moonbattery logo

Aug 15 2013

NY Times Exposé of Rotten Clinton Foundation

Hillary Clinton seemingly had a lock on the presidency in 2008; but then the powerbrokers in the media snatched it away and handed it to someone who would drive the stick even deeper into the eye of traditional America and those who love it. Now she supposedly has a lock on 2016. Yet the ruling oligarchy’s flagship publication has published an exposé on the cesspool known as the Clinton Foundation that might pry loose her grip from the prize. The Telegraph sums it up with this extract:

For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.

Lifting the rock to expose the Clinton Foundation hardly casts Shrillary Rotten in a favorable light. Those who follow politics closely are already aware that she is corruption incarnate. Liberals couldn’t care less; conservatives would vote against her anyway for being a socialist. The “undecided” low-information voters who determine election outcomes are dimly aware of Shrillary’s ethical shortcomings, but not being very bright, need to be reminded. The question is, why would the New York Times remind them?

Three possible answers come immediately to mind:

(1) The kingmakers at the Slimes know this info is going to come out anyway, so best to get it out there now to inoculate her. That way it will be “old news” before the election comes around.

(2) They want to weaken Shrillary, because the game plan calls for her to take the fall in 2016, the way McCain (apparently deliberately) took the fall in 2008. They might feel they can more aggressively advance their objectives without risk of revolt with a “Republican” collectivist authoritarian like Chris Christie in the White House. After all, Bush 43 was virtually a perfect president for the Left: he played Emmanuel Goldstein for the liberal base, allowing statists to indulge in anti-establishment posturing during a perpetual Two Minutes Hate; he dispersed resistance, because conservatives perceived that his opponents were even worse; and all the while he left the border undefended and caused the size of the federal behemoth to explode.

(3) There is an internecine power struggle, and the very powerful Slimes wants someone other than Shrillary to get the nomination.

If the answer is (3), we are left with the chilling question, what Democrat candidate could do even more damage to what’s left of America than an utterly unethical, ultra-left Alinskyite like Shrillary?

Sheila Jackson Lee could not be reached for comment.

hillary-benghazi-what-difference-does-it-make
(4) The elites figure she will lose anyway after this.

On tips from Bob Roberts, Spider, and G. Fox.



18 Responses to “NY Times Exposé of Rotten Clinton Foundation”

  1. Dr. 9 says:

    I believe the correct answer is #1. Get it out there so that any effect (it might) have will be totally diluted by the rest of the MSM in time for 2016. By that time, those who even remember Hitlary’s past deeds will have long forgotten. It’s a smart tactic from the Left’s deep bag of tricks.

    No one is more aware than the MSM as to just how short an attention span the sheeple really have. The pro-Hitlary push by the Left has already started, albeit quietly. But make no mistake, she is their choice for 2016, and their push will get harder as we get closer.

  2. Rides A Pale Horse says:

    “For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.”

    Yeah, but……..

    “What difference, at this point, does it make?”

  3. What successes?

    Strange Hills didn’t get her teeth whitened more often, or that the editor of that picture didn’t touch it up for her before allowing it to be published. Yellow teeth is more likely to sink her than anything she actually did, positive or negative. When it comes down to it, no one is going to vote for a bag lady to be President.

  4. Jodie says:

    “(1) The kingmakers at the Slimes know this info is going to come out anyway, so best to get it out there now to inoculate her. That way it will be “old news” before the election comes around.”

    That’s what I was thinking. The low-infos will forget all about this by election time.

    Here’s some food for thought (the kind of food that will give you e-coli symptoms): imagine Oprah Winfrey in Hillary’s cabinet.

  5. Strelnikov says:

    5) Run it early and then claim it’s “old news” when the campaign begins. (“Move on, you neanderthal sexist!”)
    6) Run it early and give her plenty of time to separate form the Foundation. (“That has nothing to do with her, you neanderthal sexist !”)

  6. sunbat says:

    SHE IS TOO OLD TO BE PRESIDENT…..SHE ALREADY HAS HAD A HEALTH SCARE THAT PREVENTED HER FROM TESTIFYING…RONALD REAGAN WAS SENILE IN HIS LAST TERM…this should be the talking points to the low info voter…help spread the word 😉

  7. sunbat says:

    she will be @78 in her 2nd term do the math…TOO OLD

  8. juandos says:

    The NY Times so called expose wasn’t an expose…

    It was an attempt to white wash some of the real scandals going on when Hillary the hag was at State…

    You know the Times piece would’ve been an expose if the following question had been asked,”what sort of fool gives these grifters money?“…

    How many of these Clinton Foundation benefactors have piece of the corruption pie (via cut outs) called rebuilding Iraq?

  9. Leonard Jones says:

    Does this surprise anyone? Whitewater and Castle Grande
    were classic cases of real estate fraud. When Clinton was governor of Arkansas, he was the Godfather of what the citizens called the “Arkansas Mafia.” Embezzling millions of dollars from his phony foundation is easier than bilking senior citizens out of real estate investments one at at a time.

    Obama is merely perfecting the practice of more than
    100 years of corrupt Democrat machine politics. With
    the expenditure of hundreds of billions of tax dollars
    to his political cronies, (Most of which declared
    bankruptcy) he could end up with a billion+ in a
    Swiss account by the time he leaves office.

  10. Jeff says:

    Also, people close to both Clintons have this nasty habit of dying when they are no longer useful to them. Documents vanish, only to turn up in the oddest of places. Hillary can have a book written, but when asked she managed to turn $1000 into $100,000 from cattle futures, then she “can’t recall”. Evil bitch

  11. Alborn says:

    We have Oblamer because Harry Reid cannot stand Shillary and encouraged O to run.

  12. Flu-Bird says:

    Where dose Hillary keep her Broom and flying monkeys?

  13. dooooooomed i tell ya says:

    4. Soros picked someone else.

  14. GoinSane says:

    1, but she’s too fat & ugly to be president.

    And what makes you think there will be an election in 2016?

  15. Jodie says:

    Soros (the Beast?) got Obama elected, no reason he couldn’t get Hillary elected:

    “For the past couple of months, I’ve been reading up on the Clinton/Soros connection into the wee hours of every night. Ever since George Soros slipped through the backdoor to American political power at the tawdry invitation of Bill and Hillary Clinton, he has carpet-bagged his way to the Democrat Party inner circle and has become the “biggest political fat cat of all time.” With more than $7 billion in his little Hungarian carpetbag, he thinks he can buy the Presidency for Hillary Clinton and get back into the throne-room of worldly hegemony — the Oval Office.

    In 1995, George Soros appeared on PBS with Charlie Rose, and said this:

    “I like to influence policy. I was not able to get to George Bush (Senior). But now I think I have succeeded with my influence…I do now have great access in the (Clinton) administration. There is no question about this. We actually work together as a team.”

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/hillary_soros_alinsky_and_rush.html

    “Hillary Clinton George Soros Connection

    Until June of 2004 George Soros and Hillary Clinton had gone to great lengths to conceal their collaboration from the Public eye.

    The causes Soros champions are precisely those dearest to hillary’s heart. such as rationing healthcare, rolling back gun rights, and extending the votingfranchise to convicted felons. Hillarys radicalism is deep rooted and fundamental , bearing the clear imprint of her early mentor Saul Alinsky Hillarys 1969 senior thesis at Wellesley College was a 75 page salute to Alinsky.

    Hillarys efforts to cultivate a “moderate” or “Centrist” Public image. faithfully reflect Alinsky’s teachings.

    Unusual is the speed with which Hillary rose to party leadership,winning plumb committee assignments which normally should have gone to more senior colleagues.

    *** In January 2003 Hillary was appointed Chair Woman of the powerful Senate Democratic steering and coordination Committee. This gave her authority to make or break Senate Democtats by blocking or approving their committee assignments. A Senate aid confided “The other Democrats resent her. bur they are so weak,their weakness permits her to grow.”

    Hillary also gained control of the Democratic money machine.When Clinton loyalist Terry McAuliffe

    became chairman of the Democratic National Committee. in 2001. This left McAuliffe and thus Hillary in charge of official fund raising for the Democratic Party.

    Hillary helped set up a network of independant fund raising groups which could continue collecting unlimited donations outside official party channels. George Soros and Harold Ickes coordinated their activities.

    Hillary and her partner George Soros remain secretive about many details of their collaboration, and with good reason”

    http://seniorcitizenspublicsquare.com/2012/03/21/hillary-clinton-george-soros-connection/

    “A founding member of the Ready for Hillary PAC’s Finance Council is a member of George Soros’ progressive donor network, The Democracy Alliance, and has links to controversial progressive organizations Media Matters for America and the Tides Foundation.

    San Francisco environmentalist Susie Tompkins Buell is one of the key founding members of the Finance Council for Ready for Hillary, a super PAC that hopes to build a strong coalition of donors and online supporters in preparation for Hillary Clinton’s expected 2016 presidential campaign. Buell is one of the only known members of the Finance Council at this point, along with Houston lawyer Steve Mostyn and his wife, Amber, who were among the top contributors to President Obama’s 2012 super PAC Priorities USA.

    Buell, a co-founder of the Esprit clothing line, is a member of the Democracy Alliance, a secretive “donor club” co-founded by progressive billionaire George Soros that helped steer millions in funding to the left-wing organizations Media Matters and the Center for American Progress, and was integral in securing Obama’s re-election victory.”

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/26/hillary-clinton-super-pac-fundraiser-linked-to-soros-media-matters/#ixzz2c60EUTED

  16. Flu-Bird says:

    Soros needs to be banished from america for life and his gun control group IANSA needs to go with him

  17. Mr Galt says:

    Clearing the deck for a Moochelle run, or perhaps Obama’s 3rd term (lifelong appointment)?

  18. Flu-Bird says:

    The antichist is surly a liberal


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy