moonbattery logo

Oct 09 2017

Open Thread

gayroller-homofascism

On a tip from Anonymous.



87 Responses to “Open Thread”

  1. seaoh says:

    Hard to beleive this was NOT in Detroit

    Mayor punched and beaten by her son in campaign headquarters

    https://vid.me/iHOR9

    Ps looking for video platform other than youtube try vidme

  2. Bodhisattva says:

    THIS JUST IN.

    Kaepernick says he’ll stand for anthem if he can play again.

    But it was on a left wing site so I can’t vouch for it’s accuracy and I’m not going to link it and drive traffic to them.

  3. Bodhisattva says:

    And if so how come they’re against the Moslems who are throwing gays off the roof and Democrats are for them?

  4. TED says:

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8609f0b1890d78252bcd18861f25824ca8346d2b9ba455036175dc099a8cddc1.png
    OTHER THAN PATTING EACH OTHER ON THE BACK WHAT ELSE ARE THESE STUPID SHOWS FOR??!!!!!!!!!

  5. SonjaTTrotter says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour,with weekly payouts.You can also avail this.
    On tuesday I got a brand new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $11752 this last four weeks..with-out any doubt it’s the most-comfortable job I have ever done .. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !dw240d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleLegitimateSitesJobsFromHomeJobs/get/hourly ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!dw240luuuuu

  6. HARVEY POON GRABBER STEIN says:

    .
    A particularly disgusting third party hate Crime Hoax just took place in NYC:

    Swastika ‘Juden Raus’ Hate Letter Sent to NYC Businesses, Israeli Consulate

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/2017/10/09/swastika-juden-raus-hate-letter-sent-nyc-businesses-israeli-consulate/

    References to Trump and MAGA strongly suggest that this is the handiwork of antifas or moslems/blm in an attempt to smear patriotic Americans.
    .

  7. Mr. Freemarket says:

    BTW…love the hammer and sickle on the gay flag. How appropriate.

  8. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Have his football talents improved to the point that he can actually play???

  9. Mr. Freemarket says:

    The doctor will see you now.

  10. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Mitch is now in his Pause Pod. He will be available soon. Let’s not rush him.
    https://d1p42fqrbwqdsw.cloudfront.net/campaigns/background_images/000/054/494/web/pausepod_thunderclap_header.jpg?1492469362

  11. Mr. Freemarket says:

    BTW…I think the North Koreans are laughing at us.

  12. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Maybe going to an Affirmative Action therapist isn’t the best idea….

  13. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Hint:
    This guy’s a democrat. He can’t help himself.

  14. Mr. Freemarket says:

    He only signs up for the GOP orchestra around election time. The rest of the time, he is only around when there is a microphone listening to him.

  15. Mr. Freemarket says:

    Paperback edition only.

  16. Mr. Freemarket says:

    And he still doesn’t listen to you or do what you say.

  17. Mr. Freemarket says:

    And he wants to govern. That’s why he’s getting together with Schumer.

  18. Occam's Stubble says:

    What a world, what a world.

  19. Occam's Stubble says:

    Mad Maxine, beyond dunderhead.

  20. Richard Jennings says:

    And all of them far more terrifying than Pennywise!

  21. Steve2 says:

    Everyone is now a participant in the oppression olympics, whether or not we want to be.

  22. StephaneDumas says:

    That poster reminded me of an article about one detail these guys except one had thought. http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/10/09/exclusive-gay-porn-kingpin-muslim-homophobia-becoming-inconvenient-liberals/

  23. physicsnut says:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPgyTzqDJhM

    MOZILLA GIVING MONEY TO ANTIFA ?

  24. Torcer says:

    The Possible Las Vegas Motive That Only Mark Steyn Is Talking About
    London think tank member tries to come up with a motive, lands on “gun control.”
    Steyn’s reader notes Paddock “spent days filling his hotel room with more weapons and ammunition than he could ever conceivably use along with an array of advanced modifications and accessories.” Which begs the question: Why did he spend energy and time sneaking all those firearms into the hotel knowing that when bullets started flying, he wouldn’t get the chance to use even half of what he had on hand?
    […]
    If Paddock’s goal was to shock the U.S. into banning guns, or passing strict gun control, as the think tank member suggests, it means the bombshell answer explaining what drove a man to murder so many innocents is never coming. If it’s true, it means that Paddock planted the seed of an idea — that gun control is necessary — that is already tearing through the United States like a cancer. It’s an interesting theory, but I hope that it’s wrong. Stephen Paddock has devastated too many lives already. The idea of his murderous actions posthumously influencing our world more than they already have is hard to stomach.
    http://www.dailywire.com/news/22026/possible-las-vegas-motive-only-mark-steyn-talking-tyler-dahnke

  25. Torcer says:

    Nancy Pelosi is a national treasure
    By Torcer
    A gun grabber throws away the mask and admits to the obvious and illustrates why we cannot give in to their demands that we disarm.
    “Two steps forward, one step back”

    For years now the gun grabbers have used a tried and true method of denigrating our Civil Rights the instant a ‘serious crisis’ takes place. This is best described as the Gun Grabber Two Step. It begins with the “easy access to guns” lie whenever there is a ‘serious crisis’. It continues with whatever they can muster in taking away our rights and finishes up with them resetting the rhetoric for the next time around.

    For example, in her news conference Oct. 5 Nancy Pelosi talked about the ‘background check’ as though it’s new and has yet to be implemented while in point of fact the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) has been around for almost 20 years. Of course, they now want to impose an ‘Enhanced’ Background Check or [Intergalactic Background Checks for want of a better name] which will assert government control over everyone’s private property.

    And Bless her heart (as they say in the Southern regions of the country), Nancy gave up the game when she said at the same news conference that “They’re going to say, ‘You give them bump stock, it’s going to be a slippery slope.’ I certainly hope so.”
    The problem for the gun grabbers is that they must studiously maintain the fiction that their ultimate goal is not their ultimate goal. No, they don’t really want to confiscate everyone’s firearms, they merely want to tie them up in so much government control that any slip-ups mean they take them anyway.

    Thus, I’ve taken it upon myself to bestow this great honor on Ms. Pelosi for her unguarded moment of clarity in letting everyone in on one of the Left’s worst kept secrets: That they want to incrementally destroy a fundamental, God given Civil Right.
    http://noqreport.com/2017/10/09/nancy-pelosi-national-treasure/

  26. Torcer says:

    YouTube Rolls Out Big Changes in Response to the Las Vegas Shooting https://bearingarms.com/erika-h/2017/10/09/youtube-modifies-video-guidelines-in-wake-of-vegas-shooting/ via @BearingArmsCom

  27. Torcer says:

    Why A Bump-Fire Stock Ban Won’t End Bump-Firing
    Sen. Dianne Feinstein has proposed a ban on bump-fire stocks or anything that would allow someone to fire “too fast.” The NRA has even come out and said bump-fire stocks should probably be regulated. The gun community is evenly divided on just whether these stocks should be legal or not.

    However, even if something is done to ban bump-fire stocks, it won’t stop the problem. It won’t prevent another maniac from using bump-fire to kill numerous people if he’s so inclined.

    You see, while the bump-fire stock is useful for bump-firing, eliminating those won’t eliminate bump-fire.

    “But doesn’t Sen. Feinstein’s bill ban other devices that assist in things like that?” some might ask, and they’re right. Unfortunately, the ban is useless and here are two videos to illustrate just why it’s useless.

    For example, in this one, they use an ordinary rubber band.
    https://youtu.be/GnD3Ame7Z5c
    Here’s one that just uses a belt loop.
    https://youtu.be/hI86T8RghWY
    Either Sen. Feinstein’s bill will also lead to the banning of office supplies and parts of our clothing or her proposal is less than useless. After all, a would-be killer who wishes to use bump-fire to kill can easily obtain rubber bands and is probably wearing pants.
    [..]
    Especially since, with proper training, you can get this kind of aimed fire:
    https://youtu.be/9hXV-Buvs1Y
    https://bearingarms.com/tom-k/2017/10/09/bump-fire-stock-ban-wont-end-bump-firing/

  28. Torcer says:

    Is Vladimir Putin’s regime in trouble? Probably not
    With all the protests taking place in the streets of the United States, Venezuela and Catalonia it’s easy to miss some of the others which don’t get quite as much air time. In the streets of Moscow and other cities across Russia, protest fever is catching on once again and dissatisfied citizens decided to celebrate Vladimir Putin’s birthday by sending a message: It’s time for you to retire. (Associated Press)
    https://hotair.com/archives/2017/10/08/vladimir-putins-regime-trouble-probably-not/

  29. Torcer says:

    The Possible Las Vegas Motive That Only Mark Steyn Is Talking About
    London think tank member tries to come up with a motive, lands on “gun control.”
    On Friday, Las Vegas undersheriff Kevin C. McMahill told the media that the motive underlying Stephen Paddock’s monstrous rampage remains a mystery. It’s truly bizarre that almost a week after the shooting we have no insight into what set Paddock off. Generally speaking, mass murderers kill in order to send a message, or because they’re seriously mentally ill.
    [..]
    Mark Steyn pointed out that, in many ways, Paddock’s actions more closely resembled those of a professional hitman than those of his mass-shooting predecessors. The careful planning suggests Paddock had some form of motive.
    [..]
    Perhaps, but alternatively, author Mark Steyn shared a theory on Friday sent to him by a reader whom he describes as a “gentleman at a London think tank.” The reader’s theory, which is worth reading in its entirety, even if just as a thought experiment, arrives at a motive that seems to check nearly every box.
    [..]
    Steyn’s reader notes Paddock “spent days filling his hotel room with more weapons and ammunition than he could ever conceivably use along with an array of advanced modifications and accessories.” Which begs the question: Why did he spend energy and time sneaking all those firearms into the hotel knowing that when bullets started flying, he wouldn’t get the chance to use even half of what he had on hand?
    […]
    If Paddock’s goal was to shock the U.S. into banning guns, or passing strict gun control, as the think tank member suggests, it means the bombshell answer explaining what drove a man to murder so many innocents is never coming. If it’s true, it means that Paddock planted the seed of an idea — that gun control is necessary — that is already tearing through the United States like a cancer. It’s an interesting theory, but I hope that it’s wrong. Stephen Paddock has devastated too many lives already. The idea of his murderous actions posthumously influencing our world more than they already have is hard to stomach.
    http://www.dailywire.com/news/22026/possible-las-vegas-motive-only-mark-steyn-talking-tyler-dahnke

  30. KirklesWorth says:

    Hooray! It’s time for another patented Torcer Attack Thread™ against me! This will be the 29th since September, and here are the previous: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28.

    Here, let me show you how to prove things:

    Torcer had no candidate and no plan to defeat Hillary
    Torcer knew the election was down to two candidates
    Torcer has a history of contempt for Trump supporters.
    Torcer is/was a NeverTrumper (“We tried to inform you”).
    Torcer demanded people “sell” trump to a NeverTrumper.
    Torcer subjected poster Tom to similar tactics.
    Torcer tries “currying [the] favor” of @Bodhisattva:disqus.
    Torcer didn’t think defeating Hillary was good enough reason.
    Torcer has a faux persecution complex.
    Torcer attacked conservative Trump supporters on 9/7/17.
    Torcer tried to use polls against Trump supporters.
    Torcer readies the blame for Trump supporters.
    Torcer impresses others with his/her winning personality.
    Torcer gets comments from others about his/her motives..
    Torcer demands replies contrary to previous free speech claims.
    Torcer has a stash of 2.875-to-1 Trump-to-Hillary articles.
    Torcer‘s 2.75-to-1 ratio of Trump-to-Hillary story tips that Dave Blount used according to these monthly accumulations:
    . . Torcer‘s August 2016 23 Trump to 10 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer‘s July 2016 4 Trump to 9 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer‘s June 2016 35 Trump to 13 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer‘s May 2016 44 Trump to 7 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer‘s April 2016 39 Trump to 8 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer‘s March 2016 28 Trump to 11 Hillary tips
    Torcer with just over a week before the election:
    . . ● declared Trump will lose
    . . ● still tried to steer votes away from Trump
    . . ● still did not suggest a candidate
    Torcer on the day before the election:
    . . ● surrendered to Hillary
    . . ● “absolved” NeverTumpers.
    . . ● blamed Trump supporters for “disaster”.

    And using Torcer‘s favorite leftists’ tactics…

    “A lie told often enough becomes the truth” – Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Goebbels (2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28)
    “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon” (2) – Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #5.
    “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it” (2 3 4) – Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #12.
    Decaff: This is a case where someone doesn’t try to win in the marketplace of ideas and just attempts to shout down the opposing voices.

    Torcer attacks me accordingly:

    Torcer <a href="childishly refers to me with derogatory pronoun “it”.
    Torcer lied saying I lied that he/she had no candidate.
    Torcer generates thread after thread of attacks against me.
    Torcer cries “attacks” and “wasting time” while doing both.
    Torcer doesn’t charge me rent to live in his/her head.
    Torcer lied and propagated that I am the “originator of attacks against conservatives” (2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23) and variations on that theme. when actually Torcer holds that title.

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    Today’s review is Torcer‘s hyperbole, histrionics, innuendo, and outright lies:

    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/13/2017) Why are you obsessing over a non-existent issue?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/19/2017) Why are you trying to Control what other people are discussing?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/20/2017) And once again KirklesWorth displays it’s prowess for projection in complaining about such tactics while engaging in the practice!
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) So are you going go through your usual method of attacking Conservatives with long screeds over past events?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) So once again it has FAILED to proves it’s point. Note that it merely wants to imply something without actually PROVING anything. And once again it failed making an intellectual argument as was the original point. The question still remains as to who has the time to the time to write these long screeds.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Before you demand that I address your post – you need to respond to this: Note that it originated the tactic of initiating attacks on old threads. KirklesWorth You are obviously oblivious to the use of your own tactics Okay, everyone… today’s word is irony in that it originated the tactic of initiating attacks on old threads.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Are you serious? You initialed countless attacks – are you denying this Fact?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Why don’t you put more effort in addressing my question than Avoiding it: Perhaps for once we can try to elicit an honest and open opinion from KirklesWorth on this turn of events.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Are you serious? You initialed countless attacks – are you denying this Fact?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Again, it is based on information you do NOT have. Therefore it is false. Clearly you cannot address that issue.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Ohh.. scare quotes, again you are implying something based on information you do not have – therefore it is False
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What are your referring to? Do you understand that that is a subjective standard. That there is a vast difference between fact and opinion? TRY AGAIN
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) I can appreciate your position here – you have to avoid saying too much or engaging in debate, so you assail everyone with endless postings of what they have said in the past as cover for that lack of debate. You have to accuse others of what you do in spades in order to muddy the waters and confuse everyone as to who you truly are.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Remember that long screed when you DEMAND that someone prove you use them to avoid addressing the issue at present.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) How do you have so much time to wast endlessly posting those long screeds?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) And now instead of debating the issue it trots outs ‘Rules for Radicals’ and desperately tries to accuse other of what is does. Clearly we are dealing with someone without any moral grounding..
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) I can appreciate your position here – you have to avoid saying too much or engaging in debate, so you assail everyone with endless postings of what they have said in the past as cover for that lack of debate. You have to accuse others of what you do in spades in order to muddy the waters and confuse everyone as to who you truly are.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) And you very aptly proving to everyone that you cannot debate the issues and have to project those tactics on others. Odd that you are well familiar with them
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) And now we’re down to the the originator of attacks against Conservatives wasting time hurling a blizzard of postings. Everyone should note that it is wasting more time trying to AVOID debate on the issue than it would were it to do so…… …Which only deepens the mystery of why the originator of attacks against Conservatives is here…
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Have you ever considered the fact that your repeated failure to explain the inherent contradictions has rendered your assertions as false? Or is it a case where you are just barely holding on and thus feel the need to lash out at those that highlight those contradictions?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Note that aside from it’s attempt at currying your favor and lying once again, it didn’t actually have anything substantive to add to the conversation.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Here KirklesWorth was shown to be a LIAR making a declarative statement based on information IT Does not have:
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Why don’t you go off and do something useful instead of harassing Conservatives?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) It should be patently obvious that your actions are harassment.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Why don’t you go off and do something useful instead of harassing Conservatives?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/08/2017) Isn’t that curious that It’s playing it’s link & Number game instead of padding it’s response… what is it trying to hide?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/09/2017) Isn’t that curious that It’s playing it’s link & Number game instead of padding it’s response… what is it trying to hide?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/09/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.

  31. TED says:

    Maxine put dunderhead at midscale…

  32. TED says:

    he NEEDS TO GET AWAY FROM THAT NYC SNAKE POS!!!

  33. TED says:

    LIKE everyone else, RULER you are NOT nor EVER BE!!!

  34. TED says:

    In case you run out of TP!

  35. TED says:

    I doubt HIS voters CARE. FROM POW TO POS!!

  36. TED says:

    BAM,!!!

  37. TED says:

    THROWING HIS WORTHLESS ASS OUT WOULD BE THE CORRECT DIRECTION…!

  38. Torcer says:

    Murderer Che Guevara Shouldn’t Be Lionized 50 Years After His Death http://theresurgent.com/murderer-che-guevara-shouldnt-be-lionized-50-years-after-his-death/ via @Gabby_Hoffman

  39. Torcer says:

    WATCH: James O’Keefe Exposes The New York Times, Staff ADMITS Political Agendas http://www.dailywire.com/news/22124/watch-james-okeefe-exposes-new-york-times-staff-ryan-saavedra

  40. Chocolate&Cheese says:

    lol. NeverTrumptard central.

  41. Torcer says:

    "The widespread denial of communism’s death toll enables the West to forget the 100-year legacy of red genocide." https://t.co/BpHlkb3r5m pic.twitter.com/p28mvonN2G— Victims of Communism (@VoCommunism) October 10, 2017

  42. Torcer says:

    Did it actually answer my question?

  43. Torcer says:

    And here it goes with another long screed no one wants to read….

    Over 1500 words! Who has time to write that much?

    Once again, Everyone please note that ‘KirklesWorth’ doesn’t actually answer the question…

    KirklesWorth But anyway…I am hardly obligated to account for every second in your life

    Actually, YOU ARE since you made that claim.
    If you cannot, you will have been shown to be a Liar.

    KirklesWorth I provided five instances where you admitted you had no candidate

    Where did I state that?
    Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have.
    Therefore it is false and you are a liar.

    Again, YOU made the claim:
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b0eb951db7bc79899f2ec41bb3239994c520efa30d3883909cedadaff05b82bd.jpg
    You have to back it up with information you do not have, but your projection is rather interesting, to say the least…

    KirklesWorth

    Hooray! It’s time for another patented Torcer Attack Thread™ against me! This will be the 29th since September, and here are the previous: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28.

    Here, let me show you how to prove things:

    ● Torcer had no candidate and no plan to defeat Hillary
    ● Torcer knew the election was down to two candidates
    ● Torcer has a history of contempt for Trump supporters.
    ● Torcer is/was a NeverTrumper (“We tried to inform you”).
    ● Torcer demanded people “sell” trump to a NeverTrumper.
    ● Torcer subjected poster Tom to similar tactics.
    ● Torcer tries “currying [the] favor” of Bodhisattva.
    ● Torcer didn’t think defeating Hillary was good enough reason.
    ● Torcer has a faux persecution complex.
    ● Torcer attacked conservative Trump supporters on 9/7/17.
    ● Torcer tried to use polls against Trump supporters.
    ● Torcer readies the blame for Trump supporters.
    ● Torcer impresses others with his/her winning personality.
    ● Torcer gets comments from others about his/her motives..
    ● Torcer demands replies contrary to previous free speech claims.
    ● Torcer has a stash of 2.875-to-1 Trump-to-Hillary articles.
    ● Torcer’s 2.75-to-1 ratio of Trump-to-Hillary story tips that Dave Blount used according to these monthly accumulations:
    . . Torcer’s August 2016 23 Trump to 10 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer’s July 2016 4 Trump to 9 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer’s June 2016 35 Trump to 13 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer’s May 2016 44 Trump to 7 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer’s April 2016 39 Trump to 8 Hillary tips
    . . Torcer’s March 2016 28 Trump to 11 Hillary tips
    ● Torcer with just over a week before the election:
    . . ● declared Trump will lose
    . . ● still tried to steer votes away from Trump
    . . ● still did not suggest a candidate
    ● Torcer on the day before the election:
    . . ● surrendered to Hillary
    . . ● “absolved” NeverTumpers.
    . . ● blamed Trump supporters for “disaster”.

    And using Torcer’s favorite leftists’ tactics…

    ● “A lie told often enough becomes the truth” – Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Goebbels (2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28)
    ● “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon” (2) – Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #5.
    ● “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it” (2 3 4) – Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #12.
    ● Decaff: This is a case where someone doesn’t try to win in the marketplace of ideas and just attempts to shout down the opposing voices.

    …Torcer attacks me accordingly:

    ● Torcer childishly refers to me with derogatory pronoun “it”.
    ● Torcer lied saying I lied that he/she had no candidate.
    ● Torcer generates thread after thread of attacks against me.
    ● Torcer cries “attacks” and “wasting time” while doing both.
    ● Torcer doesn’t charge me rent to live in his/her head.
    ● Torcer lied and propagated that I am the “originator of attacks against conservatives” (2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23) and variations on that theme. when actually Torcer holds that title.

    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

    Today’s review is Torcer’s hyperbole, histrionics, innuendo, and outright lies:

    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/13/2017) Why are you obsessing over a non-existent issue?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/19/2017) Why are you trying to Control what other people are discussing?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/20/2017) And once again KirklesWorth displays it’s prowess for projection in complaining about such tactics while engaging in the practice!
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) So are you going go through your usual method of attacking Conservatives with long screeds over past events?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) So once again it has FAILED to proves it’s point. Note that it merely wants to imply something without actually PROVING anything. And once again it failed making an intellectual argument as was the original point. The question still remains as to who has the time to the time to write these long screeds.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Before you demand that I address your post – you need to respond to this: Note that it originated the tactic of initiating attacks on old threads. KirklesWorth You are obviously oblivious to the use of your own tactics Okay, everyone… today’s word is irony in that it originated the tactic of initiating attacks on old threads.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Are you serious? You initialed countless attacks – are you denying this Fact?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Why don’t you put more effort in addressing my question than Avoiding it: Perhaps for once we can try to elicit an honest and open opinion from KirklesWorth on this turn of events.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Are you serious? You initialed countless attacks – are you denying this Fact?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Again, it is based on information you do NOT have. Therefore it is false. Clearly you cannot address that issue.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Ohh.. scare quotes, again you are implying something based on information you do not have – therefore it is False
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What are your referring to? Do you understand that that is a subjective standard. That there is a vast difference between fact and opinion? TRY AGAIN
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) I can appreciate your position here – you have to avoid saying too much or engaging in debate, so you assail everyone with endless postings of what they have said in the past as cover for that lack of debate. You have to accuse others of what you do in spades in order to muddy the waters and confuse everyone as to who you truly are.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Remember that long screed when you DEMAND that someone prove you use them to avoid addressing the issue at present.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) How do you have so much time to wast endlessly posting those long screeds?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) And now instead of debating the issue it trots outs ‘Rules for Radicals’ and desperately tries to accuse other of what is does. Clearly we are dealing with someone without any moral grounding..
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) I can appreciate your position here – you have to avoid saying too much or engaging in debate, so you assail everyone with endless postings of what they have said in the past as cover for that lack of debate. You have to accuse others of what you do in spades in order to muddy the waters and confuse everyone as to who you truly are.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) And you very aptly proving to everyone that you cannot debate the issues and have to project those tactics on others. Odd that you are well familiar with them
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) What is this supposed to be? Some sort mass attack of BS [Bernie Sanders] to continually AVOID debate? How can you waste so much time in your pointless endeavours?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) And now we’re down to the the originator of attacks against Conservatives wasting time hurling a blizzard of postings. Everyone should note that it is wasting more time trying to AVOID debate on the issue than it would were it to do so…… …Which only deepens the mystery of why the originator of attacks against Conservatives is here…
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (09/28/2017) Have you ever considered the fact that your repeated failure to explain the inherent contradictions has rendered your assertions as false? Or is it a case where you are just barely holding on and thus feel the need to lash out at those that highlight those contradictions?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Note that aside from it’s attempt at currying your favor and lying once again, it didn’t actually have anything substantive to add to the conversation.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Here KirklesWorth was shown to be a LIAR making a declarative statement based on information IT Does not have:
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Why don’t you go off and do something useful instead of harassing Conservatives?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) It should be patently obvious that your actions are harassment.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Why don’t you go off and do something useful instead of harassing Conservatives?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/06/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/08/2017) Isn’t that curious that It’s playing it’s link & Number game instead of padding it’s response… what is it trying to hide?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/09/2017) Isn’t that curious that It’s playing it’s link & Number game instead of padding it’s response… what is it trying to hide?
    Torcer►KirklesWorth: (10/09/2017) Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have. Therefore it is false and you are a liar.
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=88460#comment-3561090380

  44. KirklesWorth says:

    HAHAHAHAHA!!! I can’t believe you actually believed that “I am obligated to account for every second in your life that you didn’t have a candidate”! HAHAHAHAHA!!! I let it pass the first time but you are so shameless that you continued on anyway! And after that meticulous list I made of your escapades to boot! But let’s recap…I said:

    KirklesWorth►Torcer: (10/09/2017) But anyway…I am hardly obligated to account for every second in your life that you didn’t have a candidate…so get over yourself

    And you seriously replied:

    Torcer: (10/10/2017) Actually, YOU ARE since you made that claim. If you cannot, you will have been shown to be a Liar.

    HAHAHAHAHA!!! Un-freaking-believable! Then I posted all of your histrionics and you still say I’M THE ONE that has to account for what I’ve said? HAHAHAHAHA!!!

    How about this: you tell us who your candidate was and how they were going to defeat Hillary. If you cannot, you will have been shown to be a Liar…because you’ve already admitted:

    1. Torcer►TED: (06/24/2016) I have no idea what I may do in November – I will vote down ballot but whether or not I can do that for Trump IF he’s on the ticket is another story.
    2. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (08/11/2016) At this point I don’t have the foggiest idea on who I will vote… I suspect it’s going to what is going on when I step into the voting booth.
    3. Torcer►KirklesWorth: (08/11/2016) Did you miss the part where I said I hadn’t decided yet?
    4. Torcer►Noovuss: (08/20/2016) Perhaps – at this point in time I cannot indicate what I will do come election day.
    5. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (09/20/2016) The problem is not just voting – and I cannot indicate what I will do when the day comes around because even now I don’t know – but it’s also a question of Volunteering and donations.

  45. Torcer says:

    Once again, Everyone please note that ‘KirklesWorth’ doesn’t actually answer the question…

    KirklesWorth But anyway…I am hardly obligated to account for every second in your life

    Actually, YOU ARE since you made that claim.
    If you cannot, you will have been shown to be a Liar.

    KirklesWorth I provided five instances where you admitted you had no candidate

    Where did I state that?
    Again, you made a blanket declarative statement based on information you do not have.
    Therefore it is false and you are a liar.

    Again, YOU made the claim:
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b0eb951db7bc79899f2ec41bb3239994c520efa30d3883909cedadaff05b82bd.jpg
    You have to back it up with information you do not have, but your projection is rather interesting, to say the least…

    KirklesWorth
    HAHAHAHAHA!!! I can’t believe you actually believed that “I am obligated to account for every second in your life that you didn’t have a candidate”! HAHAHAHAHA!!! I let it pass the first time but you are so shameless that you continued on anyway! And after that meticulous list I made of your escapades to boot! But let’s recap…I said:

    KirklesWorth►Torcer: (10/09/2017) But anyway…I am hardly obligated to account for every second in your life that you didn’t have a candidate…so get over yourself

    And you seriously replied:

    Torcer: (10/10/2017) Actually, YOU ARE since you made that claim. If you cannot, you will have been shown to be a Liar.

    HAHAHAHAHA!!! Un-freaking-believable! Then I posted all of your histrionics and you still say I’M THE ONE that has to account for what I’ve said? HAHAHAHAHA!!!

    How about this: you tell us who your candidate was and how they were going to defeat Hillary. If you cannot, you will have been shown to be a Liar…because you’ve already admitted:

    1. Torcer►TED: (06/24/2016) I have no idea what I may do in November – I will vote down ballot but whether or not I can do that for Trump IF he’s on the ticket is another story.
    2. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (08/11/2016) At this point I don’t have the foggiest idea on who I will vote… I suspect it’s going to what is going on when I step into the voting booth.
    3. Torcer►KirklesWorth: (08/11/2016) Did you miss the part where I said I hadn’t decided yet?
    4. Torcer►Noovuss: (08/20/2016) Perhaps – at this point in time I cannot indicate what I will do come election day.
    5. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (09/20/2016) The problem is not just voting – and I cannot indicate what I will do when the day comes around because even now I don’t know – but it’s also a question of Volunteering and donations.
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=88460#comment-3561182279

  46. KirklesWorth says:

    I seriously can’t believe how ridiculous this is. I guess I will just keep reposting Torcer‘s own admissions of no candidate:

    1. Torcer►TED: (06/24/2016) I have no idea what I may do in November – I will vote down ballot but whether or not I can do that for Trump IF he’s on the ticket is another story.
    2. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (08/11/2016) At this point I don’t have the foggiest idea on who I will vote… I suspect it’s going to what is going on when I step into the voting booth.
    3. Torcer►KirklesWorth: (08/11/2016) Did you miss the part where I said I hadn’t decided yet?
    4. Torcer►Noovuss: (08/20/2016) Perhaps – at this point in time I cannot indicate what I will do come election day.
    5. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (09/20/2016) The problem is not just voting – and I cannot indicate what I will do when the day comes around because even now I don’t know – but it’s also a question of Volunteering and donations.

  47. KirklesWorth says:

    Please refer to the Torcer General Reference Guide. You can find the five times Torcer admitted having no candidate using the link Torcer had no candidate and no plan to defeat Hillary.

  48. Mr. Freemarket says:

    It will still be rough and give you splinters.

    Similar to using the free TP at freeway rest stops.

  49. Mr. Freemarket says:

    And yet…he has spent his career currying favor from NYC snakes.

  50. Torcer says:

    Does it understand that the mere claim of something such as that does not make it true?
    As I’ve asked it repeatedly: Where did I state that?
    Again, it made a blanket declarative statement based on information it does not have.

    KirklesWorth 1. Torcer►TED: (06/24/2016) I have no idea what I may do in November – I will vote down ballot but whether or not I can do that for Trump IF he’s on the ticket is another story.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth2. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (08/11/2016) At this point I don’t have the foggiest idea on who I will vote… I suspect it’s going to what is going on when I step into the voting booth.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth 3. Torcer►KirklesWorth: (08/11/2016) Did you miss the part where I said I hadn’t decided yet?

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth 4. Torcer►Noovuss: (08/20/2016) Perhaps – at this point in time I cannot indicate what I will do come election day.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth 5. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (09/20/2016) The problem is not just voting – and I cannot indicate what I will do when the day comes around because even now I don’t know – but it’s also a question of Volunteering and donations.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

  51. Torcer says:

    Does it understand that the mere claim of something such as that does not make it true?
    As I’ve asked it repeatedly: Where did I state that?
    Again, it made a blanket declarative statement based on information it does not have.

    KirklesWorth 1. Torcer►TED: (06/24/2016) I have no idea what I may do in November – I will vote down ballot but whether or not I can do that for Trump IF he’s on the ticket is another story.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth2. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (08/11/2016) At this point I don’t have the foggiest idea on who I will vote… I suspect it’s going to what is going on when I step into the voting booth.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth 3. Torcer►KirklesWorth: (08/11/2016) Did you miss the part where I said I hadn’t decided yet?

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth 4. Torcer►Noovuss: (08/20/2016) Perhaps – at this point in time I cannot indicate what I will do come election day.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

    KirklesWorth 5. Torcer►Bodhisattva: (09/20/2016) The problem is not just voting – and I cannot indicate what I will do when the day comes around because even now I don’t know – but it’s also a question of Volunteering and donations.

    Definition of decide
    1.1[no object] Make a choice from a number of alternatives.
    Origin
    Late Middle English (in the sense ‘bring to a settlement’): from French décider, from Latin decidere ‘determine’, from de- ‘off’ + caedere ‘cut’.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/decide

    Definition of choice
    1 An act of choosing between two or more possibilities.
    Origin
    Middle English: from Old French chois, from choisir ‘choose’, of Germanic origin and related to choose.
    https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/choice

  52. KirklesWorth says:

    #1 The replies to this multiple comment are here and here.

  53. KirklesWorth says:

    #2 The replies to this multiple comment are here and here.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy