moonbattery logo

Oct 19 2011

Occupy Movement Draws Sex Fiends

Imagine if the degenerate vermin constituting the Occupy Wall Street movement really did represent 99% of America. Sex crimes units would be busy dealing with a lot more of this:

A man accused of exposing himself to children at least five times across Seattle was arrested early Tuesday morning. … Officers had been given a composite sketch of the suspect and detectives learned he had been at Westlake Park taking part in the Occupy Seattle protests. … In one instance, the man allegedly approached two 13-year-old girls on swings, made a comment and was engaged in a lewd act when they turned to look, according to police.

…and this:

Cleveland police are investigating an alleged sexual assault incident Saturday at the “Occupy Cleveland” rally involving a 19-year-old female student from Parma.

According to police reports, the 19-year-old student was instructed by “Occupy Cleveland” personnel to “share a tent with the suspect due to a shortage of tents.” The suspect identified himself as “Leland” to the woman. The woman told police that after she had thought the suspect went to sleep in his own bed, she slept in a sleeping bag provided to her by the rally.

The student went to school Monday and told a teacher about her sexual assault incident in Public Square — which is being classified as “kidnapping/rape” — prompting the teacher to immediately contact the authorities.

Sexual assault is so commonplace among the sociopathic creeps drawn to the Wall Street Movement that Occupy Baltimore explicitly states that it is against their policy — but so is going to the police after you’ve been raped, because “we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community.” You’re supposed to discuss the incident with a comrade counselor named Koala instead.

What kind of moral climate would expect among communists?

In related news, Barack Hussein Obama has announced of the lawless OWS scum, “we are on their side.”

occupy-wall-street-lowlifes
Come for the communism, stay for the social opportunities.

On tips from GoY, RF, J, Bob Roberts, SR, RKae, and lao’s automated rant generator.



88 Responses to “Occupy Movement Draws Sex Fiends”

  1. StanInTexas says:

    Hey LaoZee, would these people at Occupy Baltimore qualify as ‘a leader?

    hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

  2. Conan says:

    If you sifted through all of the human flotsam in all of the occupy sites, you MIGHT find one decent human being worth working with. All of the others are simply liberal filth who would be better off as fertilizer.

  3. lao's automated rant generator says:

    Hey, LOOK THIS WAY!!!!

    THIS OWS ACTION!
    THIS OWS ACTION!
    THIS OWS ACTION!

  4. Mickey Shea says:

    “a comrade counselor named Koala”…you couldn’t make this shit up…welcome to the Twilight Zone

  5. Henry says:

    Progs of a feather…

  6. lao says:

    You flakes are priceless. Thousands of people have been gathering in cities all over the country, 24/7 for over a month and you express astonishment that there’s some criminal elements?

    From the Occupy Baltimore website:

    The Occupy Wall Street movement is committed to nonviolence and has organized themselves to be a leaderless group, committed to participatory democracy and collective decision-making.

  7. metprof says:

    You’re right Lao…….remember all the rapes and burglaries during the Tea Party rallies??? Shameful I tell ya!!!

    THANKFULLY these meatsticks are committed to non-violence. Whew, scared me there for a minute.

  8. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    Please don’t feed the insane canadian dipwad. I’m sick of scrolling over its chicken buggery in every thread.

  9. lao says:

    Remind me again metprof, were the Tea Party rallies running 24/7 for over a month?

  10. Lao Zedong says:

    You know why Tea Party rallies don’t run 24/7 for over month? Tea Partiers have LIVES, JOBS and most times FAMILIES!

  11. JT says:

    Yay! The anal retentive troll has spoken. LOL

  12. Lao Zedong says:

    Notice also that Lao didn’t “denounce” the sexual assaults, he just tried to excuse them away.

  13. Uneducated Moonbat says:

    HYPERBOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  14. lao says:

    poor stanwee, I didn’t realize when I called those people as criminals I was excusing them.

  15. lao says:

    oops, strike that “as”.

  16. JT says:

    metprof, don’t say “meatsticks” to lao, he’ll get all hot and bothered and start clucking about gay Republicans again. LOL

  17. StanInTexas says:

    That wasn’t me, LaoZee. I’ve told you before that you have other fans.

    And who is it that “has organized themselves to be a leaderless group“? Doesn’t someone have to be a leader to organize such a thing?

    You are your own parody, LaoZee!

  18. Lao Zedong says:

    Lao, you never called anyone a criminal either. You said “some criminal elements” as if they are natural occuring like the period table of the elements. Yet another non denouncing denouncement. What a shock.

  19. lao says:

    stanwee, groups of people don’t need a leader to organize, they simply need a common purpose. Ever joined a pick-up baseball game?

  20. metprof says:

    Sooooo if you’re operating 24/7 in your little spoiled brat-fest you’ll attract sex criminals and burglars vs. 6 or 8 hours with no problems. Who could have known!!! I’m thinking there are cops and DAs around the country who should know about this!!!

    What a find, lao! Congratulations on your concise and highly-technical criminal justice research.

  21. metprof says:

    Yup, nothing like “eating the rich” to gel a movement.

  22. Blame Bush and The Tea Partiers. Yeah!!! That’s the ticket.

  23. StanInTexas says:

    Yes I have, LaoZee, and they all have a leader. They call him the Coach.

    The OWS have people that self-identify as leaders. They give marching orders, like stop posting stupid demands and let us speak for the group.

    I even gave you the name of a leader of thew OWS JUST LIKE YOU ASKED. Stop being a pissy little bitch and just admit you got the answer to your question. Or at least stop displaying your idiocy and move on!

  24. lao says:

    A pick-up baseball game has a coach. Too funny.

  25. StanInTexas says:

    Spoken like a true idiot, LoaZee. And someone who does not know baseball.

  26. Kevin R. says:

    “… we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community.”

    Community?

    You know what we have going on here? They’ve set up communes. These are communes. They aren’t protests. They’ve set up a commune system.

    They don’t know it, but their American Commune is even more stupid and shallow and will end up being even more tragic than the Paris Commune was.

  27. Son of Taz says:

    Lao dear boy: thousands of Tea Party members have gathered at rallies around the country and have had no such problems as rape and assault. Astonishment is not the word. A sense of satisfaction in the knowledge we were right about the type of people at the OWS events.

    There’s an old saying – a conservative is a liberal that’s been mugged. I wonder if that applies to women that have been raped or molested at your ilk’s events. Will they turn to the “dark side” and start thinking like conservatives?

    Nahh, not likely. Once a moonbat, always a moonbat.

  28. lao says:

    If someone identifies themselves as a member of the Tea Party and they commit a crime, does that implicate the Tea Party?

  29. StanInTexas says:

    Asked and Answered, LaoZee. Move on!

  30. lao says:

    Feel free to directly quote that answer stanwee.

    Anyone else?

  31. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 19, 2011 at 10:04 am
    Remind me again metprof, were the Tea Party rallies running 24/7 for over a month?

    ———
    No, because Tea Party members have lives and jobs and aren’t expecting to be coddled and carried, unlike flea bagger trash bagger party people involve with the “occupy” movement.

    Unlike these vermin, Tea Party members know that they need to produce and contribute to deserve.

  32. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 19, 2011 at 11:16 am
    If someone identifies themselves as a member of the Tea Party and they commit a crime, does that implicate the Tea Party?
    ———
    No, because leftist infiltrators openly planned to infiltrate Tea Party gatherings, do and say outrageous things, then blame it on the Tea Party.

    The Tea Party never formally said, “We’d rather you didn’t go to the police – instead go to our own internal security.”

    The flea party trash baggers did.

  33. StanInTexas says:

    I already have, LaoZee. I’m sorry you are incapable of scrolling. Do not think your incompetance means no answer.

  34. lao says:

    stanwee, if you are not capable of quoting yourself, no problem.

    I’m interested in other people’s answers.

  35. StanInTexas says:

    I know that Loa; because I answered you, you impotently tried to counter my answer, you failed to do that, then you started on this “you never answered me” campaign.

    It is truly pathetic that someone like you is allowed to use a computer unsupervised.

  36. Obama Nation says:

    There have been quite a few woman running around topless at the OWS protests.

    Do you think perhaps some of them have been sending out the wrong signals?

    You have to admit for a woman to run around with no shirt on is a bit like them standing on a chair in the middle of crowd yelling at the top of their lungs, “Attention everyone in case you hadn’t noticed I’m a slut! Please hit on me, I’m easy.”

  37. lao says:

    Do you also have to admit that for a guy to run around wearing a sharp suit, diamond rings and an expensive watch is a bit like them standing on a chair in the middle of crowd yelling at the top of their lungs, “Attention everyone in case you hadn’t noticed I’m rich! Please rob me, I’m easy.”?

  38. StanInTexas says:

    Sharp Suit and expensive jewelry says class.
    Topless female says slut.

    But since the only topless women LaoZee see’s are on the internet, I doubt he could ever tell the difference.

  39. lao's automated rant generator says:

    I think I’ll go off to a dead thread now and post some more YouTube video of David Duke.

    THIS OWS ACTION!

  40. son of a preacher man says:

    Actually it is more like slathering yourself up with fish guts jumping into shark infessed waters and then acting suprised that you just got bit.

  41. lao says:

    Blaming the victim says air head flake.

  42. Geeknerd says:

    Are THESE the rapes that Biden threatened us with if the (Destroy All) Jobs bill isn’t passed?

  43. StanInTexas says:

    No, LaoZee, MAKING yourself the victim said AirHead… FLAKE!

  44. SR says:

    “Occupy Wall Street is nothing more than a vile orgy of class envy, covetousness and hatred of achievers.”

    Tea Party Represents America, Not Occupy Wall Street

    http://www.lloydmarcus.com/?p=2329

  45. lao says:

    A well dressed guy, walking down the street MADE himself a robbery victim?

  46. StanInTexas says:

    No, a topless girl in a crowd of dirty hippies and “free love” losers like these OWS people did.

  47. GoY says:

    Remind me again metprof, were the Tea Party rallies running 24/7 for over a month?

    No, the Tea Partiers obeyed the law and got permits from authorities for their events. The Occupiers just squat as long as they want while the Democrats in power ignore the rules for them.

  48. GoY says:

    If they know the authorities aren’t going to enforce the law, they know they can get away with anything.

  49. Obama Nation says:

    A well dressed gut who walks through the ghetto with hundred dollar bills hanging out of his pocket does make himself the victim.

  50. Jay B. says:

    Hey Lao, having fun trying to give them credit? Go ahead “The actions of one individual don’t reflect the whole group” That’s why you have rapes, active attempts to stiffle crimes, a pedophile jacking off in front of 13 year olds, thefts and God knows what else is NOT reported.

    I’m sorry to say this but you’re really, morally disgusting. At best a paid troll to disrupt conversations, at worst an idiot who really believes this, I just hope you wash twice when you do.

  51. lao says:

    Blount claims: Sexual assault is so commonplace among the sociopathic creeps drawn to the Wall Street Movement that Occupy Baltimore explicitly states that it is against their policy — but so is going to the police after you’ve been raped, because “we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community.”

    If you click on the Occupy Baltimore link, what will you find? Surprise, surprise, Blount has clipped out the important part of the quote:

    Though we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community, the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.

  52. StanInTexas says:

    Sure thing, LaoZee. I’m sure the LEADERS of Occupy Baltimore didn’t go in and amend their statement after their “Don’t Tell the Cops” statement was published.

    You are a gullible fool!

  53. Jay B. says:

    lao says:
    You mean a group that’s openly discouraging seeking police help? Of course they will add a disclaimer saying a survivor has the right to seek protection. Are you seriously defending this? We all know having you admit what’s in plain view is a waste of time, you’re either paid to yell the same talking points or you willfully refuse to even see what’s in front of you.

    If a group gives you a leaflet saying “If you’re attacked, go see “Koala” instead of the police” you’re in goddamn trouble. That means everyone is well aware of the kind of thugs they’re attracting.

  54. SR says:

    Video: Abusive Occupy Oakland protesters ban media from tent city…Wonder what they they’re hiding?

    Video: Abusive Occupy Oakland protesters ban media from tent city

  55. lao says:

    bwahahahahahahahaha!!

    Look at the link Blount provided stanwee it goes to American Thinker QUOTING Occupy Baltimore.

    Thanks for pwning yourself yet again, gullible fool.

  56. StanInTexas says:

    Still plagerizing insults from me, huh LoaZee. Typical of the brainless fool you are.

    The LEADERS of Occupy Baltimore are encouraging their people that are abusing each other to not call the police. Please continue to defend this, as it shows what a truly horrible person you are.

  57. Jay B. says:

    Lao, I’d really like you to state how instructing people not to seek police help AS A POLICY, that means, not the actions of one or two individuals, means this is a peaceful and legitimate protest. If you can’t do it as a troll reciting talking points, please, do it as a person.

    This one is a moot point but would you send your children there? Would you look at them and say “Yes, you’re 13 years old, that’s fine, you’ll be well looked after”? Would you recommend your close friends to attend there? Would you carry your own laptop or pricey Iphone there?

  58. lao says:

    Read this stanwee: …the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.

    Now just stop and think, for, oh maybe a minute.

  59. StanInTexas says:

    And that is AFTER their stated policy of… “It is an explicit policy of Occupy Baltimore to prohibit abuse by any members of the community upon another person. Violation of this policy will result in the abuser no longer being welcome at the occupation.

    …and before their policy of “Any member of the Occupy Baltimore community who believes he/she/they have been a victim of, are aware of, or suspect a commission of sexual abuse, are encouraged to immediately report the incident to the Security Committee. T (sic)
    The point person for dealing with these situations will be Koala! (sic) Largess, (443) 642-XXXX.

    So they throw in atheir little CYA statement. And what if the rape turns to murder and they don’t survive. Do you think the LEADERS of Occupy Baltimore will call the police?

  60. Jay B. says:

    lao says:
    Answer me Lao please. Please, do tell me how you can call this a genuine, peaceful protest when the official policy is to go see someone named Koala for sexual assaults. What would she do, anyway? Give you an ecstasy? A kiss on the forehead?

  61. lao says:

    JB, you should take the advice I suggested to stanwee.

    The quote that Blount DELIBERATELY left out of his whining header, is perfectly clear: …the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.

    Perhaps you should be asking yourself why Blount decided to hide that bit of information in his effort to smear Occupy Baltimore.

    As for Koala, you mention people going to her re “sexual assaults”. The quote doesn’t talk about sexual assault, it talks about “sexual abuse” and that would include harassment, stalking etc.

  62. Jay B. says:

    lao says:
    You’re skirting the point. I asked you how you can defend protests who adopt a “Don’t seek the police” as official doctrine.

  63. StanInTexas says:

    He can’t Jay.

    LoaZee will continue to tout the little CYA statement that is sandwiched in between the official policy of the LEADERS of the Occupy Baltimore movement, which is…
    1) If you are raped, don’t call the cops
    2) If you are raped, take your concerns to Koala.

  64. lao says:

    Hello JB can you read? THIS is official:

    …the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.

    I’d expect you might be just a little annoyed at Blount’s game which has steered his loyal little parrots into the embarrassment of once again having reality held up for all of you to look at.

  65. StanInTexas says:

    See what I mean, Jay?

    Rinse and repeat, that is all LoaZee is. Rinse and repeat!

  66. lao says:

    When you deny the truth stanwee, it’s necessary to repeat it.

  67. StanInTexas says:

    For that to be true, LaoZee, you would have to post something that was true. And you would have to post ALL the truth, not just a small portion of it that you want to concentrate on while ignoring the rest.

    You seem to think that when your posts are challenged, it is a valid debate strategy to simply restate your original position. For a room-temperature IQ like yours, that may seem reasonable. But for the rest of us, you look like a pathetic and petulant child.

  68. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 19, 2011 at 12:32 pm
    ————-
    And a bunch of other nonsense.

    Here’s the bottom line:

    The “occupy” movement actually did, to a degree, bill itself as a modern day Woodstock – you know, free love, free drugs, free everything.

    The “occupy” movement is about people ignoring common decency and laws and just taking what they want.

    Taken to it’s logical conclusion, that means if I want to have sex with you, even by force, you have no right to deny me.

    This is, at the very core, what the “occupy” movement is all about – selfishness, caring only about what the individual wants and not caring who gets hurt or even killed in the endless attainment of self-gratification, no matter what the cost.

    Of course lao will deny it, run from it, bring up nonsense like some guy holding up a sign showing how the left is turning us all into slaves, using some misspelled word he shouldn’t have, and will try to distract us from the point.

    Just like he’s trying to distract us from the OCCUPY BALTIMORE leadership doing all it can to keep the sexual misconduct that’s going on there from getting out.

  69. lao says:

    uh-oh…here comes bobby. I predict we will now be inundated with four or five of his posts.

    Meanwhile stanwee, are you claiming the quote from Occupy Baltimore that I have noted in bold in several posts, is false?

    Remind me again stanwee about how you “challenge” my posts. Your last hilarious attempt was this one:

    StanInTexas says:
    October 19, 2011 at 12:38 pm
    Sure thing, LaoZee. I’m sure the LEADERS of Occupy Baltimore didn’t go in and amend their statement after their “Don’t Tell the Cops” statement was published.

    Ever since then you’ve either been scrambling to cover your backside or whining.

    I love this stanwee quote: And you would have to post ALL the truth, not just a small portion of it that you want to concentrate on while ignoring the rest.

    Gee, let me think. Where did we see that? Oh right, Blount’s own header.

    The bold part is what he ignored and you want to ignore: Though we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community, the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.

  70. lao says:

    bobby claims: The “occupy” movement is about people ignoring common decency and laws and just taking what they want.

    Taken to it’s logical conclusion, that means if I want to have sex with you, even by force, you have no right to deny me.

    Only in what passes for your brain could you conclude that forcible rape is a “logical conclusion”.

    Naturally, desperate to keep your little fantasyland going, like stanwee and JB you are in denial about what Occupy Baltimore specifically said.

  71. StanInTexas says:

    Lao, it is a logical conclusion. These people think that they can tresspass, steal, destroy, and break the drug laws. It is not a leap AT ALL to suggest that they would be willing to break other laws.

    You are working very hard to defend these losers and prove what a societal reject you are.

  72. Bob Roberts says:

    PRICELESS:

    lao says: October 19, 2011 at 9:48 am
    You flakes are priceless. Thousands of people have been gathering in cities all over the country, 24/7 for over a month and you express astonishment that there’s some criminal elements?

    —————

    Given that ALL OF THEIR ASSEMBLIES ARE DELIBERATELY BREAKING LAWS REGARDING REASONABLE USE OF PUBLIC SPACES, no, we’re not surprised that THEY ARE ALL CRIMINALS.

    Are you?

    And by the way, they deliberately used the lure of sex (announcing it was going to be bigger/better than Woodstock) and liberals just tend to be perverts more often than not anyway, so we’re also not surprised about the perverts showing up.

    You’re the one who seems to be in denial about the fact that this group consists of mostly perverted criminals. We knew it from the start.

  73. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 19, 2011 at 2:34 pm
    ——-
    You’re hopeless!

    The whole mantra of this movement is that they can take whatever they want whenever they want. I never said it was an HONEST or PROPER conclusion, but even you have to admit that if there is anarchy, which is EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE CALLING FOR WITH THIS OCCUPY MOVEMENT, rapes and murders and other crimes will skyrocket.

    I’m not in denial about what Occupy Baltimore wanted – they desperately wanted to avoid having the public find out about the sex-related incidents that are going on so they did their best to persuade those who were sexually assaulted and were otherwise victimized sexually to NOT report it to the proper authorities. Their “of course you CAN if you WANT” line was pretty transparent. If you do report to the authorities you will be ostracized. Oh, I forgot. You are sitting there in whatever deep, dark hole you’ve created for yourself and really don’t have a clue what’s going on at any of these gatherings.

    Have you spent ANY time among the trash bagger/flea bagger crowd? How much time have you spent actually at ANY of these assemblies?

  74. Bob Roberts says:

    Obama Nation says: October 19, 2011 at 11:33 am
    There have been quite a few woman running around topless at the OWS protests.

    Do you think perhaps some of them have been sending out the wrong signals?

    ——————–

    You have to remember that lao is from the group that doesn’t recognize cause & effect, doesn’t admit that people have a responsibility for the things they do and the natural consequences that flow from those things.

    And, of course, in response to what you said, lao comes up with one of his ridiculous, false hypotheticals.

    Read it carefully:

    lao says: October 19, 2011 at 11:40 am
    Do you also have to admit that for a guy to run around wearing a sharp suit, diamond rings and an expensive watch is a bit like them standing on a chair in the middle of crowd yelling at the top of their lungs, “Attention everyone in case you hadn’t noticed I’m rich! Please rob me, I’m easy.”?
    ————-
    No, lao. Being ostentatious about your wealth is nothing like standing in the middle of a crowd yelling, I’m rich, rob me, I’m easy.

    For all the potential robber knows, the guy might be armed. He might be a black belt. And no, just flaunting his wealth does NOT suggest he’s “easy”.

    It would, though, be foolish to KNOWINGLY go somewhere that there HAS been a problem dressed in such a way that is KNOWN to attract attention.

    I think we already had this discussion and, when we did, you were on THE OTHER SIDE OF IT when it came up. Remember the one about the police telling women that they might not want to dress in things that made them easy targets when visiting an area known to have been the location of several attempted or actual sexual assaults? And you, if I remember right, got on me for saying the police were correct to tell women that WHEN THEY WENT THROUGH THAT PARTICULAR AREA THEY MIGHT WANT TO DRESS IN CLOTHES THAT MADE THEM LESS OF AN EASY TARGET? And you disagreed?

    Remember that?

  75. Bob Roberts says:

    I’ll go so far as to say that if one goes out, alone, in public places known to be problem areas for robberies and such then yes, it’s reasonable to suggest that they should not have done so because they were knowingly engaging in risky behavior in an area where such risk is more likely to lead to a problem event.

    But if we’re going to admit that case for lao, certainly he must admit the police were right when they suggested that women needed to watch how they dressed when going into areas where sexual attacks were known to be ongoing.

    And he also has to admit that, given the advertised, deliberately sexually charged atmosphere at flea bagger/trash bagger gatherings, people who later complain about sexual issues that come up while there really should have known better what they were getting into before going there.

  76. Bob Roberts says:

    Here is the part of the “OCCUPY BALTIMORE” statement that LAO wants you to ignore:

    “It is an explicit policy of Occupy Baltimore to prohibit abuse by any members of the community upon another person.”

    Taking what is not yours from another person, be it by criminal act or by criminal abuse of government, is an abuse upon another person.

    This group of people is explicitly calling for such abuse against those they’ve been programmed to hate – the “rich”.

    Therefore they are hypocrites.

    Now lao is off on a tear trying to suggest there was an attempt to hide the fact that Occupy Baltimore did say “Though we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community, the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.”

    First, Blount and I believe everyone who talked about this and provided a link did provide one that includes that statement!

    There is the link.

    You will find that full statement there. No attempt to hide anything. But still lao whined. We didn’t link to the Baltimore group’s site? Is that the problem?

    Can YOU find that statement there, lao? I don’t think any of US have ANY INTEREST in looking – we already had a site that gave us THE FULL STATEMENT and WE SHARED IT WITH EVERYONE HERE so what was your problem again?

  77. Bob Roberts says:

    And, as the link (above) stated:

    Shouldn’t Occupy Baltimore, like every other group or individual, encourage people to contact the police to get these predators off the street? You’d think so, but you’d think wrong!

    They don’t like cops because they’re criminals, doing criminal things, deliberately and repeatedly, and they avoid cops because they’re afraid, perhaps, of being recognized as such and taken in!

  78. […] Occupy Movement Draws Sex Fiends […]

  79. Right Reason says:

    lao says:
    Though we do not encourage the involvement of the police in our community, the survivor has every right, and the support of Occupy Baltimore, to report the abuse to the appropriate law enforcement.

    So lao, you are fine with the leaders of the OWS Baltimore group encouraging rape victims NOT to involve the police?

    So if, let’s say, a Tea Party leader told Tea Party members that rape victims, well, you knnow, you CAN call the police if you want, but you knonw, that is not the path we RECOMMEND, you would be fine with that.

    Right????

  80. Motorcyclist says:

    When you elect a criminal enterprise into the office of President of the United States, who do you expect to be in it’s constituency? Principled and morally upright productive citizenry?….lol


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy