moonbattery logo

Feb 13 2017

Is Sarah Silverman Really That Stupid?

Maybe Sarah Silverman is a really dumb moonbat who alienates potential fans by making the stupidest, most offensive remarks imaginable. Or maybe she is a very smart moonbat who understands that there is no such thing as bad publicity for a talent-challenged comedienne.

She certainly drew attention by shouting that the President should be overthrown in a military coup

…and by barking,

“I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I’d do it again. I’d f***ing do it again in a second.”

(Ms. Silverman is Jewish.)

Now she reports seeing swastikas on the sidewalk:

The “swastikas” are of course standard utility line markers. Then again, maybe they have only been disguised as utility line markers, thereby allowing Nazis to paint their swastikas all over the country.

Stephen Miller responds:

Congratulations to Ms. Silverman, who has succeeded at wangling an extension on her 15 minutes, even if by getting people to laugh at her rather than at her lame jokes.

On tips from Torcer, KirklesWorth, and Rob E. Hat tip: Weasel Zippers.



91 Responses to “Is Sarah Silverman Really That Stupid?”

  1. Buffalobob says:

    Is Sarah Silverman Really That Stupid? She is taking stupid to a new level.

  2. TED says:

    THEY are ALL that STUPID!!! — and — NEVER ASK THEM if they can be that stupid, THEY TAKE IT AS A CHALLENGE!!

  3. Agrippa says:

    In her case, yeah, she is that stupid (and untalented). But mainly she’s looking to be offended (typical Libtard) — living their lives in misery, unhappy about everything, miscreants and malcontents, as the Great One calls these dolts. Hilarious responses from Mr. Miller, btw! We can only hope that Ms. SKS will one day see Trump’s face in a puddle and stroke out (buh-bye!).

  4. Mr. Freemarket says:

    She is up against some very stiff competition.

  5. grayjohn says:

    Yes. Just like the feminist on You Tube that was ripping curb marker flags put up for snow plows because she thought the Patriarchy had put them up to offend women.
    They are indeed that out of touch with reality and sanity.

  6. JackisBack says:

    How many Jewish Americans share her hope?

  7. Anonymous says:

    Islamophobia is just evil white RepubkliKKKan paranoia, too…
    http://www.livescience.com/images/i/000/019/865/original/wtc-9-11-small.jpg

  8. JackisBack says:

    She need a visit from Secret Service. She can’t resist wishing death on POTUS

  9. StephaneDumas says:

    Paul Joseph Watson talk of Sarah Silverman’s meltdown.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGbdu9bFhzQ

  10. Torcer says:

    Sarah Silverman: My Idiotic Tweet Was All The Fault Of The Evil Steve Bannon…
    Last night, leftist comedian Sarah Silverman posted the above tweet.

    Well, needless to say, she was excoriated for her stupidity.

    She later tried to justify her idiocy by blaming her delusion on Trump’s chief strategist, Steve Bannon.
    http://www.weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-02-13-at-11.56.52-AM.png
    http://www.weaselzippers.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Screen-Shot-2017-02-13-at-11.56.35-AM.png
    She doesn’t explain how that squares with Trump’s Jewish daughter, son-in-law and grandchildren.

    But when you’re delusional, you only see your own delusions…
    http://www.weaselzippers.us/324737-sarah-silverman-my-idiotic-tweet-was-all-the-fault-of-the-evil-steve-bannon/

  11. StephaneDumas says:

    It’s much worse than that when some “FINO”(Feminists in name only) act like hypocrites when they criticized Trump but want to do business with Iran wearing an hidjab.
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-02-12/one-week-after-hyper-feminist-swedish-deputy-pm-mocks-trump-her-boss-visits-anti-fem
    https://sputniknews.com/europe/201702131050615784-sweden-iran-hijab-business/
    http://pamelageller.com/2017/02/sweden-feminists-walk-of-shame-prostrate-themselves-iran.html/

    And here a meme who sait it all, guess which are the “FINO”? https://onsizzle.com/i/kurdish-russian-feminist-feminist-american-imperium-feminist-feminist-2nd-wave-2267063
    [img]http://i.imgur.com/MizHhrn.png[/img]

  12. Torcer says:

    Our earlier political chart adjusted for Sarah Silverman @SarahKSilverman #nazipunch #Paranoid

  13. StephaneDumas says:

    And the competitors are Lena Dunham, Alec Baldwin, Madonna, etc….

  14. octa bright says:

    Sarah Silverman is too much of a fool to be left on her own. She badly needs a keeper.

  15. Mr. Freemarket says:

    The list is extensive, even including a large portion of liberal politicians.

  16. Larry Geiger says:

    In all those pictures of working people I didn’t see any women. Hmmmmmmmmm…

  17. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Bush’s fault. Now Trump’s fault.

  18. OldSailor says:

    I’ll take “Yes, she really is that stupid” for $1000 Alex.

  19. bobdog19006 says:

    I didn’t read it that way. I just read it as a joke.

    Silverman is obnoxious as hell, and I’m not one of her dozens of fans, but I think this one was a gag.

  20. 762x51 says:

    “Once the military is with us”?!? ROTFLMFAO!!!

    Yes, because the military has fared so well under Progressive domination. As always, no one ever looks at the details. They already have all the military they are going to get, the clerks and tin stars in the Pentagon, none of which could hump a combat load out more than a few hundred feet over flat, even ground on a cool sunny day.

    A universal truth about Progressives, whether a Hollywood tool like Silverman or our resident 5th column Progressive pompom boy, is that they have no clue about that which they broadly label “the military”. While accurate when describing those who serve in uniform, that is where the similarity ends.

    The biggest fool alive should be able to understand that the Navy is not like the Army which is not like the Air Force which is not like the Marines. What they don’t get is that within each branch there are two basic types of service personnel, the combat arms and support units. These are so dissimilar, they even recognize the difference within the rank and file troops. Support personnel, clerks, staff officers, etc are POG’s, the door kickers are grunts, even within the Marine Corps, where everyone is a rifleman, there are POGs.

    A friend of mine was in a Marine Comms unit Camp Leatherneck, Afghanistan. He was a Marine that never went outside the wire, a FOBbit as described by those who did go outside the wire, stationed at a Combat OutPost(COP). As such, he had the basic training, MCT, MCMAP etc of all Marines but no knowledge of combat operations or experience under fire. I know that in a gun fight, he will not react the same as my brothers who have fought before.

    Silverman can delude herself into thinking that “the military” will join her and her Progressive vermin but their “troops” may not be up for the challenge.

  21. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Yep, coming from a woman who thinks using the military to overthrow a democratically elected government will rid us of totalitarianism. Though, I have to say, Egypt is probably better off after a military coupe ousted the Islamist theocrats Obama and Hillary helped install in there.

  22. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    So, two questions for an insider.

    First, how thoroughly do you think Obama ran out officers who are not Proggie tools? Do you think there are a large number who think like Mattis who just kept their heads down? Not that I actually think there will be any kind of military action against the admin, but at least in theory if the upper ranks are filled with leftist ideologues, it could be conceivable.

    Second, how many actual warriors do you think they could round up who would follow such orders? There must be some. I asked a couple of Navy people I know how people were feeling when Obama was re-elected. Both told me it was much like the general population, about half were smug and about half were unhappy. I don’t know how it would go in combat vs. support staff. Politics aside, I think some would pretty much always follow orders.

    Just wanted an inside perspective.

  23. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Hard to say with her. I don’t think she was joking about a military take-over of the US gov. In either case, I didn’t find it very funny.

  24. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Yes, maybe Bush can finally get a break. Though, they still blame Reagan occasionally.

  25. KirklesWorth says:

    Time to dispense this ridiculous “progressive” irrationality once and for all. Since you seem incapable of distinguishing even a moderate from a republican, you certainly can’t have any concept of the difference between a progressive and a conservative. So here, review the chart and tell me if you think modifications have to be made for accuracy. From what I see, you are more of a progressive (the verb) than I am – therefore calling me a “progressive” (the noun) is stupidity at its finest. The statement:

    762×51►KirklesWorth: (12/30/2016) BTW, Supporting a Progressive candidate DOES make you a Progressives, dumbass.

    …makes as much sense as saying “supporting a Girl Scout makes you a Girl Scout”. It is a childish sweeping generalization and some sort of warped guilt-by-association. It’s puerile.

    The informal fallacy of sweeping generalization consists of using some statement in an all-inclusive way without allowing for any exceptions. For example, if someone writes that the distinction between human beings and animals is our high IQ, that is far too sweeping.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/84f5d80b838674c36efedf1b67a69164a0e987d06ab2d178addc631134335071.png

  26. Bodhisattva says:

    I was going to say no, she’s not “THAT” stupid, but I see from the thread’s top post that is already explained in excellent detail.

  27. Bodhisattva says:

    Dozens?

    You’re way too kind.

  28. Rotohammer says:

    Going after Jesus for the amusement of others. Classy. Just begging for an anti-Semitic backlash, but I won’t give that oven dodger the satisfaction.

  29. Jodie says:

    Probably Schumer and most of the other liberal Jews.

  30. bobdog19006 says:

    I don’t think many of us thought that one was funny.

  31. bobdog19006 says:

    Worse than that, ted. They take it as a sexist taunt.

    Broads have progressed a long way since the sixties.

  32. StephaneDumas says:

    Alias “Lenadunhampuff” (portemanteau of Lena Dunham and Trigglypuff). 😉

  33. TED says:

    PROGRESSED?! I wouldn’t say progressed, AND I don’t care how THEY (feminazi’s) take it.

  34. Mr. Freemarket says:

    I note that, to my knowledge, nothing has ever been the fault of democrats.

    It’s kind of like racism….they are not capable of being at fault.

  35. Kerryjhutcheson says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !dc117c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dc11s7c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs407NetworkSimpleGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!dc117c:….,……..

  36. ICEvictim says:

    speaking as a veteran if they were blazing on fire I wouldn’t pee on them to put it out. That woman and all those like her are so completely out of touch with reality.

    The military is hard core conservative. A percentage are socialist and Heinz 57 other ideals, but we ALL swear to uphold and defend the Constitution. A thing all these libtards either have not read or have not understood. Or both.

  37. ICEvictim says:

    see my post above JSIG

  38. 762x51 says:

    The damage done by the traitor Obama is substantial and will take years to repair. Just the two commanders we lost due to the Benghazi treason will take a long time to replace. The AFRICOM commanding general and a carrier battle group commander do not grow on trees. If Gen Mattis and tRump so choose, they can now restore those officers if they wanted to come back. I hope they will reach out to officers like Gen. Carter Ham and offer them their old jobs back. I would also courts martial the officers that carried out the orders to relieve them.

    Thinking like Gen Mattis and “keeping your head down” are mutually exclusive concepts. It’s likely that many are still in uniform and have been passed over for promotion by the Progressives who obeyed Obama. They need to be discovered and the situation rectified and the traitors who were “just following orders” should then be dismissed.

    The main threat that exists in the ranks today is the prevalence of gang membership which has grow substantially over the last decade, no doubt due the influence of the Obama administration. It is, in fact, a violation of the UCMJ to belong to a criminal organization and would subject the gang member to full blown Article 30 Courts-Martial IF the rule of law were to be implemented again. I would expect Gen Mattis to fully enforce such a law, but he has a monstrous task ahead of him cleaning up the ranks. Fostering a culture of anti-gang membership within the ranks would go farther, faster to eliminating the problem than random prosecution of offenders.

    The “I was just following orders” defense went out with the Vietnam War. Some may be willing to follow illegal orders but more out of ideology or criminal affiliation than being blind order takers. As I have tried to explain to the pompom squad, who would rather denigrate me in furtherance of its ideology than recognize the truth and reality, the standard required by the UCMJ for following orders is LAWFUL orders. Unlawful orders, such as attacking the civilian population or sitting administration are null and void just as unconstitutional laws are null and void.

    Soldiers in the combat arms fully understand what the application of their craft to civilians would mean. We are trained in the application of violence on a level civilians cannot even conceive. I personally have never meet any soldier who would obey such orders and make war on the civilian population or civilian authority. There are certainly some as I observed but they would not last long against the rest of us. What would prevent them from acting fully in a military capacity is access to the weapons they are trained to use. Sure they can get semiauto versions of their rifles and civilian copies of their side arms for the few who are trained with side arms, but that is it. Stateside, weapons are stored in secured weapons rooms, usually at the company level. Access to brass and ammo is similarly restricted so they cannot just access those things whenever they want to. That access is tested by command staff regularly to see if they can access the weapons without authorization. I have drawn OD duty during such a inspection where a major rolled up to the company area and came stomping in demanding access to the weapons room. He raised hell when I informed him my orders were to prevent such access without proper authorization and requested he show me his written orders countermanding my CO’s orders. They push it pretty far in these “tests” and he came around the counter like he was going to do it anyway. He stopped when I drew my sidearm and aimed it at his chest. He then asked me if I wanted to go prison for assaulting a superior officer, I told him the JAG will need a witness to do that and he will be dead, end of test.

    That is the level of discernment of what is a lawful order and what is not lawful the combat arms train to. Non-combatants don’t have to go that far because their mission is support, not killing people. Just because a grunt always calls you sir does not mean he doesn’t have a plan on how he is going to kill you should you provide the proper provocation.

    I cannot speak for the Navy, my exposure to them is limited to air assault operations from a helicopter carrier, we didn’t interact much with them outside of the mess hall, damn but those Navy guys eat well. The problem the Navy and AF would have in actually acting against the civilian population or authority is the size and complexity of their weapon systems. Getting an attack aircraft off a carrier or air base takes a large number of people. Those separate teams, Fueling, armament, avionics, pilot, etc, have all act in concert to make it happen. If the fuel guys refuse to fuel the aircraft for such a strike mission, it isn’t going anywhere, if the armament guys refuse to arm it, it makes no difference whether it can take off or not. If the pilot refuses to fly the mission, it makes no difference whether the other teams are onboard with it or not. So the issue goes to not just whether a military member will “just follow orders” or even how many would do that, but which complete units will follow such illegal orders.

    Overall, I don’t see the “military” as a whole being a threat, individuals and even trained small groups acting outside the military, yep. Those individuals haven’t a prayer against a superior force such as SWAT, the small groups could be a large problem but can never hope to bring down the government and forget taking and holding terrain. They might be able to take small patches but could never hold it because holding terrain requires more force than taking it. The entire US military, all branches combined, could possibly “take” the CONUS but could never hold such a landmass against a determined guerrilla force over along period of time.

  39. 762x51 says:

    Off topic as usual I see.

    Time to dispense with you, permanently. Face me and back up your sniveling, driveling BS or STFU, A-hole.

    How funny though that I used to word Puerile in my last post to you on another thread and now you mimic it. I notice that you do that frequently, a demonstration of your inability to think for yourself, reinforced by your graduation from lemming school.

    GFY you turd eating RINO maggot.

  40. 762x51 says:

    True and what you call socialist are almost all POG’s.

    Also, I have tried to explain to certain idiots here that the part of the oath that says to obey the orders of the President and “those appointed over me” pertains only to LAWFUL orders not any and every order. That the paramount Oath is to the Constitution, not any individual. Some people are not capable of learning though.

  41. KirklesWorth says:

    Too cowardly and/or stupid to make your case? No surprises there – you’ve regularly made excuses why you refuse to have a civil debate:

    762×51►KirklesWorth: Sometimes, princess, it’s hard to tell if you are lying to spin your propaganda in support of your agenda or just too shallow and uneducated to know the details of the FACTS., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Either way, engaging you in civil conversation is pointless., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Your posts become more pointless every day, UrkelTwerp., 762×51►NotKennedy: He is despicable and deserving of nothing but abuse., 762×51►Mr. Freemarket: That imbecile is an Alex Jones follower, you can’t reason with that level of stupid, you can only water it twice a week., 762×51►KirklesWorth: This is why debating you assholes is pointless., 762×51►KirklesWorth: How pointless it is to try and have a conversation with a Progressive totalitarian like you., 762×51►JeffersonSpinningInGrave: Can’t reason with them, can’t avoid them, only one other course of action available . . ., 762×51►Savvyheat: You can’t reason with a drone like wrinkledick which is why I don’t even try., 762×51►TrojanMan: You can’t reason with an imbecile or a Progressive. Wrinkledick is both., 762×51►Torcer: Which is why engaging them in said argument is pointless. My way takes little effort and has them foaming at the mouth., 762×51►Mr. Freemarket: You can’t reason with this lying fucktard. He is incapable of rational thought, but is smug about it., 762×51►Azsteve53: Once I realized that tRump supporters, like their candidate, were true Progressives, who I already know cannot be reasoned with or bargained with, I gave up trying because it is pointless., 762×51►Torcer: You can’t reason with these brain dead fucktards., 762×51►Mike: You can’t reason with them so denigrating them is all that is left, until the shooting starts., 762×51►kerri: You can’t reason with these Marxist Progressive assholes. All they understand is force, that is all fascists ever understand., 762×51►fredrickbarbarossa: You can’t reason with a Progressive fascist. They are just targets awaiting engagement., 762×51►Eddie_Valiant: Piss on this asshole, you can’t reason with douche bags so why bother. Just engage the target and move on.

    Taking credit for using “puerile”? Are you a child in need of a pat on the head? If that’s the way you think this works, then give it up to Ed. G. Mann who used it on you first – and schooled you in the process:

    Ed. G. Mann►762×51: (06/11/2016) So what! You are still the loser and you cannot escape that. Once more you prove how low your intelligence level is with the threats and puerile invective. I go on my merry way and you’re stuck in the cloaca of the trailer park. One last question? Do you get all that energy from licking gay men’s taints? Probably. About all you’re good for doing on earth.

    But of course you can’t and won’t contribute anything of substance – you’ve indicated that your only interests are to do what you think you do best – abuse, browbeating, castigating, denigrating disrespecting, eviscerating, mocking, ridiculing, vilifying, etc. of me or any other Trump supporters:

    762×51►KirklesWorth: You will go on worshiping your cult and wasting every ones time and I will continue to ridicule you because that is all you deserve, 762×51►Mr. Freemarket: Just look at the Progressive vermin I mock here every day, they sure can’t take it. Ironically, they are too impotent and pathetic to back up their opposition., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Well since you are determined to hide behind your keyboard and since you are incapable of honest exchange, there is nothing left but to mock and denigrate your every post., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Time will tell, princess, and I will be here to ram it down your contemptible throat at every turn., 762×51►Alphamail: No problem, I can denigrate you just as easily by remote control, LMFAO!!
    , 762×51►NotKennedy: He is despicable and deserving of nothing but abuse., 762×51►KirklesWorth: …and I pound on you turd eaters relentlessly like the cockroaches you are., 762×51►TrojanMan: If he does win, we both know he is a big government Progressive, and I look forward to denigrating, castigating and eviscerating them daily for every Progressive action he takes., 762×51►EX-GOPJohnt✓Fᵉᵈᵉʳᵃˡ ᶦˢᵗ: Feel free to abuse him as much as you want, he deserves a all of it., 762×51►Daniel: Of course you will have crawled back into the woodwork with the other Disqus cockroaches then, but I’ll still be here, denigrating you and your cult and its leader every day., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Well, I’m off to denigrate you in other places, die in pain, asshole., 762×51►Torcer: Which is why I don’t bother to engage it in conversation,only derision, denigration and vilification., 762×51►Torcer: Look at the level of abuse they are wiling to take, jihadi’s if ever I saw one., 762×51►KirklesWorth: You haven’t seen anything yet little maggot. Win or lose, you will see the abuse increase at least an order of magnitude. You Progressives had to go underground in the early 20th century because of your fascism, this time you won’t be so lucky., 762×51►jan_poster: As the MOD, Dave has stayed out of it so someone has to oppose them. They have earned every thing I dish out to them., 762×51►Tom: You douche bags should expect the same from here on out from an ever increasing number of people as you try to force your bullshit down everyone’s throat., 762×51►TrojanMan: Abuse is all it deserves., 762×51►Rampaige: Oh I absolutely am, its a little cramped being so small but being able abuse wrinkledick like this is worth it, LOL., 762×51►Torcer: Oh it’s going be epic. The abuse I’m planning will increase by at least an order of magnitude., 762×51►Tchhht!!!: Well, I love denigrating you fascist fucks so let me know when you have time to be castigated., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Go ahead, give up, I’m laughing at you anyway. You’ll be back and I will be here to denigrate you then., 762×51►Mr_Paine: Come back after your boy loses to Hillary though, so I can really abuse you for making that happen., 762×51►Tom: Instead, I abuse you as fully as I can in this limited environment, but only because you lack the courage to face me in person, Brony Bitch., 762×51►Torcer: Until then, I entertain myself by denigrating and disrespecting them in what ever fashion suits me, 762×51►Ed. G. Mann: I’m glad you enjoy the abuse because I enjoy slathering you in it., 762×51►Jill: Rather than wasting your effort trying to draw pictures for the blind, do what I do, denigrate them viciously at ever opportunity, they have earned it!, 762×51►Tom: Angry doesn’t begin to describe how I feel about you assholes, you are despicable and have earned the browbeating I intend to administer every time your boy sells us down the river which will be often., 762×51►Torcer: He’s an unprincipled liar and a coward, you can’t reason with him but feel free to push him around, he seems to think he can come inhere and do it to us so turn about is fair play., 762×51►Alphamail: Yep, I have a personal troll or two here that I enjoy denigrating when they appear and troll my posts., 762×51►Mike: You can’t reason with them so denigrating them is all that is left, until the shooting starts., 762×51: By thE way, anyone who feels “offended” by being denigrated for their behavior here is a helpful hint on avoiding it – DON’T ACT LIKE A FUCKING RETARD!, 762×51►Lakeview Bob: You and your neo-Nazi cohorts have this one last chance to cease and desist your fascistic activities. Persist and I assure you there will be blood.

  42. KirklesWorth says:

    Is your oath the Soldier’s Oath? Have you been released from it?

  43. 762x51 says:

    Met me face to face, lessthanPOGtwerp and I’ll show you.

  44. Auburn Rapunzel says:

    “Sure, I was wrong, but I’m not wrong because you’re jerks and muh triggers. It’s really your fault and society’s fault that I’m wrong, so who’s stupid NOW HUH?! Why can’t the whole world just change to accommodate my TDTLS (Too Dumb To Live Syndrome)?”

  45. Auburn Rapunzel says:

    Is that a yes or a no, dear? Or can you tell us, but you’d have to kill us?

  46. 762x51 says:

    Debating a liar like yourself is a waste of time. That’s why NO ONE here does it anymore. They all realize what a dishonest little maggot you are, jerklesTwerp.

    I have the stones to meet you in single combat, princess, so which takes more balls, combat or blathering away incessantly and anonymously on the Internet? Ohh wait, you are the great “hero” who “heroically” saved America by braving Taliban mortars and RPG’s to get to the polls last Nov. I remember now. LMFAO!!!

    Meet me face to face, sellout RINO maggot, for a free, once in a lifetime demonstration.

  47. 762x51 says:

    I’ve posted the answer on multiple occasions, sweet cheeks, go look it up.

  48. Baloney says:

    You say that every President from Bush 41 to date has been a progressive and that progressives are only good for killing. Since you hate progressives so intensely, how do you live with yourself after having followed orders of a hated progressive regime? Maybe you just refused and spent your hitch in the stockade. Oh wait, I know. You served under Eisenhower. How about Beetle Bailey? That’s the ticket.

  49. Baloney says:

    Good chart, but I would add “Racist” and “Disrespectful of Women”. The war hero certainly qualifies for a yes for both.

  50. KirklesWorth says:

    You never had any intentions of “debating” from the beginning – that’s the point Mongo which you are too stupid to understand…as your bragging of abuse, browbeating, castigating, denigrating disrespecting, eviscerating, mocking, ridiculing, vilifying, etc. demonstrates. My simple request for you to “review the chart and tell me if you think modifications have to be made for accuracy” is too difficult and too much exposure for a simpleton like you – some tough guy.

    And there isn’t going to be “single combat” idiot, no matter how many times you try to compensate for your stupidity with violence. Adults don’t get goaded into being foolish by wannabe-bullying children. But just for the record, stay the hell away from me you psychotic snowflake. I have no intentions of offering myself up for slaughter in one of your insane snuff fantasies. You are incapable of rational thought, you are incapable if rational behavior. You’ve already admitted you won’t follow the law:

    762×51: Make all the laws you want doc, I will not obey your laws. Now, what are you going to do about it?, 762×51►Pyrran: It is why I will not obey their laws, I will not fund their agendas, I will not recognize their authority and I will not surrender., 762×51►Mr. Freemarket: I will not comply. I will not obey their laws. I will not fund their agenda. I will not recognize their authority. I will not surrender., 762×51►Mr. Freemarket: I cannot think of a single reason to obey ANY laws now., 762×51►FrozenPatriot: I think we are going to get the government THEY deserve. I will not recognize their authority., 762×51►Alphamail: Are you so ignorant that you cannot comprehend that “laws” today are in fact Rules of Engagement established by the enemy to prevent us from stopping them?, 762×51►Alphamail: You are free to participate in the fraud of this election, I will not be duped into it again nor will I comply with the results., 762×51►Louisiana Steve: They have to, it is the only way they can assure absolute control over everyone and why people like me are so dangerous to them. I will not comply., 762×51►Rusty Bill: I will not obey their laws. I will not fund their agendas. I will not recognize their authority. I will not surrender., 762×51►JeffersonSpinningInGrave: I will not obey their laws. I will not fund their agenda. I will not recognize their authority. I will not surrender.

    The chart below is still unchanged and indicating you are way more progressive than me. You encompass the worst of everything you decry.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/84f5d80b838674c36efedf1b67a69164a0e987d06ab2d178addc631134335071.png

  51. KirklesWorth says:

    Boy, for somebody who complains about things being done “over and over”, you sure hypocritically do the same things you annoyingly whine about:

    762×51►KirklesWorth: That you keep re-posting the same old post over and over again is an indicator of your ex-wife mentality. That you are an asshole is obvious.
    , 762×51►KirklesWorth: Meanwhile, all youy can do is regurgitate the same edited for spin re-posts over and over, not a single original thought since you first infested this site., 762×51►KirklesWorth: While it is mildly amusing to watch you perpetuate your smug sanctimonious fantasy of superiority, it is also boring as hell to see the same partial quotes intended to spin your fantasy into reality posted over and over again, 762×51►Bodhisattva: Einstein said that insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results. I doubt he ever thought it would be demonstrated on such a large scale., 762×51►MAS: What freedom does not require of us to to be forced daily too listen to the same BS, over and over again., 762×51►Charles: Or a bot. Watch how it repeats over and over again., 762×51►Torcer: Over and over and over again., 762×51►KirklesWorth: He has, of course already walked back most of the talking points you copied from his website and have pasted here over and over again., 762×51►Tom: Essentially doing the same thing over and over, expecting different results. Insane., 762×51: Their insanity is demonstrated in the historical FACT that they keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results., 762×51►Smith and Wesson and Me: I have thought this through over and over for more than a decade now and I wish I had a better scenario that is likely. As I have said repeatedly, civil war is inevitable now., 762×51►Asok Asus: Doing the same thing over and over expecting different results is the definition of insanity., 762×51►TED: We are past the tipping point, civil war is inevitable now as I have said over and over.

    So I’ll just copy-and-paste my previous response to your chest-thumping demands:

    KirklesWorth►762×51: And there isn’t going to be “single combat” idiot, no matter how many times you try to compensate for your stupidity with violence. Adults don’t get goaded into being foolish by wannabe-bullying children. But just for the record, stay the hell away from me you psychotic snowflake. I have no intentions of offering myself up for slaughter in one of your insane snuff fantasies. You are incapable of rational thought, you are incapable if rational behavior. You’ve already admitted you won’t follow the law:

  52. 762x51 says:

    Hey fibtard, back from your pedo trip to Bankok I see.

    Every President from Bush 41 to today IS a Progressive, that you are too stupid to understand that or too dishonest to admit it, or both, is not my fault.

    I served the Constitution, like have tried to tell your boyfriend jerklesTwerp. Only a imbecile or a PROGRESSIVE, thinks we serve the man. I received no illegal/unconstitutional orders during that time, other than as noted as a training tool.

    I hope all see the pattern here of how you PROGRESSIVES love to denigrate the military and hate me so much you cannot even stay on the thread topic, but instead have to interject your meaningless drivel into the conversation.

    You are just another coward who can’t deal in the real world so you have to hide behind your keyboard, sniveling douche.

  53. 762x51 says:

    Still can’t think for yourself I see. Being my secretary is a full time job. How fortunate you enjoy wearing skirts.

  54. 762x51 says:

    Odd, I seem to recall my answer was GFY you RINO sellout scum.

    LMAO!! You STILL don’t understand the concept of obeying orders. What a tool.

    GFY, RINO traitor.

  55. 762x51 says:

    But your real problem with me my disrespect for his Royal Henious Fibtard of Swineherd, LMAO!!

    GFY, Fibtard or face me like a man.

  56. KirklesWorth says:

    I can think for myself very well, thank you. You however, can’t even seem to muster enough synapses to fire to evaluate the chart I made to demonstrate you more progressive you are than me – unless you want me to make changes for accuracy’s sake…but when did you ever care about that?

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/84f5d80b838674c36efedf1b67a69164a0e987d06ab2d178addc631134335071.png

  57. 762x51 says:

    Well, you were a prick from the beginning, not my fault, princess. You came here looking for trouble, you found it.

    By “Adults don’t get goaded into being foolish by wannabe-bullying children.” I assume you mean “Cowards don’t accept offers which result in them being de-animated by an expert.”

    Yet you just keep running your mouth like the despicable, impotent little bastard you are.

    GFY, RINO scumbag.

  58. 762x51 says:

    Waiting for the reply you are so furiously copy and pasting together, jerkoffsTw*t.

  59. KirklesWorth says:

    It’s laughable how transparent and brainless you are.

    LMAO!! You STILL don’t understand the concept of obeying orders. What a tool.

    Yeah, right…obeying orders is too “abstract” for my brain! Let’s see if I can Google it…?

    Follow orders: to do as one has been instructed.

    Oh my gosh, that’s so deep! I’m completely flummoxed!

    You will claim you are a “defender of the Constitution” as far as it suits you, then you will cast it aside like the dirtiest progressive. You tout “free speech” until you get triggered by the mildest comment. You whine about “enemies of the United States and the Constitution” yet demonstrate all of their traits and use all of their tactics. You are a joke that keeps on giving, and I thank you for that.

  60. KirklesWorth says:

    What do I care about your “wait”? You mean copy and pasting like this:

    762×51►Torcer: (8/21/2016) Remember what it said;

    “KirklesWorth Torcer • 17 hours ago
    Yeah…you keep asking that…the answer is: to keep an eye on things. Why are you here and do you have a problem with me being here?” Kirklesworth 8/18/2016

    Huh, who’d have though you’d be hypocritical?

  61. 762x51 says:

    Really? No one here has ever seen it.

    That chart is hilarious, butt breath. I’m sure you were impartial in putting together, ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    It’s as meaning as the rest of your boring, time wasting meaningless posts. If it wasn’t for me you’d have noting to contribute at all except a bunch of lame a$$ed charts, many of which were copy and paste jobs from elsewhere.

    Copy and paste really is your only skill, other than being a tool that is.

    GFY RINO turd eater.

  62. 762x51 says:

    hmmm, weak effort that time, dance faster monkey.

    GFY

  63. KirklesWorth says:

    You are such a compulsive liar – you had me declared a “fascist” and a “target” after only two comments to each other. On your second comment to me, you declared me (1) a “Trumpanzee” (the derogatory truth), (2) a “fascist” (lie), (3) someone “who can’t handle anyone that disagrees with him” (a lie and a completely hypocritical statement to make demonstrating that 762×51 can’t handle being disagreed with), (4) Trump was my “cult leader” (lie), and (5) I was “a target” (which had better be a lie).

    I thought I was defending a Trump supporter from a immature progressive punk (not too far off in hindsight), only to be shocked that you were a so-called “conservative” retired marine with stunted mental abilities. And this is how the discussion went that triggered your bat-crap craziness:

    762×51►Sweep_the_leg_11590: (07/13/2016) Then go spread your legs somewhere else, dipshit.

    KirklesWorth►762×51: (07/14/2016) Flagged that one as inappropriate…

    762×51►KirklesWorth: (07/14/2016) I agree, spread the leg 6969 is completely inappropriate.

    KirklesWorth►762×51: (07/15/2016) Does mommy know you are using the computer?

    762×51►KirklesWorth: (07/16/2016) Another Trumpanzee fascist who can’t handle anyone that disagrees with him or his cult leader, lol. My, my, this is a target rich environment. Report me some more fascist, I love it.

    This allowed you to skip right into abuse, browbeating, castigating, denegrating disrespecting, eviscerating, mocking, ridiculing, vilifying, etc.. It also puts the following comment in better perspective when you lied by saying you are the one who generated the strife in the first lace all the way back to the first interaction I had with you. Right. The delicate snowflake can’t take the “strife” of the mild comments “Flagged that one as inappropriate…” and “Does mommy know you are using the computer?” And he called himself a “marine”? And I suppose it was playful banter being called a “fascist” and a “target”?

  64. 762x51 says:

    Copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste,

    Another brilliant effort by secretary and ex-wife jerklesTwerp.

    Now for your encore, GFY. LMFAO!!

  65. KirklesWorth says:

    I don’t take your orders fascist. Whatever stupidity of yours I repost is a public service. Like these I just posted on the other thread:

    762×51: (3/20/2016) If Trump loses the nomination, riots. If Trump wins the nomination he will lose the general election to Hitlery and there will be riots against the tyranny she has planned.

    Sorry Trump Trolls, reality is your boy can’t win a general election. I know how enraged you all get when confronted by reality, like all Progressives. He loses to her by 6.3 points, 7.2 if you exclude the USA Today poll as an outlier. Meanwhile Cruz beats her by .08 up to 3 points of you exclude the NBC poll as an outlier.

    762×51: (8/11/2016) Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51->Alphamail: (10/22/2016) I said tRump never could win, not that I was the only one, and that was true. He never had a chance to win the Electoral College and for the Presidential election, there is no other standard. He has never led in EC votes and is slipping rapidly now. That is the difference between a plurality candidate, which tRump is and a majority candidate which tRump is not.

    762×51?Alphamail: (10/22/2016) I said tRump never could win, not that I was the only one, and that was true. He never had a chance to win the Electoral College and for the Presidential election, there is no other standard. He has never led in EC votes and is slipping rapidly now. That is the difference between a plurality candidate, which tRump is and a majority candidate which tRump is not.

    762×51?Occam’s Stubble: (10/22/2016) No, the Trumpamnzees have hooped and hollered and denigrated and castigated their way to a solid Clinton victory. If every Conservative in the country got out to vote for him now it wouldn’t be enough. Clearly they suck at getting their candidate elected as much as they suck at selecting them in the first place.

  66. 762x51 says:

    Hmmm, Fascist and liar or gifted insight since you have proven me correct many hundreds of times.

    copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste. Show us another jerklesTwerp work of fart. LMMFAO!!!!!!!!!

  67. 762x51 says:

    Perhaps, but you do:

    copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste.

    Not an original thought in that tiny, tepid brain, hilarious.

    GFY, monkey.

  68. 762x51 says:

    GFY RINO bitch.

  69. 762x51 says:

    copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,

    Beat you to it, RINO scumbag.

    GFY

  70. KirklesWorth says:

    So, it’s “tacit agreement”, right? You aren’t saying anything is wrong with it, so thanks for for that. I guess the times I asked you for corrections you were too busy manufacturing more lies…? Not only are you more of a progressive than I am, it looks like you are somewhere between a republican and a moderate while I am conservative except for one issue.

  71. 762x51 says:

    Dream on moron. You give yourself waaaaayy too much credit and me none at all. Since dishonesty is your stock and trade, your “conclusion” is as meaningless as your sniveling cowardly life.

    GFY

  72. KirklesWorth says:

    Oh boy! Time for one of your trademark insults! I wonder how many times you’ve used it before…?

    “sniveling coward” 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57

    But that’s nowhere near the other one…

    “GFY” 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147

  73. KirklesWorth says:

    I’ve already addressed this before…but I’m happy to do it again! You are such a compulsive liar – you had me declared a “fascist” and a “target” after only two comments to each other. On your second comment to me, you declared me (1) a “Trumpanzee” (the derogatory truth), (2) a “fascist” (lie), (3) someone “who can’t handle anyone that disagrees with him” (a lie and a completely hypocritical statement to make demonstrating that 762×51 can’t handle being disagreed with), (4) Trump was my “cult leader” (lie), and (5) I was “a target” (which had better be a lie).

    I thought I was defending a Trump supporter from a immature progressive punk (not too far off in hindsight), only to be shocked that 762×51 was a so-called “conservative” retired marine with stunted mental abilities. And this is how the discussion went that triggered your bat-crap craziness:

    762×51►Sweep_the_leg_11590: (07/13/2016) Then go spread your legs somewhere else, dipshit.

    KirklesWorth►762×51: (07/14/2016) Flagged that one as inappropriate…

    762×51►KirklesWorth: (07/14/2016) I agree, spread the leg 6969 is completely inappropriate.

    KirklesWorth►762×51: (07/15/2016) Does mommy know you are using the computer?

    762×51►KirklesWorth: (07/16/2016) Another Trumpanzee fascist who can’t handle anyone that disagrees with him or his cult leader, lol. My, my, this is a target rich environment. Report me some more fascist, I love it.

    And there you have it. The psychotic snowflake gets triggered with “Flagged that one as inappropriate…” and “Does mommy know you are using the computer?” and tries to build that into a justification for murder. Completely pathetic.

  74. KirklesWorth says:

    You mean like this?

    762×51: (3/20/2016) If Trump loses the nomination, riots. If Trump wins the nomination he will lose the general election to Hitlery and there will be riots against the tyranny she has planned.

    Sorry Trump Trolls, reality is your boy can’t win a general election. I know how enraged you all get when confronted by reality, like all Progressives. He loses to her by 6.3 points, 7.2 if you exclude the USA Today poll as an outlier. Meanwhile Cruz beats her by .08 up to 3 points of you exclude the NBC poll as an outlier.

    762×51: (8/11/2016) Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51->Alphamail: (10/22/2016) I said tRump never could win, not that I was the only one, and that was true. He never had a chance to win the Electoral College and for the Presidential election, there is no other standard. He has never led in EC votes and is slipping rapidly now. That is the difference between a plurality candidate, which tRump is and a majority candidate which tRump is not.

    762×51?Alphamail: (10/22/2016) I said tRump never could win, not that I was the only one, and that was true. He never had a chance to win the Electoral College and for the Presidential election, there is no other standard. He has never led in EC votes and is slipping rapidly now. That is the difference between a plurality candidate, which tRump is and a majority candidate which tRump is not.

    762×51?Occam’s Stubble: (10/22/2016) No, the Trumpamnzees have hooped and hollered and denigrated and castigated their way to a solid Clinton victory. If every Conservative in the country got out to vote for him now it wouldn’t be enough. Clearly they suck at getting their candidate elected as much as they suck at selecting them in the first place.

  75. KirklesWorth says:

    Yep, and here’s my favorites!

    762×51: (3/20/2016) If Trump loses the nomination, riots. If Trump wins the nomination he will lose the general election to Hitlery and there will be riots against the tyranny she has planned.

    Sorry Trump Trolls, reality is your boy can’t win a general election. I know how enraged you all get when confronted by reality, like all Progressives. He loses to her by 6.3 points, 7.2 if you exclude the USA Today poll as an outlier. Meanwhile Cruz beats her by .08 up to 3 points of you exclude the NBC poll as an outlier.

    762×51: (8/11/2016) Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51->Alphamail: (10/22/2016) I said tRump never could win, not that I was the only one, and that was true. He never had a chance to win the Electoral College and for the Presidential election, there is no other standard. He has never led in EC votes and is slipping rapidly now. That is the difference between a plurality candidate, which tRump is and a majority candidate which tRump is not.

    762×51?Alphamail: (10/22/2016) I said tRump never could win, not that I was the only one, and that was true. He never had a chance to win the Electoral College and for the Presidential election, there is no other standard. He has never led in EC votes and is slipping rapidly now. That is the difference between a plurality candidate, which tRump is and a majority candidate which tRump is not.

    762×51?Occam’s Stubble: (10/22/2016) No, the Trumpamnzees have hooped and hollered and denigrated and castigated their way to a solid Clinton victory. If every Conservative in the country got out to vote for him now it wouldn’t be enough. Clearly they suck at getting their candidate elected as much as they suck at selecting them in the first place.

  76. KirklesWorth says:

    Odd, you’ve always demanded people prove things to you:

    762×51►KirklesWorth: Show us all where I said that, liar., 762×51►KirklesWorth: You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD!, 762×51►KirklesWorth: So prove it scumbag., 762×51►PilloryHillary: And you DO have to prove it, LIAR., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Prove it, LIAR., 762×51►PilloryHillary: Prove it, liar., 762×51►KirklesWorth: PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!, 762×51►Alphamail: Come out and prove it you lying bucket of dog vomit., 762×51: Prove it you little coward., 762×51►KirklesWorth: You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it.
    , 762×51►bed time for bonzo: Prove it., 762×51►KirklesWorth: Prove I threaten to kill you, you lying piece of dog shit.
    , 762×51►KirklesWorth: Ok, prove it, should be easy if you are right.

    Now here you are changing your criticism for doing exactly what you demanded before…who’d have thought? Besides, as you’ve indicated here before, 762×51►Jack Bauer: you don’t like what I post, don’t read it, 762×51►KirklesWorth: I shall characterize you any way I see fit, 762×51►Angel: you don’t like it, I don’t care..

  77. Baloney says:

    Hey pogey bait, you started it as usual. I don’t denigrate the military and I don’t hate you. See you’re wrong again, but that’s nothing new with you.

  78. Auburn Rapunzel says:

    Oh, but you’ve demonstrated that if I do, you’ll just declare me a nasty icky leftist and speculate about my private parts. I mean, that’s what you do to Kirklesworth; why should I expect anything different?

  79. ICEvictim says:

    ya got that right buddy

  80. 762x51 says:

    copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste, copy, paste, copy, paste, copy paste,copy, paste, copy . . .

    Is that all? Go back and recheck your archives, personal secretary jerklesTwerp. Then report back here with the results. Have that for me first thing in the morning. Looks like you will be up all night. You should have done a better job to start with.

    T^o make the math easier, I’ll stat you off with an even 150, now, go find the rest and GFY, GFY, GFY. RINO scumbag.

  81. Still Out of Service says:

    sarah, I do not know you personally, but I care…in a professional manner.
    relax, perhaps you should lay down, call a friend.

    if you have skipped some medication, start taking your meds again.

    call your doctor.
    everything will turn out ok, in the end……..

  82. KirklesWorth says:

    What did you say, “more copy and paste”? Sure! I’ll fulfill your request to Dave Blount for you!

    762×51►: (9/5/2016) Dave, I hope you have all the Trumpanzee sewage cataloged so we can replay their greatest hits and rub their noses in it daily after Nov. 8th, regardless of which scenario plays out.

    762×51►Nobama: (11/07/2016) The readers can decide if your cult leader meets the requirements. Either way, he will have fulfilled his mission of getting Hillary elected tomorrow. he was the only person so despicable that people would dislike him more than her., 762×51►calmly_observing: (10/31/2016) Furthermore, you fail to grasp WHY Romney lost by that margin. It was because Republicans didn’t want a Progressive candidate and refused to vote for him, just like we refuse to vote for the even more Progressive tRump., 762×51►Alphamail: (10/27/2016) YOU have caused Hillary Clinton to win an election she should have lost by 10 points, not me., 762×51: (10/25/2016) Unlike your cherry picked poll, here is an average. Only smart people use them so I understand how you could have missed it., 762×51►TrojanMan: (10/23/2016) With any luck, in 14 days he will off himself as his cult goes down in flames.., 762×51►Louisiana Steve: (10/18/2016) You can cherry pick the few polls you want, the major ones are all averaged in the RCP Average Poll. See averages are what smart people use to get a true number instead of a handpicked number that continues a delusion., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/21/2016) Well, I’ve posted it several times and you ignore each time as all you have to dispute those facts are some lame, vagaries about “making a come back”, weak., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/21/2016) You can’t answer anything but deflection doesn’t win elections douche bag., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/21/2016) People who can think for themselves will accept the tepid, shallow babbling’s of a phony, reality TV windbag It was never going to happen, you are are simply too much of a lemming to understand that., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/20/2016) Everyone is still waiting on your, oh so brilliant, explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome his deficit in electoral votes., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/20/2016) Prove your claim that “tRump is the only candidate who can beat Hillary”. You do realize he will need to defeat her in reality, not just your fantasy world, right?, 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/20/2016) Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/20/2016) Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (09/10/2016) You have accomplished exactly the opposite of your stated goal. You literally have “say the opposite of what you mean disease”, ROTFLMAO!, 762×51: (09/05/2016) Dave, I hope you have all the Trumpanzee sewage cataloged so we can replay their greatest hits and rub their noses in it daily after Nov. 8th, regardless of which scenario plays out., 762×51►Tom: (09/05/2016) You backed the wrong horse, Brony, time to own your mistake., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/31/2016) ROTFLMAO! None of your ridiculous bullshit has made any difference except to drive support away from your cult leader., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/30/2016) The 12 M Democrats who elected tRump won’t be there in Nov. and he will lose. That you are an imbecile who cannot admit their mistake is obvious. That you smug and arrogant about it tells us who you really are, progtard., 762×51►Tom: (08/28/2016) Your little cesspool will make zero difference, it will go to Hillary as it has gone to every Democrat candidate since 1992 so no anecdotal evidence of your neighbors beliefs has any bearing on anything., 762×51►Tom: (08/28/2016) The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it., 762×51►John: (08/27/2016) As do yours. In fact, yours and jerkoffsdworth have done far more to elect Hillary by choosing such a weak candidate as tRump in the first place., 762×51►True Story: (08/27/2016) If there were an earthquake that caused the East and West coasts to drop into their respective oceans on Nov. 7th, tRump has a chance, otherwise, he has a snowballs chance. Yet the Trumpanzees refuse to acknowledge reality., 762×51►Torcer: (08/26/2016) Jerklesworth has probably done more damage to the tRump campaign than the Hillary people could have hoped., 762×51►Grumpy Cat: (08/26/2016) Hillary was the most easily defeatable candidate the DNC has fielded since Dukakis and you douche bags managed to find an asshole who couldn’t beat her, DUMBASS!!, 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/25/2016) All your pathetic bullshit and all you have managed to accomplish is to turn off more people to tRump., 762×51►Torcer: (08/22/2016) Behold what the Trumpanzee Chorus has accomplished, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory., 762×51►Torcer: (08/20/2016) Just as its kind have enabled the election of Hillary, so have they fomented the conflict that is about to engulf this nation., 762×51►NotKennedy: (08/18/2016) Actually, it was the Trumpanzee Chorus who forced tRump on the rest of us who have ensured the election of Hillary., 762×51►TrojanMan: (08/18/2016) The problem is that the tRump disaster will most likely cause the R Progressives to lose control of the Senate to the D Progresives., 762×51►Tom: (08/17/2016) Since it is YOU who aligned your self with a Progressive, you are the one who sides with the worst elements of society and has made the election of Hillary Clinton all but assured., 762×51: (08/14/2016) Whether its wrinkledick or Tshiiiiitttttt/?!1/ or any of the lesser “vote tRump or else” crowd. They have driven away more votes than they could ever hope to generate., 762×51►C. S. P. Schofield: (08/14/2016) Since a tRump candidacy means the loss of the Senate, how will, “the Donald” get anything through Congress or would you prefer he rule imperially as Emperor Obama has done?, 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/14/2016) Yes, but you fail at everything you do, except drive support away from your candidate by being such an obnoxious little asshole., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/14/2016) I appreciate the credit for pointing out how your perpetual sniveling and harassment has helped Hillary immeasurable, and I appreciate “living rent free in your head” as others have observed., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/14/2016) Yes, that is the one thing you have accomplished here. You are so obnoxious that your every snivel puts more and more people off of your boy., 762×51►Tchhht!!!: (08/13/2016) You are doing an excellent job of eliciting anti-tRump hatred, every time you open your sperm receptacle., 762×51►Tchhht!!!: (08/13/2016) With all the help Trumpanzee assholes like you and your boyfriend wrinkledick are giving Hillary, how could she lose., 762×51►Torcer: (08/11/2016) Wrinkledick is one of the biggest Hillary enablers out there., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/07/2016) It will be proven in Nov. when the 12 million Democrats who voted for tRump in the Primaries show up to vote for Hillary., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/07/2016) You have already imposed Hillary on this country by foisting the biggest asshole you find to run against her. Someone who you can identify with., 762×51►Apache4893: (08/03/2016) You and your 12 million Democrat buddies better show for tRump in November, otherwise he will only get about 2 million votes., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (08/01/2016) 12 million democrats that elected him in the primaries will be voting for Hitlery. He’s going to lose, always was. All of this is on you and your kind. The media has played you saps like a cheap fiddle., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (07/29/2016) Idiot, we warned you jackholes that tRump could not beat Hillary BEFORE he won the primaries., 762×51►KirklesWorth: (07/28/2016) If Hillary wins we will be ramming your weak, plurality candidate down YOUR throat, instead of you ramming him down ours. Our response will be, “told you so”., 762×51►pocketfrog: (07/20/2016) Probably since the Trumpanzees have forced the only candidate she could beat, upon us., 762×51►Mr_Paine: (07/18/2016) I suppose you are naive enough to believe that they will also vote for him in the general election, how amusing., 762×51►Mr_Paine: (07/17/2016) By backing tRump, you are helping Hillary win, you are therefore a Hillary supporter., 762×51►Mr_Paine: (07/16/2016) Nope, tRump is still the presumptive nominee, no sanity out there yet. Come back after your boy loses to Hillary though, so I can really abuse you for making that happen., 762×51: (03/09/2016) The Trumpanzees will never acknowledge that their boy is un-electable., 762×51►JeffersonSpinningInGrave: (12/07/2015) Progressives will either win in 2016, if there is an election, and go forward into the hard tyranny we are beginning to see now or they will create a scenario where by they seize power under some form of martial law and go forward into hard tyranny like w

  83. […] possible, this scenario makes even less sense than Sarah Silverman‘s call for a military coup. Yet CNN pays this deranged idiot to disgorge her opinions at […]

  84. […] comparably credible Sarah Silverman, who sees swastikas even when they are not there, blames the graffiti on Trump […]


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy