moonbattery logo

Apr 15 2015

Neo-Marxist Rhetoric From Zillionaire Shrillary

The hypocrisy is enough to unhinge your jaw. Fresh on the heels of learning that Slick Willie and Shrillary have raked in a staggering $2 billion through their notoriously corrupt Clinton Foundation, we read this:

Hillary Clinton, under pressure from the left wing of her Democratic Party to aggressively campaign against income inequality, voiced concern about the hefty paychecks of some corporate executives in an email to supporters.

Striking a populist note, Clinton, who announced on Sunday she was running for president in 2016, said American families were still facing financial hardship at a time “when the average CEO makes about 300 times what the average worker makes.”

Considering the explosion in donations to the Clinton Foundation evidently inspired by her influence peddling to foreign governments, and the $billions that went missing from the State Department while she was at the helm, it is conceivable that Secretary of State Shrillary was recently making 300 times what an average CEO makes. Given the Clintons’ infamous knack for monetizing political power, if she makes it back into the White House, she will make more still.

Liberals fret about “income inequality” for the same reason they respond to water shortages by regulating how long you can spend in the shower, rather than building more reservoirs. Oligarchical collectivism entails looking at wealth as a fixed pie, to be divvied up by the oligarchy. Their lunatic ideology literally requires them to believe that you can only become rich by making others poor.

Americans, in stark contrast, know that a rising tide lifts all boats.

What is better: to get $10 and see another guy get $20, or for you both to get $5 regardless of effort or effectiveness? The answer to this question determines whether you are a moonbat or an American.

The objection to income inequality is morally shameful. Imagine applying it to baseball by redistributing wins from good teams to bad teams, working progressively toward the utopian goal of every team posting a .500 record every season. Only a moonbat would regard that as fair or desirable.

Like all things Democrat, the objection is not only foolish but fake. Hyper-regulated liberal crony capitalism actually leads to greater income disparities:

The Brookings Institution used 2012 Census data to determine the most income unequal cities in America — and their study found that from LA to Atlanta, cities with liberal governments are also the ones with the largest divide between the poor and the rich.

The Brookings Institution is a liberal think tank.

You say most all cities have liberal governments? Okay, let’s compare states. Leftists like to measure income inequality with the Gini coefficient:

According to 2012 Census Bureau data (the latest available figures), the District of Columbia, New York, Connecticut, Mississippi and Louisiana have the highest measure of income inequality of all the states; Wyoming, Alaska, Utah, Hawaii and New Hampshire have the lowest Gini coefficients. The three places that are most unequal—Washington, D.C., New York and Connecticut—are dominated by liberal policies and politicians. Four of the five states with the lowest Gini coefficients—Wyoming, Alaska, Utah and New Hampshire—are generally red states.

In the Northeast, the state with the lowest Gini coefficient is New Hampshire (.430), which has no income tax and a lower overall state tax burden than that of its much more liberal neighbors Massachusetts (Gini coefficient .480) and Vermont (.439). Texas is often regarded as an unregulated Wild West of winner-take-all-capitalism, while California is held up as the model of progressive government. Yet Texas has a lower Gini coefficient (.477) and a lower poverty rate (20.5%) than California (Gini coefficient .482, poverty rate 25.8%).

If progs were at least sincere in their morally bankrupt goal of achieving income equality, they would want a government more like Texas than California. But that is hardly what Shrillary has in mind. Being a Democrat, she is the farthest thing from sincere, and you can’t blame her. Imagine trying to run on this platform: All I care about is amassing power and wealth at your expense. That is about all she could say that wouldn’t be a lie.

hillary-clinton-queen

On tips from J, Petterssonp, and Tchhht!!!



17 Responses to “Neo-Marxist Rhetoric From Zillionaire Shrillary”

  1. | says:

    I’m glad to see someone finally separate leftists from genuine Americans and mean it.

    These people are not just your buddies or neighbors.

    It is long overdue that we stop treating these people like fellow Americans with differing opinions, and start treating them like the domestic enemies they are.

  2. | says:

    I’m glad to see someone finally separate leftists from genuine Americans and mean it.

    These people are not just your buddies or neighbors.

    It is long overdue that we stop treating these people like fellow Americans with differing opinions, and start treating them like the domestic enemies they are.

  3. wingmann says:

    clinton=SOCIOPATH.

    “A sociopath can be defined as a person who has Antisocial Personality
    Disorder. This disorder is characterized by a disregard for the feelings
    of others, a lack of remorse or shame, manipulative behavior, unchecked
    egocentricity, and the ability to lie in order to achieve one’s goals.”

    Being a sycophant and wanting her to be president is now known as a malady called Clintonopathy.

  4. wingmann says:

    clinton=SOCIOPATH.

    “A sociopath can be defined as a person who has Antisocial Personality
    Disorder. This disorder is characterized by a disregard for the feelings
    of others, a lack of remorse or shame, manipulative behavior, unchecked
    egocentricity, and the ability to lie in order to achieve one’s goals.”

    Being a sycophant and wanting her to be president is now known as a malady called Clintonopathy.

  5. Guest says:

    ☞☞☞I RECEIVED FIRST DRAFT OF $13000!@ak14:

    ,,,,

    ➨➨➨➨https://TopNetMoney.com/home/carton

    ✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣✣

  6. […] wonder Shrillary has taken to barking neo-Marxist rhetoric […]

  7. Bodhisattva says:

    And what did she have to say about people who demand huge fees – not to do anything productive, but merely to appear and give a short, liberal logic filled speech?

    Seriously – what could Hillary possibly have to offer that is worth $200,00?

    Perhaps if you invite her to explain how someone can complain that we pay people who produce things at a lower rate than she demands per minute to show up and talk nonsense?

    If anyone can spare $200K why don’t you hire her and ask her?

  8. Bodhisattva says:

    And what did she have to say about people who demand huge fees – not to do anything productive, but merely to appear and give a short, liberal logic filled speech?

    Seriously – what could Hillary possibly have to offer that is worth $200,00?

    Perhaps if you invite her to explain how someone can complain that we pay people who produce things at a lower rate than she demands per minute to show up and talk nonsense?

    If anyone can spare $200K why don’t you hire her and ask her?

  9. ab says:

    Please WATCH, SAVE, and SHARE this PRIMARY SOURCE video that should not only DISQUALIFY HILLARY CLINTON from ANY PUBLIC OFFICE but should serve as EVIDENCE against her in regard to her DISLOYALTY to the UNITED STATES of AMERICA. This is TREASON!

    The video is of WALTER CRONKITE accepting a lifetime achievement honor–the NORMAN COUSINS GLOBAL GOVERNANCE AWARD–from the WORLD FEDERALIST ASSOCIATION back in 1999. In his speech, you hear CRONKITE say such goodies as:

    “Americans are going to have to yield up some of our sovereignty–that’s going to be to many a bitter pill (5:56 mark);” “To deal with world problems, we need a system of enforceable world law (6:38);” “…all of which [c. 200 sovereign nations] are going to have to be convinced to give up some of that sovereignty to the better, greater union–…and it’s not going to be easy (7:00);” “Today the notion of unlimited national sovereignty means international anarchy (7:32);” “It [world government] will be a world where the overwhelming majority of national leaders will consistently abide by the rule of world law–if we have our way and can sell our program (6:32);” “And those who won’t obey the law,…will be dealt with effectively… (8:43);” “He [Pat Robertson] wrote any attempt to achieve world order before that time [return of the Messiah] must be the work of the Devil. Well join me, I am glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan (13:53).”

    Near the end of the clip (15:17 mark), HILLARY CLINTON appears in a video CONGRATULATING CRONKITE for his commitment and work toward establishing a ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT. She says: “For decades you told us the way it is, but tonight we honor you for fighting for the way it could be (16:03).” Keep in mind that she was the SITTING FIRST LADY at the time. And at the very end, the “distinguished” actor MICHAEL DOUGLAS is introduced to speak at the podium (17:05). Interesting!

    This is CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE that folks at the HIGHEST LEVELS of the US GOV’T and MEDIA have been CONSPIRING against the AMERICAN PEOPLE to OVERTHROW the REPUBLIC and establish a GLOBAL GOVERNMENT that WILL NOT be based on the PRINCIPLES of the SOCIAL CONTRACT, and thus our CONSTITUTION.

    youtubeDOTcom/watch?v=95Jfa95PLSI


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy