moonbattery logo

Nov 19 2019

Et Tu, Chick-fil-A?

The reason the radical left has been able to shove such an extreme agenda down the public throat is that people reflexively submit to its thuggish tactics, grovelingly acceding to even the most outrageous demands. Nowhere is this more true than with the tyrannical freaks comprising the militant LGBT movement. Virtually no company will stand against them. On the contrary, corporations pander obsequiously to their revolting agenda.

Except of course Chick-fil-A. After the abuse (e.g., here, here, here, here, and here) Chick-fil-A has taken from leftists just for having Christian ownership, it would be absurd for it ever to give in. It is not as if progressives will suddenly start eating at Chick-fil-A if the company caves to some ludicrous demand. Chick-fil-A does not discriminate against anyone; that should be enough.

Yet now we read in Breitbart that Chick-fil-A will stop donating money to the Salvation Army “following pressure from LGBT groups.”

Even bubbleheaded pop star Ellie Goulding evidently came to realize that the Salvation Army does nothing but good work and in no way oppresses people of politically privileged perversity. Has Chick-fil-A really thrown the Salvation Army under the bus?

Chick-fil-A’s tax records shows that it gave to several Christian schools and charitable groups in 2018. None of those groups appears in a list of Chick-fil-A’s 2019 charitable giving that the company made available for preview. …

In 2018, Chick-fil-A gave $115,000 to the Salvation Army for the Angel Tree program, which provided gifts for 11,000 children during the holiday season. The fast-food chain also gave $1.65 million to the Fellowship of Christian Athletes to provide underserved youth with week-long summer sports camps at historically black colleges and universities (HCBU).

Militant moonbats appear to have put the kibosh on this benevolence with their relentless bullying.

If it would let militant degenerates force them to close its first restaurant in Britain, why wouldn’t Chick-fil-A let them dictate who is off limits for donations?

At least a display of abject submission will satisfy the bullies.

Just kidding of course. Capitulation is an engraved invitation for LGBT militants to bully even harder. Ensuing demands are likely to include rainbow packaging for the food, a transsexual CEO, free condoms with kiddie meals, et cetera.

Or maybe Chick-fil-A hasn’t capitulated after all. Maybe it stands by its values. A spokesman says of donations,

“No organization will be excluded from future consideration – faith-based or non-faith based.”

It is not about to start opening on Sundays.

Looks like we will have to wait for the dust to settle. In the meantime, Chick-fil-A will do itself a great favor by making it as clear as possible that it does not take orders from the LGBT crowd.

On tips from Kate P, Dragon’s Lair, Steve T, and ABC of the ANC.

3 Responses to “Et Tu, Chick-fil-A?”

  1. […] You pander to moonbats and they sue you. Are we paying attention, Chick-fil-A? […]

  2. […] smoke still hasn’t cleared completely regarding Chick-fil-A capitulating to the LGBT militants that have given the company such a hard time. Franklin Graham says it has not […]

  3. […] dust seems to have settled regarding Chick-fil-A’s sellout. The scene revealed is not pretty. The ostensibly Christian […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy