moonbattery logo

Mar 07 2016

Open Thread

hillary-exorcist

On a tip from TED.



144 Responses to “Open Thread”

  1. Occam's Stubble says:

    The power of capitalism compels you!

  2. Occam's Stubble says:

    The power of capitalism compels you!

  3. Buffalobob says:

    Is Huma doing that?

  4. Buffalobob says:

    Is Huma doing that?

  5. Open Thread says:

    […] Source link […]

  6. Chocolate&Cheese says:

    Meanwhile, her impeached, disbarred, serial rapist, pedophile, spouse is in the next room…

  7. Bodhisattva says:

    The power of greed compels her (to do evil). Her lust for power compels her (to do evil).

    Alas, capitalism doesn’t seem to be able to compel her to wise up, like most moobats.

  8. Bodhisattva says:

    The power of greed compels her (to do evil). Her lust for power compels her (to do evil).

    Alas, capitalism doesn’t seem to be able to compel her to wise up, like most moobats.

  9. Bodhisattva says:

    http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/hln-ellen-degeneres-heads-up-1201724153/

    HLN Shelves Ellen DeGeneres-Produced ‘Heads Up’ Game Show – shelved prior to airing with 65 completed episodes in the can.

  10. Bodhisattva says:

    http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/hln-ellen-degeneres-heads-up-1201724153/

    HLN Shelves Ellen DeGeneres-Produced ‘Heads Up’ Game Show – shelved prior to airing with 65 completed episodes in the can.

    Instead they want to fill the time slots with what they call “non-fiction”.

    You know, shows about how people are causing global warming, that sort of thing.

  11. Chocolate&Cheese says:

    whom, not what!

  12. Bodhisattva says:

    THIS JUST IN!!!!!

    Climate bombshell!!!!

    NOAA DATA SHOWS NO WARMING SINCE BEFORE MANY OF US WERE BORN!

    http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

    In their “hottest year ever” press briefing, NOAA included this graph (see link), which stated that they have a 58 year long radiosonde temperature record. But they only showed the last 37 years in the graph.

    Here is why they are hiding the rest of the data. The earlier data showed as much pre-1979 cooling as the post-1979 warming.

  13. Bodhisattva says:

    THIS JUST IN!!!!!

    Climate bombshell!!!!

    NOAA DATA SHOWS NO WARMING SINCE BEFORE MANY OF US WERE BORN!

    http://realclimatescience.com/2016/03/noaa-radiosonde-data-shows-no-warming-for-58-years/

    In their “hottest year ever” press briefing, NOAA included this graph (see link), which stated that they have a 58 year long radiosonde temperature record. But they only showed the last 37 years in the graph.

    Here is why they are hiding the rest of the data. The earlier data showed as much pre-1979 cooling as the post-1979 warming.

    Here you find a lot of interesting data – some interesting and embarrassing graphs.

    And this is what the warmie moonbats do when they see this:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nSKkwzwdW4

  14. Bodhisattva says:

    Here is one for all the moonbat warmies!

    One alleged “proof” that a current surge of warming can only be due to humans is a claim that glaciers simply don’t retreat like they are normally, naturally.

    Only they have, before, normally, naturally.

    The Jakobshavn glacier in Greenland retreated more than one foot per day from 1850 to 1903, while thinning by a “considerable extent.” It was also reported that alpine glaciers were in general retreat, and “conclusively that the glaciers of Greenland are receding”

    The Scranton Republican, 27 Jul 1903, Page 4 (you can view it yourself at NEWSPAPERS DOT COM)

    In 1908, National Geographic reported that Alaskan glaciers at Glacier Bay retreated eleven feet per day from 1894 to 1907. (See National Geographic : Jan 1908, Page 76 – LOOK IT UP AT NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC DOT COM)

    USGS reports that Glacier Bay glaciers retreated four feet per day from 1760 to 1907.

    http://soundwaves.usgs.gov/2001/07/glacierbaymap.gif

    In 1910, it was reported that the glaciers of the world had been retreating since at least 1836.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/100784966

    In 1911, it was reported that glaciers in the Alps were disappearing.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/105017649

    In 1902, it was reported that glaciers in the Alps were retreating more than 100 feet per year.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/138260577

    In 1932 it was reported that the glaciers of west Antarctica had been rapidly retreating for at least a century.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/23150667

    Oddly enough, after all the falsifications of data done by those who believe in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change Alarmism, the periods in question, the times all these glaciers were supposedly disappearing, OFTEN AT RATES FASTER THAN THEY ARE TODAY, are now supposedly among the relative coldest on record:

    https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT4.png

    WTF IS UP WITH THAT?

    HAT TIP:

    http://realclimatescience.com/glacial-retreat-before-1950/

  15. Bodhisattva says:

    Here is one for all the moonbat warmies!

    One alleged “proof” that a current surge of warming can only be due to humans is a claim that glaciers simply don’t retreat like they are normally, naturally.

    Only they have, before, normally, naturally.

    The Jakobshavn glacier in Greenland retreated more than one foot per day from 1850 to 1903, while thinning by a “considerable extent.” It was also reported that alpine glaciers were in general retreat, and “conclusively that the glaciers of Greenland are receding”

    The Scranton Republican, 27 Jul 1903, Page 4 (you can view it yourself at NEWSPAPERS DOT COM)

    In 1908, National Geographic reported that Alaskan glaciers at Glacier Bay retreated eleven feet per day from 1894 to 1907. (See National Geographic : Jan 1908, Page 76 – LOOK IT UP AT NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC DOT COM)

    USGS reports that Glacier Bay glaciers retreated four feet per day from 1760 to 1907.

    http://soundwaves.usgs.gov/2001/07/glacierbaymap.gif

    In 1910, it was reported that the glaciers of the world had been retreating since at least 1836.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/100784966

    In 1911, it was reported that glaciers in the Alps were disappearing.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/105017649

    In 1902, it was reported that glaciers in the Alps were retreating more than 100 feet per year.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/138260577

    In 1932 it was reported that the glaciers of west Antarctica had been rapidly retreating for at least a century.

    http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/23150667

    Oddly enough, after all the falsifications of data done by those who believe in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change Alarmism, the periods in question, the times all these glaciers were supposedly disappearing, OFTEN AT RATES FASTER THAN THEY ARE TODAY, are now supposedly among the relative coldest on record:

    https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/HadCRUT4.png

    WTF IS UP WITH THAT?

    HAT TIP:

    http://realclimatescience.com/glacial-retreat-before-1950/

  16. Bodhisattva says:

    Have I ever mentioned the idea of the political pendulum?

    Politics is in some ways like a pendulum… it swings back and forth, we try new things, some of them don’t work and, if the system is not broken, public opinion caused the pendulum to swing back and fix what didn’t work.

    But our system is broken, the pendulum is only swinging further and further left.

    This can’t go on forever – there are natural limits. At some point it’s going to swing back – and perhaps go to far.

    What does this mean in a current day context?

    Well, here’s one fact that will give you pause:

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-record-61-million-immigrants-in-u.s.-15.7-million-illegally/article/2585110

    There are AN ACKNOWLEDGED ESTIMATE OF15.7 million illegal immigrants in the U.S.

    Now you know, that number is low. Probably significantly.

    And that’s the pendulum swinging too far left.

    Now what is the response?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4cX1xqtxo8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ9HgEO53G8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXm1sBlxxvE

    This, and other reasons, are why Donald Trump remains as popular as he is despite the fact he’s a Democrat running as a Republican and only marginally better (if that) than Bernie and Hillary.

  17. Bodhisattva says:

    Have I ever mentioned the idea of the political pendulum?

    Politics is in some ways like a pendulum… it swings back and forth, we try new things, some of them don’t work and, if the system is not broken, public opinion, public pressure, eventually causes the pendulum to swing back and fix what didn’t work.

    But our system is broken, the pendulum is only swinging further and further left.

    This can’t go on forever – there are natural limits. At some point it’s going to swing back – and perhaps go too far.

    What does this mean in a current day context?

    Well, here’s one fact that will give you pause:

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-record-61-million-immigrants-in-u.s.-15.7-million-illegally/article/2585110

    There are AN ACKNOWLEDGED ESTIMATE OF15.7 million illegal immigrants in the U.S.

    Now you know, that number is low. Probably significantly.

    And that’s the pendulum swinging too far left.

    Now what is the response?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4cX1xqtxo8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJ9HgEO53G8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXm1sBlxxvE

    This, and other reasons, are why Donald Trump remains as popular as he is despite the fact he’s a Democrat running as a Republican and only marginally better (if that) than Bernie and Hillary.

    Don’t mistake this as me endorsing Trump. He’s my last choice among those currently running as Republicans – a RINO, a Democrat, and a guy I’m not convinced we can trust either. All three better than Bernie and Hillary, but I’m actually looking forward to enough of a lack of a clear front runner (which we may not get) that someone else is brought forward – hopefully NOT Romney. He had his chance. Someone like Newt Gingrich was before he sold out maybe. Someone with the good qualities of Reagan but not the bad – he was not perfect either.

    Sad to say – Reagan set a pretty high mark, but who else on the Republican side, any Republican you can think of from right now back as far as you want to go, so in other words, past or present, would be someone you can say “Gee, I wish he was running, I’d vote for him in a heartbeat, no question.”

  18. Donna M says:

    Suddenly caught off guard!
    Made me laugh!
    The power of greed compels her!
    Horizontally, right up, off the bed!
    …and herr lust for power, motivates the broomstick in her skeleton closet!

  19. Donna M says:

    Suddenly caught off guard!
    Made me laugh!
    The power of greed compels her!
    Horizontally, right up, off the bed!
    …and her lust for power, motivates the broomstick in her skeleton closet!

  20. Bodhisattva says:

    Odd… the left isn’t yammering about the need for gun control over this:

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gunman-goes-after-pastor-who-endorsed-cruz/article/2585195

    The pastor who led prayer at a Saturday campaign rally for Sen. Ted Cruz was shot six times outside his church less than 24 hours later.

    Pastor Tim Remington of Altar Church in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, was shot by a man who police say is local resident Kyle Andrew Odom, 30, a former Marine, but is expected to survive. Odom remains at large.

    Law enforcement confirmed the victim was still unconscious Monday, but in fair condition at Kootenai Health.

    “We pray for his full recovery and are thankful for the efforts of law enforcement to ensure the attacker is swiftly brought to justice,” the Cruz campaign said in a statement Monday.

    Odom does not have a criminal record, but does have a history of mental illness and, therefore, is very likely a liberal moonbat.

  21. Bodhisattva says:

    Odd… the left isn’t yammering about the need for gun control over this:

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gunman-goes-after-pastor-who-endorsed-cruz/article/2585195

    The pastor who led prayer at a Saturday campaign rally for Sen. Ted Cruz was shot six times outside his church less than 24 hours later.

    Pastor Tim Remington of Altar Church in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, was shot by a man who police say is local resident Kyle Andrew Odom, 30, a former Marine, but is expected to survive. Odom remains at large.

    Law enforcement confirmed the victim was still unconscious Monday, but in fair condition at Kootenai Health.

    “We pray for his full recovery and are thankful for the efforts of law enforcement to ensure the attacker is swiftly brought to justice,” the Cruz campaign said in a statement Monday.

    Odom does not have a criminal record, but does have a history of mental illness and, therefore, is very likely a liberal moonbat.

  22. Bodhisattva says:

    Because hey, that’s where the deep pockets are.

  23. Bodhisattva says:

    Because hey, that’s where the deep pockets are.

  24. Bodhisattva says:

    Since we’ve proven we can’t get through to moonbats, why not try a more receptive audience?

    http://www.littlethings.com/steve-martin-dogs-get-jokes/?&utm_source=washingtonexaminer.com

  25. Donna M says:

    …and may the power of Justice, ring the truth outta’ ya’!

  26. Bodhisattva says:

    Since we’ve proven we can’t get through to moonbats, why not try a more receptive audience?

    http://www.littlethings.com/steve-martin-dogs-get-jokes/?&utm_source=washingtonexaminer.com

  27. Donna M says:

    …and may the power of Justice, ring the truth outta’ ya’!

  28. Bodhisattva says:

    OMG are there any places SJWs won’t go?

    The latest Social Justice Frontier?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaY8XFbq-Hg

    No, I’m serious:

    http://news.yahoo.com/space-shouldnt-exclusive-domain-big-nations-astronauts-234038239.html

    Space shouldn’t be exclusive domain of big nations

    I think these guys must have caught a few too many cosmic rays when they were up there doing their thing.

    Space shouldn’t be the privileged domain of big countries but a frontier open to all, astronauts and scientists gathered in Costa Rica said Monday.

    Even the smallest nations benefit from access to space technology, for example, improving farming and providing better understanding of oceans, weather and climactic changes, they told a news conference at the beginning of a weeklong forum.

    THEIR OWN ARGUMENT PROVES THEIR ARGUMENT WRONG.

    All nations have access to the positive gains that space gave us – mainly since the U.S. was the one generating many of them.

  29. Bodhisattva says:

    OMG are there any places SJWs won’t go?

    The latest Social Justice Frontier?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaY8XFbq-Hg

    No, I’m serious:

    http://news.yahoo.com/space-shouldnt-exclusive-domain-big-nations-astronauts-234038239.html

    Space shouldn’t be exclusive domain of big nations

    I think these guys must have caught a few too many cosmic rays when they were up there doing their thing.

    Space shouldn’t be the privileged domain of big countries but a frontier open to all, astronauts and scientists gathered in Costa Rica said Monday.

    Even the smallest nations benefit from access to space technology, for example, improving farming and providing better understanding of oceans, weather and climactic changes, they told a news conference at the beginning of a weeklong forum.

    THEIR OWN ARGUMENT PROVES THEIR ARGUMENT WRONG.

    All nations have access to the positive gains that space gave us – mainly since the U.S. was the one generating many of them.

  30. ScrewyPuppy says:

    Long but worth it.

    https://youtu.be/rwPlY6EYnJ8

  31. ScrewyPuppy says:

    Long but worth it.

    https://youtu.be/rwPlY6EYnJ8

  32. Momster says:

    Well, Bod….part of the pendumlum swinging back to the right is the Trump phenomenon. Is he truly a “rightie”? Is he the person America needs right now? Maybe, maybe not. But there is a lot of territory between where the pendulum is now and where it needs to be.

  33. Momster says:

    Well, Bod….part of the pendumlum swinging back to the right is the Trump phenomenon. Is he truly a “rightie”? Is he the person America needs right now? Maybe, maybe not. But there is a lot of territory between where the pendulum is now and where it needs to be.

  34. Momster says:

    Worked for Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

  35. Momster says:

    Worked for Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson.

  36. Momster says:

    Donna, some of them skeletons still have meat on them!

  37. Momster says:

    Donna, some of them skeletons still have meat on them!

  38. Momster says:

    Excellent!!!

  39. Momster says:

    Excellent!!!

  40. Donna M says:

    Hey Mom!
    Remember when she had that canine, “lycanthropic possession” episode,
    Where she started barking like a dog!
    Now I know where she hid all the bones!

  41. Donna M says:

    Hey Mom!
    Remember when she had that canine, “lycanthropic possession” episode,
    Where she started barking like a dog!
    Now I know where she hid all the bones!

  42. Bodhisattva says:

    On the west coast, in California in particular (that makes up the bulk of our non-Alaska west coast), if you’re an illegal you can get a drivers license.

    And if you get a drivers license you’re automatically registered to vote in California and, as the article points out, Oregon as well:

    http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/8dbf4f35ce7740d6a30b5bd9c57927f8/automatic-voter-registration-takes-hold-west-coast

    Interestingly enough, you DO have to prove who you are to get a drivers license and you DO have to provide ID if your driving gets you pulled over, but you still DON’T have to provide ID to vote.

    12 states — including California — grant driving privileges to people who can’t prove they’re legally in the United States.

  43. Bodhisattva says:

    On the west coast, in California in particular (that makes up the bulk of our non-Alaska west coast), if you’re an illegal you can get a drivers license.

    And if you get a drivers license you’re automatically registered to vote in California and, as the article points out, Oregon as well:

    http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/8dbf4f35ce7740d6a30b5bd9c57927f8/automatic-voter-registration-takes-hold-west-coast

    Interestingly enough, you DO have to prove who you are to get a drivers license and you DO have to provide ID if your driving gets you pulled over, but you still DON’T have to provide ID to vote.

    12 states — including California — grant driving privileges to people who can’t prove they’re legally in the United States.

  44. Bodhisattva says:

    Well maybe if they would learn to write better they would write more books people want to read – and oh, they need to stop writing whiney books about how terrible it is to be them, perhaps?

    http://news.yahoo.com/publishings-lack-diversity-fails-readers-author-rai-071826680.html;

    Bali Rai warns publishing too has a serious diversity issue.

    “Not enough people are buying my books”, he whines! “It sucks to be me!”

  45. Bodhisattva says:

    Well maybe if they would learn to write better they would write more books people want to read – and oh, they need to stop writing whiney books about how terrible it is to be them, perhaps?

    http://news.yahoo.com/publishings-lack-diversity-fails-readers-author-rai-071826680.html;

    Bali Rai warns publishing too has a serious diversity issue.

    “Not enough people are buying my books”, he whines! “It sucks to be me!”

  46. Bodhisattva says:

    Bruce Jenner – the freak that roars!

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/07/caitlyn-jenner-hillary-clinton-couldnt-care-less-about-women/

    Never mind that!

    How does Hillary feel about deluded, mentally ill men who THINK they’re women?

    And I’m not talking about in public. I want to know how she feels about them IN PRIVATE.

    If Obama had a son who wanted to get his penis turned inside out and who wanted to get breast implants and hormone treatments along with many other surgical procedures, how would Obama feel about THAT?

  47. Bodhisattva says:

    Bruce Jenner – the freak that roars!

    http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/07/caitlyn-jenner-hillary-clinton-couldnt-care-less-about-women/

    Never mind that!

    How does Hillary feel about deluded, mentally ill men who THINK they’re women?

    And I’m not talking about in public. I want to know how she feels about them IN PRIVATE.

    If Obama had a son who wanted to get his penis turned inside out and who wanted to get breast implants and hormone treatments along with many other surgical procedures, how would Obama feel about THAT?

  48. Bodhisattva says:

    Obama administration going after the guy who revealed Clinton’s secret e-mail accounts and started the whole servergate scam rolling in the process.

    And he’s in more trouble than she is over it.

    How messed up is that?

  49. Bodhisattva says:

    Obama administration going after the guy who revealed Clinton’s secret e-mail accounts and started the whole servergate scam rolling in the process.

    And he’s in more trouble than she is over it.

    How messed up is that?

  50. Bodhisattva says:

    Liberals don’t know who Washington, D.C. is named after.

    I was wondering who this “D.C.” guy was, too.

    Because “Kirshner” starts with a “K”.

    This video shot at PACIFIC BEACH, SAN DIEGO – if you look real close you might see me riding by!

    Ask them what the “D.C.” stands for. That’s harder.

  51. Bodhisattva says:

    Liberals don’t know who Washington, D.C. is named after.

    http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-07/who-is-washington-dc-named-after-americans-dont-know

    I was wondering who this “D.C.” guy was, too.

    Because “Kirshner” starts with a “K”.

    This video shot at PACIFIC BEACH, SAN DIEGO, at the foot of Hornblend St – if you look real close you might see me riding by! Also not Crystal pier in the background at the foot of Garnet when the camera faces north and the new lifeguard tower at the foot of Grand when it faces south.

    Ask them what the “D.C.” stands for. That’s harder.

    This video was shot, apparently, at the western end of Hornblend St in Pacific Beach. Interesting point – they spelled it wrong. When they named the street. Anyone know what I’m talking about? HINT: It is missing a letter.

    I spoke with Mark Dice once up at the Oceanside Pier, another of his regular haunts. Not one of his better days – he was pushing some nonsense petition – I think it was to get rid of money, of currency, or something. But people were signing it.

    I declined.

  52. Bodhisattva says:

    Indeed!

    and

    I think I figured out “whom”:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nSKkwzwdW4

  53. Bodhisattva says:

    Indeed!

    and

    I think I figured out “whom”:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nSKkwzwdW4

  54. flyin brian says:

    he’s a fool.

  55. flyin brian says:

    he’s a fool.

  56. Stephen Hague says:

    The Inexorable Spirit of Hillary.

  57. Stephen Hague says:

    The Inexorable Spirit of Hillary.

  58. Torcer says:

    New Ad Shows Donald Trump Has The Best Words [VIDEO] http://www.redstate.com/saragonzales/2016/03/07/new-ad-shows-donald-trump-best-words-video/ via @SaraGonzalesTX

    New Ad Shows Donald Trump Has The Best Words [VIDEO]
    Floridians in the Pensacola and Panama City areas are about to get an unpleasant dose of the real Donald Trump through a 30-second anti-Trump ad that will run tomorrow through the March 15th primary.

    “I went to an Ivy League school. I’m very highly educated. I know words. I have the best words,” says Trump in the beginning of the ad. It then cuts to a montage of Donald Trump using various profanities in his public speeches, and is censored appropriately, of course.

    Aptly titled, “The Best Words,” and funded by the super-PAC American Future Fund, the ad is short and sweet, yet says so much.

    The Best Words
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Thw6k1XNRtc

    http://www.redstate.com/saragonzales/2016/03/07/new-ad-shows-donald-trump-best-words-video/

  59. Torcer says:

    Do The Media Favor Hillary? Here’s Your Proof. http://www.dailywire.com/news/3943/do-media-favor-hillary-heres-your-proof-ben-shapiro

    Do The Media Favor Hillary? Here’s Your Proof.
    ust in case you were wondering, the media are clearly in Hillary Clinton’s pocket.

    Sunday night provided more proof of that incontrovertible fact when NBC’s Kristen Welker got caught on a hot mic feeding questions to Hillary aide Jen Palmieri. “I’m going to ask you about Flint,” Welker said, not aware she was on the microphone. Then, as the segment began, she turned to Palmieri and stated, “Let’s start with the issue of Flint. Tonight she came out for the first time calling for the resignation of the governor. Why tonight, and was that a last-minute decision to flip-flop?”

    Why, it’s almost as if the media coordinated with the Hillary campaign to ensure that nobody would be blindsided.

    Meanwhile, on the Republican side of the aisle, media have covered Donald Trump with thoroughness bordering on the obsessive. As Adrian Gray points out, in 2012, Romney had won 54 percent of delegates in the 34 days after Iowa, and had received 56 percent of all media coverage; Trump has received 43 percent of delegates and 84 percent of the media coverage. Part of that is Trump’s shocking rise and his entertaining manner. But part of that is the media’s willingness to watch Trump soar to the nomination without facing serious questions about his record.

    Trump represents the left’s best shot at rendering anti-Hillary attacks ineffective. Hillary is perhaps the most disliked politician in American history; Trump is even more disliked, by every available poll. Hillary wants to fight against a mythical Republican war on women; Trump is the guy who once said that women ought to be treated “like s***.” Hillary wants to run a campaign in which she plays the ally of minorities; Trump pussyfoots around David Duke.

    This is why Republicans ought to be careful before they guzzle down the heady champagne of Trump-hope. Trump may be beating other Republicans in the field, but that’s largely due to a media that won’t stop giving Trump free airtime – and that same media will turn their bazookas on Trump the minute he secures the nomination.
    http://www.dailywire.com/news/3943/do-media-favor-hillary-heres-your-proof-ben-shapiro

  60. Torcer says:

    New Ad Shows Donald Trump Has The Best Words [VIDEO] http://www.redstate.com/saragonzales/2016/03/07/new-ad-shows-donald-trump-best-words-video/ via @SaraGonzalesTX

    New Ad Shows Donald Trump Has The Best Words [VIDEO]
    Floridians in the Pensacola and Panama City areas are about to get an unpleasant dose of the real Donald Trump through a 30-second anti-Trump ad that will run tomorrow through the March 15th primary.

    “I went to an Ivy League school. I’m very highly educated. I know words. I have the best words,” says Trump in the beginning of the ad. It then cuts to a montage of Donald Trump using various profanities in his public speeches, and is censored appropriately, of course.

    Aptly titled, “The Best Words,” and funded by the super-PAC American Future Fund, the ad is short and sweet, yet says so much.

    The Best Words
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Thw6k1XNRtc

    http://www.redstate.com/saragonzales/2016/03/07/new-ad-shows-donald-trump-best-words-video/

  61. Torcer says:

    Do The Media Favor Hillary? Here’s Your Proof. http://www.dailywire.com/news/3943/do-media-favor-hillary-heres-your-proof-ben-shapiro

    Do The Media Favor Hillary? Here’s Your Proof.
    ust in case you were wondering, the media are clearly in Hillary Clinton’s pocket.

    Sunday night provided more proof of that incontrovertible fact when NBC’s Kristen Welker got caught on a hot mic feeding questions to Hillary aide Jen Palmieri. “I’m going to ask you about Flint,” Welker said, not aware she was on the microphone. Then, as the segment began, she turned to Palmieri and stated, “Let’s start with the issue of Flint. Tonight she came out for the first time calling for the resignation of the governor. Why tonight, and was that a last-minute decision to flip-flop?”

    Why, it’s almost as if the media coordinated with the Hillary campaign to ensure that nobody would be blindsided.

    Meanwhile, on the Republican side of the aisle, media have covered Donald Trump with thoroughness bordering on the obsessive. As Adrian Gray points out, in 2012, Romney had won 54 percent of delegates in the 34 days after Iowa, and had received 56 percent of all media coverage; Trump has received 43 percent of delegates and 84 percent of the media coverage. Part of that is Trump’s shocking rise and his entertaining manner. But part of that is the media’s willingness to watch Trump soar to the nomination without facing serious questions about his record.

    Trump represents the left’s best shot at rendering anti-Hillary attacks ineffective. Hillary is perhaps the most disliked politician in American history; Trump is even more disliked, by every available poll. Hillary wants to fight against a mythical Republican war on women; Trump is the guy who once said that women ought to be treated “like s***.” Hillary wants to run a campaign in which she plays the ally of minorities; Trump pussyfoots around David Duke.

    This is why Republicans ought to be careful before they guzzle down the heady champagne of Trump-hope. Trump may be beating other Republicans in the field, but that’s largely due to a media that won’t stop giving Trump free airtime – and that same media will turn their bazookas on Trump the minute he secures the nomination.
    http://www.dailywire.com/news/3943/do-media-favor-hillary-heres-your-proof-ben-shapiro

  62. TED says:

    http://i.imgur.com/3n2QRC6.gif Actually this would be ALL half-wit liberals…as long as it ISN’T theirs.

  63. TED says:

    http://i.imgur.com/3n2QRC6.gif Actually this would be ALL half-wit liberals…as long as it ISN’T theirs.

  64. TED says:

    A VIVTIM of his own EDUCATIONAL(?) system! http://i.imgur.com/UVjNO19.jpg

  65. TED says:

    A VIVTIM of his own EDUCATIONAL(?) system! http://i.imgur.com/UVjNO19.jpg

  66. TED says:

    Tell THIS to someone even 20 years ago, THAT is how quickly we are sliding into SUPIDITY!! http://i.imgur.com/HAHYvep.jpg

  67. TED says:

    Tell THIS to someone even 20 years ago, THAT is how quickly we are sliding into SUPIDITY!! http://i.imgur.com/HAHYvep.jpg

  68. TED says:

    IF ONLY! WOULDN’T THE MEDIA CRAP THEMSELVES AT THE MASSACURE! http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/198294.jpg

  69. TED says:

    IF ONLY! WOULDN’T THE MEDIA CRAP THEMSELVES AT THE MASSACURE! http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/198294.jpg

  70. TED says:

    http://i.imgur.com/2CoJR7K.jpg
    OH NO! What happened Bernie/Trumpies??!

  71. TED says:

    http://i.imgur.com/2CoJR7K.jpg
    OH NO! What happened Bernie/Trumpies??!

  72. TED says:

    It’s what the left usually get BUT they are surprised EVERY TIME!! http://i.imgur.com/uhvuLv1.jpg

  73. TED says:

    It’s what the left usually get BUT they are surprised EVERY TIME!! http://i.imgur.com/uhvuLv1.jpg

  74. TED says:

    Isn’t it STRANGE how that works??!!! The LEFT is SILENT?! http://i.imgur.com/DytJfO4.jpg

  75. TED says:

    Isn’t it STRANGE how that works??!!! The LEFT is SILENT?! http://i.imgur.com/DytJfO4.jpg

  76. TED says:

    Story Time: Bill Reads a Hillary Clinton Children’s Book! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlE0g3MYMaw

  77. TED says:

    Story Time: Bill Reads a Hillary Clinton Children’s Book! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlE0g3MYMaw

  78. Bodhisattva says:

    The problem is, more and more these days, liberal moonbats see OUR money as theirs to spend.

    And the more elections they win, the closer they come to making that a reality.

  79. Bodhisattva says:

    The problem is, more and more these days, liberal moonbats see OUR money as theirs to spend.

    And the more elections they win, the closer they come to making that a reality.

  80. TED says:

    Haven’t they always? They’ve always had plenty of money for everything, as long as THEY don’t have to provide it.

  81. TED says:

    Haven’t they always? They’ve always had plenty of money for everything, as long as THEY don’t have to provide it.

  82. Bodhisattva says:

    Well yes and no.

    Why did Trump throw his hat in the ring? How much was it a result of contacts from Bill Clinton – and what was Clinton’s motivation for trying to get him to run? Isn’t it odd that Clinton would try and get someone to run against his wife? What sense does that make?

    Clinton’s strategy, I believe, was to convince a Democrat to run as a Republican, a Democrat who would have a great deal of popular support due to his established name recognition, his proven ability as an entertainer and his carefully crafted but blatantly false populist/nationalist promises, but would certainly not be able to muster enough support to oppose those who want to make history by electing the first woman President, come election day.

    Trumps whole reason for running is to validate the hatred Democrats spew at Republicans – even though his past words and actions, as well as his present ones prove he’s nothing like a true Republican.

    Note how he is the perfect lunatic leftist moonbat caricature of what a Republican is. But he’s also showing clear Democrat traits, chief among them making promises we all know, and I’m certain he knows, he has no power to keep and so when the time comes he will say yes, I promised to build a wall and I meant it, and I tried, but it turns out that the President does not have the power to allocate the funds and pass the laws necessary to do that and Congress (which, if the plan goes as they hope, will still be dominated if not outright controlled by Republicans, so it will be the Republicans who are at fault, not Donald, that the promises weren’t kept) wasn’t on board and what do you know, our President cannot force Mexico to pay for it anyway.

    Donald will look us all straight in the eye and tell us he meant to do exactly what he promised, and still means to do it, but he will admit it’s those darn Republicans who are keeping us from achieving his goals.

    That’s in the unlikely event he actually beats the chosen Democrat – Hillary.

    The whole Bernie Sanders thing is a sideshow. Elections, at least when Democrats are involved, are a sideshow, a joke, a formality. Not unlike in the former USSR, in Iraq under Hussein, etc. Hillary is going to get her shot this year – that was decided some time previously. It doesn’t matter if more Democrats want Bernie Sanders – their choice will be Hillary. And the Democrats knew she likely wouldn’t beat a valid Republican challenger, so they asked Donald to step in and run.

    Yes, the fact he’s doing so well is indeed a result of this pendulum, it appears you completely understand my point here – if the pendulum is forced too far left it will naturally swing too far right in response.

    This is an irrefutable law of nature and physics, apparently also somewhat valid in politics.

  83. Bodhisattva says:

    Well yes and no.

    Why did Trump throw his hat in the ring? How much was it a result of contacts from Bill Clinton – and what was Clinton’s motivation for trying to get him to run? Isn’t it odd that Clinton would try and get someone to run against his wife? What sense does that make?

    Clinton’s strategy, I believe, was to convince a Democrat to run as a Republican, a Democrat who would have a great deal of popular support due to his established name recognition, his proven ability as an entertainer and his carefully crafted but blatantly false populist/nationalist promises, but would certainly not be able to muster enough support to oppose those who want to make history by electing the first woman President, come election day.

    Trumps whole reason for running is to validate the hatred Democrats spew at Republicans – even though his past words and actions, as well as his present ones prove he’s nothing like a true Republican.

    Note how he is the perfect lunatic leftist moonbat caricature of what a Republican is. But he’s also showing clear Democrat traits, chief among them making promises we all know, and I’m certain he knows, he has no power to keep and so when the time comes he will say yes, I promised to build a wall and I meant it, and I tried, but it turns out that the President does not have the power to allocate the funds and pass the laws necessary to do that and Congress (which, if the plan goes as they hope, will still be dominated if not outright controlled by Republicans [if this is confusing, yes, they would rather Congress be controlled by Democrats, but they know this is unlikely, so given the reality they know they will likely face…], so it will be the Republicans who are at fault, not Donald, that the promises weren’t kept) wasn’t on board and what do you know, our President cannot force Mexico to pay for it anyway.

    Donald will look us all straight in the eye and tell us he meant to do exactly what he promised, and still means to do it, but he will admit it’s those darn Republicans who are keeping us from achieving his goals.

    That’s in the unlikely event he actually beats the chosen Democrat – Hillary.

    The whole Bernie Sanders thing is a sideshow. Elections, at least when Democrats are involved, are a sideshow, a joke, a formality. Not unlike in the former USSR, in Iraq under Hussein, etc. Hillary is going to get her shot this year – that was decided some time previously. It doesn’t matter if more Democrats want Bernie Sanders – their choice will be Hillary. And the Democrats knew she likely wouldn’t beat a valid Republican challenger, so they asked Donald to step in and run.

    Yes, the fact he’s doing so well is indeed a result of this pendulum, it appears you completely understand my point here – if the pendulum is forced too far left it will naturally swing too far right in response.

    This is an irrefutable law of nature and physics, apparently also somewhat valid in politics.

  84. Momster says:

    But, that’s all based on whether or not your suspicion that Clinton got Trump to run in the first place. If not–your theory falls apart.

  85. Momster says:

    But, that’s all based on whether or not your suspicion that Clinton got Trump to run in the first place. If not–your theory falls apart.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy