moonbattery logo

Oct 17 2011

OWS Moonbat of the Day

From Denver, compliments of Looking at the Left:

occupy-denver-moonbat

If liberalism prevails, guys like this will be manning the guard towers at the reeducation camps.

On a tip from SR.



66 Responses to “OWS Moonbat of the Day”

  1. Momster says:

    I just love that Oliver J. Dragon tooth!

  2. Graycat says:

    Here’s another moonbat in the Mile High City—in more ways than one—if you know what I mean. This guy actually felt up a male television news photographer. He is also a medical mary-gee-wanna activist.

    http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_19124616

  3. Momster says:

    When you get the munchies there’s nothing like a nice, tasty rich person. Mmmm-mmmmm-mmmmm!

  4. TonyD95B says:

    Let’s see…..a Totenkopf with the Anarchy “A” on it…..and a nihilistic / cannabalistic class warfare “message”.

    Anybody know what the bizzare male/female/andro zigzag symbol and an “E” in a circle mean?

    The Raiders cap is a nice touch.

    That guy looks like he’s a few rounds short of a full magazine, iffin’yaknowhatI’msayin’.

  5. RKae says:

    Graycat:

    He is also a medical mary-gee-wanna activist.

    That always grates on me. If you want to get stoned, then be an “I want to get stoned” activist. Using cancer patients as a prop to further your recreational dizziness is revolting. “It’s for the cancer patients!”

  6. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    Ever notice how the mentally-challenged are some of the happiest and affectionate people in the world? I harbor some insane, special reserve, aged-to-perfection hate for people who manipulate or abuse these special people.

    I have some of that waiting for the vermin who worked-over this retard. Pretty damn certain it was a commie that did it too.

  7. Spider says:

    “Economic power is exercised by means of a positive, by offering men a reward, an incentive, a payment, a value; political power is exercised by means of a negative, by the threat of punishment, injury, imprisonment, destruction. The businessman’s tool is values; the bureaucrat’s tool is fear…”
    –– Ayn Rand

  8. Mockingbird says:

    Since these occupy wall street began,all they really want is…attention. Alot of them are trustfund trotskies with their hormones flowing white hot. There showing off their financial independence by skipping class, and showboating their phony feelings for the underclass. Lastly, they are being steered by the really wealthy left wing plutocrats who benefit from these sheep.

  9. chuck in st paul says:

    Wow!! He’s the model for Jeff Dunham’s Bubba J! I always wondered where Jeff got his models.

  10. Henry says:

    TonyD95B says: October 17, 2011 at 7:30 am

    Anybody know what the bizzare male/female/andro zigzag symbol and an “E” in a circle mean?

    Squatting

    No idea what the “Circle-E” symbol is…

  11. TonyD95B says:

    RE: Henry at October 17, 2011 at 9:01 am:

    No kidding! So it’s a Eurotrash neocommunist thang.

    Funny how that gap-toofed mentally deficient whacko “feminized” it.

    Still wondering about the “Circle E”.

    Now, if it was a “Circle K” it would stand for the convenience store chain where the dope-smoking “OWS” rabble form “flash mobs” to shoplift their munchies…..

  12. Sgt Stadenko says:

    Hermaphrodite squatters? Weird. Is it a mix-up, perhaps, like the kids holding up placards with a Mercedes-Benz logo, thinking it’s a “peace” symbol?

    The “Circle E” symbol is supposed to be “Equality”, if I’m not mistaken.

  13. Chris in N.Va says:

    (Momster — I’m afraid I can all-too-easily remember Kukla and Fran’s companion!! Let’s hear it for Nestle’s chooooocolate!)

    Is this guy a tooth-er…???

  14. Graycat says:

    Eat The Rich! Look, it’s Hannibal the Cannibal’s half-cousin! Ahhh, Clarice, so nice to see you again!

  15. Drake says:

    If he is guarding the re-education camp, I will escape in 5 minutes. Probably “Idiocracy” style.

  16. Sam Adams says:

    So this is what the zombie apocalypse looks like.

    Clearly it is time to consider whether you ammo stores are sufficient.

  17. Well I suppose if you have to eat someone you could do worse than eating rich people. They are less likely to be infested with parasites internally than they are externally. The external ones drop off at death and attach themselves to someone else. The poor are probably loaded with toxins too.

  18. wingmann says:

    #16 October 17, 2011 at 8:56 am
    Mike commented:

    After the divorce, his parents will still be brother and sister.

  19. wingmann says:

    When eating the rich there jr…..don’t forget to use NaCl…..since he is into symbols.

  20. lao says:

    (sings)

    Then unsuspecting Chlorine felt a magnetic pull
    She looked down, her outside shell was full
    Sodium cried: “What a gas, be my bride!
    And I’ll change your name from Chlorine to Chloride.”

  21. Joe says:

    lao’s on crack.

  22. Lao Zedong says:

    If that guy is going to be a guard at the reeducation center, I feel pretty good about my chances at escape

  23. Obama Nation says:

    Ditto Lao, I was thinking the exact same thing. If this Occutard is all we will have standing between us and freedom we have nothing to worry about.

    http://www.commieblaster.com/

  24. TonyD95B says:

    RE: Sam Adams at October 17, 2011 at 9:52 am:

    Hornady has introduced just the thing, Sam:

    http://www.hornady.com/in-the-news/latest-news/zombie-max-ammunition

    BTW, the CMP just announced they are down to 50 million rounds of M2 ball .30-06.

    That sounds like a lot – but it’s nary a magazine’s worth when you divide by the number of M1, M1903 and M1917s still in circulation.

  25. logic Mine says:

    The picture of the skull that he is holding has better teeth than HIM!

  26. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 10:36 am
    ———
    But… but… but… OWS doesn’t support the “EAT THE RICH” meme!

    Then why does it keep showing up at all their rallies?

    The leadership may not OFFICIALLY endorse it but they sure aren’t distancing themselves from it or asking their moonbat supporters NOT to bring signs that say that.

  27. hadenough! says:

    Darwin applies here: Who would have sex with this tool?

    If this is what we get if the liberals win, no worries, the breed will die off quickly.. The TFR (total fertility rate) will be nil!

  28. lao says:

    From a previous thread:

    bobby said: The OWS does advocate cannibalism.

    I said: I look forward to some video proof, documenting when the knives and forks of the O.W.S. rank and file are put to actual cannibalistic use.

  29. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 1:45 pm

    Once again, lao, are you an advocate of abortion? Do you expect me to prove that you are by presenting a video of you having one?

    You don’t have to actually DO something to advocate it. Are you an advocate of same sex unions being called “marriage”? Are you currently in a union with a same sex partner?

    Your one dimensional thinking gets tiresome.

  30. Bob Roberts says:

    Over and over at OWS gatherings you see and hear them openly advocating that we should “eat the rich” and in fact when asked, in order to clarify, they say yes, absolutely, we want to start killing and eating the rich. Literally cutting them up and devouring them.

    Now I suppose even after this some like lao will say they’re not serious.

    I don’t think it’s appropriate even if it’s a joke or otherwise not serious.

    Over and over at many (I won’t say all because I haven’t seen evidence to support that, yet) of their “occupy” gatherings you see the signs, you hear them say it.

    The leadership has not come out and denounced and banned such symbols and talk. Therefore they give at least tacit approval to the idea that it’s time to eat the rich. Literally.

    And even if we dismiss that, lao is only going here to avoid answering the question. The other thing that OWS has been doing is openly calling for their gatherings to turn violent. They have speakers come in who make urgent calls for the sheep involved to turn to violent action. They don’t disavow their statements. This is part of the plan – for the movement to turn violent eventually. The liberal left media has been letting the cat out of the bag along with some of the other Democrats and Hollywood elite. Which star said that we need a dictator like Hugo Chavez – can you remember? I do. Which governor said it’s time to suspend elections and freeze the Democrats control of two branches of government? And at which group’s rallies do people routinely get arrested and do their spokespersons routinely call for violence and for eating the rich?

    I’ll give you a hint: It’s NOT the Tea Party, but they ARE known as the FLEA Party.

  31. RICH says:

    Raiders fan. Of course. Is that what happened to Rich Gannon, they ate him?

    Nice hair by the way. Is that a rat tail? What does a 100 pound Rat Boy need utensils for? He’d probably satisfy his hunger by using that tooth to gnaw on skin moles.

  32. lao says:

    bobby, I understand you feel some desperate need to marginalize the people attending these demonstrations but when you indicate you seriously believe cannibalism is a possibility, all I can do is laugh.

  33. lao says:

    Unlike you bobby, I have no interest in visiting threads that have scrolled off the page to add another comment.

    Here’s a couple of quotes from your second last comment, my response and your just added remarks.

    bobby, “debate” with you is an exercise in the surreal.

    @9:55 you say: I also note that there are more OWS “foot soldiers” who DO openly advocate violence and eating the rich than there are leaders who denounce such tactics – ergo the movement, which claims to be democratic, so surely a majority rules, has by majority vote advocated both positions – eating the rich and turning violent to achieve their means.

    I responded: No O.W.S “majority vote” advocating violence and cannibalism has been taken, but you deem it has to justify your claims. Very amusing.

    Bob Roberts says:
    October 17, 2011 at 3:28 pm
    Now YOU are the one who is saying that this represents a “majority vote”. I didn’t say that, YOU DID. It does, however, represent “tacit approval” when the leadership of the group sees a position taken by a number of it’s members and doesn’t come out against it.

  34. Cameraman says:

    “Hey at least if this Turd finds a can of vittles he has a built in Can Opener! What a bunch of Assholes!

  35. lao zedong says:

    I understand you feel some desperate need to marginalize the people attending these demonstrations

    These people have done a better job marginalizing themselves.

  36. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 3:33 pm
    bobby, I understand you feel some desperate need to marginalize the people attending these demonstrations but when you indicate you seriously believe cannibalism is a possibility, all I can do is laugh.
    ———–
    Lao, look at the photograph at the top of this thread.

    Look at pretty much ANY photograph of those who support this movement.

    Once again, the laugh is on you.

    I have NO NEED to marginalize these people.

    They’re doing that just fine without my help.

    Curious, though, that you choose to continue your “The OWS does NOT support cannibalism” nonsense ON A THREAD THAT’S TOPPED BY A MOONBAT AT AN OWS EVENT WITH A SIGN THAT SAYS “EAT THE RICH”.

    You really do need help, lao.

    lao says:
    October 17, 2011 at 3:45 pm
    Unlike you bobby, I have no interest in visiting threads that have scrolled off the page to add another comment.
    ———–
    Yeah, that’s why you went back to it TO GET THIS INFORMATION! That’s why, when I went back to it, I FOUND YOU HAD ALREADY GONE BACK AND ADDED MORE COMMENTS.

    And, by the way, AT THE MOMENT, it is NOT off the page, it’s still right there, at the bottom.

    SO that’s TWO LIES I caught you in this time.

    And you should have noticed how I set you up for this, and that is EXACTLY what I did because I wanted to show, beyond any doubt, how easily it is to manipulate people like you, how predictable you are.

    NOTE THAT I SAID:

    Bob Roberts says:
    October 16, 2011 at 7:50 pm
    I’m likely</n) done with this thread, lao. You can either catch me on another or make a pathetic attempt to post again then claim victory when I don’t respond.

    I’m expecting the latter.

    And it didn’t take long for you to take the bait:

    The very next morning, rather than live your life, you had to come back with your pathetic attempts to present illogical arguments and demands:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 8:30 am
    ————-
    I know just how to get you to do exactly what I expect you will do, and you keep doing it.

    You’re a true zombie moonbat.

    By the way, you are STILL running away from the two questions with this nonsense about EAT THE RICH. The questions you STILL have not answered are:

    1) You CLAIM that you renounce groups that have violent messages. The OWS routinely includes calls for violence in their messages (even if their leadership doesn’t openly advocate such calls, but also DOES NOT COME OUT FIRMLY AGAINST THEM EITHER). So do you renounce OWS?

    2) The works of Marx and Lenin are inherently violent. Do you denounce them?

  37. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 3:45 pm

    Yes, I did forget that I stated that by NOT coming out against it was effectively a vote for. That is true, though not in the sense YOU tried to use it, which was my point.

    As I said, the OWS group leadership as well as the rank and file stands by and does NOT denounce the repeated calls for violence, for direct physical attacks, and yes, even for killing and eating the rich. I’m sure, were we talking about race relations, you would be using THE EXACT SAME ARGUMENT to condemn those who remained silent and, if that were the case, you know I’d be RIGHT THERE WITH YOU saying it also.

    That’s the problem with you moonbats – inconsistent as the day is long.

  38. lao says:

    Laugh Out Loud.

  39. Bob Roberts says:

    This is what LAO said, here:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 8:30 am

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=3360

    No O.W.S “majority vote” advocating violence and cannibalism has been taken.

    ———–
    As I said above, I never said they got together and said, “Now let’s take a vote on whether or not we are really going to engage in cannibalism and kill and eat the rich.”

    LAO IS THE ONLY ONE TALKING ABOUT THAT.

    I said, as he noted above,

    I also note that there are more OWS “foot soldiers” who DO openly advocate violence and eating the rich than there are leaders who denounce such tactics – ergo the movement, which claims to be democratic, so surely a majority rules, has by majority vote advocated both positions – eating the rich and turning violent to achieve their means.

    ——–
    Now lao USED to be able to distinguish between the figurative and the literal, when it suits his purpose. He took my comment 100% out of context and implied that I had suggested they actually CALLED A VOTE. I never said that, BUT HE DID. I said that they voted with their words, with their deeds AND WITH THEIR SILENCE.

    And I stand by those remarks.

  40. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 4:59 pm
    ———–
    Keep lauging… when your socialist masters decide you’ve outlived your usefulness and are just a laughing idiot, don’t expect anyone to come to your defense. You will get the end you seek and you will deserve it.

  41. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 4:59 pm
    ———–
    Keep lauging… when your socialist masters decide you’ve outlived your usefulness, don’t expect anyone to come to your defense. You will get the end you deserve.

  42. Bob Roberts says:

    lao:

    1) You CLAIM that you renounce groups that have violent messages. The OWS routinely includes calls for violence in their messages (even if their leadership doesn’t openly advocate such calls, but also DOES NOT COME OUT FIRMLY AGAINST THEM EITHER). So do you renounce OWS?

    2) The works of Marx and Lenin are inherently violent. Do you denounce them?

  43. Bob Roberts says:

    Here is another question for you lao:

    Let’s say we come up with a plan that will help the poor and middle class but will also help the rich get richer.

    Would you be FOR or AGAINST that plan. Answer with ONE WORD, “FOR” or “AGAINST”. No dissembling, like you ALWAYS DO.

    FOR

    or

    AGAINS?

  44. lao says:

    Not counting my laughter post you have sent 7 comments in a row. Get a flipping life. Post ONE comment and wait for some response.

    Re The End Game Unfolds thread, bobby screams: I FOUND YOU HAD ALREADY GONE BACK AND ADDED MORE COMMENTS.

    And, by the way, AT THE MOMENT, it is NOT off the page, it’s still right there, at the bottom. SO that’s TWO LIES I caught you in this time.

    Nice try bobby. WordPress has a default of 10 threads to the page. The End Game Unfolds thread was on page one when I posted my last comment there @8:30 am.

    bobby sez: You CLAIM that you renounce groups that have violent messages.

    Remind me again where and when I said that and have the courtesy to provide an exact quote as opposed to what you imagine I have said.

    I renounce individuals, as I did re whoever sent the violent e-mails.

    If Mark and Lenin’s “works” are “inherently violent”, I could care less. Their “works” are of no interest to me.

    Now Groucho Marx and John Lennon are another matter completely. I definitely support their “works”.

  45. TonyD95B says:

    ……and Gordy the Canadian Wonder Troll derails yet another thread with inane semantics.

  46. lao says:

    You figure your 11:49 am comment re ammunition was an important contribution?

  47. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 5:34 pm

    lao, the moonbat who’s here the most, telling ME to get a life?

    Now THAT IS FUNNY!

    THE END GAME is still there now. Page one, right at the bottom.

    “I renounce individuals, as I did re whoever sent the violent e-mails.”

    OK my bad, so you do NOT renounce groups who advocate violence. Or are you going to try to squirm out of THAT, too?

    And, as usual, instead of simply answering the questions, you dissembled.

    Keep tap dancing, lao… someone might throw a penny in your cup!

  48. Bob Roberts says:

    @ TonyD95B from his October 17, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    Do we have a true identity for lao? He’s a Canadian named GORDY? I missed that.

  49. Zombie OWS'er says:

    I’ll eat the rich, the poor and even yo’ mama given the chance.

  50. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 5:45 pm
    ——–
    You figure ANY of your posts are even significant, don’t even bother with important?

    You’d figure wrong if so.

  51. lao says:

    Meanwhile, bobby figures worrying about O.W.S. and cannibalism IS significant.

  52. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says:
    October 17, 2011 at 6:00 pm
    Meanwhile, bobby figures worrying about O.W.S. and cannibalism IS significant.
    ————
    No, actually, again I never said or even implied that. I’m laughing at the movement and, even more, I’m laughing at you.

    I can sit out on my deck and watch the girls go by as the sun sets as I post and, more often than not, one will use some lame question like, “Do you know what time it is” to indicate she wants to join me for a drink or whatnot… so it’s really no big deal watching for your lame posts and rapid fire posting back at you. It’s just another part of a perfect end of a perfect day here in paradise.

  53. Bob Roberts says:

    Zombie OWS’er says: October 17, 2011 at 5:52 pm
    I’ll eat the rich, the poor and even yo’ mama given the chance.
    ———
    That would be a neat trick… my mama passed away some time ago. Still hungry?

  54. Alan says:

    I’m not rich, but that guy can still Eat Me.

    (SO disappointed I’m the first to post that…)

  55. Bob Roberts says:

    SIGNIFICANCE OF OWS THREATS TO KILL AND EAT THE RICH

    I don’t seriously think many of the OWS moonbats will ever actually follow through on their oft-repeated calls to kill and eat the rich. Nobody does and lao knows that too. The point is they ARE saying it and they MAY well wind up taking violent action against SOMEONE. Tragically it will probably be someone they MISTAKE for those they’ve been programmed to hate.

    I was watching the OWS live feeds, both the webcam and the live chat. The word “hate” kept coming up. I hate this… I hate that… Don’t you hate…

    So much hatred. It’s what the left feeds on and depends on.

    Are they REALLY going to EAT the rich? We will have to wait and see. But lao’s demand that I present a video of them doing it is ridiculous! Who would be dumb enough to videotape themselves committing a crime?

    Other than a moonbat, I mean.

    One of these days we’re going to post a link to a story about lao. Did I just?

  56. Bob Roberts says:

    Alan says: October 17, 2011 at 7:05 pm
    ————-
    I thought about it but passed.

  57. lao says:

    I said Meanwhile, bobby figures worrying about O.W.S. and cannibalism IS significant.
    ————
    bobby responded: No, actually, again I never said or even implied that.

    Does this quote of yours imply that? The OWS does advocate cannibalism.

  58. lao says:

    bobby tries to be reasonable: I don’t seriously think many of the OWS moonbats will ever actually follow through on their oft-repeated calls to kill and eat the rich.

    Too funny.

  59. TonyD95B says:

    RE: lao at October 17, 2011 at 5:45 pm:

    Loud Angry Obfuscator (lao) declares himself the Thread Moderator with, “You figure your 11:49 am comment re ammunition was an important contribution?”

    My comments were a direct response to another post, plus I know it is of interest to others here on Moonbattery.

    Although slightly off topic, the difference that Loud and Obnoxious (lao) misses is that I did not continue to add post after post on the topic, and make the whole thread all about that.

    Gordy the Canadian Wonder Troll is an egotistical little b#stard – although many of us regard him as sometimes mildly amusing, and sometimes mildly annoying (like a buzzing gnat), lao himself has a much, much more inflated view of his own importance.

    It’s all about HIM, d#mmmit!!!

    Quite frankly, do any of us really give a flying f#ck if lao ‘denounces cannibalism” or if ‘Bobby can quote a specific statement’ about this, that or the other?

    Jesus H* Christ, enough is enough – who gives a f#ck?

    He’ll have some sort of smart-a## response – his EGO won’t let it go…..because this blog is ALL ABOUT HIM.

    Whatever it is, I’m already too disgusted to respond, and it would just feed the dumb, misguided mentally ill narcissistic bastard’s false sense of self-importance.

    We’re done here.

    *NOT Hussein.

  60. Momster says:

    Logic mine–I was thinking the same thing about the skull having better dentition than O.J. Dragon–but I didn’t comment on it–I am glad you did.

    Great minds…..

  61. Obama Nation says:

    The Big Government Website Shows Proof That Municipal Police Departments Are Colluding With The Occupy Wall Street Protestors To Stage Pre-Arranged Arrests For The Cameras.

    Learn More About How This Propaganda Is Being Passed Off As Real News.

    http://biggovernment.com/kolson/2011/10/18/occupy-arrest-scam-unmasked/

  62. Bob Roberts says:

    lao says: October 17, 2011 at 7:36 pm
    ———–
    No, lao – maybe in your sick, twisted mind. The quote merely states an established fact:

    The OWS does advocate cannibalism.

    Rather than issuing more pointless denials, start with the image at the top of this thread and from there go to any of many others, from many times and locations, where similar images exist. Now do I think that, aside from the really completely mentally ill ones, they’re actually going to do it? No, of course not. But they will become a mob that will terrorize the rich on command and they will perhaps be involved in an action that turns violent and someone will be hurt or killed. Not necessarily eaten, but that’s the trivial part, in the end.

    It’s ironic that, as their “occupation” proceeds, they’re getting a taste of their own “redistribution” creed, and THEY DO NOT LIKE IT.

    But I’ll give you four reasons why they, and you, are full of nonsense.

    1) It is morally wrong to take what is not yours by force or threat of force. Even if the government is the one doing the taking, it is wrong.

    2) Socialism has been tried over and over and each time, every time, it fails. It’s failing in Venezuela and Europe even as we discuss these issues. Each time it brings misery and death with it. So-called “liberals”, and “liberal” implies they are dedicated to new ideas, not old, disproven ones, keep thinking the tired canard that is socialism is the answer. Who cares how many times it failed – this time I can make it work! Just another sign of narcissism.

    Third, socialism requires people to become dependent on the state and, as they do, they lose their self-respect, self-worth, work ethic and independence. They lose their motivation and social problems multiply, from addiction to family violence and everything in between. Fourth, socialism only works by using hate. Two of the chief weapons of socialism are class envy and class warfare. Dressed up in attractive buzz words such as “economic justice” and “social justice” these terms are used to motivate mindless zombies who think emotionally not rationally. Were they able to think beyond the immediate, they would realize that a government that can steal from the rich can steal from anyone, and will.

  63. Bob Roberts says:

    TonyD95B says: October 18, 2011 at 4:11 am

    Actually in a funny sense it is about him – showing once again how he is easily duped and manipulated.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy