moonbattery logo

Jul 26 2012

Moonbat Mayors Target Chick-fil-A

We have reached the appalling point in our decay into liberal totalitarianism where companies associated with traditional morality are not allowed to do business by militantly degenerate government authorities. Flamboyantly perverted Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has announced that Chick-fil-A will not be permitted to create jobs by building restaurants in his fiefdom because the CEO of the company opposes the blasphemous travesty of homosexual “marriage”:

“What the CEO has said as it relates to gay marriage and gay couples is not what I believe, but more importantly, it’s not what the people of Chicago believe. We just passed legislation as it relates to civil union and my goal and my hope … is that we now move on recognizing gay marriage. I do not believe that the CEO’s comments … reflects who we are as a city.”

The thought crime that precipitated this latest liberal assault on free enterprise:

Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy was quoted last week as saying he was “guilty as charged” for supporting, what he called the “biblical definition” of marriage as between a man and a woman.

“We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit. We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives. We give God thanks for that,” Cathy was quoted as saying.

Because he holds this highly conventional view — which any decent person would find admirable — his company is effectively banned from expanding business in the cesspool of corruption that gave us Barack Hussein Obama.

Emanuel piously screeches that Christian values “are not Chicago values.” What are Chicago values? Here’s a hint: Emanuel has opened his arms in welcome to the rabidly anti-Semitic, anti-Caucasian, and anti-American lunatic Louis Farrakhan.

Chicago isn’t alone in persecuting Chick-fil-A:

Boston Mayor Thomas Menino has said Chick-fil-A “doesn’t belong in Boston” because of Cathy’s discriminatory stance.

The word “discriminatory” in this context is particularly absurd, considering that the discrimination is against anyone who will not abandon conventional morality and embrace repugnant sexual abnormalities in the name of political correctness.

Because government has bloated to the point that it has total power over all human activity, verminous bureaurats will have no trouble keeping businesses associated with decency out of town:

Moreno said he has an ace in his back pocket if he runs into legal trouble: traffic and congestion issues caused by the store that have been the subject of behind-the-scenes negotiations for the last nine months.

The Muppets, frequently used as vehicles for corrosive left-wing ideology, are supporting our degenerate rulers by pulling toys from the restaurants:

“The Jim Henson Company has celebrated and embraced diversity and inclusiveness for over fifty years and we have notified Chick-Fil-A that we do not wish to partner with them on any future endeavors. Lisa Henson, our CEO is personally a strong supporter of gay marriage and has directed us to donate the payment we received from Chick-Fil-A to GLAAD.”

GLAAD is a warped moonbat sect devoted to mainstreaming depravity.

To his credit, Mike Huckabee has declared August 1 to be Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day. But why only August 1? If there’s a franchise within driving distance, countermoonbats should celebrate Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day at least once a week.

On tips from Shawn, AC, G. Fox, and Barry Soetoro.



96 Responses to “Moonbat Mayors Target Chick-fil-A”

  1. A. Levy says:

    We are seeing the results of our society becoming overly tolerant of radicals, gays, blacks, etc. and their causes. Of course, those radicals don’t see us as tolerant, simply weak and gullible. And one need only look around at this country to see how very right they are.

  2. Red Dawn says:

    It’s part of a pattern of obstruction of economic progress and jobs, by the democrat party, in the name of radical special interest factions like the militant mentally ill who choose to life the homo “sexual” lifestyle.

    We really need to think about splitting the country into red and blue.

  3. Comrade Terry says:

    I’ve never eaten at Chick-fil-A, but I’ll have to start.

  4. Clay says:

    It’s a shame, but, they’ll buckle and give in to the blackmail.

  5. Poncey Leftist Liberal says:

    “We are very much supportive of the family — the biblical definition of the family unit.”

    Genesis 22:2 Then God said, “Take your son , your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.

    Genesis 19:8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them.

    Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.

    Luke 14:26 Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple.

    deutoronomy 21:18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, then shall his father and his mother, bring him out unto the elders of his city, And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die.

  6. Laurie says:

    Based on this, whenever I want fast food, I’ll go to Chick-fil-a. Just like I stopped going to Walmart and now shop at Target exclusively.

    If for no other reason, it’ll p!ss off the groups of homosexuals who have no reason to live other than to protest things and pork each other in the rear. And of course, to p!ss off the closet homosexuals (liberals) who have no reason to live other than to protest things and WISH they could be porked in the rear.

  7. That’s just how Mayor Tiny Dancer rolls –
    http://www.CrimeInChicago.blogspot.com

  8. Uncle Pinko says:

    Dave, your hatred is consuming that it has warped any sense of humanity your body may have had at one point. And for what? How on earth do 2 men (or women) getting married have *any* effect on your life whatsoever? The simple answer is … they don’t.

    You are a sad excuse for a person. That you would use the ‘blasphemous’ to describe gay marriage is particularly ironic, as there is not one thing about you that is sacred or honors God.

  9. Laurie says:

    A. Levy you said: “…those radicals don’t see us as tolerant, simply weak and gullible.”

    You’re absolutely right! That’s why we need an uprising the likes of which they’ve never seen before. Fire back on them with everything they do and more. Lawsuits, riots, beatings, burned cars, etc (just like the Occupy riots). Inflict enough pain and they’ll stop. It’s that easy.

  10. Geeknerd says:

    Two hens cannot make any baby chicks.
    Two roosters cannot make any baby chicks.
    Only a rooseter AND a hen can make any baby chicks.

    And as to Nangleator and Poncey Leftist Liberal, the Devil can quote Scripture quite well. Try reading the whole Bible; at 3 or 4 chapters a day, you can do it in a year.

  11. Geeknerd says:

    But then again, without the Holy Spirit, you’ll never grasp the Bible’s true meaning. Seminaries are full of professors who’ve read the Bible–in the original languages–who still don’t get it.

  12. lao er um "Jackel" says:

    Yeah, Rahm RAWKZ!

    He should start banning the building of MOSQUES too!

    um, wait (liberal cognitive dissonance warning goes off in tiny brain) let me think about what I just said a minute….

  13. Uncle Pinko says:

    Hey Geeknerd. Please be sure to tell any childless hetero couple you see that they are 2nd class citizens.

    Let me know how that goes over.

  14. Unkle Pinko says:

    Because once we’ve identified all 2nd class citizens, there will be boxcars waiting to take them to the DNC ‘re-education’ camps in Montana.

    A little shower for the sake of Comrade Obama will wash all the ideological impurities away, right?

  15. nobarack08 says:

    Thanks for posting! likewise I am going to a chick-fil-a just to support them.

    This is government tyranny out in the open.

  16. Mickey Shea says:

    Personally, I’d be more concerned about murderous urban
    yoot savages playing the knockout game and blowing little kids out of their playgrounds than some businessman
    expressing his opinion…but that’s just me.

  17. blue says:

    anybody keeping track of how many people Romney bows to on his world tour?

    by my count:
    Romney – 0
    Obama -everybody

  18. Nangleator says:

    Uncle Pinko: “How on earth do 2 men (or women) getting married have *any* effect on your life whatsoever? The simple answer is … they don’t.”

    That was a tough one for me to understand, too. I thought, if two men getting married somewhere else endangered a wingnut’s marriage, then the wingnut’s marriage was already in danger.

    Then, I realized it’s not about a threat to marriage at all. It’s about privilege and the loss of same. Hint for white male Americans: When you feel oppressed, that feeling is a lie. What you’re really feeling is the loss of the ability to oppress someone else. It feels like others are getting your privileges, but they’re really just getting your rights.

    Welcome to America.

  19. AC says:

    This news item is about the persecution of a private citizen for speaking his mind and refusing to lay down his principles in favor of the politically correct way of thinking. Demanding that others embrace and celebrate your perversions is rooted in the same sort of intolerance formerly shown by the rednecks who would run gays out of town.

    At one point, straights made life hell for gays, even to the point of offering up physical violence. We have evolved past that, and the vast majority of society turns the other cheek.

    The gay activists have become what they once struggled against. They have become the purveyors of intolerance.

    Get over yourselves. Nobody cares what gross form of sex you’re having in a bathhouse in San Franfreakshow. What we’re tired of is constantly hearing about it, just as we would have little patience for lurid stories of heterosexual sluttery, as well as the constant strong-arm demands that we think as you do.

    Anyone who defines their public persona first and foremost by their lust for stinking anuses is in serious need of a reality check.

  20. Nongleator says:

    One more thing, gay marriage is a basic human right because as all of us intellectuals know, it’s marriage that is an obstacle to female freedom of expression. Uh, wait a minute.

    Oh, oh, now I get it, marriage should only be between tow women, or wait, BETTER YET, between women and DOGS.

    Now I’m REALLY getting turned on!

  21. son of a preacher man says:

    Genesis 22:2 Then God said, “Take your son , your only son, whom you love—Isaac—and go to the region of Moriah. Sacrifice him there as a burnt offering on a mountain I will show you.

    Was Issac killed by his father or did God stop him?

    Genesis 19:8 Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them.

    Said by a man living in Sodom trying to stop a gang of homosexuals intent on raping the male visitors sent to him to get him out of the city. This is what happens when you hang around amoral people.

    Ephesians 5:22 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.

    Why don’t you read a little further:
    Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

    Luke 14:26 Whoever comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, yes, and even life itself, cannot be my disciple.

    Again if you bothered to read further Christ is making a point not to have anthing in your life before God.

    deutoronomy 21:18 If a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, then shall his father and his mother, bring him out unto the elders of his city, And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die.

    Is it better to kill him in the womb before he becomes rebellious?

  22. Brian_Boru says:

    I’ve went to Chick-fil-A yesterday for lunch since hearing about this queer obnoxiousness. I’ll be going at least twice a week every week to give them my hard-earned dough in complete support for their stance on normalcy. Degenerate circus freak show exhibits are the most intolerant of them all.

  23. Chad White says:

    I plan to try their food!

  24. Nangleator says:

    son of a preacher man, on the detestable man Lot, sacrificing his two daughters to save himself… where in the Bible does it say the mob was homosexual men? How exactly would that trick have worked on homosexual men? Do you understand what homosexual means?

    Here’s the message of Sodom: “Now this was the sin of Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen.” Ezekiel 16:49-50

    So let’s talk again about gutting the food stamp program, welfare, Social Security, etc.

  25. Jimbo says:

    Liberals/radical homosexuals and their enablers are THE most intolerant, hateful people the world has ever known.

    Nothing from abhorrent places like Chicago or Boston has any place in my life. I reject Satan.

  26. St. Gilbert says:

    There is much cognitive dissonance amongst our Liberal friends. Natural Law Theory seems to be one thing that cannot be (or refuses to be) grasped by the Leftist mind.
    Let’s start with this simple notion: In principle, a man and a woman can procreate. Whether one or the other is sterile or past child-bearing years is incidental. By contrast, in principle, same-sex couples cannot procreate. There is nothing incidental about this. Only sexual complementarity can achieve the natural end of sexual behavior — producing new life. Homosexual “sex” is utterly closed to new life. It breaks from the proper order of nature. It is, by definition, a disorder. When disorder is introduced into an ordered system, breakdown occurs and there is a loss of human flourishing.

    As for the cognitive dissonance that exists in those who object to same-sex “marriage” and yet still accept a pro-contraception lifestyle, what moral principle do you stand upon that distinguishes sterile heterosexual sex from sterile homosexual “sex”? There is a direct link between contraception and the societal acceptance of homosexuality. A deep re-thinking needs to happen by those who accept contraception and then hypocritically reject the push for homosexual “marriage”.

  27. son of a preacher man says:

    “where in the Bible does it say the mob was homosexual men?”

    And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
    And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant’s house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night.
    And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.
    But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:
    And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.
    And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,
    And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
    Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
    And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.
    But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.
    And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.
    Gen 19: 1-11

    “How exactly would that trick have worked on homosexual men? Do you understand what homosexual means?” You will have to ask Lot. He was the one offering his daughters to gang of raping fags.

    “So let’s talk again about gutting the food stamp program, welfare, Social Security, etc.”

    Why do you want to change the topic?

  28. Kanaka Girl says:

    Rahm Emanual just hired the Nation of Islam Thugs (i.e. New Black Panther Party) to be the civilian security force in Chitcago, and we’re supposed to listen to him as the voice of morality and reason? I think NOT!

  29. Drury says:

    So lemme see if I get this right….Chitcago thug-in-charge Rahmbo Emanuel rejects the CEO of Chik-fil-A because of his stand that he is PRO traditional marriage. YET….he wholeheartedly accepts the vile racist scum farrakhan who happens to also be anti-gay marriage.

    http://thegrio.com/2012/05/29/louis-farakhan-slams-obamas-stance-on-gay-marriage/

    Hypocrisy knows no bounds with leftist turds.

  30. AC says:

    So let’s talk again about gutting the food stamp program, welfare, Social Security, etc.

    As long as you’re making up straw men from thin air, you forgot to quote this part:

    And Jesus said unto his disciples, “Let not a Democrat voter go without Mountain Dew or Doritos, or force him to cook for himself, and let not food expenses drain his wallet, leaving him unable to buy cigarettes and an iPhone.” And so Obama provided, and it was done.

  31. czuch says:

    And he has the “fruit of islam” as his citizen police force???? Thats what the bammster was talking about with his “just as well funded,trained,armed civilian police force”
    2012/2013,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

  32. Mikhail Evansky says:

    Thanks #son of a preacher man. It is always a blessing to have Light shining in the dungeon that liberals live in.
    Maybe one day they will see it, or maybe they will rot in the dungeon of decay they live in.

    As for the thread, my favourite fast food restaurant now is chick-fil-a.

  33. Nangleator says:

    “”Ya,da” is a Hebrew verb which is commonly translated as “know.” Its meaning is ambiguous. It appears 943 times elsewhere in the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament). Usually it means “to know a fact.” In only about a dozen of these cases does it refers to sexual activity; in these instances, the sexual meaning is always obvious. The text generally talks about a man “knowing” a woman and of her conceiving a child as a result of the “knowing.” With the possible exception of this verse, aAll such references involve heterosexual relationships.”

    From here: http://www.religioustolerance.org/hombibg192.htm

    So, I don’t see any homosexuality.

    “Why do you want to change the topic?”

    I don’t. Just pointing out that Republicans might not want to bring up the subject of Sodom and Gomorrah. It isn’t a morality tale about sex. It’s a warning not to be Republican.

  34. Nangleator says:

    St. Gilbert, homosexual marriage isn’t about procreating, obviously. It’s about a legally recognizing a relationship. That matters for many legal purposes.

  35. Dmgore says:

    Nangleator,
    How does a company that dosent discriminate against anyone, hires anyone and serves anyone, but who’s president supports marriage as defined between a man and a woman threaten same sex couples anywhere.
    “here at the museum of tolerance, intolerance will not be tolerated”
    Dm

  36. Alphamail says:

    Uncle Pinko says:

    Righteous fair-minded people everywhere should be applauding Dave for his commitment to forthrightness in the battle against an aggressive intolerant despicable homosexual agenda.

    Over the span of seven decades I have watched the gay populace morph from a basically quiet subdued minority to an in-your-face, up-your-butt, over-the-top conglomeration of marching Caligula misfits, Christian-bashing, tradition-smashing, bombastic, self-promoting degenerates.

    In the black community blacks call one another nigger with such frequency it boggles the mind. In the gay community the word faggot and queer are used with nearly the same frequency. But woe be unto anyone outside those communities who mentions the word nigger or queer.

    Hence, the epitome of the hypocritical double-standard that is the cornerstone of liberal thought.

    As far as gays are concerned, the less than 2% of the population that is homosexual has raised such an inordinate stink in their effort to legitimize what every oxygen breathing entity understands is not God bequeathed but is rather a chosen desire, they are rapidly undermining the very moral structure that has quietly acquiesced to their non-normal behavior.

    You essentially ask, what’s the riff if a man sleeps with another man or a woman wants to live her life with another woman? At one point in time I would have said nothing. But now 2% of the population is attempting to dictate what the rest of society should think, they are aggressively attacking and disparaging those who disagree with them, they are changing marriage, mores, and tradition, and are ramping up an unprecedented attack on Christianity – all done in the spirit of a kindergartner who isn’t getting his way.

    Unbelievers misrepresent and attempt to twist the Bible in such fashion it would be humorous were it not so sad. The Bible says homosexuality is wrong and I agree. But the Bible doesn’t say bash homosexuals or condemn them or deny them jobs, and it is grievous some people choose to project their personal unhappiness outwardly toward gays. That shouldn’t happen, especially with Christians.

    But Christians didn’t start this war with gays. You are attempting to change everything that is Christian – from Bible studies, to Crosses, to the Ten Commandments, to gender, to private club criteria, to marriage, to decency laws, to hiring preferences, to school agendas, and to free speech itself.

    It is always curious that gays don’t try this hard sell on Muslims. If you did you’d find out how comfortable it was living under Christian dogma.

  37. Dmgore says:

    Btw,
    Pretty sure nangleator is lao. Too many similarities to be coincidental.
    Dm

  38. AC says:

    I don’t. Just pointing out that Republicans might not want to bring up the subject of Sodom and Gomorrah. It isn’t a morality tale about sex. It’s a warning not to be Republican.

    I’m not a Christian, and even I know that the tale centers around God’s wrath against a city populated exclusively by the wicked. Abraham asked God to spare the city on behalf of the righteous if even ten righteous men could be found within, however no such righteous men existed.

    Sodom and Gomorrah were judged and destroyed because of the lack of individual righteousness and worth, not because their governments hadn’t erected ineffective and wasteful welfare systems at the collective level.

    Christian theology calls on Christians to be righteous and charitable in their own, individual, personal behavior. As the story goes, had ten individually charitable people existed there, the cities would have been spared, implying that God was not in the business of condemning good individuals for a failure to erect charity on a collective level.

    People can be generous and charitable without a governmental weapon pointed at their heads come April 15th.

    Perhaps you haven’t noticed the abundance of churches and synagogues caring for the poor and the downtrodden. Perhaps you are unaware of the theological background of organizations such as the Red Cross and the Salvation Army.

  39. M. Kraus says:

    It doesn’t surprise me that Mumbles Menino says Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. Anything for brownie points with Barney Frank. Disgusting.

  40. AC says:

    Unbelievers misrepresent and attempt to twist the Bible in such fashion it would be humorous were it not so sad. The Bible says homosexuality is wrong and I agree. But the Bible doesn’t say bash homosexuals or condemn them or deny them jobs, and it is grievous some people choose to project their personal unhappiness outwardly toward gays. That shouldn’t happen, especially with Christians.

    That had never stopped militant theophobes from dredging up Old Testament verses to attack Christians for views and laws made obsolete by the arrival of Jesus. If anything, they should be condemning Jews for the Old Testament ways, yet the militant perverts and theophobes tend to focus almost exclusively on Christians.

    Likewise, the far left goes out of its way to please Muslims, who are by far the most brutal of the lot when it comes to anti-gay violence. When was the last time a leftist extremist criticized Islam as the driving force behind the execution of homosexuals in the Middle East?

  41. son of a preacher man says:

    Wow, talk about willful ignorance. So when the fags show up and want to “know” the male visitors, they are just stopping by to hi.

    Lot offers them his daughters whom have not “known” a man and that definitly means have sex.

  42. wingmann says:

    I go there all the time.They rock.
    If you gays don’t like their”Stance”don’t give patronage to it.
    Trust me,their business will increase.
    People have respect for people/business that say what they mean and mean what they say…AND STAND BEHIND WHAT THEY SAID.(why i think allen west rocks)
    If they walk it back I will be really disappointed.
    Have the courage of your convictions and let the chips fall.

  43. Doug says:

    Pretty sure nangleator is lao.

    or at least he wants to marry him.

  44. Bubba says:

    Uncle Pinko says:
    July 26, 2012 at 8:24 am How on earth do 2 men (or women) getting married have *any* effect on your life whatsoever? The simple answer is … they don’t.

    How does a man that owns a fast food operation saying he supports traditional man-woman marriage affect YOU? The answer is, it doesn’t. He didn’t say anything about gays. He didn’t say he wouldn’t hire them, or serve them food, or anything of the sort. You get your panties (probably pink ones) all in a wad over nothing. Where’s the tolerance you phonies preach?

    BTW, Chick-fil-A’s chicken sandwich is delicious. I’ll support them any day of the week (except Sunday).

  45. Nangleator says:

    Hmm. I’m called gay and an amateur gynecologist on the same day.

  46. Ahmadinejad says:

    Dear mister Nangleator and Uncle Pinko:

    Thank you for doing my work so well today on this thread. Unfortunately, I cannot pay you until my UN check clears the Swiss bank. Don’t for a minute go back to thinking that your work for mister Soros will be any more lucrative. And please don’t forget, once we erect a minarets over the White House, we will make sure to take care of you both first and give you the royal Iranian treatment. How does that song go again? WE WILL WE WILL ROCK YOU. Love that Freddie Mercury. Too bad I couldn’t invite him the royal palace.

    warmest regards,
    Mahmoud

  47. wingmann says:

    Will catch y’all later…heading now to chic-fil-a for lunch.Go Hetros!
    Yummy!

  48. IslandLifer says:

    Alright! Love chic-fil-a! Especially now!! Now you other faggots take your Kermit and shove it up your nangelator!!!

  49. Naqamel says:

    Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed because of homosexuality, they were destroyed because of unrepentant sin. Rampant homosexuality was just ONE of the sins of Sodom and Gomorrah.
    That’s an important distinction to make.
    And these waffle fries are tasty. Thanks, Chic-Fil-A!

  50. St. Gilbert says:

    @Nangleator, 10:42 am.
    “It’s about legally recognizing a relationship.”

    It’s about legally recognizing a disordered relationship. Thus, people who understand Natural Law and the consequences of introducing disorder into a system, object in defense of trying to maintain proper, natural order in society.

  51. son of a preacher man says:

    Naqamel

    Agreed. Has more to do with what happens when narcissistic hedonism is the ruling principle in one’s life and how it can turn any human into such a vile creature.

  52. Nangleator says:

    I’ve heard ‘natural law’ and ‘order in society’ arguments before: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/slavery/ethics/justifications.shtml

  53. Winston Smith says:

    The leftist kooks always talk about FREEDOM but they are the first to do their best to deny the FREEDOM of others to have other viewpoints that conflict with liberal leftist views.

  54. St. Gilbert says:

    Erroneous concept of Natural Law. But error is what it takes to justify giving license to all destructive things. Natural Law, rightly understood, rejects slavery on the basis of a person’s intrinsic dignity and ultimate purpose.

  55. wingmann says:

    Just got back from chick-fil-a…
    I counted 47 people inside(at2pm)and cars wrapped 3/4ths around the building in the drive thru(maybe 14).
    Looks like goobermint oppression doesn’t work here in TEXAS.

  56. Jodie says:

    Geeknerd says:
    July 26, 2012 at 8:32 am

    “But then again, without the Holy Spirit, you’ll never grasp the Bible’s true meaning. Seminaries are full of professors who’ve read the Bible–in the original languages–who still don’t get it.”

    Right on!

  57. Nangleator says:

    Winston Smith, you want the freedom to prevent other people from being married? That’s not actually a freedom. Not for you. Certainly not for others.

  58. wingmann says:

    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    And I even had time to vote for tea party favorite Ted Cruz.

  59. octa bright says:

    @Nangleator
    This is a series of thought problems for you. Would it be acceptable for a county government to use regulations to attack a business who supported homosexual marrage? Would it be acceptable for a government agency to treat in an arbitrary and discriminatory manner a business whose officials supported the NAACP? Would it be acceptable for a government agency to retaliate against the company of a pro-choice officer? Unless you can say yes to those questions I believe that it would be advisable for you to rethink your position.
    What can be done for you today can be done to you tomorrow.

  60. Uncle Pinko says:

    Bubba, your are right about one thing: Chick-Fil-A’s food is delicious.

  61. Jester says:

    If you’re a conservative who holds the same position on same-sex marriage that Barack Obama publicly held up until a couple of months ago, you’re a bigot unworthy of even getting a business license. If you’re a practitioner of the Religion of Peace™ who advocates putting gays to the sword, though, no problem.

  62. Nangleator says:

    octa bright, I joined the conversation to point out the shaky ground of biblical justification, and stayed to defend gay marriage. I don’t condone government decisions of this sort. I wasn’t sure what the original comments or actions were that started this kerfuffle, since my googling resulted in only the more recent spate of reactions, instead of to the original story.

    Having found the original story, I’m surprised at what politicians are doing, in their official capacity.

  63. KHarn says:

    Since Chic-Fil-A is not welcome in chicago and Boston, they should CLOSE ALL THOSE SHOPS and move out.

    “Nangleator says:July 26, 2012 at 1:05 pm”

    Oh, so ONLY NOW you check the FACTS? And you are “surprised at what politicians are doing”? Not SHOCKED? Not ANGRY? Not INSULTED at the interferance in and the force used against a person because of his OPPINION?

    Do you even KNOW what it’s like to live in a FREE country? Have you ever wanted to know what it is like?

    How about the rest of you neo-commies?

  64. KHarn says:

    PS: “Et mor chikin”.

  65. Bob Roberts says:

    PROOF Nangleator CANNOT READ:

    Nangleator says: July 26, 2012 at 8:07 am
    ————————-

    Chick-fil-A President Dan Cathy was quoted last week as saying he was “guilty as charged” for supporting, what he called the “biblical definition” of marriage as between a man and a woman.

    —————–

    He didn’t say the Bible didn’t provide other examples of the way different cultures saw and did things, he said, clearly, that he was backing the concept, which you know you will find in the Bible, of proper marriage being that between one man and one woman.

    Look, I’m not a big fan of fast food. I will not lead anyone into any plan where we all start going there once or several times a week. In fact I think I’ve maybe been there twice in a decade and only because my brother wanted to go – and he bought stuff, I didn’t.

    Their locations are simply not convenient for me and, as I said, I’m not a huge fan of fast food.

    That said…

    Because of this, I personally WILL make it a point to find people who already eat their food and I will see to it that I get some of their food for those people at least once a month, perhaps more often if these idiots persist in attacking them FOR EXPRESSING A VALID AND REASONABLE OPINION.

  66. Bob Roberts says:

    Nangleator says: July 26, 2012 at 1:05 pm
    octa bright, I joined the conversation to point out the shaky ground of biblical justification, and stayed to defend gay marriage.
    ———————–
    Despite claims to the contrary and ongoing efforts to redefine marriage which, admittedly, are having some success mostly due to being imposed through the courts or by out of control moonbat led legislatures (with perhaps 1 exception, and I’m not even sure about that, EVERY time this comes up for a vote it gets defeated soundly), the TRUE definition of marriage remains “a union between one man and one woman with the primary purpose being to create the possibility of new life and a nurturing, optimum situation for that new life.”

    Or something along those lines.

    There is no such thing in the real world (you may argue that in a handful of states and countries around the world that is no longer true, but it really is, they are just deluding themselves) as “gay marriage” even though some have taken to calling it that. Because marriage still is what it always was and will still be even if a majority of people in a majority of states or countries is fooled into believing otherwise.

    There is something people like you and the other trolls just don’t understand about facts, truth and logic.

    None of them care what you say, what you think, or how many of you believe otherwise – they still are what they are.

  67. Bob Roberts says:

    octa bright says: July 26, 2012 at 12:36 pm
    ————–
    One question back at you.

    Did he answer ANY of your questions, or just pretend he didn’t get how much sense they made?

  68. Bob Roberts says:

    wingmann says: July 26, 2012 at 12:30 pm
    ———————-
    I bet the FISH on the backs of cars rarely have LEGS there, also, from what I remember when I lived there.

    Imagine that – liberals putting fish that have legs on their cars!

    Must not get out much!

    Also, what about this “coexist” symbol they keep pushing even though they’re the ones who fuss when anyone says or does anything, the slightest thing, they’re against.

    Plus their rules are always for EVERYONE ELSE to follow. I don’t notice Obama sending his OCCU-TARD army against his rich donors – do you?

  69. Bob Roberts says:

    Nangleator says: July 26, 2012 at 12:31 pm
    Winston Smith, you want the freedom to prevent other people from being married? That’s not actually a freedom. Not for you. Certainly not for others.
    —————–
    LIAR!

    They all can get married – they just have to follow THE EXACT SAME RULES EVERYONE ELSE DOES!

    How about this – what if gay people decided, to make a point of how oppressed they are – that they had the right to drive the wrong way on the freeways of this great nation. How long do you think that would last?

    You will claim it’s not the same, but IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME.

    All people – doesn’t matter if they’re male, female, black, white, rich, poor, gay or straight (or any other nonsese) – all people must choose a marriage partner OF THE OPPOSITE SEX. This is ONE RULE that ALL MUST FOLLOW. Trying to do the opposite is JUST LIKE DECIDING THEY WANT TO DRIVE THE WRONG WAY ON THE FREEWAY!

  70. Bob Roberts says:

    Nangleator says: July 26, 2012 at 12:02 pm
    ———-
    Yeah and Democrats were the ones who first wanted to keep slavery then second wanted to keep segregation.

    Try to stay on topic – we’re not talking about slavery – Lincoln freed the slaves over a century ago.

    Just because someone might have falsely applied an argument 100+ years ago doesn’t mean that it is being falsely applied in this case.

    The reason you didn’t explain to us how the argument doesn’t fit here is because you know you cannot because it does.

  71. Bob Roberts says:

    Doug says: July 26, 2012 at 11:07 am
    Pretty sure nangleator is lao.
    ————–
    If not, he certainly studied under him.

    And I do mean “UNDER” him, if you catch my drift.

  72. Bob Roberts says:

    Uncle Pinko says: July 26, 2012 at 8:24 am

    You and people like you keep bringing “hate” into this – we don’t.

    You don’t understand this is just another assault on marriage and the family, which are the basis for society and necessary for the continuation of the species. See other posts if you don’t understand why as that has already been covered.

    AH, SO HE DOES GET IT!

    Nangleator says: July 26, 2012 at 10:42 am
    St. Gilbert, homosexual marriage isn’t about procreating, obviously. It’s about a legally recognizing a relationship. That matters for many legal purposes.
    ——–
    So you DO know, you admit, that since marriage IS about procreating and gay unions are just about getting government bennies, the two are NOT the same!

    Look, let me explain something to you. Marriage is only special because with it comes the possibility of new life, something that takes a man and a woman, not two men, not two women. No matter how much two men or two women howl and complain it’s not fair they can’t make new life without outside help, that simply is life.

    So why is it the government has anything to do with marriage in the first place? Do you know?

    Well, I’ll tell you:

    Because, first, the government has a vested interest in setting certain basic rules to ensure that there is a better chance for a marriage to succeed, produce children and raise them successfully. You will of course now argue that they’re failing in that respect and that is not an argument relevant to this discussion because all your doing is pointing out why we need less government, not more, because government tends to fail more than it succeeds, unfortunately. Any arguments you make about the heterosexual divorce rate or heterosexual families that are train wrecks does not change the fact that it takes one man and one woman to make a baby and that the government has a vested interest in having some basic rule making control over that.

    Plus the government has an interest in making sure that the children become good taxpayers, not lawbreakers. And, of course, not occu-tards!

    So this is why governments are in the marriage racket. None of these reasons applies when you’re talking about two men or two women – in fact they CANNOT make new life, cannot create new potential taxpayers without outside help, so I’m going to point out the obvious fact that THEY DO NOT DESERVE THE SAME CONSIDERATION BECAUSE THEY CANNOT PRODUCE THE SAME EFFECT.

    You can go on and argue that (1 man + 1 woman) = 2 men = 2 women all you want. You can believe it if you care to do so.

    Just don’t expect us to be as stupid as you, because by doing that you are proving that and only that.

  73. Bob Roberts says:

    St. Gilbert says: July 26, 2012 at 9:54 am
    ———–
    I would like to add that denying one man and one woman the right to marry based on alleged infertility of one or both WOULD be a violation because that would be denying them a right everyone else has based on a disability, a medical condition.

    And besides, they said my sister in law was infertile and would never get pregnant – now she’s the proud mother of a wonderful little girl. Produced 100% the old fashioned way (GO TONY!).

  74. Bob Roberts says:

    Nangleator says: July 26, 2012 at 9:49 am
    So let’s talk again about gutting the food stamp program, welfare, Social Security, etc.
    ————
    Why would YOU want to gut the food stamp program, welfare and Social Security.

    Let’s take each one in reverse order presented:

    Since DEMOCRATS set up Social Security as the ultimate PONZI scheme, only to be hoisted by their own petards once capitalism led to a doubling of the average lifespan and lifesaving, if expensive, medical techniques, it’s funny that you complain about this. For Conservatives don’t want to “GUT” Social Security, they want to replace it with an honest program that isn’t just a way for government to steal more of your money and hope you die before you get a chance to get any of it back.

    By the way, how much of what the government collected over the years for this program is still in the trust fund as actual cash and how much is worthless government paper?

    Welfare – the program BILL CLINTON “GUTTED”, actually it wasn’t him but he took credit for it. Congress did it under him and it was a good move. For they didn’t “GUT” it, they made it workable. They made it a hand instead of a handout. People were at last put into a path towards self-sufficiency instead of perpetual need with no chance to ever become achievers. This was, before the reforms, and more are needed, but Obama just rolled them back, pretty much an example of modern day slavery. Just keep voting Democrat and we’ll keep that check coming. Meanwhile that money comes from people who rightfully earned it only to have the government steal it and give it to those who didn’t.

    Food Stamps Obama is properly known as the “food stamp President” and the vast number of those who’ve been forced to get on the program have Obama and the Democrats to blame. Nobody but YOU is talking about “GUTTING” food stamps. We do need to do some more reasonable checking regarding both who goes on them and how they use them and I know this first hand – for I know people who take their food stamp money, let others buy food with it and they take cash, often at 50 cents to the dollar, which they then use for drugs, alcohol and such. Food stamps were never meant to enable drug and alcohol abuse, yet that is exactly what is going on with many food stamp recipients.

    So YOU can go ahead and talk about gutting these programs all YOU want. But you’re talking, and lying, to yourself, as usual. We just want them to be reformed , replaced or whatnot as is reasonable and proper.

  75. Bob Roberts says:

    And another note to the pathetically obnoxious troll Nangleator:

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=14624

    Steven – isn’t it past your bedtime?

  76. Bob Roberts says:

    Uncle Pinko says: July 26, 2012 at 8:36 am
    Hey Geeknerd. Please be sure to tell any childless hetero couple you see that they are 2nd class citizens.
    ———–
    Yeah, but what’s your address so we can tell them YOU SAID SO!

    They’re not “2nd class citizens”, they have to follow the same rules as everyone else, that’s all.

    Starting with “when you want to get married, the first thing you do is pick a member of the opposite sex to marry!”

  77. Bob Roberts says:

    Oh, I thought you said “homo”, my bad. Still makes more sense than what you said. Childless HETERO couples are not 2nd class citizens by any measure.

  78. Wilberforce says:

    Hope you see this, but:

    Way to go, AC. I’ve got to hand it to you because as a Christian, I find that lately it’s people like you who are self-professed non-Christians that are actually making a better apologetic case for Christianity than the unbelievers. And I thank you for that.

    More of an indictment on the Christian community, really. Applause, mate 🙂

  79. Paul Revere says:

    You can barely get into one here they are do Packed. We here in the south love God, Country, & the Opposite Sex…..you mentally I’ll homosexuals stay in San Fran! Stay far away from the south. Ae are fully prepared for saving our way of life. Country folk can survive. Shut the power off in NY and people will starve! It’s coming, head for the hills!!!

  80. Paul Revere says:

    You know I hate talk to text!

  81. Narrator 1 says:

    “Emanuel piously screeches that Christian values ‘are not Chicago values’.”

    You know what they say about broken clocks? Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Thanks for the telling slip, Dead Fish.

  82. Ruby says:

    Will someone please tell me what “lao” means? Thanks.

  83. Alan says:

    +++

    I hope you all have enjoyed your little flame war. I didn’t. Getting back to the central issue here…

    So a company CEO made some offhand political comments, and so other business and political elements who disagree are attempting a boycott. Which is their right, however unwise it may be.

    I don’t agree with everything Bill Gates says and does but I’m typing this on Microsoft Windows. Tom Cruise has said batty things in the past but his films still earn billions. We buy oil from the Saudi Royal Family who … Anyway, it’s the product, not the people.

    In a time of high unemployment, Chick-Fil-A provides entry-level work to young people and minorites in a clean, pleasant environment. (Every CFA I’ve been in was spotless and well-managed) Franchise opportunities for managers enable hard-working folks to realize their professional ambitions. CFA’s advertising is clever, and lest we forget, ALL STORES ARE CLOSED SUNDAYS, which is unheard of in the hospitality industry, of which I was a member for a good decade. Any city attempting to ban such a company does so at its own economic risk.

    Even larger issue: Most people are aware the Muppets are owned by pro-gay Disney, which has (or had) ties to McDonalds and Burger King. Anybody care to bet Mayor Emanuel owns stock or received campaign donations from one or both? Just wondering.

    I also wonder how many adult bookstores, porno shops, liquor stores and tobacco shops are in Chicago. That, friends, is an issue for another link.

  84. Alan says:

    ^^ another thread. Long day at work.

  85. Nangleator says:

    Look at all the muck that floated to the top when I stirred the pot!

    I keep getting called lao and Steven. Just for one last time, I’ll say nope. You haven’t found me yet. But it’s a pretty clear signal to me that my arguments are hitting their targets: You are trying to attack me directly, personally. (The guy who throws the chess pieces at the other guy isn’t winning.)

    And good gravy, comparing gay marriage to driving on the wrong side of the highway, saying it’s the same thing… wow. You never consider actual repercussions, it’s obvious.

  86. 762x51 says:

    I regularly boycott liberal companies including Progressive Insurance.

    I do not usually eat at Chick-fil-a but will start and I will eat there once a week for the rest of the year.

    In addition, I will review the other companies I have done business with and find at least one additional lib supportive business and boycott them as well.

  87. Stephan the Original says:

    “And good gravy, comparing gay marriage to driving on the wrong side of the highway, saying it’s the same thing…”

    Ummm, yeah – since every human being is compatible with the opposite sex, it is actually a no-brainer. And then given the diseases associated with homosexual behaviour which leads to an average reduced lifespan, it’s not really a stretch to point out that it’s not an activity that enhances life just like driving on the wrong side of the road is not.

    Everybody has a mother and father, including you. They must be so proud of your think-ability to ignore 100% of the evidence.

  88. missraveusa says:

    Magnificent points altogether, you just won a new reader. What would you suggest in regards to your post that you just made some days in the past? Any certain?


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy