moonbattery logo

Dec 20 2016

Open Thread

jon-stewart_fake-news

Passed along by Bodhisattva.



109 Responses to “Open Thread”

  1. Torcer says:

    Who Is Going To Fact Check The Fake News Fact Checkers?
    Here is ABC News this morning – even after German Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere said yesterday that, “authorities have “no doubt” that the attack was intentional,” and German Chancellor Angela Merkel also said yesterday, “We must assume at the current time that it was a terrorist attack.”:
    http://patterico.com/files/2016/12/Untitled.png
    http://patterico.com/2016/12/20/who-is-going-to-fact-check-the-fake-news-fact-checkers/

  2. Torcer says:

    On this day: the Soviet Union founds the CHEKA, their dreaded secret police force
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/20/day-soviet-union-founds-cheka-dreaded-secret-police-force/

    99 years ago today, the Bolshevik regime founded its bloody secret police—the Cheka. https://t.co/Yg9HzvJzbP

  3. Torcer says:

    Voters Really Did Switch To Trump At The Last Minute
    Donald Trump’s somewhat surprising win has forced many political analysts to wonder: Were we wrong all along in thinking Hillary Clinton had the upper hand, or was late-breaking movement to Trump part of the reason why polling averages missed his upset Electoral College victory? There’s certainly evidence that the polls underestimated Trump’s support in crucial Midwest states. But the latest wave of the Institute for the Study of Citizens and Politics panel survey that my University of Pennsylvania colleague Diana Mutz and I have been overseeing is now complete, and it provides new evidence that voters did shift to Trump in the final weeks of the campaign, too.

    Our October 2016 wave was conducted with nationally sampled adults over age 26 between Oct. 14 and Oct. 24, meaning that it ended soon after the third Clinton-Trump debate. At the time, Clinton was riding high in the polls — and 43 percent of our panelists in that wave expressed support for Clinton, as opposed to 36 percent for Trump. By way of benchmarking, this same group of panelists had gone for President Obama over Mitt Romney 46 percent to 39 percent in October 2012.

    And while most people’s support remained the same, the changes we did observe were consequential. Consider the table below, showing panelists’ support in the October 2016 poll versus their support in the post-election poll, which took place from Nov. 28 to Dec. 7. Eighty-nine percent of the 1,075 American adults reported the same preference in both waves, whether it was for Clinton (38.0 percent), Trump (35.2 percent) or neither (15.8 percent). But among those who did move, Trump had the advantage. While no one moved from Trump to Clinton, 0.9 percent of our respondents moved from Clinton to Trump. Although that 0.9 percent isn’t a lot, those changes are especially influential, since they simultaneously reduce Clinton’s tally and add to Trump’s. If there were a comparable swing in the national electorate, 1.2 million votes would move to Trump.
    [..]
    As to what moved these Americans in the final weeks of the campaign, the panel has little to say. The timing of James Comey’s letter to Congress — released on Friday, Oct. 28 — makes it one potential explanation. When making sense of campaigns, people often search for overarching narratives, and Comey’s letter provides a ready-made story. No less a political observer than Bill Clinton recently explained his wife’s loss by pointing to Comey’s letter.

    Still, we shouldn’t discount the possibility that voters might have gravitated to Trump anyhow. Research has long suggested that over the course of a campaign, partisans come home to their party’s candidate.
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/voters-really-did-switch-to-trump-at-the-last-minute/

  4. Torcer says:

    Sowell: A public service
    Concealed guns protect not only those who carry them, but also those who do not. If concealed guns become widespread, then a mugger or a car jacker has no way of knowing who has one and who does not. It makes being a mugger or a car jacker a less safe occupation. Gun control laws are in effect occupational safety laws — OSHA for burglars, muggers, car jackers and others.

    The fatal fallacy of gun control laws in general is the assumption that such laws actually control guns. Criminals who disobey other laws are not likely to be stopped by gun control laws. What such laws actually do is increase the number of disarmed and defenseless victims.

    Mass shootings are often used as examples of a need for gun control. But what puts a stop to mass shootings? Usually the arrival on the scene of somebody else with a gun.

    Mass shooters are often portrayed as “irrational” people engaged in “senseless” acts. But mass shooters are usually rational enough to attack schools, churches and other places where there is far less likelihood of someone being on the scene who is armed.

    Seldom do we hear about these “irrational” shooters engaging in “senseless” attacks on meetings of the National Rifle Association or a local gun show or a National Guard armory.

    The fallacy of believing that the way to reduce shootings is to disarm peaceful people extends from domestic gun control laws to international disarmament agreements. If disarmament agreements reduced the dangers of war, there would never have been a World War II.
    – See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/12/a-public-service

  5. TrojanMan says:

    “To disagree, one doesn’t have to be disagreeable.” Barry Goldwater

  6. TrojanMan says:

    “Equality, rightly understood as our founding fathers understood it, leads to liberty and to the emancipation of creative differences; wrongly understood, as it has been so tragically in our time, it leads first to conformity and then to despotism.” Barry Goldwater

  7. TrojanMan says:

    “So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear. That there is no alternative way, so far discovered, of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by a free enterprise system.” Milton Friedman

    Emphasis added

  8. TrojanMan says:

    “And what does reward virtue? You think the communist commissar rewards virtue? You think a Hitler rewards virtue? You think, excuse me, if you’ll pardon me, American presidents reward virtue? Do they choose their appointees on the basis of the virtue of the people appointed or on the basis of their political clout?” Milton Friedman

  9. TrojanMan says:

    While i was looking up quotes from the greats i decided to look up some of Trumps greatest hits:

    DISCLAIMER: Some my find the following offensive… viewer discretion advised.

    “When somebody challenges you, fight back. Be brutal, be tough.” Donald Trump
    Ahh now it all makes sense.

    “One of the key problems today is that politics is such a disgrace, good people don’t go into government.” Donald Trump
    Himself included?

    “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me – consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.” Donald Trump

    “Owning a great golf course gives you great power.” Donald Trump
    With great power comes great responsibility Peter……LOL

    “I think Ronald Reagan was one of the great presidents, period, not just recently. I thought he had the demeanor. I thought he had the bearing. I thought he had the thought process.” Donald Trump
    Truth

    “The debt limits have to come down. The whole world of debt has to be changed as far as this country is concerned. We have to create jobs and we have to create them rapidly because if we don’t things are just going to head in a direction that’s going to be almost impossible to recover from.” Donald Trump
    And that will be accomplished by a trillion dollar infrastructure package and paid maternity leave.

    “We need a great president.” Donald Trump
    Indeed we do Donald, 2020 is 4 years away. LOL 🙂 Just kidding. He surely wont be any worse than the last 4 presidents right?

    “I’m a believer in the polls, by the way. Rarely do you see a poll that’s very far off.” Donald Trump

    “As far as single payer, it works in Canada. It works incredibly well in Scotland.” Donald Trump

  10. 762x51 says:

    Schumer Says Trump’s Trillion-Dollar Infrastructure Plan ‘Sounds Good to Me’

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/schumer-trumps-trillion-dollar-infrastructure-plan-sounds-good/story?id=44311598

    Looks like Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary has a new fan. What “conservative” wouldn’t want Chuck Schumer’s approval? LMAO!!

  11. TrojanMan says:

    When Chuck Schumer agrees with you… you need to reevaluate your priorities.

  12. 762x51 says:

    This is how desperate and how committed the ‘D’ flavored Progressives and their offensive unit, the Democrat Party are to destroying the republic.

    https://techfeatured.com/3128/the-anti-trump-electoral-college-effort-is-only-the-beginning

    They plan to try to use Title 3, Section 15 of the US Code to stop tRump from taking office. By using the Emoluments Clause, as a basis, they plan to try and invalidate the Electoral College vote from today, thereby creating a constitutional crisis of immense magnitude. Should they succeed, or even make a big stand on this desperate measure, it will drive us down the garden path to civil war by leaps and bounds.

    You may even see our resident Trumpanzees grow some stones over such an issue, but don’t hold your breath.

  13. 762x51 says:

    LOL, no doubt. ANYTHING Chuckles is good with must be bad. Besides, unless they are willing to take my Zimbabwe bank notes for my share, they are out of luck confiscating that money from me.

    This is just another Progressive agenda item and I will not fund their agenda.

  14. 762x51 says:

    To actually see cool, you have to watch an airstrike, from a respectable distance is preferable but up front and personal is unbelievable. CAS means never having to say you are sorry. I thought an A-10 gun run was cool until I saw those 500lb JDAM’s rain hate from the sky. Anything bigger than that is best observed from another zip code.

    A long time ago, I was part of a joint training exercise where the AF was involved running “carpet bombing” simulations with infantry in close proximity. No actual bombs were used, it was all done with radar and computer models but on some of the runs, I was able to look up into the open bomb bay’s of the B-52’s as they passed directly over our position at a very low altitude. They don’t do it anymore as doctrine has changed but man that was quite a sight.

  15. Kerryjhawkins says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !sr424c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !sr424c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash724MarketSourceGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sr424c:….,….

  16. 762x51 says:

    Ohhh hell, don’t tell jerklesTwerp about this, he thinks he’s a genius because his boy won. He might off himself or something. . . . . On second thought, let’s be certain he knows about this.

    The RCP average on Nov 7th had Clinton up by 2.1 points over tRump. Your numbers indicate a 1.8 point shift at the last minute leaving a statistically insignificant .3 points difference. The lateness of the shift was undetectable in the polling so anyone relying on data instead of blind ideology would not know about it until election day.

    I think the reason people waited so long to decide is that instead of just holding their nose and voting for tRump they had to have their nostrils surgically sealed to avoid the Progressive stench.

  17. Bodhisattva says:

    I always found it to be hilarious that liberals really thought Sarah Palin ever said “I can see Russia from my house”. They really had no idea that was part of a comedy skit on Saturday Night Live and she never said it.

  18. Bodhisattva says:

    Obama doesn’t realize that what one President does the next President can undo using the same method.

    http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obama-offshore-drilling-20161220-story.html

    Obama will use his executive authority to impose new permanent bans on offshore drilling

    Invoking a rarely used provision in federal law, the Obama administration on Tuesday announced a permanent ban on offshore drilling in broad parts of the Arctic and Atlantic coasts — a sweeping and controversial move that will help secure the president’s environmental legacy even as critics vowed to reverse it.

    The ban relies on the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953, which says the president “may, from time to time, withdraw” federal waters from oil and gas development that are not already leased. It was announced as part of a joint action with Canada, where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also made long-term, though not permanent, commitments to protect the Arctic from drilling.

    Trump can come in and invalidate the action just as quickly as Obama took it.

    They say the law does not allow reversal, but it also does not allow permanent bans.

  19. Bodhisattva says:

    Voters Really Did Switch To Trump At The Last Minute

    I don’t know about that. His rally crowds were always super sized compared to hers.

    If you look at the places that made the difference you will find people who’ve been particularly hurt by Obama’s actions in particular and the Democratic party in general. They didn’t leave the party – the party left them.

  20. Bodhisattva says:

    Did anyone ask the truck just what it was that was bothering it so we can go talk to other trucks and see if maybe this is something other trucks are struggling with as well?

  21. StephaneDumas says:

    This is a unintended consequence of MTV 2017 New Year’s Day Resolution clip. One of the peoples who participated in it had became a new internet meme.

    https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/folder1/500x/74139001.jpg

  22. KirklesWorth says:

    Which side will you be fighting on in this civil war?

  23. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Every day Obama’s acts makes him look like more of a puppet.

  24. Mr. Freemarket says:

    I suspect she wonders why she is asked out on few dates.

  25. Mr. Freemarket says:

    When you get your news from Comedy Central, you can’t expect to be well informed.

    Then again…when you get your news from MSNBC, the New York Times, Fox News…..

    It’s almost like you have to seek out your own news sources……

    Like Moonbattery….

  26. Mr. Freemarket says:

    That “Revenue” sign should read “Revenue/Entitled Oppressor.”

  27. Mr. Freemarket says:

    I’m hoping that we do not end up with a “Let’s make a deal” president.

  28. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Wait….why Turkey?

    Isn’t there an opening for an Ambassador to Libya?
    After all….she has the experience.

    And she has some extra time on her hands, too.

    Huma should enjoy the change of venue.

  29. KirklesWorth says:

    Compared to you, any Trump supporter is a genius. Just look at the rampant wrongness:

    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.

    This is where it calls Hillary a better candidate than Trump:

    762×51: Your cult leader is losing to the SECOND most un-electable candidate in American history, the responsibility lies directly on him and those who support him. His campaign has cancelled their ad campaigns in FL and OH, NC, news flash, ignoramus, he can’t win without those sates.

    The following statement is wrong and wrong:

    762×51: Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails.

    Who is wrong (and who was right) in the following statement is self-evident:

    762×51: Everyone is still waiting on your, oh so brilliant, explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome his deficit in electoral votes. Prove your claim that “tRump is the only candidate who can beat Hillary”. You do realize he will need to defeat her in reality, not just your fantasy world, right?

    Funny how it brags about always using the progressive media’s “documented facts”:

    762×51: That Thor and McMullin can’t beat Hillary is not the question but your deflection is noted. Getting a “second wind” a fortuitous bounce, a magic lamp, etc., is not a plan to defeat anyone, idiot. Mr. I always use documented facts, LMFAO!!

    And yet you still tout how you swallowed the progressive media’s propaganda hook, line and sinker and keep giving the same excuses:

    762×51: ALL of the available data, right up to Nov 7th had your boy down an average of 2 – 3 points. I didn’t come up with that you vile little toad, vast news and polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it.

  30. Mr. Freemarket says:

    “Dunham said that “something I’ve thought about a lot is the fact that there is stigma around abortion.”

    Humm……a stigma associated with killing unborn children….and then celebrating the fact that you have promoting killing unborn children….

    How could there possibly be a stigma associated with that? It’s almost like saying that there is a stigma associated with a guy who kidnaps and kills young children, too.

  31. Mr. Freemarket says:

    That is a scary dude. Yet….I suspect there are a number of liberals with similar attitudes. They just understand that Donald Trump doesn’t drive a UPS truck in his off hours.

    The Secret Service will have its hands full.

  32. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Thank goodness that there is no offence so bad that Obama could ever be criticized for his actions. After all….he really cares.

  33. 762x51 says:

    Which desk will you be hiding under when it starts? Coward.

  34. KirklesWorth says:

    Perfect! I couldn’t have asked for a better evasion!

  35. 762x51 says:

    Too late . . .

  36. Mr. Freemarket says:

    And I remember how Obama made the statement that he would promote higher taxes on the rich, even if it hurt the economy.

    Think about that….the man was willing to hurt the American public as a whole if it served the purpose of punishing the rich for being rich.

  37. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Let’s hope it doesn’t become his signature meme.

  38. 762x51 says:

    What evasion jackass? I have already explained this to you at least 3 to 5 times. As a professional liar in training, your game is weak, princess tinklesTw*t.

  39. 762x51 says:

    LOl, no doubt. If Monty Hall was still alive he could be his chief negotiator.

  40. TrojanMan says:

    Dont fat shame. There is nothing wrong with being overweight and the plethora of health problems that comes with it…nothing at all. Diabetes, heart disease, liver, kidney, bones, joints, et al….. no problems. /s

    I was overweight for a period of time and one should feel some self inflicted shame for being like this. Of course many factors go into being being obese but the main, undeniable factor is we chose to.

    It is now sad that society has actually lifted this up as something to be proud of and normal.

  41. TrojanMan says:

    I did a project out in Tucson last winter and got to see the A10’s fly around all the time. When you land at the airport there they have what looks to be F16’s in there own little car ports. I imagine that has something to do with the 120+ degree heat in the summer.

  42. Mr. Freemarket says:

    And now the chick claims that it was a distasteful joke…
    http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/12/21/lena-dunham-apologizes-for-distasteful-joke-about-abortion/

    I guess we know who is the distasteful joke….

  43. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Old Monty didn’t have to throw political contributions into the mix in order to “make a deal.”

    It could be a very long four years, and the republican congress (obviously) would do nothing to stop Trump were he to wander into unconstitutional actions.

  44. TrojanMan says:

    I read a story once that claimed the reason the Donald was behind in the polls was that when pollsters called people they either lied or said they were voting for someone other than the Donald. Does not sound like a vote of confidence.

    Donald was just the least loser. Even then he lost the popular vote. He won because just enough people in 3 key states hated Clinton just a tad more than him.

  45. 762x51 says:

    tRump could, in fact, revoke every single EO issued by Comrade Cockroach Obama and every other Marxist Progressive President all with a single EO on Jan 21st, listing them as revoked. He has promised to do that, I’ll believe it when I see it.

  46. KayElle says:

    Russians (or perhaps alien pod people) hacked voters’ brains and forced them to vote for Trump. Just ask John Podesta…

  47. 762x51 says:

    Don’t know what I’ve already answered this question repeatedly means huh? Fine, I’ll school you.

    762×51 KirklesWorth • 2 days ago
    Ohh jerkles, we have already had this conversation repeatedly! You do not possess the intellect to discuss the topic as your single focus on Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary demonstrates. Your premise that there will two sides is proof that you cannot comprehend the dynamics involved, just as you so epically fail at formal logic. Hey, how come you never post any of that stuff, princess?

    Even now, the civil unrest precursor I told you about, REGARDLESS OF WHO WON THE ELECTION, is happening, yet you will not address it just as you will not address the globalist Progressive cabinet that Not Hillary is putting together. Just as the Obama zombies have done for eight years, you are just like them and equally as despicable.

    Now GFY.

    It is not “actually quite simple: the sides would be “republican”, “democrat”, or “other””. stupid, that is just all you are capable of comprehending. Thanks for demonstrating my point though. You have absolutely no idea what I “want” jackhole, only an arrogant little pr!ck like you would assume that.

    No doubt you will be fighting for Mitch McConnell and Paul RyanO like a good little RINO stooge, or at least hiding under their desks, whispering sycophantic sweet nothings to them, at least their crotches.

    Now as I said before, GFY.

  48. KirklesWorth says:

    You are a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims progressives are for killing and that Hillary, Trump, and their supporters are progressives…therefore in two ridiculous claims you somehow justify the extermination of over 135,000,000 Americans – and those are just the ones who voted. Don’t lecture me about anything you psycho.

  49. Torcer says:

    Yes, we should make inquires into their feelings – perhaps they are vehicle questioning – wanting to be a sport’s instead of a lorry for instance.

    This is a very important issue – more important than guns that go crazy and start shooting people – we must understand why they are doing this.

    After all, it started with those Eeevvviiiil that began killing people and now it’s grown worse with larger vehicles..

  50. Torcer says:

    I would submit that was part of it, but the FBI actions must have played a critical role.

  51. Torcer says:

    Take a look at the RCP polling average:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C0N5vJfXUAQ1ZIL.jpg
    Note the sudden jump around the time of the FBI announcement.

    I would also submit that any one of the other top contenders would have won – easily.

  52. KirklesWorth says:

    And the LA Times poll looked like this…so? https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a5ed4c4f305af83cc7e0135eef7f715f2a21d61ca802ae74ba47337d5f9d44c.png

    I said months ago that the polls can’t be trusted, but a select few just couldn’t wrap their heads around that concept. And I didn’t make the laughable proclamations with so much assuredness and condescension, bragging about “emperical observation” and who would “deny the data”.

    762×51: Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces. You keep saying “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary” yet he is failing to do so by empirical observation. Now a loyal, deluded Progressive would deny the data, in effect, shooting the messenger. You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it. Let’s go jerkelsworth, show us how superior you are. Just don’t try logic because you simply have no grasp of it. ROTFLMAO!!

    762×51: I can’t wait to see you try and address the tRumpsters shortfall in electoral votes although you avoided doing so here. Did all that “logic” wear you out, jerklesworth? ROTLMFAO!!

    762×51: What matters in a presidential general election is the electoral college, nothing else matters. Your inexperienced candidate does not understand this and apparently neither do you.. He still thinks of this as TV ratings and they are not the same thing. Right now, your cult leader is losing, 224 to 126 electoral votes, period.

    762×51: Everyone is still waiting on your, oh so brilliant, explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome his deficit in electoral votes. Prove your claim that “tRump is the only candidate who can beat Hillary”. You do realize he will need to defeat her in reality, not just your fantasy world, right?

  53. TrojanMan says:

    The polls showing Donald down were correct. They poll likely voters and Clinton won the popular vote. The majority of the electorate wanted the criminal but popular vote a president does not elect and for good reason.

    Abolishing the electoral college, as the democrats want, should have the result of an immediate revolt.

  54. Torcer says:

    Sadly for the Trumpers they have to once again distract from the reality of the situation because it is unfavourable to their mythopoeic mindset.

    I would also like to point out that is an average of the polls and not just one, thus it tends to filter out the noise of biases etc.

    One does have to wonder how they decide the threshold of with which to attack those daring to speak on their leader. Too low a threshold and they end up wasting everyone’s time in incessantly berating anyone daring to mention the man’s name.

  55. KirklesWorth says:

    Um, the Trumpers won – you lost and your pathetic obsession with the polls back then as justification to criticize Trump supporters shows what progressive propaganda you were willing to swallow:

    Apparently they haven’t begun polling for him, so what is your point aside from dodging the question? Now that I’ve answered your questions – now it YOUR turn: Do you believe the polls? Shouldn’t Trump and his followers try something different?

    No. Now that I’ve answered your questions – now it YOUR turn: Do you believe the polls? Shouldn’t Trump and his followers try something different?

    And I’ve answered your questions – now it YOUR turn: Do you believe the polls?Shouldn’t Trump and his followers try something different? How is Trump doing in the polls?

    How is Trump doing in the polls?

    Are you referring to the ‘viable’ that is dropping in the polls?

  56. TrojanMan says:

    “I’m a believer in the polls, by the way. Rarely do you see a poll that’s very far off.” Donald Trump

  57. KirklesWorth says:

    And he was right – fortunately for him, the polls were just far off enough so that Trump supporters who didn’t buy in to the polling propaganda rallied to give him the win.

  58. TrojanMan says:

    This quote of his was correct. That’s the point i am trying to make. The polls were indeed correct showing him down. He did indeed receive less votes than the criminal. What is fortunate for him are two things: 1. the electoral college and 2. a few key swing states went in his favor.

    This is all a moot as the election is over and hindsight is always 20/20.

  59. Torcer says:

    But only when they show the proper results…

  60. StephaneDumas says:

    And as if wasn’t enough, double-standards is still at work in this case from what I saw on this image I saw on a random blog.
    https://anonmgur.com/up/3ae351238e656b5a516aba9b20b76257.jpg

  61. 762x51 says:

    I shall lecture you as I see fit, A-hole. You came in here eight or nine months ago looking for trouble, well it just so happens I’m the west coast distributor.

    As an apologist for globalist Progressives, I would expect you to see it that way. However, I’m not responsible for the numbers of enemies of the United States Constitution, you all have made your own choice.

    UrkelJerk – Mitch McConnell, John McCain, Paul RyanO, John Boeher, fanboy.

    SS-Rottenführer JerkleTwerp – backer of Goldman Sachs, George Soros, Rothchild’s.

    Princess Jerkles – “Here to keep and eye on things” and “report” what he doesn’t like.

    As always, GFY.

  62. 762x51 says:

    ROTFLMFAO!! Yep, jerkles, you found the outlier, that’s what smart people call one result that is contrary to the rest of the results. Like I said, polls reflect the POPULAR vote because the electoral vote cannot be polled prior to the election. They were correct in that tRump did lose the popular vote.

    Most people utilize data, not the zombiesque blind cult ideology you follow. Having witnessed your flailing with logic, it is no wonder you cannot comprehend data.

    So GFY.

  63. Bodhisattva says:

    Well to be honest, I occasionally post stuff from some of those sources you listed – but to be REALLY honest I post it so we can laugh at it!

  64. Bodhisattva says:

    Since the left didn’t care about the server and didn’t care really about ANYTHING any of their anointed ones do, I would submit that very few people changed their minds due to the FBI stuff. Again, look at the states that normally vote Democrat that switched and went for Trump, look at what influenced them. I doubt it had anything to do with scandals, servers, e-mails, the FBI or even for that matter Russia.

  65. Bodhisattva says:

    And of course, lest we forget, a car ran into a crowd here in the U.S. then a knife started hacking away at people. So we can’t just limit it to trucks – wider inquiries are needed.

  66. Bodhisattva says:

    Did he promise to do that in specific words?

    I hope so, and I hope he follows through.

    But at the same time, I would HOPE that somewhere in that mess of nonsense Obama slipped in at least one or two sensible EOs. Probably not, but one would think he at least should have.

  67. 762x51 says:

    Read the first entry under the “Five actions to restore security and the constitutional rule of law”, section.

    https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf

    Not every EO issued by Obama was unconstitutional, for example:

    EO 13736:
    Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Veterans Affairs

  68. 762x51 says:

    That or the “chair force” doesn’t want to burn their butt when they slide into those overheated seats.

    Those are ANG jets though, not AF.

    We used to call CAS when things got “busy”. The A-10’s on station would come in and the first thing you heard was the cannon shells exploding on the target, not the gun or the aircraft. It was always spectacular but then you have to move in and secure the area and strain the remains for intel and ID.

    The difference between them and Apaches was the Apache would come in low over our position some times and it would rain those 30mm shell casings out of sky when they would engage hajji, that sucked. The A-10 were always far enough away it never happened with them. I suppose someone may have experienced that but I never did with the A-10’s.

  69. Mr. Freemarket says:

    When I was growing up, we always watched the 10 o’clock news. Now….I don’t think any of my kids “watch the news.” Then again….neither do I any more.

  70. Rebeccatsaunders says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !sf223c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !sf223c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash513TopSecurityGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sf223c:….,……..

  71. KirklesWorth says:

    Ooooh…not an “outlier”! And I found it! Who would have thought that swallowing the progressive media’s polling could result with an “outlier”? Oh wait, Trump supporters would have thought that – but apparently not the so-called “conservative” Hillary-enabling anti-Trump losers. Besides which, do “smart people” say stupid things like this:

    You called Trump the “most un-electable candidate in American history”, claimed that Trump and his supporters “have done more to put Hillary Clinton in the White House than the Clinton campaign itself”, questioned my correct statement that “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary”, claimed “you have managed to lose this election”, announced “of course tRump can’t win, he never could”, suggested “Better fascist harder jerkles, looks like your boy mat [sic] turn out to be a LOSER, ROTFLMFAO!!”, claimed “It will be proven in Nov. when the 12 million Democrats who voted for tRump in the Primaries show up to vote for Hillary”, proclaimed “Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails”, blamed your errors on “polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it”, announced Trump is a surefire loser, the loss of the Senate, and maybe the House – all because of Trump supporters, and asked the ironic question “How long would it take to turn those states, and their legislatures even purple, much less magenta or red? Ten years? Twenty? More?”

  72. 762x51 says:

    You wouldn’t listen to anyone but tRump jerkles, that’s why I don’t talk to you, I only lecture you. It looks like most everyone else has come to the same conclusion, you are a brain dead cultist with nothing but propaganda to offer, so why bother.

    But I do love making you put together those long responses with links from your “records” on me, SS-Rottenfurher JerklesTwerp.

    I only reply to mock you because that is all you are worth.

    Now, GFY.

  73. KirklesWorth says:

    That’s all you’ve got? I’ve posted a dozen stupid things you’ve said and your reply is “that’s why I don’t talk to you, I only lecture you”? Well guess what – your lectures have as much worth as they have wisdom – squat. You don’t “lecture” me – you embarrass yourself.

    I only reply to mock you because that is all you are worth.

    And your “mockery” is as void as your intelligence. But what can be expected of a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims (1) progressives are for killing 2 and that (2) Hillary and Trump, and democrats and republicans are all progressives, your enemies, and your targets 2 that you find killing “tons of fun”. Therefore using these ridiculous claims you somehow justify the extermination of over 135,000,000 Americans – and those are just the ones who voted.

  74. Torcer says:

    Those cars and knives cannot be trusted – lest they force a poor Islamic Terrorist to do their bidding.

  75. 762x51 says:

    ROTFLMAO!! You just worked your little hooves off on that one, dance monkey, I love it. Tell me princess, did Alex Jones help with that or did you do it all by yourself?

    Taking snippets and stringing them together without the original context, then framing the whole thing in lies like “blamed your errors on “polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it”, ” is a time honored Progressive tactic. Hey, you aren’t related to John Podesta are you, because you sure act like him. Nahh, he’s a lot tougher than you, probably disown a gay bitch like you. No, you remind me more of Chrissy “thrill up his leg” Matthews. Effeminate but arrogant and dishonest and a hard line cult follower, yep, Tingles and tinkles, LMAO.

    So , tinkleTw*t, I assume you will be supporting ‘R’ Progressive Mitch McConnell for Senate Majority Leader again this time, after all, gotta tow the party line. And of course Paul RyanO in the House. You and the cult will need them to ram the Globalist agenda through Congress so your leader can sign it. See it will soon be time for him to put up or shut up about the lies . . . er . .ah . . I mean Promises he made during his campaign. Let’s take the whole Muslim ban and border fence thing which naturally include sanctuary cities. The link will take you to a map where you can see how much of the country is going to be at odds with your boy so will he stand up to them or not? If he doesn’t then he is a liar, just like you, if he does, the shooting will start very soon thereafter. Get someone with at least a room temperature IQ to explain all those things we call states and what the various dots mean, there is something called a “legend”, not like you are in your own mind, this is different, it’s a map thing. If you focus and try really hard, you may be able to grasp a few of the complexities involved and why there will be many “sides” in this coming conflict. Doubtful, but maybe . . .

    http://cis.org/Sanctuary-Cities-Map

    See you on the battlefield, princess tinkles, GFY.

  76. KirklesWorth says:

    Too stupid to click the obvious links? I expected as much. Why are you giving anybody but yourself credit for writing what I have posted – you wrote practically all of it. But very well, time to school you again on your “snippets” because you are a disingenuous liar and incompetent link-clicker:

    Taking snippets and stringing them together without the original context, then framing the whole thing in lies like “blamed your errors on “polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it”, ” is a time honored Progressive tactic.

    You dare call me out on this? It’s condensed for brevity but I’ll let you tell it to your own lying self (my favorite one first):

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51: Your cult leader is losing to the SECOND most un-electable candidate in American history, the responsibility lies directly on him and those who support him. His campaign has cancelled their ad campaigns in FL and OH, NC, news flash, ignoramus, he can’t win without those sates.

    762×51: That @$$clown Donald tRump and the imbeciles who backed tRump have done more to put Hillary Clinton in the White House than the Clinton campaign itself.

    762×51: Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces. You keep saying “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary” yet he is failing to do so by empirical observation. Now a loyal, deluded Progressive would deny the data, in effect, shooting the messenger. You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it. Let’s go jerkelsworth, show us how superior you are. Just don’t try logic because you simply have no grasp of it. ROTFLMAO!!

    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.

    762×51: Hmmmm, looks like your cult leader has slipped another point in the polls – Post Debate. How can that be when he has you out here denigrating as many people as possible to try and force them to support him? Gee, maybe your strategy is FAILING as is everything else you do. Better fascist harder jerkles, looks like your boy mat turn out to be a LOSER, ROTFLMFAO!!

    762×51: It will be proven in Nov. when the 12 million Democrats who voted for tRump in the Primaries show up to vote for Hillary. Then you can blame Conservatives who had nothing to do with any of it rather than yourself which is what Progressives always do. Poor little Proggie, just doesn’t get it, but you are still an excellent drone. So; go f__k yourself.

    762×51: Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails.

    762×51: ALL of the available data, right up to Nov 7th had your boy down an average of 2 – 3 points. I didn’t come up with that you vile little toad, vast news and polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it.

    762×51: How long would it take to turn those states, and their legislatures even purple, much less magenta or red? Ten years? Twenty? More? Had this effort begun in earnest 30 year ago, it might have succeeded, but now there simply is no time left. The enemy has been allowed to grow too strong.

  77. 762x51 says:

    No, I just don’t care what you post monkey, I just like to watch you dance, LMAO!

    It’s not incompetence, it’s just that I’m right handed which means clicking with my index finger, not my middle finger and you are ever going to get from me A-hole is the middle finger.

    What is really funny is that you believe that people actually read the crap you post, you smug, arrogant, pompous little ass. I just like winding you up and getting you to do it, that is it’s only value to me. Watching you dance, little monkey, is my only interest. Unless you ever grow the stones to come out from behind you keyboard that is.

  78. 762x51 says:

    Yep, that’s why I use the RCP average among a couple of others, it generally gives a clearer, more accurate picture. One thing no poll or average of polls can account for is duplicity, the respondents straight up lying to the pollster thereby skewing the poll results. We have seen the unlimited duplicity employed by the tRumpian cultists and their dogmatic loyalty to the personalty at the center of that cult first hand so we know it exists.

  79. 762x51 says:

    Yep, they didn’t vote for tRump, they voted for Not Hillary which is why I refer to him now as Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary. It is a far more accurate description of what he really represents.

  80. KirklesWorth says:

    You’ve got nothing per usual. Even using all of your progressive tricks and Alinsky tactics you only show yourself more the fool. One of my favorites is your lying whine to Dave:

    762×51: I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.

    Why are you changing your story? Everybody knows want to murder anyone who easily schools you on your pathetic comments. You’ve already explained how you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

  81. KirklesWorth says:

    Funny, that’s not what you’ve previously said:

    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.

    762×51: Weird, she should be thanking the imbeciles who put up the only person in the country who is a bigger a__hole than her to run against her. That’s what higher negatives means, it means he is a bigger a__hole that Hillary.

    762×51: That @$$clown Donald tRump and the imbeciles who backed tRump have done more to put Hillary Clinton in the White House than the Clinton campaign itself.

    762×51: Your little cesspool will make zero difference, it will go to Hillary as it has gone to every Democrat candidate since 1992 so no anecdotal evidence of your neighbors beliefs has any bearing on anything. It is more likely that they don’t want tRump but also don’t want to have to deal with Trumpeteers and their LDS / Scientology style bullshit so they just avoid it completely. You underestimate how outcast you all have made yourselves with all this cult like bullshit.

    762×51: The one and only thing you have accomplished here is to increase reader animosity towards tRump and further ensure the election of Hillary Clinton. You are among the top Hillary enablers in America.

    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.

    762×51: I can’t wait to see you try and address the tRumpsters shortfall in electoral votes although you avoided doing so here. Did all that “logic” wear you out, jerklesworth? ROTLMFAO!!

    762×51: You have managed to lose this election against the worst (now second worst) candidate in modern history, possible ever. It’s Clinton by 4.6 points with less than 30 days until the election. Nice going.

  82. KirklesWorth says:

    No, it’s just that it makes sense to do the opposite of what you think.

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51 as kirklesworthintheGround: tRmp supporters who gave us Hillary with your stupidity, you will beg for Hillary.

    762×51: Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces. You keep saying “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary” yet he is failing to do so by empirical observation. Now a loyal, deluded Progressive would deny the data, in effect, shooting the messenger. You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it. Let’s go jerkelsworth, show us how superior you are. Just don’t try logic because you simply have no grasp of it. ROTFLMAO!!

    762×51 as KirklesworthRentFreeHead: The one and only thing you have accomplished here is to increase reader animosity towards tRump and further ensure the election of Hillary Clinton. You are among the top Hillary enablers in America.

    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.

  83. 762x51 says:

    8 OCT 2016 – RCP AVG T 42.9 C 47.5
    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.
    This is where it calls Hillary a better candidate than Trump:

    8 OCT 2016 – RCP AVG T 42.9 C 47.5
    762×51: Your cult leader is losing to the SECOND most un-electable candidate in American history, the responsibility lies directly on him and those who support him. His campaign has cancelled their ad campaigns in FL and OH, NC, news flash, ignoramus, he can’t win without those sates.

    20 SEP 2016 – RCP AVG T 43.5 C 45.4
    762×51: Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails.

    20 SEP 2016 – RCP AVG T 43.5 C 45.4
    762×51: Everyone is still waiting on your, oh so brilliant, explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome his deficit in electoral votes. Prove your claim that “tRump is the only candidate who can beat Hillary”. You do realize he will need to defeat her in reality, not just your fantasy world, right?

    Post election, clearly you FAILED to grasp what you were being told, yet again.
    762×51: ALL of the available data, right up to Nov 7th had your boy down an average of 2 – 3 points. I didn’t come up with that you vile little toad, vast news and polling organizations with millions of dollars in resources came up with it.

    11 AUG 2016 – RCP AVG T 41.2 C 47.5
    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    Well tinkles,looks like I was correct at the time based on the available DATA. In each case your cult leader was behind Hitlery in the polls, now your hindsight is absolutely brilliant, I assume that is what you are touting here. That your hindsight is more accurate than the data was at the time, DATA, that is what most go by, not blind emotion or in your case sexual desire for the candidate. See, that’s what the rest of the world calls CONTEXT, something a dishonest, smug, toady propagandist like you cannot possibly understand. Will your leader be promoting you from head of the tWinks for tWump PAC to White House bathroom attendant soon?

    Thanks for the opportunity to show I was correct about your cult leaders position at the time of those posts. You keep re-posting them, I’ll keep debunking your lies.

    Now, GFY.

  84. Torcer says:

    Yes, it filters out the noise.

    She suffers from the mistake known in the mathematical discipline of statistics as essentially a sampling error.

  85. KirklesWorth says:

    Hey, you did some actual work…kudos! Why should anyone care that you wantingly swallowed poll numbers and spewed them like a good little progressive? You just helped prove my point that you constantly side with progressives – thanks! You were wrong but somehow the polls excuse you from being wrong? Classic! Your “available data” was as wrong as you were, yet you tout it as some sort of badge of honor. I don’t care what sources you cite for for you embarrassing claims – you were wrong and you lost and all of your panties-wetting isn’t going to change that. So let’s review how you said things so matter-of-factly with no regards to polls:

    The polls didn’t say “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary”, I did – and I was right and you were wrong.
    The polls didn’t call Trump “a surefire loser” – you did.
    The polls didn’t say “tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did” – you did.
    The polls didn’t say “he will lose us the senate” – you did.
    The polls didn’t say “and maybe lose the house” – you did.
    The polls didn’t call Trump supporters “progressives” that “have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary” – you did.
    The polls didn’t claim that I “ensure the election of Hillary Clinton” – you did.
    The polls didn’t say “Of course tRump can’t win, he never could” – you did.
    The polls didn’t call Trump the “2nd most unelectable candidate in American history” – you did.
    The polls didn’t say “your cult leader is losing, 224 to 126 electoral votes”, you did.
    The polls didn’t say “Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails” – you did.

    Any more of your epic failures you want to discuss?

    762×51: The one and only thing you have accomplished here is to increase reader animosity towards tRump and further ensure the election of Hillary Clinton. You are among the top Hillary enablers in America.

    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.

    762×51: Your cult leader is losing to the SECOND most un-electable candidate in American history, the responsibility lies directly on him and those who support him. His campaign has cancelled their ad campaigns in FL and OH, NC, news flash, ignoramus, he can’t win without those sates.

    762×51: Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces. You keep saying “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary” yet he is failing to do so by empirical observation. Now a loyal, deluded Progressive would deny the data, in effect, shooting the messenger. You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it. Let’s go jerkelsworth, show us how superior you are. Just don’t try logic because you simply have no grasp of it. ROTFLMAO!!

    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.

    762×51: Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails.

  86. KirklesWorth says:

    Sorry, the only “dogmatic loyalty” here was with the anti-Trumpers and the polls – which is another area where they all sided with the progressives. With all this progressive poll-swallowing (notice I didn’t say “pole”), I wouldn’t put it past them to start touting “global warming” since they justify themselves with “that’s what the numbers say” without criticism of the research methodology.

    And somehow the polls that showed Trump behind were embraced while the polls that showed Trump ahead were ignored…I wonder why the lack of objectivity?
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a5ed4c4f305af83cc7e0135eef7f715f2a21d61ca802ae74ba47337d5f9d44c.png

  87. 762x51 says:

    Blah, blah, blah, BFD, jackass. That an $5 will get you a cup of coffee these days.. It could have just as easily gone the other way as the numbers that push Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary over the top didn’t make up their minds until they were in the voting booth.

    Sometimes, blind faith, or in your case sexual desire, works out The only one impressed by this is you.

    Checking your latest batch of meaningless propaganda:

    20 SEP 2016 – RCP AVG T 43.5 C 45.4
    762×51: Jerklesworth pushes complete GOP failure as tRump candidacy fails.
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    8 OCT 2016 – RCP AVG T 42.9 C 47.5
    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    8 OCT 2016 – RCP AVG T 42.9 C 47.5
    762×51: Your cult leader is losing to the SECOND most un-electable candidate in American history, the responsibility lies directly on him and those who support him. His campaign has cancelled their ad campaigns in FL and OH, NC, news flash, ignoramus, he can’t win without those states.
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    28 AUG 2016 – RCP AVG T 41.3 C 47.2
    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    18 SEP 2016 – RCP AVG T 44.0 C 44.9
    762×51: Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces. You keep saying “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary” yet he is failing to do so by empirical observation. Now a loyal, deluded Progressive would deny the data, in effect, shooting the messenger. You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it. Let’s go jerkelsworth, show us how superior you are. Just don’t try logic because you simply have no grasp of it. ROTFLMAO!!

    So tinkles, besides demonstrating that I was right at each of those points in time, is there a reason why you keep rehashing all this and boring everyone to death? I swear, you are like talking to a bitchy woman, if any of the men here have never been divorced, they can sample the experience just by talking to you. You are literally every man’s ex-wife.

  88. 762x51 says:

    Like I said, you are every man’s ex-wife, but a cultist ex-wife.

    We have already seen how you have run away from defending your cult leader, Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary’s cabinet selections. Duplicitous A-hole.

  89. Bodhisattva says:

    Yeah, they watch the news. At least they did until Jon Stewart retired.

  90. Bodhisattva says:

    Not every EO issued by Obama was unconstitutional

    I believe I made that same point where people were calling for an immediate repeal of every EO issued by Obama.

    The problem is putting the brakes on the bad ones quick while not touching the ones that were OK.

  91. 762x51 says:

    All you do is prove I was right based on the available DATA at the time and that you lucked out going on blind emotion which is almost never successful, BFD. Try picking stocks to buy or a new car, or house, let me know how it works out for you.

    7 AUG 2016 – RCP AVG T 40.1 C 47.3
    762×51: It will be proven in Nov. when the 12 million Democrats who voted for tRump in the Primaries show up to vote for Hillary. Then you can blame Conservatives who had nothing to do with any of it rather than yourself which is what Progressives always do. Poor little Proggie, just doesn’t get it, but you are still an excellent drone. So; go f__k yourself.
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    8 OCT 2016 – RCP AVG T 42.9 C 47.5
    762×51: Of course tRump can’t win, he never could and MB and its few remaining actual conservatives have been saying that ever since he started.
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    8 OCT 2016 – RCP AVG T 42.9 C 47.5
    762×51: Hmmmm, looks like your cult leader has slipped another point in the polls – Post Debate. How can that be when he has you out here denigrating as many people as possible to try and force them to support him? Gee, maybe your strategy is FAILING as is everything else you do. Better fascist harder jerkles, looks like your boy mat turn out to be a LOSER, ROTFLMFAO!!
    Yep, I was right at that time.

    Thanks for taking the time to show everyone that I was correct on each of these dates, professional ex-wife jerklesTw*t.

    GFY
    .

  92. KirklesWorth says:

    You just reposted data – anybody can do that. Kind of like this:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.

    It certainly didn’t make you right about your “conclusions” Trump, Hillary, the Senate, the House, or the “Trumpanzee Progressives” – in fact, you were quite wrong. But you go ahead and keep blaming it on the “polls” that you so willingly swallowed up like a good progressive.

  93. 762x51 says:

    Already rehashed those posts numerous times, professional ex-wife jerklesTw*t.

    So all polls are “Progressive”? I see that discernment is among your many lacking characteristics, like logic and intelligence. Anyone who uses polls is a Progressive? ROTFLMFAO. You are an even bigger idiot than I though, a remarkable accomplishment.

    Hey tinkles, for your business cards, the ones for the professional liar business you are building, you should have your name appear

    SS-Rottenführer jerklesTw*t, EMEW – Every Man’s Ex-Wife, LMFAO!!!!!

  94. KirklesWorth says:

    It’s a public service to remind people of your “stellar intellect” laughing boy.

    So all polls are “Progressive”? I see that discernment is among your many lacking characteristics, like logic and intelligence. Anyone who uses polls is a Progressive? ROTFLMFAO. You are an even bigger idiot than I though, a remarkable accomplishment.

    As you once shrieked, Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!

    I said “you so willingly swallowed up like a good progressive” – you either have a problem with reading comprehension or are setting up another progressive-style straw man.

    I posted the LA Times poll on a few occasions – so I guess you just preferred the one that coincided with your progressive masters’ propaganda that you swallowed whole.
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2a5ed4c4f305af83cc7e0135eef7f715f2a21d61ca802ae74ba47337d5f9d44c.png

  95. 762x51 says:

    ROTFLMAO!! So now you are re-posting your own edited re-posts of re-edited re-posts, of re-edited re-posts, of re-edited re-posts of re-edited re-posts, (whew) of my original posts and trying to present them as original fact. Your deceit is not in question but your ability to present it is.

    Here is the entire “re-post”:

    KirklesWorth 762×51 • a month ago
    As you shrieked at me: Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!

    No, what I said was the patriotic and heroic Americans who voted for Trump saved us from stupid people who believed things like this:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.
    1. Whose side will you be on if there is a civil war?
    2. You wanted Trump to lose, who did you want to win?

    The second re-post of my original, again out of context but presented as true fact:
    KirklesWorth 762×51 • a month ago
    And once again, you offer the opportunity for me to show what a hypocritical, disingenuous moron you are – and let me show my appreciation:

    “Everyone must obey the cult.Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    “everyone must worship tRump.”Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!
    “Everyone must submit to SS-Rottenführer jerkleTwerp as your political compliance officer.Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!

    There are, in fact 7 re-posts in this chain where you took one snippet of a post with no context and have re-posted it that many tines, probably more in other chains to try and make yourself out to be a some pathetic victim. One more duplicitous than the next.

    Here is the original exchange: 13 NOV 2016:
    KirklesWorth 762×51 • a month ago
    You complete and utter liar! Let’s start with how you wanted Trump defeated for Hillary to win to get your civil war to kill “prograssives”. What are you laughing at – your own stupidity?

    762×51: Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.
    762×51: I didn’t start this, the Progressives did and with them there is no room for reason. Hillary = Progressive. tRump = Progressive. Election of either one = civil war. Get used to it, you are making it happen.
    And you are a coward, but fortunately nobody is stupid enough to get cowardly ambushed by you.

    762×51 KirklesWorth • a month ago
    Oh do ” Let’s start with how you want the election overturned, Hillary instated”.

    PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!

    Your lies are all you have, that and your cowardice. Say it to my face, sissy.

    See CONTEXT. You act like you have no role here other than the innocent victim but in fact you are the one who generated the strife in the first lace all the way back to the first interaction I had with you. Ten years of no jerklesTw*t on MB then you roll in and start by “reporting” something you claim was “inappropriate”. Thus you are only here looking for trouble which you are too much of a coward to handle once you find it.

    I was wrong professional ex-wife jerkleTw*t, you aren’t just a liar, you are a liar who lies about his lies. As i said, you are a prolific liar, but you suck at it.

    Let me know when I break 100, GFY.

  96. KirklesWorth says:

    You are so dumb you think I have to repost everything you bloviate about verbatim to satisfy your new-found “context requirements”? You should not be preaching about anybody else using “context”. But dream on laughing boy – that is why I provide links, which you don’t, to provide any “context” the casual reader wants to check.

    Sit and spin all you want. You make demands of others you refuse to follow. You whine like a petulant child. You go ahead and cry me a river about “context” and then explain how you “interpreted” me as a “progressive”. Your “interpretation” does not equal FACT, jackass. Tell me again how I am a “progressive”. Come on pipsqueak, you made the statement, NOW BACK IT UP, COWARD! Show me where I said I was a “progressive”. PROVE WHERE I SAID THAT YOU LYING PUDDLE OF DOG VOMIT!

    Go ahead and repost the “context” of how you swallowing up the polls like a good little progressive when you said this:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy