moonbattery logo

Jul 31 2012

Oxford University Degenerates Into Transsexual Farce

Even as Western Civilization collapses into moral decay and socialist insolvency, progressives continue to push boldly forward toward utopia. The latest milestone in the path of progress:

Oxford University has rewritten the laws governing its strict academic dress code following concerns that they were unfair towards transgender students.

Under the new regulations, students taking exams or attending formal occasions will no longer have to wear ceremonial clothing that is specific to their gender.

It will mean men will be able to sit tests in skirts and stockings and women will have the option of wearing suits and bow ties.

In all seriousness, this story is on the level. The objective on the part of educrats is to pander to Oxford’s Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer Society.

Liberals are good at something besides choking the economy to death after all: self-parody.

Next in Oxford formal attire.

On a tip from Steve T.

20 Responses to “Oxford University Degenerates Into Transsexual Farce”

  1. Chris in N.Va. says:

    Well…..if they’re so “loud and proud” then why not just go totally nude?

    But then there ARE those pesky little (hmm…no comment!) physical “cues” as to potential “sexuality/gender/whatever” identity. Best if we cover them up and keep ’em all guessing??

    Could be Much Ado About Nothing.

  2. mark says:

    I hope the biology professor there studying animal behavior keeps all the gerbils under lock and key.

  3. czuch says:

    I smell the next “Reality show”.
    Another vehicle for Ru Paul.
    Que the shark in 3,,2,,,,,,1

  4. Uncle Pinko says:

    Ceremonial clothes to take a test? Now THAT’S gay.

  5. dan says:

    Suddenly the pageantry that is Monarchy makes sense

  6. Momster says:

    Hey, try to be a little understanding. They just want to be treated like everyone else. No special treatment…just like everyone else.

    Of course that would assume that everyone else is a freakazoid.

  7. Tim from TK says:

    “Uncle Pinko says: July 31, 2012 at 7:28 am

    Ceremonial clothes to take a test? Now THAT’S gay.”

    Indeed, heaven forfend there should be any standards of dress or decorum.

  8. JNN says:

    Is anyone really surprised?

  9. modd kenwood says:…repeat

  10. Geeknerd says:

    Liberal thought goes like this…

    “Opposed to abortion? Then don’t have one.
    Opposed to guns? Demand they be banned.
    Opposed to gay marriage? YOU MUST BE PUNISHED!”

  11. chuck in st paul says:

    I lived in England for three years. Half (or more) of the “men” are cockholsters. It was great. The lovely Brit lasses couldn’t keep off me when it was discovered I was a 100% lady loving male from Chicago and had a job that paid actual money.

  12. mojo says:

    “Sorry, Gentlemen – no feathered head-dresses after 9 pm.”

  13. Bloodless Coup says:



  14. beforethestorm says:

    How the mighty have fallen; I weep for England.

  15. james says:

    Go ahead and jump on the bandwagon to hell… idiots! You’d think people would learn, without having to be destroyed over and over again.

  16. A. Levy says:

    Todays Question:

    Oregon has claimed ownership of all water in the state, including rainwater. It’s no joke, because an Oregon man got 30 days in a slammer, for collecting rainwater without permission. Given this self deification, what’s to stop them from claiming ownership of the sunlight and imposing fines for anyone who gets a tan without written permission from the state?

    Things like this can only be done to a nation of weak, gullible, sheep…

  17. Jester says:

    Too true, james. Too true.

  18. MicahStone says:

    The d-cRAT socialist won’t let Oxford (didn’t bill “monica-stain” clinton go there?) out-do them…
    “Democrats set to add gay marriage to official party platform”
    I hope they put on a San Francisco-style Gay Pride Parade on the d-cRAT socialist convention floor. I’ve seen that SF spectacle (I’m NOT proud of that fact, I still have nightmares about it) – it was like watching the most nauseating circus freak show one could ever imagine. If the d-cRAT socialists recreate that depraved, disgusting and vomit-inducing display at their convention – or even lets one of the freaks appear on national tv – that should be sufficiently to ensure that normal, decent, American voters give Romney a landslide victory.

  19. Momster says:

    All you moonbatterers, I need your help understanding something.

    When a conservative person makes any public comment that is perceived as being negative toward the “gay community,” he or she is immediately branded as being a closeted gay by the lib/prog/commies (LPCsO.

    If the LPCs believe that being gay is wonderful, and all things gay need to be celebrated and emulated, then why is a critic of the gay movement branded as GAY???

    Really, I don’t understand. The LPCs say that person is gay like its a bad thing? When all the conservative did was say that being gay is not necessarily a good thing.

    My mind is reeling trying to figure this out.

    Why, it almost seems that LPCs are doing some gay bashing themselves. Why else would they use calling someone gay as a pejorative?

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy