moonbattery logo

Dec 30 2015

Muslim ACLU Bigwig “Emphatically” Refuses to Condemn Islamic Terrorism

Muslims are still a tiny percentage of the US population, and already they are gaining enough leverage to dispense with the taqiyya:

Rana Elmir, an American Muslim and deputy director of the ACLU of Michigan, says that she “emphatically” refuses to condemn jihadist terrorists “just because I’m Muslim.”

In her provocative article in Monday’s Washington Post, Elmir claims that she is often asked to condemn Islamic terrorism, to which she replies: “I emphatically refuse.”

She defends her stance with a grab bag of standard liberal tactics, including misdirection, tu quoque, moral equivalence, relativism, and dubious assertions, shouting that “mostly white men” commit a mass killing every 2 weeks in the USA, therefore the 27,529 lethal Muslim terror attacks since 9/11 are A-okay.

Never mind the fundamental difference between isolated outbreaks of psychosis and acts consciously committed as part of a terror war. It is as if a Japanese writer in 1941 refused to condemn Pearl Harbor, and justified it with the claim that every 2 weeks people get hurt in airplane accidents involving white pilots.

Well, maybe she hasn’t completely discarded the taqiyya:

“Muslims across the globe are not threats. They are threatened,” she wrote.

Tell that to the Christians watching their children get beheaded and crucified by the Islamic State.

“Condemnation,” she says, “becomes our admission of guilt.”

That the Post would publish such a piece tells you all you need to know about WaPo. That it would employ this evil creature tells you all you need to know about the ACLU.

rana-elmir
The enemy within never wants for a megaphone.

On tips from Torcer and Rob E.



51 Responses to “Muslim ACLU Bigwig “Emphatically” Refuses to Condemn Islamic Terrorism”

  1. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    ACLU condones terrorism.

  2. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    ACLU condones terrorism.

  3. Giorgio Palmas says:

    Let’s air drop her into Saudi Arabia in a thong and Plexiglas stripper shoes and watch the fun ensue.

  4. Giorgio Palmas says:

    Let’s air drop her into Saudi Arabia in a thong and Plexiglas stripper shoes and watch the fun ensue.

  5. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    White privilege, “Condemnation,” she says, “becomes our admission of guilt.”

  6. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    White privilege, “Condemnation,” she says, “becomes our admission of guilt.”

  7. SammyPrissy12 says:

    Ugly, inside and out.

  8. SammyPrissy12 says:

    Ugly, inside and out.

  9. Jim says:

    Where’s her burqa? Who let her out of her home without a male family member?

  10. Jim says:

    Where’s her burqa? Who let her out of her home without a male family member?

  11. Xavier says:

    “Muslims across the globe are not threats. They are threatened,” she wrote.

    And who are they threatened by? Moslems!

  12. Xavier says:

    “Muslims across the globe are not threats. They are threatened”

    And who are they threatened by? Moslems!

  13. […] (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Source link […]

  14. Jack Fisher says:

    an islam torched his own mosk.

    very cool.

  15. Jack Fisher says:

    an islam torched his own mosk.

    very cool.

  16. Henry says:

    No head bag? Rana is not muslim… (I’ll bet $1.00 she eats bacon…)

  17. Henry says:

    No head bag? Rana is not muslim… (I’ll bet $1.00 she eats bacon…)

  18. chris black says:

    The terrible Hate Crime Christmas fire at the Texas Mosque was just discovered to be: Wait For IT: started by a Muslim Member of the Mosque!

  19. chris black says:

    The terrible Hate Crime Christmas fire at the Texas Mosque was just discovered to be: Wait For IT: started by a Muslim Member of the Mosque!

  20. Vic Kelley says:

    I feel sorry for that fella in the photo holding the ACLU card. He’s very homely looking. A better haircut and different glasses would help.

  21. Vic Kelley says:

    I feel sorry for that fella in the photo holding the ACLU card. He’s very homely looking. A better haircut and different glasses would help.

  22. oldguy says:

    Duly noted.

  23. oldguy says:

    Duly noted.

  24. NotKennedy says:

    That one looks like a viable candidate for “transgendering”.

  25. NotKennedy says:

    That one looks like a viable candidate for “transgendering”.

  26. NotKennedy says:

    “Well I’m not dumb but I can’t understand
    Why she walked like a woman and talked like a man
    Oh my Lola la-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola”
    If not for the lack of laryngeal prominence, it might go either way.

  27. NotKennedy says:

    “Well I’m not dumb but I can’t understand
    Why she walked like a woman and talked like a man
    Oh my Lola la-la-la-la Lola la-la-la-la Lola”
    If not for the lack of laryngeal prominence, it might go either way.

  28. NotKennedy says:

    I think her man may be in her purse.

  29. NotKennedy says:

    I think her man may be in her purse.

  30. Bill T says:

    Muslim Students Demand TOTAL BAN On All ‘Islamophobic Speech’ At Taxpayer-Funded College
    http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/30/muslim-students-demand-total-ban-on-all-islamophobic-speech-at-taxpayer-funded-college/#ixzz3vogkqgZV

    The Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University is calling on officials at the public, taxpayer-funded school develop a formal policy outlawing political speech they dislike.

    The demand to suppress free speech is part of a larger list of demands that is similar to the various lists proposed in recent months by black leftists on campus around the country, reports The College Fix.

    The highlight of the extensive list of demands from “We the Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University” is a call for a ban on “Islamophobic speech” and, in fact, “bigotry towards any other identity group.”

    “We demand that the SDSU administration enact a zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions as well as targeted bigotry toward any other identity group,” reads the first demand of the SDSU administration.
    http://www.ktrh.com/articles/national-news-104668/muslim-students-demand-total-ban-on-14233482

  31. Bill T says:

    Muslim Students Demand TOTAL BAN On All ‘Islamophobic Speech’ At Taxpayer-Funded College
    http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/30/muslim-students-demand-total-ban-on-all-islamophobic-speech-at-taxpayer-funded-college/#ixzz3vogkqgZV

    The Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University is calling on officials at the public, taxpayer-funded school develop a formal policy outlawing political speech they dislike.

    The demand to suppress free speech is part of a larger list of demands that is similar to the various lists proposed in recent months by black leftists on campus around the country, reports The College Fix.

    The highlight of the extensive list of demands from “We the Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University” is a call for a ban on “Islamophobic speech” and, in fact, “bigotry towards any other identity group.”

    “We demand that the SDSU administration enact a zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions as well as targeted bigotry toward any other identity group,” reads the first demand of the SDSU administration.
    http://www.ktrh.com/articles/national-news-104668/muslim-students-demand-total-ban-on-14233482

  32. Hans Pfall says:

    Can’t wiggle out of this one, b*tch. Neither can the ACLU. She said it, is on record as saying it, and is clearly identifying herself as a Deputy Director with the ACLU in that very unambiguous photo.

    She will not denounce terrorism. The reasons are meaningless justification.

    We will NEVER let you forget this.

    Ever.

  33. Hans Pfall says:

    Can’t wiggle out of this one, b*tch. Neither can the ACLU. She said it, is on record as saying it, and is clearly identifying herself as a Deputy Director with the ACLU in that very unambiguous photo.

    She will not denounce terrorism. The reasons are meaningless justification.

    We will NEVER let you forget this.

    Ever.

  34. Hans Pfall says:

    Well, since Moslems are totally fine with the treatment of women as property, then the punchline to the above photo

    “…nothing, you already told her once.”

    shouldn’t be offensive to them. After all, you just cannot condemn anything Islamic, right Ms. Elmir?

  35. Hans Pfall says:

    Well, since Moslems are totally fine with the treatment of women as property, then the punchline to the above photo

    “…nothing, you already told her once.”

    shouldn’t be offensive to them. After all, you just cannot condemn anything Islamic, right Ms. Elmir?

  36. Jester says:

    FINALLY a Muslim woman who would actually look better in a burqa.

  37. Jester says:

    FINALLY a Muslim woman who would actually look better in a burqa.

  38. Donna M says:

    That’s “AMERICAN” CIVIL LIBERTIES stamped on your union card!
    Mz “Muslim”, Rana Elmir!
    Better remember that, before you and your misguided cohorts open your mouths!

  39. Donna M says:

    That’s “AMERICAN” CIVIL LIBERTIES stamped on your union card!
    Mz “Muslim”, Rana Elmir!
    Better remember that, before you and your misguided cohorts open your mouths!

  40. Donna M says:

    Wouldn’t want you to get, accidentally “stoned to death”, by an “errant” misjudgement from one of your patriotic, “Muslim terrorist” contemporaries!
    Or thrown off a high wall, after being maimed and blinded by sulfuric acid!
    Oh, how unfortunate!
    For you…to be a liberated Muslim woman…

  41. Donna M says:

    Wouldn’t want you to get, accidentally “stoned to death”, by an “errant” misjudgement from one of your patriotic, “Muslim terrorist” contemporaries!
    Or thrown off a high wall, after being maimed and blinded by sulfuric acid!
    Oh, how unfortunate!
    For you…to be a liberated Muslim woman…

  42. liz says:

    Exactly!

  43. liz says:

    Exactly!

  44. Jack says:

    This filth needs to be purged.

  45. Agrippa says:

    Or, his balls, at least.

  46. Agrippa says:

    Or, his balls, at least.

  47. sf44 says:

    Her article in the WaPo has over 3300 comments, and a huge percentage support her warped viewpoint.

    Note that she said she has repeatedly been asked to condemn simply “terrorism,” and emphatically refuses to do so. Note that the question–as stated by HER–was NOT “Do you condemn *Muslim* terrorism” but simply “terrorism.”

    She emphatically refused to do even that. Bloodthirsty scum.

  48. sf44 says:

    Her article in the WaPo has over 3300 comments, and a huge percentage support her warped viewpoint.

    Note that she said she has repeatedly been asked to condemn simply “terrorism,” and emphatically refuses to do so. Note that the question–as stated by HER–was NOT “Do you condemn *Muslim* terrorism” but simply “terrorism.”

    She emphatically refused to do even that. Bloodthirsty scum.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy