the violent, militant arm of an unhinged, lawless, tyrannical government.

  12. Vic Kelley says:

    The freed slaves don’t just want to be free. They want to be master. As for the non-citizens, yeah they’re already celebrating their diversity by hiring somalis onto the Minneapolis PD. What a nightmare this will be.

  13. Jester says:

    LEOs Can Be Criminals or Non-Citizens, So Long As They Aren’t White Guys…

    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat.
    And vote Democrat…

  14. miket says:

    ALSO, an Article V Convention of the States could propose amendments to the Constitution that would increase the power of the states and institute checks on the power of the federal judiciary and the regulatory agencies.

  15. 50gary says:

    The continual and persistent lowering of the Bar in all facets of American life.

  16. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    I was enthusiastic for a while about an Article V convention, and it may be worth a shot. Two things damped my enthusiasm, however.

    First, the concept of a run-away convention. Once the process starts, states could pass literally anything. I don’t have much trust for any politicians right now.

    Second, if the Constitution isn’t effectively constraining the Feds now, why would they respect the new amendments? Much like the argument against gun control: Criminals don’t care what laws you pass. Again, I think a split is more likely than blue state leaders and feds suddenly being willing to follow the law.

  17. miket says:

    It takes 3/4 of the states to pass an amendment. Since there are still quite a few “red” states, I am not concerned that the states could pass anything that would hasten the demise of the republic. I’m still on board for an Article V Convention.

  18. […] Department of social justice: LEOs can be criminals or non-citizens, as long as they aren’t white … […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy