moonbattery logo

Mar 26 2012

Obama Promises Medvedev He Will Sell Out USA After Election

The USA spent $trillions on a nuclear arsenal to prevent Russians from imposing communist totalitarianism on the free world. The money was wasted. We now have a president who for all intents and purposes is a communist and who is planning to sell us out to Russia:

Unaware that a microphone was recording him, President Obama asked outgoing Russian President Dmitry Medvedev Monday for breathing room until after Mr. Obama’s re-election campaign to negotiate on missile defense.

“On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me space,” Mr. Obama told Mr. Medvedev at the end of their 90-minute meeting, apparently referring to incoming Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Mr. Medvedev replied, “Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…”

“This is my last election,” Mr. Obama said. “After my election, I have more flexibility.”

The Russian leader responded, “I understand. I transmit this information to Vladimir.”

Obama has already pulled promised missile defense from Poland and the Czech Republic to please Russia. The USA received nothing in return. The Obama Regime has also offered the nuclear secrets of our British allies to Russia.

Barack Hussein Obama’s appeal is simple: he is the personification of treason, which is the most basic impulse of the America-hating elitist liberals who run the media and installed him in power.

On a tips from Granny Jan, Incitatus, Shawn, Kate, Bob Roberts, Sean, and Jim.

26 Responses to “Obama Promises Medvedev He Will Sell Out USA After Election”

  1. kiplingsburdens says:

    What’s the story here? He has been selling out the country since January 20, 2009.

    Interesting phrasing from his KGB handler: “I Will Transmit the information to Vladamir.” There once was a time when High Treason was punishable by death, not rewarded with high office.

  2. modd kenwood says:

    we are sooooo fucked

  3. TheRonPaulSteve says:

    Europe should pay for their own defense.

  4. cmon people says:

    Gotta love this one…

    Odds of Russia declaring nuclear war on Poland? Zero.

    Odds of a missile shield wasting a vast fortune that could be better spent essentially anywhere else? 100%.

    Odds that the likes of you people will see pragmatism and detente, plus saving a pile-o-cash, as a bad thing? Apparently, 100%.

    Aren’t you embarrassed to be this stupid and easily led? Do you really think that we should be spending all this $ on a truly pointless boondoggle? (Aren’t you supposed to be against wasteful gov’t spending??? Guess that would be looking for a little too much consistency from the lunatic fringe…)

  5. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    The missile shield isn’t to protect Poland from Russia Mr. Media Matters Asshole. It’s to protect Europe from an Islamic ICBM.

    No way you can derail the image of a POTUS conspiring with Russians to sacrifice European security in order to advance his election. No way.

    Project much, lunatic?

  6. Mattius Maximus says:

    There’s no doubt, not that there was before, that this idiot is anti-American. I have a question, is it possible for obama to be arrested for his treason, either now, or when he is defeated in November and is a private citizen?

  7. Kevin R. says:

    If Obama’s negotiations were going to be good for America he’d want to do them before the election so as to help him in the election.

  8. SeaFoamGreen says:

    Well, we know The Kenyan Punk hates the Constitution because it’s so dang restrictive. After “his election”, that won’t be an issue anymore. He’s assured his Russian komrades of that.

    Still think Romney is just as bad?

  9. Judith M. says:

    How does Obama not drown when it rains?

  10. Robert Peahl says:

    @ Judith M.

  11. IslandLifer says:

    And yet again, Congress does nothing.

  12. Robert Peahl says:

    More “smart diplomacy” at work. Let’s review: Russia holds an “election”. Putin “wins”. Obama sends attack dog Hillary out to castigate Putin. Obama then asks for Putin’s help. Trash someone, then ask for their help. Yep, “smart diplomacy”.

  13. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    Odds of a missile shield wasting a vast fortune that could be better spent essentially anywhere else? 100%.
    Cmon moron
    You know, now that I think about it, that money could be spent on Obamacare treating radiation poisoning
    It’s not as if national defense is like a constitutional function of government or something.

  14. Robert Peahl says:

    cmon@ 10:29
    The only ignorant person is yourself. Let’s look at history.
    “Russia threates to put nuclear missiles on Polish border” International Herald Tribune, 2008.
    Russian Deputy Chief of Staff for the Armed Forces, Gen. Nogovitsin, in August 2009: “Poland, by deploying system is exposing itself to a strike-100%.”
    23 Nov. 2011, “Russian President threatens nukes if Poland deploys system.”
    Basic research will inform you that the U.S. based system is located in Alaska. The Central European system was designed to protect Europe AND the U.S. from launches originating in the Middle East and North Africa, as the Alaska system doesn’t have the range.
    In Sept. of 2009 Obama cancelled the Polish system, and the Romanian system doesn’t come online until 2015. So exactly which missile system is the President talking about?
    The cancellation of the Polish system was done in favor of the more mobile naval based system. Unfortunately, until upgrades are developed and installed, the naval based missile interceptors are too slow for mid-range destruction.
    I am not in favor of wasteful spending. However, the annual cost of the missile shield is a fraction of what the U.S. spent on bankrupt Solyndra, and other true boondoggles. Plus it actually provides a tangible benefit in acting as a deterrent.
    Secret: detente requires compromise from BOTH sides.
    So no, I’m not embarassed to be “this stupid”. I do pity you though for having to rely on opinions which are not even based on any research. Simple liberal mantra: “I FEEL, therefore I don’t have to know what I’m talking about.”

  15. Robert Peahl says:

    Typos in my last post. Sorry, didn’t proofread.

  16. Jeff says:

    There is a word for this: TREASON. It is Obama’s good fortune that he has a lap dog media that will whore itself out to make him look good. Congress will not do its’ job of impeaching him, since they too are all guilty of treason, caring only for enriching itself at the expense of the public they were elected to serve, but now only look down on with utter contempt.

  17. Sam Adams says:

    cmon people says:
    March 26, 2012 at 10:29 am

    Gotta love this one…

    Odds of Russia declaring nuclear war on Poland? Zero.

    Lemme see here….how long ago was it that Russian tanks rolled into Georgia?


    Odds of a missile shield wasting a vast fortune that could be better spent essentially anywhere else? 100%.

    I have to agree with you here. So much better to waste all that cash on boondoggles like Solyndra, or loaning cash to Brazil so they can drill for oil in deep water.

    I’ll bet you vote to Obama again, too.

  18. Jimbo says:

    I would love to give Obama ‘space’. Space in Leavenworth, perhaps. For the rest of his stinking life.

  19. Sam Adams says:

    Daily Obama demonstrates why the founders wanted only natural born citizens, aka citizens without divided loyalties, to serve as president of the US.

    Time to start prosecuting him for trying to pass off a fake ID. I think there should be a federal offense in there somewhere.

  20. Hedgehog says:

    And none dare call it treason? This phony is playing for the other team.

  21. TaterSalad says:

    The No. 1 issue that will defeat Obama
    Exclusive: Joseph Farah identifies BHO policy proposal GOP could exploit to victory

    There’s an issue out there that can ensure Barack Obama is defeated in 2012.
    It’s not Obamacare.

    It’s not his religious views.

    It’s not his commitment to socialist and anti-American causes.
    It’s not even the birth certificate and his eligibility issues.
    I believe the issue that will take Obama down if Republicans make it an issue is his administration’s proposed budget cuts for active-duty military personnel and military retirees – but not civilian defense workers.
    Do you get the picture?
    Obama has tipped his hand. He’s showing the entire country what he thinks about our military service people – the people who risk their lives for their country are worth less than civilian defense workers who push papers around in Washington.
    Chances are you don’t know much about this story. There’s a good reason for that. The Big Media don’t want you to know, because they recognize the political radioactivity it represents. This is the Death Star for Obama’s re-election campaign. If Americans know about this – Republicans, Democrats and independents all oppose him.
    Here are the details of the story broken by the intrepid Bill Gertz:

    “The Obama administration’s proposed defense budget calls for military families and retirees to pay sharply more for their health care, while leaving unionized civilian defense worker’ benefits untouched.”
    “Several congressional aides suggested the move is designed to increase the enrollment in Obamacare’s state-run insurance exchanges.”
    “The disparity in treatment between civilians and uniformed personnel is causing a backlash within the military that could undermine recruitment and retention.”
    “Significantly, the plan calls for increases between 30 percent to 79 percent in Tricare annual premiums for the first year. After that, the plan will impose five-year increases ranging from 94 percent to 345 percent – more than three times current levels.”

    Think about this – and imagine how you would campaign against Obama on just this one issue.
    U.S. military service people don’t get the equipment they need to do their jobs. They don’t have the manpower they need to complete their missions. Their families scrimp and sacrifice financially so they can serve their country. They risk their lives and give their lives for their country.
    But, according to the Obama administration, unionized civilian defense workers, sitting behind their comfortable desks in Washington, deserve better treatment than our heroes serving overseas in Iraq and Afghanistan and elsewhere.
    It’s almost unbelievable that Obama could serve up a slow-pitch softball like this for Republicans to knock out of the park.
    It’s even more unbelievable that none of them has.
    Which is why I write this column.
    Obama needs to pay for this. Whether or not he backs off, whether or not Congress throws his budget out the window, whether or not these cuts are ever enacted, Obama needs to pay a big political price for showing his cards. Republicans need to remind Americans every day that Obama is the guy who wants to cut medical care for soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen – all while preserving the goodies for Washington bureaucrats.
    Men and women who put their lives on the line, who risked their health and well-being, are treated like second-class citizens in ObamaWorld.
    He signaled his absolute contempt for the U.S. military – not just the institution of the military, but the active-duty grunts on the front lines.
    This is an easy one for the American people to understand.
    So where are the Republicans?
    Where are the talk-show hosts?
    Where is the blogosphere chatter?
    Obama has stepped in something very smelly here. Why aren’t more Obama critics making hay of it?
    Can you understand it?

    Ben H. Willingham

    Association of Naval Aviation

    Bald Eagle Squadron

    P. O. Box 621

    Orange Park, FL 32067-0621

  22. MissAnthropy says:

    Get a load of the imperious look on that SOB’s face. Can’t even count how many times we’ve seen it.

    And I’m not talking about Medvedev either….he in fact seems to be looking off-camera to his delegation, as if to say “I know, I can’t believe it either!”

  23. elliemae says:

    Why hasn’t Obama been impeached? Is it because he is black? Get that SOB out …

  24. Marian says:

    No one in congress has the guts or cojones to bring this treasonous bastard to justice. I guess once elected, castration is next. Where are the good guys??? Why do holder and obama et. al. get away with breaking the law? The media should have no say on the matter. Screw them. The problem is castrated politicians. Now obama and his thugs are trying to start race riots. Hello hispanics…any say on this lynch mob after the “white” hispanic??? This is what feminism has done to the men of this country. It’s just sad to watch.

  25. Russian says:

    I have to ask, why is communism brought into this? Russia has not been communist for 21 years already. In many ways they are even more capitalistic than the United States, today. I mean I get that it was a big part of Russia’s history, but it really has nothing to do with the story.

  26. […] this from comments section at Moonbattery. Very informative regarding perception of Obama’s view of our […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy