moonbattery logo

Aug 02 2013

Lid Begins to Come Off Benghazi

It’s beginning to become clear why Obama refused to rescue the Americans who died in Benghazi on September 11, 2012; why he absurdly attempted to blame the terror attack on an unwatched YouTube video out of California; why undocumented Democrat John Boner won’t appoint a select committee to get to the bottom of the matter; why our rulers don’t want to find out what really happened. They know what really happened. Soon we will too. The lid is coming loose:

Sources now tell CNN dozens of people working for the CIA were on the ground that night, and that the agency is going to great lengths to make sure whatever it was doing, remains a secret.

CNN has learned the CIA is involved in what one source calls an unprecedented attempt to keep the spy agency’s Benghazi secrets from ever leaking out.

Since January, some CIA operatives involved in the agency’s missions in Libya, have been subjected to frequent, even monthly polygraph examinations, according to a source with deep inside knowledge of the agency’s workings.

The goal of the questioning, according to sources, is to find out if anyone is talking to the media or Congress.

It is being described as pure intimidation, with the threat that any unauthorized CIA employee who leaks information could face the end of his or her career.

In exclusive communications obtained by CNN, one insider writes, “You don’t jeopardize yourself, you jeopardize your family as well.”

Another says, “You have no idea the amount of pressure being brought to bear on anyone with knowledge of this operation.”

The dead — Ambassador Chris Stevens, Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, and former SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods — were hardly the only Americans at the Benghazi consulate that night.

A source now tells CNN that number was 35, with as many as seven wounded, some seriously.

Who are they? Where are they? The Obama Regime does not want us to know. It is taking desperate measures, according to Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC):

“Including changing names, creating aliases. Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names.”

What was Obama up to that puts such an extravagant price on secrecy? We don’t know yet, but it appears to involve illicitly supplying missiles to the al Qaeda–linked terrorists who have been attempting to gain control of Syria as a step toward establishing a vast terrorist caliphate across the region to challenge American hegemony.

You put someone who holds to an anti-American ideology in charge of the Executive Branch, what would you expect to result if not treason?


On tips from Troy, TED, Ben S, and G. Fox.

24 Responses to “Lid Begins to Come Off Benghazi”

  1. Dr. 9 says:

    IMO, you can forget the HHS, Fast & Furious, AP, and IRS scandals. If republicans can somehow gather some strength, passion, and will, it is Benghazi that will bring down, not only the Marxist-in-Chief, but Hitlary as well. That’s why the Demoncrats are fighting so hard to derail the investigation. Just think of what that does to them in 2016.

  2. Comrade J says:

    Take the pictures of Hillary and Bambi, with blood of Americans flowing over, put it on every corner…

  3. Remember Benghazi says:

    Gun running to Syria or dingle Barry wanted to look like a hero and save his sinking poll numbers by rescuing all parties involed?

  4. Anonymous says:

    Charlie Rangel: Tea Party Is ‘Same Group’ Of ‘White Crackers’ Who Fought Civil Rights

    In an interview with the Daily Beast published Friday, Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) suggested Tea Partiers are the “same group” who fought for segregation during the Civil Rights movement.

    “It is the same group we faced in the South with those white crackers and the dogs and the police. They didn’t care about how they looked,” Rangel said.

  5. chronos the wonder pig says:

    bet ya that CNN cancels the scheduled broadcast (Tue 10PM EST) due to “technical difficulties” and replaces it with a Hillary campaign ad

  6. Xavier says:

    Just wait until one of the SAMs they were illegally supplying to Syrian rebels et. al. takes out a commercial airliner.

  7. RKae says:

    Well, looks like they’ll have to deny everything for about ten days to two weeks so the news cycle and the idiot voters will forget… as usual.

  8. KHarn says:

    Sometimes I can’t believe how STUPID the CIA can be about “secrets”. (This isn’t the first time I’ve heard about this sort of thing)


    “When the Libyans attacked, they didn’t know that we had over thirty ‘spooks’ holding a meeting there. Our men opened fire with their pistols and drove them away. No, we can’t tell you what the meeting was about, that’s classified”.

    There, was that so hard? People would have accepted that and the government wouldn’t look like a bunch of INCOMPETENT, TRAITOROUS, ASSHOLES.

  9. KHarn says:

    By The Way, I meant for the above “lie” to be told if they HAD FOUGHT instead of letting our people die!

  10. Conan says:

    A number of years ago I almost took a job with the CIA. THANK GOD I reenlisted in the Marines.

  11. jan says:

    4 americans killed in benghazi by alquida not by obama national scandel! over 4000 americans killed by bush neo-cons who cares sez fox news same for over 2000 killed on 9-11 because bush and neo-cons need second PEARL HARBOR! in there progress for new american century report 1998 look it up!

  12. Flu-Bird says:

    OPEN ME A CAN OF WORMS im hungry squawk squawk kkkaaahhhaaaccckkk

  13. KHarn says:

    “jan says:August 2, 2013 at 1:26 pm”

    COMMIES rely on accusations, not evidence. Let’s see some EVIDENCE.

  14. dan says:

    no conspiracy here….
    …it was a lone gunman with a magic bullet
    move along folks

  15. CGW409 says:

    Jan don’t need no proof jan’s a troofer and knows it could never be those sweet innocent mudslime extremists responsible for the events on 9-11-2001.
    It was ebil Booshitler that personally placed demo charges in the WTC complex and Pentagon.
    Jan knows cuz Rosie said so and you’d know too if you weren’t such a sheeple.

  16. jan says:

    proof? how about congo rice saying who could ever imagine terroists attacking building with plane? then shown picture of her walking past anti aircraft missle battery in milan italy a week before 9-11 to shoot down any plane trying to crash into bulding. her anwser I better stick to fox news they don’t ask hard questions of republicans! or bush telling cia when given report bin ladin determined to attack america with planes in august 2011 . his anwser ok the cia has covered its ass I will tell my cabinet not to fly commercial aircraft. because as they said in progress for new amerikkkan century in 1998! the needed second PEARL HARBOR! look it up sheeple.

  17. […] seems likely that the extreme “transparency” surrounding the fugazi in Benghazi is due to the terror attack having resulted from covert […]

  18. Whitey Whiteman III says:

    Jan, you ignorant slut.

  19. Jodie says:

    I don’t think jan understands what “proof” means.

  20. Agent 54 says:

    So, Obama was arming some jackalopes who double crossed us for some reason and attacked and killed our Ambassador and then he and Hillary covered it up to protect their own election prospects.

    We are witnessing the end of the United States of America.

  21. octa bright says:

    If you are refering to the conflicts in Iraq and Afganistan it should be noted that those actions were approved by Congress. The attacks of 9/11/01 were done by foreign nationals. Unless you are claiming that it was done by internal demolition, in which case the burden of proof lies with you to demonistrate that all of the evidence provided is false and your hypothises is more probable.

    As far as SAM batteries in NYC think of the scandal if they shot down a hyjacked jumbo-jet that crashed into Manhatten. That very easily could exceed the 9/11 death toll and I find it difficult to believe that the public would accept prior to 9/11 that such a carnage was the better choice.

    A alternate theory is that Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid conspired to encourage 9/11 to damage the economy and embarass the GOP. The above statement is stupid, irrisponsible, and improbable. I do hope that none of the readers are stupid enough to take it seriously or unethical enough to take it out of context.

    My point is that evidence must be used to refute other evidence. Speculation is acceptable only when the authorities improperly supress the evidence.

  22. jan says:

    bush alowed 9-11 to happen because neo-cons needed second pearl harbor and wanted to take publics mind off of how republicans on supreme court stole him 2000 election. far more evedence knaive then fool!

  23. jan says:

    unless this is democrat blog democrats who voted war also have the blood of those over 4000 dead americans on there hands! hillary voted for war she was not for for political reasons it cost her 2008 nomination and rightly so! dumb democrats will forgive in 2016 so get used to term president hillary clinton as 6 million more minority kids will have turned 18 and 4 million of them will vote!

  24. ZZMike says:

    They keep telling us “If you have nothing to hide,…..”

    So then, if they have nothing to hide, why hide it?

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy