moonbattery logo

Aug 15 2011

Pedophiles Follow Close in the Footsteps of Militant Homosexuals

You didn’t need a crystal ball to predict that pedophilia would be the next perversion to be officially normalized by our liberal rulers after homosexuality. Few besides moonbats deny the connection between them. Here we go:

If a small group of psychiatrists and other mental health professionals have their way at a conference this week, pedophiles themselves could play a role in removing pedophilia from the American Psychiatric Association’s bible of mental illnesses — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), set to undergo a significant revision by 2013. Critics warn that their success could lead to the decriminalization of pedophilia.

The August 17 Baltimore conference is sponsored by B4U-ACT, a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists. According to the conference brochure, the event will examine “ways in which minor-attracted persons [pedophiles] can be involved in the DSM 5 revision process” and how the popular perceptions of pedophiles can be reframed to encourage tolerance.

Until 1973, homosexuality was acknowledged by the DSM as a mental illness. That was changed in the interests of the still more severe form of mental illness known as political correctness. Now acceptance of homosexual depravity as normal is mandatory. The same will eventually be true of raping children, if moonbats have their way.

Child advocate Dr. Judith Reisman, a visiting professor at Liberty University’s School of Law, said the conference is part of a strategy to condition people into accepting pedophiles.

“The first thing they do is to get the public to divest from thinking of what the offender does criminally, to thinking of the offender’s emotional state, to think of him as thinking of his emotional state, [and] to empathize and sympathize,” Reisman said. “You don’t change the nation in one fell swoop; you have to change it by conditioning. The aim is to get them [pedophiles] out of prison.”

According to Reisman, empirical data show that pedophiles typically molest many children before finally being caught.

“The data on paroled pedophiles confirms these predators repeat their crimes against children and are known to have escalated them even to murder,” Reisman said.

But the important thing is that Minor Attracted Persons not be subjected to “discrimination.” Before long, it will be illegal to fire them from daycare centers.

Reisman warns that declassifying pedophilia as a mental illness could result in the repeal of child-protection statutes because the law always follows the input of psychiatry. She points to psychiatry’s normalization of sadomasochism, exhibitionism, and homosexuality as precedents.

Society should have drawn the line a long time ago.

Elbowing its way into the mainstream. Via Pat Dollard.

On tips from Leslie and J.

163 Responses to “Pedophiles Follow Close in the Footsteps of Militant Homosexuals”

  1. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Its almost like natural attraction (Heterosexual or otherwise) might not be a defect! Who’da thunk it?

  2. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I mean, having sex with children is still horrible, of course.

  3. StanInTexas says:

    Yep, no truth to the slippery-slope argument that acceptance of homosexuality and the discussion of gay marriage would EVER turn into discussions on polygamy or pedophilia. {/sarcasm OFF!}

    Eric the LB, you and all of your ilk owe every Conservative in America an apology!

  4. President Potemkin says:

    You’re an @$$hole, logan! I thought you were just a misguided teenager. I’d tell you to get lost, but you’re already there.
    And Dave, no matter whether airdick can solve the math problem below, it doesn’t make it human.

  5. Dookiestain Laflair says:

    Removing homosexuality from the list of mental disorders happened almost 40 years ago, and gay people still can’t get married. I don’t think child molesters are going to fare any better. But don’t pass up an opportunity to compare gay people to pedophiles.

  6. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Just what the hell is wrong with Polygamy, anyway? Give me one non religious argument as to why three people can’t love each other.

  7. StanInTexas says:

    Dookie, are you unable to read, or is it the comprehension part that has you stumped?

    Pedophiles are using THE EXACT SAME ARGUMENT to legitimize their perversion that homosexuals have used. It is not us making the comparision, it is the homosexuals and the pedophiles.

  8. Mickey Shea says:

    Every person I have ever met in my life who was in the
    field of psychiatry / therapy was a flaming moonbat !
    No exceptions !

  9. ThatDorkEricDraven says:

    I love my Star Wars action figures.

    I want to marry Han Solo!

  10. trace says:

    Beastiality and necrophelia are next.

  11. browncoat says:

    “Just what the hell is wrong with Polygamy, anyway? Give me one non religious argument as to why three people can’t love each other.”

    And you give us one reason without any science of any kind period why you think macroevolution is true

  12. Brian_Boru says:

    Psychiatry is for psychos. Only faggots and child molesters get into that profession so that they can decriminalize their own revolting behavior. And look at all the liberal zombies they’ve created with their “depression” medication prescriptions.

  13. trace says:

    Liberalism is a mental disorder

  14. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Actually, Browncoat, I hardly even know what Macroevolution is.

  15. ThatDorkEricDraven says:

    I think macroevolution has something to do with how macaroni can turn into spaghetti if you cook it too long. Kind of like how a fish can grow legs and lungs when it ‘cooks too long’ in primordial soup.

  16. Jayne C says:

    That don’t surprise me none

  17. Carmen says:

    What’s next is men fucking goats in public, during a PRIDE PARADE – beast loving will be yet another thing libtards and muzzies will have in common. (it’s okay to fuck your goat as long as you don’t eat it afterward for dinner)

    Once you decriminalize one deviant sex preference/fetish, you must, by libtard logic, decriminalize them all. It’s ENLIGHTENMENT.

  18. trace says:

    Isn’t funny who degenrating back to the habits of the ancient greeks and the romans is considered progggggggreeeeeeessssssssivvvvvvve

  19. Marci says:

    What a shocker. No wonder these bastards have no issues with old men marrying (by force) and raping little girls in Islam. I never thought I would see the day that people would try to legitimize the abuse of children and the rape of children.

  20. says:

    More proof that the surest way to justice in a devolving society is Vigilantism. No police, no courts, only brutal exacting justice. Freddy Krueger was a pedophile that the parents knew how to deal with. Time to return to the good old days of disappearing perverts and criminals.

    The more I see going on, the more I understand the Italian, namely Sicilian ways of doing things. The government is NEVER to be Trusted. The Black Hand fills the void of incompetent, corrupt government.

  21. Jodie says:


    The only difference is that after having sex with the goat, the Muslim must wash his privates before praying to Allah.

  22. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Marci, no one is trying to legitimize the abuse of children and the rape of children. Don’t be a pussy.

    Kipling, you realize the EVERY SINGLE EVENT in the Nightmare on Elm Street series was kicked off because Freddy Krueger was lynched, right? Talk about missing the point.

  23. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, that is EXACTLY what is being discussed here. This will lead to the abuse and rape of children by people that are being normalized here.

    But you know this already and are just looking forward to having your particular repulsive behaviour made ‘normal’!

  24. FrankW says:

    Just what the hell is wrong with Polygamy, anyway? Give me one non religious argument as to why three people can’t love each other.
    1. Jealousy.
    2. Disease factor multiplication.
    3. Increase in toilet seat arguments.
    4. Not to mention the toilet paper crisis that always occurs, over the top or under the bottom.
    5. The simple fact that (if you believe in it) evolution best equipped modern man (and chick) for pairing, not tres-ing.

  25. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    No, Stan. Not all people with a Lolita Complex want to rape children, just the same a man intrested in grown women wouldn’t rape a grown woman. Its not a hard concept to understand man.

  26. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, you claimed you wanted to have sex with children. That is sick. A child cannot possible consent to a sex act, making it RAPE. THAT is what you are championing here.

    Also, the fact that this normalization woudl make pedophiles a protected group and places like schools, daycares, and civic organizations would be forced to hire them BY LAW!

  27. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    No, I said I was attracted to young girls. Tis a diffrence.

  28. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, you said you were SEXUALLY attracted to young girls.

    Stop lying!

  29. FPST says:

    Seriously. The porn. Delete that.

  30. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Attracted MEANS sexually attracted. Is that not implied?

  31. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, and sexually attracted means sex with a child, which is RAPE!

  32. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Stop it Amelia, you’re not helping.

  33. Jay B. says:

    StanInTexas says:
    Exactly, this is also the point the left want the rest to forget the most. A child is not equipped to take these decisions and an adult who wants to be their “lover” blurs the line between helper and abuser. This is a violation of trust, simply.

  34. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    But I’m not going to have sex with a young girl.

  35. StanInTexas says:


    So not wanting grown men to rape little girls or boys means we are stopping the children from their RIGHT to their bodies?

    Eric the LB, we finally have a poster here that is even more perverted and sick than you!

  36. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, the thing preventing you from having sex with a child is the thought of jail (and your creepy and demented personality).

    But that aside, you claim you want to have sex with a young girl. That make you a deviant. Unless this proposal goes through, then you will be protected in your perversion.

  37. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I don’t have sex with a child because I’m not moraly bankrupt.

  38. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Also, its sexist to assume only men have Lolita/Shota complexes.

  39. Bill T says:

    This is just another law that illegal aliens think is broken, sine in mexico the age of consent is 7!

  40. Carmen says:

    WOW – Amelia, how shallow can one human think?

    Pedophilia is when an ADULT, male or female, forces a minor child to have oral and vaginal/anal sex WITHOUT them being “sexually” ready or physically ready. They rape them, beat them and threaten them, scarring them for life. (not including your weak persecution of BF of 17 yr old girls).

    Pedophiles fuck newborns and toddlers & pre-pubescent kids – are they READY to go?

  41. Austin says:

    I don’t agree with homosexuality or pedophilia (love the sinner, hate the sin). I often wonder why we’re supposed to accept that some people like the same gender (born that way?) but people that like little kids (pervert!) can be rehabilitated. Pedophiles prefer children (born that way?).

  42. StanInTexas says:


    You are a fool. The age of consent is the law, and it varies from state to state. A woman in one state is a child in another. And you can shove your BS politics, as it is not just the Right that pushes this notion.

    Yoru body may have been ready at 13, but you mind is not ready now. You cannot even control your emotions here. Why should we beleive you could control them at that age.

    I’m sorry you were raped, but that only means you need help. It does nto give you the right to wish that horror on other girls.

  43. FrankW says:

    So if you are sexually attracted to young girls, what keeps you from acting on the impulse? Leaving out the legal ramifications of acting on your impulse, what prevents the manifestation of the fantasy? Morality?
    And btw, Amelia did an excellent job of explaining the viewpoint of libs on this issue, paraphrased “It ain’t morals, it is biology” (that must have been why you said she was not helping). Reasoning is what separates us from the other primates. Morality is an offshoot of reasoning.

  44. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, you most definitely are morally bankrupt. And I have no doubt you woudl sexually abuse children if you thought you could get away with it.

  45. Carmen says:

    Being pregnant ruins one’s body? You have not seen mine, eh?

    What a screwy and sad way to live. The altar of ME ME ME is all that matters, even if a few precious children must be sucked out your cooch and crushed and thrown into a dumpster.

    How enlightening. You must be very proud of yourself. THIS. This is why libs are so angry all the time – they hate everyone.

  46. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Yes Frank! Morality!

  47. StanInTexas says:


    You need serious help to get over whatever trauma you have encountered. No one can be as blind as stupid as you are.

    I never said the laws were OK and I think it is stupid that a person can go to jail for having sex today, but tomorrow it’s OK becasue she had a birthday. But that is not what we are talking about here.

    We are talking abotu CHILDREN, pre-teens, that adults want to have sex with. You want to argue about a 17-year-old? What about a 6-year-old? Is it OK for them to have sex, just because some moral deficient like you claims that their body is ready and NATURE says it is OK?

    You can call me all the names you want, but that will never stop me from trying to protect children from monsters like YOU!

  48. FrankW says:

    And to add to Stan…
    Several states have a “Romeo and Juliette” law. If the younger of the couple has their age subtracted from the age of the older member and the number is less than X there is no rape charge.
    And as far as 13 being the age you were ready goes, bullshit. Body may have developed all of the physical elements needed for completion of the act, but your ability to make a reasoned and informed decision was most likely not ready. That is the major reason for an age of consent, not to prop up the church.

  49. StanInTexas says:

    Amelia, anem a single Republican that has advocate or introduced legislation that woudl outlaw sex outside of marriage!

    Oh, you can’t because none exists? Then apologize to us for your lie!

  50. StanInTexas says:

    Amelia, NONE of those people are advocating making sex outside of marriage illegal, so apologize for your lie. Do it NOW!

    And I didn;t say anything about a 12-month-old child, but your point is valid. When the law says child, that is anything below the age of consent, so those grown men will be having sex with the 12-month-old-child as well. Does noature say their body is ready for sex with an adult, Amelia?

    So because you were a pathetic slut having sex when you were 13, you think everyone is like that and no one has the right to say otherwise? I think you have just proven what a pathetic whore you are, Amelia. You may go now!


    The same leftists news media who calls the tea parties radicals and terrorists are the same bunch of wackos who interview these NAMBLA freakos

  52. Sinister66 says:

    These poeple can try whatever they want. Pedophilia will remain illegal.

  53. StanInTexas says:

    Amelia, you need to stop lying and you need to do it now!

    So your proof that the Right would outlaw sex outside of marriage is the Bachmann once worked for a professor that advocated it? That you for admitting what a pathetic LIAR you are!

    And we have already proven that you were not ready at 13, Amelia. In fact, you have proven that you do not have the mental capacity to make those kinds of decisions NOW.

    Apparently in your world, the only two choices a young girl has is to be a celebate nun or a complete whore like you. Most reasoning human (of which you do not qualify) believe there is something in between.

  54. Profiler says:

    I just had a feeling young Logan would be the first to have posted on this, I’m suprised he didn’t lead with

  55. StanInTexas says:

    Why is that Sinister? Why will pedophilia remain illegal?

  56. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Don’t be a dick, Profiler.

  57. Carmen says:

    I have ZERO stretch marks and 38DD perfect boobies – all natural birth of my love child = great woman’s body & I don’t hate myself either!!
    WIN WIN.

    Maybe one day you will know real love & will quit bitching like a bitch about everything? Maybe. I hope so. Smooch!!

  58. StanInTexas says:

    Amelia, I told you to stop lying. You know NOTHING about me, or my feelings, or those fo the Christian Right.

    The Christian right does not hate sex, and has more of it (AND BETTER) than you ever will. Sex is from God. And while we prefer it to be between a husband and wife, we also understand the reality of this world. Sex outside of marriage will not damn you to hell. Forgiveness is available.

    I hope you will seek help for our bitterness and that you do it soon!

  59. ThatDorkEricDraven says:

    I bet Amelia is a dog.

  60. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Oh, hush it.

  61. Dookiestain Laflair says:

    Amelia, if you are proud of your farts, I will gladly cook you a bean burrito and steamed cabbage.

  62. Dr. Theo says:

    TheDarkEricDraven says:
    No, Stan. Not all people with a Lolita Complex want to rape children…

    But they DO want to have sex with children, don’t they, DarkEric?

    Is it the fate of “people with a Lolita Complex” (that sounds so much nicer than pedophile) to live lives of denial with never a hope of attaining even once the object of their sexual desires? Must they live in silent shame and practical celebacy because of the prudish demands of a moralistic oppressive majority?

    We’ve heard these arguments before. We know where it’s going. Next up, Bestiality.

  63. FrankW says:

    Which church am I in? I have never mentioned being in a church. I do believe I detect a bit of religious hostility however.

  64. trace says:

    Just a bit, frank.

    Amelia, how old what your partner when you were 13?

    My daught was physically developed at 13 as well, but by no means ready. She was not ready at 15.
    And by the way, it is MY right and job to protect my daughter, and if I see some skeevy 19 year old preying on my 15 (she is 17), I need the law to back me up, or I will be forced to use my shot gun.

    BTW, just because a kid is tall enough to sit behind
    the wheel and see over the dash and reach the petals does that mean that that kid is ready to drive? Why should some arbitrary age get in the way?

  65. StanInTexas says:


    Saying Amelia has a bit of religious hostility would be like saying that Hitler was not fond of Jews and Gypsys.

  66. FrankW says:

    Another goofy question Amelia,
    Why do you presume I am a Christian? Is it due to my lack of hostility towards the church (meaning any organized religion)? Is it because I use a reasonable argument to counter hysteria? For all you know I am polytheist, Valhalla and all that. Maybe I am a Cardinal of the Catholic church, maybe I am just a tolerant atheist? Religion or lack thereof is a personal decision, I don’t assume your religious preference (although it is a bit obvious), don’t presume mine.

  67. trace says:

    wow amelia.
    Because if you are not responsible enough to preform day to day activities you are not ready to handle the gift of sex. And the 19 year old with no job is not ready to handle it either.
    Because your body is not a play thing.
    It deserves more respect that a pleasure palace.
    You degrate yourself to a thing if it only about physical pleasure.

  68. StanInTexas says:

    So Amelia, you’ve been with GUYS (plural) and you have had them compare you to their wife? Guess we were all correct about your line of work!

    There has NEVER been an anti-sex agenda from the Christian right. I promise you that I DO enjoy sex, but I only share it with my wife.

    And please stop assuming that everyone hops in the sack with just anyone, just because you do it!

  69. StanInTexas says:

    Amelia, your body has been ruined in many ways.

  70. Dr. Theo says:

    “Why Are Christians Having Better Sex Than the Rest of Us?”

  71. trace says:

    too many guys (or jars or baseball bats) will stretch you out too you know.

    I have seen the affects of a lifestyle like yours.
    Some of the hottest, or cutest girls from high shool, 20 years later look like used up burlap sacks.
    But my wife, who has bared 2 beautiful baby girls, can still pass for 25 at the age of 36.
    Heh, and yes we are christian and yes we enjoy sex very much. Probably because it means more then just pleasure to us.

  72. Dr. Theo says:

    Why Are Christians Having Better Sex Than the Rest of Us?
    Here’s the link:

  73. trace says:

    oh, and girls will do whatever girls want to do, so while I do not approve of it, she has been with a couple of guys. How do I know? It devestated her emotionaly and she came to me about it on her own.

  74. StanInTexas says:

    Amelia, your personality alone would keep any normal man away from you. Not even to mention the host of diseases you most likely have.

  75. Jvdawg says:

    I think that people who sexually abuse children should all be shot, why would we even try to “cure” these freaks, fuck them let them burn in Hell.

  76. StanInTexas says:

    Say Amelia, have you ever heard of a C-Section? Did you even think about that?

  77. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    Carmen says:
    August 15, 2011 at 12:06 pm
    I have ZERO stretch marks and 38DD perfect boobies –

    That’s the kind of post I like to read.

  78. Jayne C says:

    Proof! We want Proof!

  79. Jayne C says:

    Hey, Amelia, how much you charge an hour?

  80. Spurwing Plover says:

    And more reasons to end computuary schooling and stop these perverts from contaminating kids with their dirty way of living time for NAMBLA to lose its tax exempt status

  81. Proud Kuffar says:

    I have a hunch that “Amelia” is that commie troll Gunther is one of his disguises. You can never trust a Goddamn Commie.

  82. Mal says:

    God, I can’t know that!

  83. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Though I don’t quite agree with her, you guys are being rather rude to poor Amelia. Can’t we be civil? Please?

  84. Hail The Amberlamps! says:

    Got news for you amelia, your youthful, non-reproducing female figure will not withstand the ravages of time. Nor will your psyche escape the inevitable depression that arises from having killed your own children in sacrifice to your vanity.

    That’s the part the communists’ abortion racket doesn’t tell desperate young women. But good news is there is a massive collection of medications you can take for the rest of your life once it hits.

    My advice to you is to have a good spouse, job and medical insurance by your late 30s. You will need all of them to keep from killing yourself.

  85. Truthseeker 2 says:

    “amelia” started off with this statement:

    Like usual a bunch of Rethuglican Jesus nuts

    She doesn’t deserve one once of respect, DorkEric

  86. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, you want us to be CIVIL to Amelia? Perhaps you need to go review here first post on this thread…

    Like usual a bunch of Rethuglican Jesus nuts freak out when anybody suggests sex is about valuing our humanity instead of some boring and sanitized reproduce for the church bullshit.
    Nature determines when we become sexual beings. We grow into sexuality by our body’s chemistry. Not when we are a specific age or when some control freak priest says its okay.
    Teens can explore their bodies and they have the right to do it without angry Jesus assholes controlling their bodies.

    Sure, WE need to be civil, sure we do!

  87. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Right. Good point. For once. Lets ALL be civil then, aye?

  88. FrankW says:

    Ummm Eric, please noticed who fired the first shot. AmIaliar fired the first salvo @ 11:09, followed by followup @ 11:20. Strangely enough (or maybe not) the only one she was civil to was you.
    BTW, I responded with 5 answers to your little question.

  89. trace says:

    “That’s the part the communists’ abortion racket doesn’t tell desperate young women. But good news is there is a massive collection of medications you can take for the rest of your life once it hits.”

    Thats exactly why they end up looking like used up burlap sacks chasing their next high so they wont have to deal with the misery their life choices have brought upon them.

  90. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I know, I didn’t think it was worth following up on. I think if three or more people are in love with each other, its fine. I mean, just living with one person whom you are romanticly involved with but not married is a crime. The law needs a washing.

  91. Adam says:

    “Marci, no one is trying to legitimize the abuse of children and the rape of children.”
    Yes, they are. It is a slippery slope argument.

    “Kipling, you realize the EVERY SINGLE EVENT in the Nightmare on Elm Street series was kicked off because Freddy Krueger was lynched, right?”
    On the one hand, yes, the films do make the point that what the Simpsons once referred to as “Angry- mob justice” is never a good idea. On the other hand, the films, specifically Krueger’s origin, can very easily be seen as an indictment of the effects of liberalism on our justice system. Krueger gets acquitted of molesting and murdering almost two dozen kids in spite of the mounds of evidence proving his guilt, because his scumbag liberal attorney perverts the justice system enough to exploit a loophole and get him off on a technicality. In the real world, every day, bleeding- heart ultra- liberal attorneys and judges enable similar psychos and sickos to either get back on the streets as soon as possible or receive the minimum possible sentence for their crimes, especially pedophiles. As the article in question shows, the Left tends to be far more interested in protecting the “Rights” of degenerate criminals than in ensuring justice for their victims or preventing such crimes from happening again. The films can thus be seen to show that if the lawyers and judges don’t do their jobs and put real- life monsters as bad as Krueger where they belong, then horrible things like mob actions are the inevitable result. Oh, and not to nitpick, but lynching tends to refer to when they are hanged, not when they are burned alive as Krueger was.

    “Pedophilia laws are used to persecute the boyfriends of 17 year old women for sharing the loving and tender moments nature intended.”
    No, pedophilia laws are used to protect innocent children from being raped and having their lives ruined by disgusting perverts of the sort that you and many other liberals protect and fight for with every breath you can muster.

    “Though I don’t quite agree with her, you guys are being rather rude to poor Amelia.”
    And she’s (Though I strongly suspect she’s another of Goonturd’s sock puppets) being EXTREMELY rude to us! Civility is a two- way street.

  92. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Perhaps Adam, but I doubt that was the intended message. And WHY he was let off changes depending on what your source is. I think it was at first that he wasn’t read his rights or something (Which would NEVER work in real life like that) and in the Friday the 13th Vs. Evil Dead Vs. Nightmare on Elm Street comic, its some time traveler messing with his file.

  93. Brian_Boru says:

    amelia is a hermaphrodite, so at 13 he/she was already old enough to screw itself.

  94. StanInTexas says:

    I mean, just living with one person whom you are romanticly involved with but not married is a crime.

    No where in America is that a crime, Eric the LB.

    It is telling that the only way you can make a point is to LIE!

  95. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I’m pretty sure it is in some states.

  96. StanInTexas says:

    I’m pretty sure it is in some states.

    Name One, Eric.

  97. StanInTexas says:

    “amelia says:”

    Stan Says… Shut up, WHORE!

  98. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I don’t know. You are the one disputing it, you look it up.

  99. StanInTexas says:

    TheDarkEricDraven says: August 15, 2011 at 2:33 pm
    I don’t know. You are the one disputing it, you look it up.

    Eric the LB, we’ve been through this before. You made the claim “just living with one person whom you are romanticly involved with but not married is a crime” It is your job to prove it, not my job to disprove it.

  100. amelia says:

    whore aka the RepubliKKKlan’s insult for any woman who enjoys good sex. keep talking u keep proving how much of a christian male pig u really are

  101. StanInTexas says:

    WHORE – A skanky bitch that has sex for money with multiple men, who compare her to their wives.

    And the KKK was a DEMOCRAT organization, Amelia. Learn some history before shooting off your slut-mouth again!

  102. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Amelia, if you don’t mind me asking, are you like…a lesbian of any sort? Not that thats a bad thing, you sound very cute, just…you say things like “male pig”…

    Stan: You are the one that cares though. I do not.

  103. StanInTexas says:

    Oh, so your a cheap whore that just sleeps around with married men.

  104. h. says:

    Amelia is obviously one of those talking blow up dolls.

  105. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB, I knwo that you do not care that you were caught in a lie. I expect the “Whatever” reply to this post.

    You posted a claim that is 100% wrong. I asked you to provide proof and you went straight into your pissy little bitch mode.

    There is no place in America where it is a crime for two people to live together intimately.


  106. trace says:

    If it were ever ilegal, it would have been during the time of the British Colonies, but I am not sure it was even then…

  107. Sinister66 says:


    Your not going to find anyone who will overturn age of concent laws. You would have a better chance lowering the drinking age. From what I got in reading the article all that is happening is pedophilia will no longer be considered a mental disease. But not made a legal activity.

    Another thing to consider, my child is my responsibility to care for and protect. Anyone attempting to try anything to my daughter that I consider harmfull and/or abusive will be delt with in the most violent way possible. You would be hard pressed to find a parent that would disagree.

  108. Jodie says:

    Right Eric. Three or more people in a marriage always works out great./sarc

    “After being beaten repeatedly by her husband — who had also threatened to kill her — Jameela turned to her local Sharia council in a desperate bid for a way out of her marriage. Today she discovers the verdict. Playing nervously with her hands, the young mother of three listens as the panel of judges discuss whether they should grant her a divorce.

    The council meets once a month at the Birmingham Central Mosque. Many of the cases relate to divorce and involve the husbands and wives entering the room separately to make their appeals.

    In an airless room in the bowels of the mosque, Jameela is asked to explain why she wants a divorce. She replies that her husband spends most of his time with his second wife — Islamic law allows men to have up to four wives — but complains he is abusive whenever he returns to her home.

    Across the desk, Mohammed ­Naseem, chair of the mosque’s Sharia council, sits alongside Talha ­Bokhari, a white-robed imam, and Amra Bone, the only woman sitting on an Islamic court in England.

    While a husband is not required to go through official channels to gain a divorce — being able to achieve this merely by uttering the word “talaq” — Islamic law requires that the wife must persuade the judges to grant her a dissolution.

    Although the judges appear sympathetic, they are concerned about the rights of the father, as Islamic law says he is still responsible for his children’s education. ‘For the sake of the children, you must keep up the facade of cordial relations,’ says Naseem. ‘The worst thing that can happen to a child is to see the father and mother quarrelling.'”

  109. StanInTexas says:

    Sinister, the age of consent laws are already in flux. 21 in some states, 18 in others, even younger in a few. What is a woman in this state is legally considered a child in another.

    This is only one of the reasons why I oppose gay marriage. If you can LEGALLY say two men can marry, you can just as easliy say an adult can marry a child, or lower the age of consent to 11 so that the parents have no say in the matter.

    And while I agree with the protect-your-daughter attitude, you currently cannot protect your daughter once she passes the age of consent, as she is now an ADULT in the eyes of the law. Heaven help us if these twisted Liberals go after age-of-consent next.

  110. Jayne C says:

    Picures dammit!

  111. StanInTexas says:

    “And Stan, sex outside marriage was illegal for most of history in America.”


  112. Jeff says:

    Amelia, there is a critical element to the sex act that you don’t and mostly will NEVER understand or experience. There is more to sex than justing your pleasure out of it physically. There it the emotional and spiritual part of you, of connecting with that some one else, who has made the commitment (and keeps it) of being there for you and beside regardless of circumstances and who can see you as you really are, with your faults, short comings and weaknesses. It is about loving unconditionally as best you can. Sex is the best, when you seek to give your best to your partner. Amelia, you will NEVER have truely great sex because you seek to take from, rather than selflessly seeking to give to your partner. I have yet to see any evidence that those have multiple sex partners are happier, healthier or have better sex, then those who stay faithful to their mate.

  113. StanInTexas says:

    You told me what Amelia? That you were a whore? That you sleep with married men?

    My point was that the age of consent varies from state to state. We went through this before. Adult bodies? So you were an adult at 13? Spare us your stupidity, SLUT!

    Still waiting on yoru PROOF!

  114. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    (Sorry for asking Amelia, I just like having a clearer insight when talking to people on subjects such as this. I also am bisexual, and its refreshing to see someone who breaks the mold of “Crazy political nutjob” like Gunther or…everyone else on this site.)

    Stan, you are the one who wants proof that it is ilegal. I don’t care. Why don’t you disprove it?

  115. StanInTexas says:

    Eric the LB.

    OK, I’ll play your little game.

    Hold on a sec…

    OK, THERE! I looked through every law in every state in America, as well as every Federal Law. It is not a crime to live with someone intimately and not be married!

    I’ll await your apology!

  116. StanInTexas says:

    What was easy? Another non-working link, probably to come child-sex website that you frequent?

    Spare me, Eric the LB. I just proved you wrong. Deal with it!

  117. Grunt says:

    Ameliar says:
    “Christian right have been on an anti sex agenda for thousands of years.”

    Sure….started with that whole “God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth” bit.

    Prudish, PRUDISH God! Wanting a PAIRED, Heterosexual Couple to follow his specific command to have sex, and lots of it!

    Christian couples haet teh Secks? Oh noes! Somebody mistook that steamy pie in the meadow for chip dip!

    I Love sex! 😀

    Of course, you’d never know Christians enjoy intimacy because most just don’t go around bragging about it. There is no need. We love our mates and that’s what is important.

    Speaking of importance, most Christians will agree, there is more to life on this planet than figuring out what to do with our genitals, or thinking about the world as it applies to them.

    “I see you mentioned nothing about tightness” (paraphrased) is that any of your business? She fits her husband!

    Speaking of loose, how sexy your next cum-dump will look with a two by four strapped across his but to keep from falling into your wallowed-out dimension…

    Having sex at a young age with multiple partners doesn’t empower a woman, it teaches her that her body is currency and she need only spread her legs if she wants males to like her. And an overly used snatch loses its elasticity far more rapidly than that of a few childbirths…not to mention, the whole disease factor.

    So you help men cheat on their wives. Nice. Good on you.

    Funny thing about that, leading another to sin; it always comes back to bite you in the end. You don’t have to believe in it…it’ll happen.

    As to DorkEric…still waiting on the reasons you think child porn (loli) is arousing and useful. Why do you like “little” girls? Are real grown females too intimidating, or are they unattractive because they have preferences and expectations you can’t live up to? What makes a preteen child “attractive”, sexually? Is it because of small parts more suited to the size of your small parts?

    Personally, I think pedopliles shouldn’t be shot or killed, they should be castrated–and not chemically. Let’s see if it really is “love” that motivates them. “Love” has very little (nothing, really) to do with one’s genitals.

    Who wants to bet Logan’s “girlfriend” is somewhere between the ages of seven and ten?

  118. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    No, Stan, I proved you wrong. Ask someone who can see the link.

    Grunt: It sort of disturbs me other people can’t find lolis attractive.

  119. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    And call me Eric or Erika.

  120. Grunt says:

    It’s funny that Amelair is the one being compared to the Wife…she’s good for cheap, quick sex…but she’s always have a career as “the other woman”. (At least, until she’s in her late thirties and it looks like she’s got tripe and flank steak oozing out of either side of her panties.)

    Not the wife.

    Something tells me she’s fine with that.

    >Can’t stop laughing…<

  121. Dave Blount says:

    Some news for you: Amelia is Gunther.

  122. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Oh, okay then…I’m very gullible, you see. Do as you like.

  123. Grunt says:

    Logan, your name is Logan. That is what I will call you.
    You’re a fifteen year old loli pervert from Arkansas with a thing for “The Crow” and a penchant for video games, seldom finding time for anything not computer or fap-related.

    I don’t have to be civil to you, I don’t have to respect anything about a pedophile in training. You wanna site with fewer “nutjobs” as you and the teeny-bimbo shareware seem to deem us, there’s a snazzy “X” on the corner of this window: feel free to indulge its use.

    Let the adults discuss whether or not your bizarre need to be a big man only seems to extend to children because you can’t be a real man in any realm where it truly counts.

  124. dmgore says:

    You make quite a bit of vague statements regarding republicans, christians, bachmann, etc. But you have yet to show specific cases. YOU are offering the straw man argument repeatedly. Its just talking points….old white men this, christian white men that, priests this.
    20 year sentence? Who? what? when? and where?
    Know what? I can do this too. Let me show you…
    You liberals and and Democrats only want the militant feminist and homosexual group to dominate any one who is sexually ready. Your politicians advocate for this. And your withered wiccan priestess’ are continually trying to corrupt anyone who dosent subscribe to thier beliefs by using thier sexuality.
    I can do that too.

  125. Grunt says:

    Why are children sexually attractive to you, Logan?

    What good does loli-porn serve the greater good?

    What makes it acceptable?

    Would you and your whole family sit and enjoy a night of loli, or is that a “private” thing?

  126. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I could go, Grunt, but I’m bored. Arguing with stupid people will never get old because you never learn.

  127. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Its still porn, Grunt. Have I ever, at any time, denied that?

  128. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    And call me Eric. Or Erika.

  129. Proud Kuffar says:

    I knew Amelia was Gunther! Fucking commie troll won’t quit.

  130. Proud Kuffar says:

    No woman in her right mind sounds like Amelia, not even the most libertine Leftist or depraved whore.

    By the way, screw you Logan. The AIDS fairy will deal with you in kind just like your fellow homo brethren across the world.

  131. Incitatus says:

    Guess who was behind the Federal Hate Crimes bill S. 909, AKA The Pedophile Protection Act?

  132. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Eric or Erika, PK.

  133. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    And Incitatus, your link used the word “Jewry”. Really? Thats the best you can do?

  134. Proud Kuffar says:

    @ DarkEricDraven

    Shut up clown! I will call you the fairy faggot Logan from now on. You are lower than pond scum as you have sick fantasies of molesting children.

  135. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    But my proper name is Eric or Erika. So. Eric or Erika. Or, if you would like, A Grand Masta’ Pimp Named Eric.

  136. Grunt says:

    “Arguing with stupid people will never get old because you never learn.”

    I wonder how many times his Mommy told him that one. Looks like at least one lesson stuck.

    Yes, you have denied that it’s porn. Your argument was that it’s not porn because it’s ink and ink isn’t real.

    And still you fail to answer the questions presented to you. You aren’t arguing so much as you are whinging to your betters, anyway.

    So what is it about baby-flesh that gets you so excited, Logan? What’s the appeal of a person who’s young and ignorant, as opposed to a person your own age and older?

    Looking for a tight fit?

    Just for the record, you’re not a “genderqueer”; you have admitted here and elsewhere that you are a male, and that you are sexually attracted to little girls.

    That just makes you an insecure little boy who has sick preferences and can’t handle 1.) waiting until you know you’re sure–that hard-on won’t take care of itself, ya know! and 2.) You couldn’t handle a mature and able lover or mate.

    You’re just willing to experiment with anyone who’ll have you, and used that to justify your perversion.

    You have a great future as a statistic.

    Don’t bother with me if you aren’t willing to answer the questions truthfully.

  137. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Dude. Girlfriend. Own age. Fuck, man.

  138. Apostle53 says:

    I worked with the issue of sexual offending and the new sexual alternative following normalcy of homosexual perversion will be pediphilia.

  139. Grunt says:


    Check this out. “Study shows link between homosexuality and pedophilia”

    Copyright: The Interim.

  140. Grunt says:

    A snippet from the above linked article.

    **According to Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse, pedophiles have long existed as a subculture within the gay rights movement. Dailey quotes David Thorstad, a homosexual activist and founding member of NAMBLA, to demonstrate that by 1985, pedophilia had gained acceptance within the homosexual movement, as it was in that year that NAMBLA was admitted as a member in New York’s council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations and the International Gay Association. In the words of Jim Kepner, at one time the curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: “A point I’ve been trying to make is that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today, we’d better stop waving the banner of the ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We’d better stop claiming them as part of our history unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be gay.” **

    Here I thought it would be polyamory, right?

  141. Proud Kuffar says:

    The future of the gay “rights” movement lies in indoctrinating the youth with their depraved message of faggotry. Logan is a prime example of this.

    Also the Greeks and Romans did not restructure their society to accommodate sodomite unions, so that is a mute comparison.

  142. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Maybe because they were already so gay, Spartan women had to shave their heads and dress in heavy clothing to make love to their husbands? (On that note, Greece and Rome were huge empires-They had no were to go EXCEPT DOWN. Why the hell did the British Empire fall? Cuz of teh ghay right?)

  143. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    And call me Eric or Erika Kuffar.

  144. Proud Kuffar says:

    No one is buying your revisionist history Logan. They were not so “gay.” AIDS will smite if you do not change your ways.

  145. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Yes, yes they were. You guys were even arguing the point that that was the reason Rome and Greece fell.

  146. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    And call me Eric or Erika, dude.

  147. Proud Kuffar says:

    Rome and Greece fell due to foreign invasions and the inability to effectively govern their vast provinces under a central government. The Greek city states were eventually conquered by the Romans and the Western Roman Empire was conquered by Germanic tribes from the North (Ostrogoths and Visigoths). Rome fell in 476 AD. Thanks for playing, Logan.

  148. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Gays being the reason is what YOUR side was arguing!

  149. Proud Kuffar says:

    No one was arguing that. What is my side? People who do not know history? Go see a shrink.

  150. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    What…just what-the fuck-ever.

  151. Proud Kuffar says:

    Sad to see you in your natural state, Logan. Maybe should crack open a history text book instead of whacking it to preteen girls in japanese lolicomics.?

  152. Adam says:

    “Grunt says:

    August 15, 2011 at 3:19 pm”
    Awesome retorts! Way to tear apart Goonturd’s (Since Blount has now confirmed it was him, though I figured it was all along) typically asinine and hate- filled ramblings!
    “Grunt: It sort of disturbs me other people can’t find lolis attractive.”
    Wait, wait, wait Eric/ Logan: So, it “Sort of disturbs” you that other people aren’t sexually attracted to animated child pornography?
    Get help. Seriously. Before you ruin your own life as well as that of some poor innocent girl, because based on your writings, unless you change your ways, it almost certainly WILL happen.

  153. Proud Kuffar says:

    Lol. I finally came around to looking up the profile of Logan Vaughn. You look like a total deadbeat stoned-out loser.

    Anyone interested, can take a gander:

  154. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I’m not a rapist, Adam.

  155. Grunt says:

    Thank you Adam…it’s very kind of you to say. 🙂

  156. Pete says:

    Dr. Judith Reisman is an angel. She has been warning about “free love” and homosexuality for decades. Hero of Mankind.

    As for this, it never stops…once a society accepts this virus its over.

  157. Pete says:

    Ohhh one more thing…remember when everyone was making jokes about Nambla and not taking it seriously? Remember how everyone warning how Nambla was for real was being called names?

    Now you know…

  158. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    Is NAMBLA not still a joke?….

  159. StanInTexas says:

    No, Eric the LB, it is a legitimate organization of pedophiles that want the ability to rape young boys. It is NOT a joke.

  160. GoY says:

    NAMBLA certainly is not a joke to the ACLU, which went to court to defend NAMBLA’s “right” to distribute instructional booklets on how to rape children and get away with it.

  161. TheDarkEricDraven says:

    I meant in the sense that no one takes it seriously. They sure as hell don’t speak for me, and what other LCs I’ve met.

  162. Adam says:

    “I’m not a rapist, Adam.”
    Not YET, you’re not. However, the point I was making, based on your own writings, is that if you stay on your current path, the odds of your eventually becoming one are quite high.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy