moonbattery logo

Jun 27 2013

Repercussions of the Supreme Court’s Attack on Marriage

Yesterday the Supreme Court launched an intolerable assault on the sanctity of holy matrimony, squashing the Defense of Marriage Age and California’s Proposition 8. The repercussions will twist society beyond recognition.

Among the most obvious is the effective banning of Christianity; inevitably, priests and ministers will face legal retribution if they refuse to reject their own faith by performing blasphemous homosexual “marriages.” There are also secular forms of blasphemy, like this:

The spouses of gay and lesbian service members will be among those to receive federal benefits, including burial at Arlington National Cemetery, the Pentagon announced Wednesday, hours after the Supreme Court overturned the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act.

Just hours after. It’s almost as if the moonbat apparatchiks Obama has set atop the Armed Forces were waiting for the Supremes’ rulings on the edge of their seats.

“We will move very swiftly, expeditiously, on implementing the law,” Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said during a Wednesday afternoon press briefing. …

“I have a responsibility to carry out the law of the land – the decision the Supreme Court gave today – from this place,” he said.

Presumably Hagel managed to say this with a straight face — despite the Obama Regime’s open refusal to enforce DOMA, which was the law of the land until yesterday. But things change quickly lately; until just recently, Obama himself opposed the obscene concept of homosexual marriage, recognizing that it was too outrageous for the public to support.

That leftists were eventually able to push this grotesque social engineering campaign to such a disgusting extreme is due not only to the compliance of the same brainwashed herd that was duped into electing Obama, but to the cowardice and moral spinelessness of the conservatives who failed to rally resistance. Virtually no so-called conservatives will criticize anything to do with homosexuality, out of pants-wetting terror of being denounced as politically incorrect. All who have been cowed into pandering to depravity are complicit in the Supremes’ sick rulings — which like much that is imposed by the federal government these days appear to be a calculated gob of saliva in the face of all that is good, decent, holy, and worthy of respect.

Fortunately, spit wipes away. Liberals in their absurd hubris believe they can reverse human nature and thousands of years of history by simple decree. Depravity is now normal, according to the law. But not according to our hearts.

Though liberals revere homosexuality, the taboo against it is so strong that all three of the major religions that have come out of the Middle East to shape human history — Christianity, Judaism, and Islam — have called for it to be punishable by death. Other than Muslims, no one advocates the death penalty now; but normalization, so that homosexual liaisons are decreed by law to be of equal validity to legitimate marriages, as the deranged Justice Kennedy demands? No way.

The social engineers have run a masterful propaganda campaign, but this time they have overstepped. Though human spirits often give way, they are not easily broken. Like saplings, the farther you bend them, the harder they snap back. Sooner or later, people will rediscover their sense of decency — and their sense of outrage.

On tips from Jodie and Hillman.

28 Responses to “Repercussions of the Supreme Court’s Attack on Marriage”

  1. Doug says:

    My Grandfather is buried in Arlington.

    If he finds out that fruits are being buried there, I assure you he will claw out of the grave and go kick some homo ass.

  2. I think that fairness demands that I play Devil’s advocate and present the clear, concise and logical arguments in favor of gay marriage that have proven to be so persuasive.

    Hope that was helpful.

  3. Seriously, I have yet to hear any argument for fundamentally redefining marriage that didn’t sound like the above.

  4. La Lydia says:

    What I want to know is how much all of this bounty for pervs is going to cost the non-perv taxpayers, espcially at the Pentagon. Maybe the reason they are cutting back the size of our armed forces is so they can afford benefits for these “spouses.” Ugh.

  5. DJ says:

    We are no longer slouching towards Gomorrah as Robert Bork warned about 15 years ago, we are there.

    National Cathedral Rings Bells
    to Cheer Gay Marriage

    CBS DC/Associated Press, by Staff

    Posted By:JoniTx, 6/26/2013 9:33:29 PM

    WASHINGTON— The National Cathedral is pealing its church bells, along with some other Washington churches, to celebrate the Supreme Court’s decisions on gay marriage. Cathedral spokesman Richard Weinberg said the bells rang at noon Wednesday for 45 minutes to an hour. Bells also rang at other Episcopal, Methodist, Presbyterian, Unitarian and other Christian churches. The cathedral scheduled a prayer service for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender families Wednesday at 7 p.m. to celebrate the ruling. In a statement, the cathedral’s dean, the Rev. Gary Hall, says the church is ringing its bells “to celebrate the extension of federal marriage equality”

  6. wingmann says:

    I love my dog but I don’t want to”Love”my dog…but since this ruling can I marry her?
    And if she has a litter of eight,can I claim them as dependents?

  7. aidan says:

    I wonder how many pictures the gay commie muslim of the judges and senators with 10 yr old boys to get his agenda passed.

  8. justme says:

    When does the “homosexual” tax take effect? Since we as a nanny state punish smokers, the obese and drug dependent with heavy taxes to offset their healthcare, Why is there no Homosexual Tax?

    Homosexuals indulge in high risk unhealthy behavior that is known to spread deadly, incurable disease that cost the healthcare system countless billions. Homosexuals as a group suffer far higher rates of mental illness and commit suicide at far greater rates than the heterosexual population.

    Why aren’t homosexuals paying “their fare share”? Why are their health insurance costs at a premium of at least equal to smokers?

    If even dog owners of so called “vicious” breeds are forces in many areas to carry $1Million Liability Insurance, why is a group that is known to victimize children not forced to carry a similar policy?

  9. Big Creepy Lookin' Cracka says:

    Playing Sodom and Gomorrah never turns out well.

  10. Nathaniel says:

    Silly me… And I voted for prop 8! Wonder what the next law/amendment I vote for will be selectively enforced or NOT enforced by Guv Jerry Brown or Kamala Harris?

  11. KHarn says:

    DOMA may have been a mistake. LET ME EXPLAIN.

    Like “don’t ask, don’t tell”, it gave the queers, “progressives” and commies a CAUSE. It gave them something to rally against and scream “hater!” about. It should have been left to the states, they couldn’t have bribed and bullied them all.

    That said, let me ask the neo-commie jerks this: “what will be your cause NOW? What will you demand NOW?

  12. KHarn says:

    What will the queers do when SHARIA is the law of the WORLD? It’s coming; their “progressive” friends are bringing it about as fast as they can in the name of “diversity”.

  13. Jimbo says:

    Voting does no good in the United States. You WILL be RULED by homosexuals. Bend over and take it. If you do not revere the act of anal intercourse you are hateful, hateful, hateful. Your religious beliefs be damned. Your family (REAL family) be damned. America be damned!

    Homos go to hell.

  14. Jay says:

    How long now before the Westboro Baptist Lunatics find a highly publicized funeral to protest?

  15. Nathaniel M says:

    KHarn says:
    June 27, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    That said, let me ask the neo-commie jerks this: what will be your cause NOW? What will you demand NOW?

    That’s simple; A never ending, shite-load of lawsuits. 😉

  16. Jester says:

    That said, let me ask the neo-commie jerks this: what will be your cause NOW? What will you demand NOW?

    Simple. The complete and total dissolution of Christianity.

  17. Jester says:

    Hey trolls! Where’s your Religion of Peace (TM) now?

    (cheep cheep cheep cheep)

    Do I have to remind you again? Fine.

  18. […] Gaga appears to have it correct, and not only because the Supremes are imposing homosexual “marriage.” The USA aggressively promotes itself as the Home for the […]

  19. Ginny says:

    Christians/Conservatives are truly paranoid, ridiculous people. When Marriage Equality was voted in here in Maryland, the ballot specifically said that churches would not be forced to perform same-sex marriages.

    Hardly a blow to christianity. People can get married anywhere – even by clergy from other religions. Why on earth would any same-sex couple want to push a christian church to marry them? That’s a rhetorical questions designed to make you think, I realize you won’t have a rational answer to it.

    Churches will not be forced to perform gay weddings. The law will not allow it due to that little bit in the Constitution that promises you freedom of religion while preventing you from forcing it on others. Your persecution complex has completely eclipsed your common sense.

  20. Jackson B. says:

    Sadly, Ginny, your words will fall on deaf ears.
    The people here are still angry about interracial marriage (and using the same arguments they did back in the 50s & 60s).
    What’s really sad is when they break out the “high risk of STDs” thing, when lesbians have a far lower risk of any STD – especially HIV/AIDS – than any heterosexual.
    But then, they’re not really fond of facts. They prefer propaganda… which is why they sequester themselves to echo chambers like this one.

    Ten bucks says our posts get deleted before the end of the week.

  21. […] Supremes’ twisted rulings on homosexual “marriage” have made this nightmare scenario all but […]

  22. […] Supremes’ twisted rulings on homosexual “marriage” have made this nightmare scenario all but […]

  23. […] that the social-engineering Supremes have laid the groundwork for the nationwide imposition of homosexual “marriage,” we can get down to brass […]

  24. […] that the social-engineering Supremes have laid the groundwork for the nationwide imposition of homosexual “marriage,” we can get down to brass […]

  25. […] Recent rulings by the Supreme Court make similar suits in the USA inevitable; in all likelihood, enabling such suits was the objective of the rulings. […]

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy