moonbattery logo

Oct 28 2017

NRA Responds to Risible CNN Ad

CNN positioned itself to be ridiculed with this absurd ad:

The NRA steps up:

Via Bearing Arms, on a tip from Torcer.

8 Responses to “NRA Responds to Risible CNN Ad”

  1. cylde says:

    Democrats love them some fruits and nuts.


    obama lied once again, this time when he said that elections have consequences.

    The way things look the democRAT party is still in power, no matter how badly they got creamed last November:

    House Intel Committee Reaches “Deal” Securing Fusion GPS Bank Records — Will Remain Confidential

    I mean since when do people under subpoena get to “make deals”!!!

    We may really need a THIRD PARTY because THIS IS IT… the GOP refuses to get it done!



    OlucyOlucy • a minute ago

    signed by an Obama Judge, Tanya Sue Chutkan, appointed by Obozo to DC
    District Court in 2014. And get this, her husband Peter Arno Krauthamer,
    sits on the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, also appointed
    by Obozo in 2011

    are 12 judges and 3 vacancies on this Court. 2 Clinton, 9 Obozo, and 1
    Trump and is exactly why Federal District and Appeals courts are as
    critical as the USSC.

    And why the Dems and RINOs continue to
    obstruct the 22 US Attorneys and 55 Judges Trump has nominated for US
    Courts of Appeals, District courts, Federal Claim Courts and Tax Courts.
    Some sitting in limbo since May. Of course, can’t forget the 190 Agency
    nominees still sitting and waiting.

  4. ramrodd says:

    The NRA has been selling out the American gun owner for over 100 years.
    They actively supported the NFA in 1934, the Gun Control Act in 1968 and the
    oppositely named Firearm Owners’ Protection Act of 1986 (FOPA) which removed the right of Americans to purchase new automatic or AOW weapons, a clear violation
    of the Second Amendment.

    All of this was done with the cooperation of the sellout Progressive owned and run Republican Party as well.

  5. ramrodd says:

    Dear NRA…..
    Stop “negotiating” excuses to INFRINGE on OUR RIGHTS.

    If there must be background checks, let’s try this idea…
    Are there any ‘legislators’ that are interested in a Constitutional
    Background Check?

    Since SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED means exactly that..

    Let’s try a “Background Check” that DOES NOT INFRINGE on anybodies
    RIGHTS…A FULL, IN DEPTH background check for ALL Politicians, Bureaucrats, and ALL government employees, and set MINIMAL INTELLIGENCE, JOB SKILLS AND CHARACTER QUALITIES that must be met before they can run for office,
    be appointed or hired.

    That way, WE, THE PEOPLE, get a much better class of politicians and
    bureaucrats, as well as EMPLOYEES that can be trained to do the jobs they are
    being hired for.

    Any bets on how hard the political class will fight to prevent it?

    THAT would be a Background Check that nearly ALL AMERICAN CITIZENS will
    support and I don’t much care if the illegals and their sycophants don’t like
    the idea.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy