moonbattery logo

Apr 10 2013

Plundering the Ovaries of Aborted Girls

Just try to get you head — let alone your heart — around this:

There’s been some buzz this week about a scientific discovery that can help the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process: for about ten years, doctors apparently have had the ability to harvest the eggs of aborted baby girls and use them to aid women who have difficulty conceiving.

Soon our moral decay will catch up with advancing science, and the artificially conceived children of homosexual “married” couples can go through life knowing that their mothers might have been killed before being born.

As Stalin and Hitler demonstrated so graphically, progressive ideology is a gateway through which nightmares that could only be spawned in hell enter our world.

What can be looted from her body?

On a tip from St. Gilbert.

29 Responses to “Plundering the Ovaries of Aborted Girls”

  1. Henry says:

    Free ObrownMaoCare abortions… Harvesting eggs from aborted babies… Free “infertility” treatments for homosexual partners… See the connection?

  2. Pegon Zellschmidt says:

    The AIDS problem is that the rectum wasn’t made for sex like the vagina. A condom will still tear at the thin wall of the rectum, ergo, since Bill and Melinda are so pro-abortion maybe they could fund the creation of a technique whereby the tiny vaginas of aborted baby girls are sewn together and then retrofitted into the anus of homosexuals. Everybody’s happy and we’ve cured AIDS!

    Bill and Melinda are pondering: “Serious or parody? With our billions, anything is possible.”


  3. Flu-Bird says:

    Just like the nazis Obama and his fellow tolatitarians want to use aborted fetuses for experaments the nazis used mentaly handicapped persons and PETA wants to use kids in medical research

  4. Wilberforce says:

    “Unmoored from Transcendent Truth, our ship is now free to float and and wander the open seas of ‘possibilities’, untethered from the wisdom of The Ages and God Himself.”

    Have mercy on us…

  5. StanInTexas says:

    Critics of abortion have warned for years that the bodies of aborted children would be used for scientific experiments and money, basically turning aborted children into a cash crop.

    And we were told we were wrong, that it would never happen, and that our’s was nothing more that irrational fear-mongering.

    I *HATE* being right!

  6. Sam Adams says:

    Every day I think that things can’t get worse.

    Every day, I find that I underestimated the left yesterday.

  7. whotothewhat says:

    Where the left champions destroying life in order to allow a womyn who for whatever reason needed aborted baby girls eggs to be able conceive. The same left becomes totally unhinged whenever science looks at or works on any factor that can determine or alter homosexuality in humans.

  8. Carolyn says:

    Well, now, isn’t this a Brave New World?

  9. Clingtomyguns says:

    America was certainly lied to by Obama and the Dems that Obamacare would not be used to pay for abortions when they rammed it through. But how can we blame the corrupt immoral politicians who were just catering to their corrupt immoral low information constituents that elected them?

    “[Obamacare] specifically provides that state health exchanges may cover abortions unless the state enacts specific legislation prohibiting abortion coverage. Moreover, the law’s requirement that insurance providers cover “preventive services” and preventative care are so broadly defined that they could be used to force coverage of abortions and abortion related drugs. Thus, all Americans are forced to purchase health insurance that could cover abortion and in some cases is required to cover abortion.”

    “This pro-abortion law also opens the door to Planned Parenthood-run clinics in public middle schools and high schools, and specifically provides federal tax dollars to establish these clinics. ObamaCare provides grants for establishing “School-based Health Centers,” which could be run by abortion organizations like Planned Parenthood.

    The proposed amendment to ObamaCare that would have prevented all taxpayer funding for abortions that was debated in Congress, known as the Stupak-Pitts Amendment, was not included in the final bill signed by President Obama.

    In fact, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress worked considerably to keep the Stupak-Pitts Amendment from being included in the final bill. The Stupak-Pitts Amendment simply said: “No funds authorized or appropriated by [ObamaCare] may be used to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion ….”

    Second, the Hyde Amendment – the yearly amendment to appropriations bills that prevents federal taxpayer dollars from funding abortions – does not apply to ObamaCare.

    Third, as we have previously explained in detail, the Executive Order signed by President Obama, which he claimed would “ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services,” did not prevent taxpayer funds from being used for abortions – and then Solicitor General (now Supreme Court Justice) Elena Kagan and the White House knew it. This Executive Order does not stop ObamaCare from funding abortion because an executive order cannot trump a congressionally enacted statute.

    As our legal analysis of a the bill that would become ObamaCare concluded, there is nothing to “prohibit federal dollars from funding plans that include abortion services.” In fact, the law has a section describing “ABORTIONS FOR WHICH PUBLIC FUNDING IS ALLOWED.”

    By forcing states to create and run health exchanges and by forcing them to expand their Medicaid rolls which can, and in some case must, include abortion funding, more tax-payer dollars will go to fund abortions.

    One example: the Department of Health and Human Services has already used powers granted under ObamaCare to force insurance companies and employers to fully cover an abortion drug.

    And we know Obamacare will cover sexual disfigurement procedures.

    We know that LGBT’s are fighting, and seemingly winning, the culture rot towards federal approval of gay marriage and the devil knows what other depravities, and extending all fringe benefits and healthcare benefits of married couples from the government, paid for by Joe Q. “Sucker” Taxpayer.

    In short, our leaders have seen to it that taxpayer slaves will bankrolling the immoral enterprise if “married” homosexuals choose to have an aborted fetus’s vagina installed in one of their partner’s grotesque rear ends.

    Remember Bart Stupak and the willing dunces who went along with this charade?

    “All the safeguards we were looking for, the principle we fought for all these months, will be enforced through this Executive Order,” Stupak said at a press conference in March 2010 announcing the deal. “It’s a good agreement.”

    At the time, others in the pro-life movement argued that Stupak had sold out. The compromise could be easily undone by the White House, they noted, because the president can revoke an Executive Order at any time.

    Stupak appears to have belatedly realized his pro-life critics were right.

    Now he’s making up excuses how he allegedly got duped, as if no one in their right mind knew that Obama was lying through his teeth:

    “I am perplexed and disappointed that, having negotiated the Executive Order with the President, not only does the HHS mandate violate the Executive Order but it also violates statutory law,” Stupak said at a forum hosted Tuesday by Democrats for Life, a pro-life group.”

    As Queen Nancy bequeathed from her throne: “But we have to pass [the Obamacare] bill so that you can find out what’s in it….”

    Now we know.

    Scores of milstones, rope and one way deep sea voyages would be merciful for what these evil, lying, crooked and immoral scum and their enablers deserve.

  10. Mr Evilwrench says:

    I see they’re trying to have things both ways again; when they want to kill it, it’s a “lump of cells”, yet when they find a use for some of those cells, they’re suddenly somehow human enough.

  11. Jodie says:

    I can’t wait to see Michael J. Fox answer to his maker about this on judgment day. He fought for legislation that opened the door for Planned Parenthood to sell babies for their stem cells, for Pepsi to use to research new flavors, and the “plundering the ovaries of aborted baby girls”. He deserves God’s wrath for this!

  12. Sam Adams says:

    Michael J. Fox has a debilitating illness that he would like to cure. So he has, at least, a vested interest. I really pity the moonbats who, for no other reason than a twisted ideology, support killing unborn children.

    I am glad I am not in their shoes when they stand before their maker. At that time, they would prefer having the mountains fall upon them to hide their sins rather than have to stand and give an accounting of their life.

    BTW, if you want a good definition of hell, it is what happens in a woman’s mind when she realizes what she has done in having an abortion.

  13. Jodie says:


    A vested interest in killing and selling babies is not a Godly thing. It was never about using “adult” stem cells and he had to KNOW that.

  14. Skyfall says:

    Sadly, Jodie is right. I feel sorry for Fox and anyone with a disease like that, but two wrongs don’t make a right. Literally. They’ve found promise in adult stem-cell research, and nothing but failure with embryonic SSR. Kind of like it’s not supposed to be done!

  15. Skyfall says:

    Bottom line: When a progressive gets all misty-eyed and talks about saving children, they mean “in the freezer for later use”.

    …and it’s only going to get worse, yet no matter what the abomination, we will be the ones targeted as haters and impediments to “progress”.

    God help us.

  16. AM says:

    Remind you of anyone? Mengele, perhaps? This is BEYOND sick. Somebody stop the planet, I want to get off!

  17. opiate-of-the-liv's says:

    This is beyond sick.

  18. opiate-of-the-liv's says:

    Isn’t it interesting how something that libtards don’t consider to be a life will be used to give life?

  19. Musicmaven says:

    Judgement Day will sure be a bitch for these scientists!

  20. Tax Slave says:

    if children belong to the collective, isn’t an abortion destruction of public property?

  21. Doug says:

    …isn’t an abortion destruction of public property?

    No, just a Moonbat’s form of ‘recycling.’

  22. Clingtomyguns says:

    State run media ignores the crimes of abortion doctor murderer like they do black flash mobs. Move along, nothing to see here.

  23. victoria in san diego says:

    leftists do not value life.
    even their own.

    they believe that this is it. no accountability. no judgment day. satan is their buddy.

  24. Vic Kelley says:

    Thank you for posting this thread even though I am going to be a little sick to my stomach and emotionally scarred from it. Damn I did not know there was this depravity in the world.

  25. ToreyDawn says:

    This is the sickest thing I’ve heard yet. I know you promised, God, but the homosexuals took your rainbow, so I say flood the joint! Delete, delete, delete. EVIL!

  26. Sam Adams says:

    Jodie says:
    April 10, 2013 at 9:40 am


    A vested interest in killing and selling babies is not a Godly thing. It was never about using “adult” stem cells and he had to KNOW that.

    I didn’t say that a vested interest in using the stem cells from unborn children was a Godly thing. Michael J. Fox isn’t a mental giant. I doubt that he understands enough about stem cell technology to know that adult stem cells are controllable, while stem cells from unborn children may likely lead to very bad cancers.

    I suspect that all he has heard is the “embryonic stem cells may offer a cure to your disease.” I don’t know that he understands that embryonic stem cells come from killing unborn babies, or maybe he believes the whole “mass of tissue” excuse. I don’t know what he “knows”….kind of like the women at the top of this thread….did she know she was killing babies until the doctor handed one to her? And then, when she knew….did she keep on killing babies?

    I’ll let their Creator decide how to deal with such folks. I’ve got plenty of my own sins to worry about already, so I try not to stand in judgment.

  27. Sam Adams says:

    When I referred to the “woman at the top of the thread” I was thinking about this story….

  28. Ivan says:

    Do the couples who receive this treatment know about this? Do they care? All these people are complicit in ths. No amount of indirection can change that. The human race has a lot answer for.

  29. Jodie says:

    Sam Adams says:
    April 10, 2013 at 11:43 pm

    “I’ll let their Creator decide how to deal with such folks. I’ve got plenty of my own sins to worry about already, so I try not to stand in judgment.”


    That’s why I said:

    “I can’t wait to see Michael J. Fox answer to his maker about this on judgment day”

    I can’t judge a man’s heart, but I can bring to light his actions. Michael J. Fox has been fighting for this cause for years. He begged Nancy Reagan to do something about it, he went before congress to argue for it, and he has been on numerous talk shows pushing this agenda. He’s not retarded at all. His mind seems to be as good as it ever was; his body is what is affected by the Parkinson’s disease.

    If he once believed that the stem cell research on embryos was going to be limited to only the frozen embryos that would be discarded anyway, well then, now he knows that that isn’t the case. They are using aborted babies for their stem cell and Planned Parenthood is selling them.

    Like everyone else, he has the right to confess his sins to God and be forgiven, but even with all of this new information, I don’t see that he has any attention of seeking forgiveness or even admitting that he was wrong.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy