moonbattery logo

May 23 2016

Sabo Defends #NeverTrump With Latest Poster

There have been many sellouts, but information warfare streetfighter Sabo is not one of them. His latest production is a parody boxing promo poster that pits principled #NeverTrump leader Ben Shapiro against flamboyantly homosexual alt-right stormtrumper Milo Yiannopoulos of Breitbart.

“Anyone who knows anything about me knows I’ve been fighting the establishment for years, and the thought that I’m somehow on their side because I don’t support a New York, Democrat, game show host is ridiculous,” Sabo told The Daily Wire. “My focus has been to teach Republicans how to fight like Democrats, not to have a nominee who fights like a Democrat who actually is one! Trumpkins need to realize that there are very real Republicans who demand change just as much as they do, but we need a constitutionalist at the helm to do it.”

His poster sums up the ongoing civil war nicely:

shapiro-vs-yiannopoulos


75 Responses to “Sabo Defends #NeverTrump With Latest Poster”

  1. good riddance says:

    you lost! the republican base is now populist thenks to you ayn ranist free trade movement conservatives. not everyone wants to lose their good paying manufacturing jobs and send them out of the country. don’t let the door hit you on the way out! 88% percent of republicans now support trump! the ayn randists and wealthy or less then12% of the party bye bye!

  2. Artfuldgr says:

    nevermind…

  3. MicahStone says:

    Hey, Trumpsters: Wanna buy a bridge in Brooklyn – I’ve got a TREMENDOUS deal for you !!!!

  4. Artfuldgr says:

    since when did ayn rand say it was ok to ship out jobs to other economies and redistribute USA money to poorer communist states? just curious on this point… as redistribution to other states is not free trade… its just INTERNATIONAL socialism, which used to be called communism…

  5. Artfuldgr says:

    Anyone other than myself realize that IF the nevertrump wins, they make hillary or bernie the leader? you may not like trump, but do you really prefer hillary/bernie? at best it would be a pyric victory… at worst, well, learn to goosetep like soviets and what tovarish and council in russian means…

  6. toheckwithyou says:

    If Hillary wins I blame these asssholes

  7. helena handbasket says:

    Hey, an obnoxious five percent of the country seems to want the gasbag — and they loved trashing Cruz and his family as well — let them pull his orange ass over the finish line, ’cause I’m not.

  8. Occam's Stubble says:

    Not so fast! I’ve heard many a Trumpkin say that it doesn’t matter because Trump will bring in four Reagan Democrats for every conservative he loses.

  9. Torcer says:

    No, if that befalls the nation it will be the fault of Trump supporters forcing the worst possible candidate on the party.

    Did you fully vet your choice? Yes or No?

  10. Torcer says:

    Wow, is that the best rationalization you can muster for your hero being close to being a socialist?

    Ed. G. Mann

    Why don’t you do everyone a favor and detail the reasons why Donald isn’t close in policy positions to Bernie Sander’s national Socialist agenda?

    BTW, childish denial hardly constitutes a valid argument.

  11. Torcer says:

    Why aren’t you supporting the libertarian candidate instead some close in national policy agenda to a Socialist?

    Ed. G. Mann
    Why I might vote the New Republican Party just to see how that feels. It is…is well, voting for a NEW AMERICA.

    Don’t you claim to be a Libertarian?

    If that’s the case, why aren’t you supporting them?

  12. Occam's Stubble says:

    Below is what a cell phone looked like in the 1980s. You know what they look like and can do today.

    Today, the technology in its infancy is 3D printing. Where do you think that will be in thirty years?

    Any candidate who tells you he is going to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US is filling your head with visions of sugarplums. Those jobs aren’t even going to exist in China in thirty years.

    Our leaders need to get on the stick making way for the 21st century economy rather than trying to bring back the one from the 20th century.

    http://www.colejeneststone.com/sites/default/files/history-timeline/CJS-1990-cell-phone.jpg

  13. Trump 2016 says:

    NEW HEADLINE: David Bout’s pussy aching reaches an all time high, bloggers worried he may rage stroke at any moment.

  14. Torcer says:

    Math: Trump got 40.65% of GOP vote. Together, Cruz, Rubio and Kasich garnered 54.33% of the GOP vote. Plurality is not majority.— Charles Sykes (@SykesCharlie) May 6, 2016

    Ed. G. Mann
    Oh, I see. So tell me who is the Republican Nominee? Did that person run in Panama, Peru, Mexico, Canada or England? Nope so I guess only AMERICANS voted for him.

    Try looking at the numbers instead of wasting your time making up meaningless strawman arguments.

  15. Torcer says:

    WATCH: Trump asked if he’d pick Sanders as VP
    Donald Trump on Friday declined to answer whether he would consider Independent Bernie Sanders as a running mate, noting he thinks many of Sanders’s supporters will eventually back him in November.

    “Oh wow, that’s a great question,” the presumptive Republican presidential nominee said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” when asked whether he would consider Sanders, who is running for the Democratic nomination.

    Trump said he has some things in common with the Vermont senator before noting, “I do have much bigger crowds than him, but that’s OK.”

    “The difference between Bernie and myself is I know how to make those trade deals fantastic and he doesn’t. He has no clue,” Trump added.

    “But as your number two, he could watch and learn from you ,” panelist Nicolle Wallace said.
    http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/280670-trump-demures-on-sanders-as-running-mate

    toheckwithyou

    Try again – fact is the man can’t distinguish himself from a Socialist – that should bother you. Why doesn’t it?

  16. Artfuldgr says:

    The trump supporters didnt create the things that made evryone engry enough to want him, did they?

    and the GOP had more than 16 years to try hard which they didnt… (clinton, obama).

    now under the current GOP we have open borders, offshoring companies, zika, importing ebola, race games like 40 years ago, record on welfare, 250k fines for not saying ze, protected speech areas, muslim brotherhood in offices, anemica economy of 0.5% growth, and on and on…

    MAYBE.. just MAYBE if they did something to prevent such things over the past 16 years, or even the past 30 years… instead of reaching cross the aisle, people might have trusted a man whose wife is CFR and Goldman sachs, whose team has the man who started the crack epidemic and had to be pardoned, etc.

    Cruz should have selected his associates better…
    he ended up being the only saint in a group of sinners
    which doesnt seem to work out well for most people

    so dont blame trump..

    blame the people to blame, in whose trust the public gave, and were betrayed for giving it… if that didnt happen, trump would have been first of the 15 or so to drop out.

  17. Torcer says:

    That utterly FAILS to answer the Question – Try again:

    Did you fully vet your choice? Yes or No?

  18. Occam's Stubble says:

    Love Sabo. I wish we had a hundred more just like him.

    Seems to have a thing for boxing posters, though.

    http://unsavoryagents.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/cruz_01.jpg

  19. Artfuldgr says:

    Here’s how much Hillary Clinton was paid for her 2013-2015 speeches:

    4/18/2013, Morgan Stanley, Washington, DC: $225,000
    4/24/2013, Deutsche Bank, Washington, DC: $225,000
    4/24/2013, National Multi Housing Council, Dallas, Texas: $225,000
    4/30/2013, Fidelity Investments, Naples, Fla.: $225,000
    5/8/2013, Gap Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $225,000
    5/14/2013, Apollo Management Holdings LP, New York, NY: $225,000
    5/16/2013, Itau BBA USA Securities, New York, NY: $225,000
    5/21/2013, Vexizon Communications Inc., Washington, DC: $225,000
    5/29/2013, Sanford C. Bernstein and Co. LLC, New York, NY: $225,000
    6/4/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, Palmetto Bluffs, SC: $225,000
    6/6/2013, Spencer Stuart, New York, NY: $225,000
    6/16/2013, Society for Human Resource Management, Chicago, Ill.: $285,000
    6/17/2013, Economic Club of Grand Rapids, Grand Rapids, Mich.: $225,000
    6/20/2013, Boston Consulting Group Inc., Boston, Mass.: $225,000
    6/20/2013, Let’s Talk Entertainment Inc., Toronto, Canada: $250,000
    6/24/2013, American Jewish University, Universal City, Calif.: $225,000
    6/24/2013, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Company LP, Palos Verdes, Calif.: $225,000
    7/11/2013, UBS Wealth Management, New York, NY: $225,000
    8/7/2013, Global Business Travel Association, San Diego, Calif.: $225,000
    8/12/2013, National Association of Chain Drug Stores, Las Vegas, Nev.: $225,000
    9/18/2013, American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, Ill.: $225,000
    9/19/2013, American Society of Travel Agents Inc., Miami, Fla.: $225,000
    10/4/2013, Long Island Association, Long Island, NY: $225,000
    10/15/2013, National Association of Convenience Stores, Atlanta, Ga.: $265,000
    10/23/2013, SAP Global Marketing Inc., New York, NY: $225,000
    10/24/2013, Accenture, New York, NY: $225,000
    10/24/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, New York, NY: $225,000
    10/27/2013, Beth El Synagogue, Minneapolis, Minn.: $225,000
    10/28/2013, Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, Chicago, Ill.: $400,000
    10/29/2013, The Goldman Sachs Group, Tuscon, Ariz.: $225,000
    11/4/2013, Mase Productions Inc., Orlando, Fla.: $225,000
    11/4/2013, London Drugs Ltd., Mississauga, Canada: $225,000
    11/6/2013, Beaumont Health System, Troy, Mich.: $305,000
    11/7/2013, Golden Tree Asset Management, New York, NY: $275,000
    11/9/2013, National Association of Realtors, San Francisco, Calif.: $225,000
    11/13/2013, Mediacorp Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada: $225,000
    11/13/2013, Bank of America, Bluffton, SC: $225,000
    11/14/2013, CB Richard Ellis Inc., New York, NY: $250,000
    11/18/2013, CIIE Group, Naples, Fla.: $225,000
    11/18/2013, Press Ganey, Orlando, Fla.: $225,000
    11/21/2013, U.S. Green Building Council, Philadelphia, Pa.: $225,000
    01/06/2014, GE, Boca Raton, Fla.: $225,500
    01/27/2014, National Automobile Dealers Association, New Orleans, La.: $325,500
    01/27/2014, Premier Health Alliance, Miami, Fla.: $225,500
    02/06/2014, Salesforce.com, Las Vegas, Nev.: $225,500
    02/17/2014, Novo Nordisk A/S, Mexico City, Mexico: $125,000
    02/26/2014, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Orlando, Fla.: $225,500
    02/27/2014, A&E Television Networks, New York, NY: $280,000
    03/04/2014, Association of Corporate Counsel – Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.: $225,500
    03/05/2014, The Vancouver Board of Trade, Vancouver, Canada: $275,500
    03/06/2014, tinePublic Inc., Calgary, Canada: $225,500
    03/13/2014, Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, Orlando, Fla.: $225,500
    03/13/2014, Drug Chemical and Associated Technologies, New York, NY: $250,000
    03/18/2014, Xerox Corporation, New York, NY: $225,000
    03/18/2014, Board of Trade of Metropolitan Montreal, Montreal, Canada: $275,000
    03/24/2014, Academic Partnerships, Dallas, Texas: $225,500
    04/08/2014, Market° Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $225,500
    04/08/2014, World Affairs Council, Portland, Ore.: $250,500
    04/10/2014, Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries Inc., Las Vegas, Nev.: $225,500
    04/10/2014, Lees Talk Entertainment, San Jose, Calif.: $265,000
    04/11/2014, California Medical Association (via satellite), San Diego, Calif.: $100,000
    05/06/2014, National Council for Behavioral Healthcare, Washington, DC: $225,500
    06/02/2014, International Deli-Dairy-Bakery Association, Denver, Colo.: $225,500
    06/02/2014, Lees Talk Entertainment, Denver, Colo.: $265,000
    06/10/2014, United Fresh Produce Association, Chicago, Ill.: $225,000
    06/16/2014, tinePublic Inc., Toronto, Canada: $150,000
    06/18/2014, tinePublic Inc., Edmonton, Canada: $100,000
    06/20/2014, Innovation Arts and Entertainment, Austin, Texas: $150,000
    06/25/2014, Biotechnology Industry Organization, San Diego, Calif.: $335,000
    06/25/2014, Innovation Arts and Entertainment, San Francisco, Calif.: $150,000
    06/26/2014, GTCR, Chicago, Ill.: $280,000
    07/22/2014, Knewton Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $225,500
    07/26/2014, Ameriprise, Boston, Mass.: $225,500
    07/29/2014, Coming Inc., Coming, NY: $225,500
    08/28/2014, Nexenta Systems Inc., San Francisco, Calif.: $300,000
    08/28/2014, Cisco, Las Vegas, Nev.: $325,000
    09/04/2014, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, Calif.: $225,500
    09/15/2014, Caridovascular Research Foundation, Washington, DC: $275,000
    10/02/2014, Commercial Real Estate Women Network, Miami Beach, Fla.: $225,500
    10/06/2014, Canada 2020, Ottawa, Canada: $215,500
    10/07/2014, Deutsche Bank AG, New York, NY: $280,000
    10/08/2014, Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), Chicago, Ill.: $265,000
    10/13/2014, Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers, Colorado Springs, Colo.: $225,500
    10/14/2014, Salesforce.com, San Francisco, Calif.: $225,500
    10/14/2014, Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, Calif.: $335,000
    12/04/2014, Massachusetts Conference for Women, Boston, Mass.: $205,500
    01/21/2015, tinePublic Inc., Winnipeg, Canada: $262,000
    01/21/2015, tinePublic Inc., Saskatoon, Canada: $262,500
    01/22/2015, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Whistler, Canada: $150,000
    02/24/2015, Watermark Silicon Valley Conference for Women, Santa Clara, Calif.: $225,500
    03/11/2015, eBay Inc., San Jose, Calif.: $315,000
    03/19/2015, American Camping Association, Atlantic City, NJ: $260,000

  20. Torcer says:

    Many a time they have boisterously asserted they don’t need us, because they can win with all the new voters they are bringing into the party.. so they don’t need us..

    Oh wait:
    Confirmed: Bad News For Trump Supporters: He’s Not Bringing In New Voters | RedState http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2016/05/23/bad-news-trump-supporters-hes-bringing-new-voters/

  21. Torcer says:

    Runaway Train
    Yes, it’s a con. In the three weeks since Donald Trump became the presumptive Republican nominee the remains of modern American conservatism have decayed at an alarming rate.
    [..]
    In the time since he effectively captured the GOP nomination, Trump has doubled down on his slanderous claim, borrowed from the National Enquirer, that Ted Cruz’s father helped Lee Harvey Oswald months before the JFK assassination; refused to apologize for attacking Heidi Cruz’s looks, once again calling her “fair game”; picked a fight with David Cameron, leader of America’s longest-standing ally; distanced himself from his own tax plan; recommitted himself to releasing his tax returns and then declared defiantly that those returns are his private business and would not be released; backed off his proposal to ban temporarily entry to the United States for Muslims and then reiterated his support for such a ban; and, finally, lied on national television about a 1991 audio recording in which he created a fake persona—”John Miller,” a made-up spokesman played by Trump himself—for an interview with a gossip magazine, in order to boast about his virility and his virtue.

    Most striking, perhaps, was Trump’s decision last week to abandon the promise at the heart of his unorthodox candidacy: that he would forgo political contributions in order to remain immune to the influence of political money. “I will tell you this,” Trump said last fall. “Nobody’s putting up millions of dollars for me. I’m putting up my own money.” When donors contribute to a political campaign, Trump argued, they buy the candidates who accept their money. “Remember this: They have total control over Jeb and Hillary and everybody else that takes that money.”
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/runaway-train/article/2002484

  22. Grumpy Cat says:

    It will be Hillary’s bridge…because of assholes like you.

  23. Vote Third Party says:

    We told you months ago we aren’t voting for the scumbag.

  24. Nobama says:

    Think again.

    A shocking new poll from ABC News reveals Hillary Clinton is losing to Donald Trump nationwide 46 percent to 44 percent. That’s an 11 percent shift from March, when Trump trailed Clinton by 9 points.

    What was the biggest driver in this shift in the polls? Surprisingly, it’s young voters.

    Clinton’s support among young voters ages 18 to 29 has dropped 19 percent since March — and Trump has gained 17 percent support from the same demographic. That’s a 36 percent swing.

    Read more at http://redalertpolitics.com/2016/05/23/abc-poll-trump-surge-due-massive-36-millennial-swing/#WG8PzmqoiLYx9ZxB.99

    Plus 20% of Bernie supporters say they’ll vote for Trump over Hillary.

  25. Deathstroke says:

    Torcer, whether or not we vet them is irrelevant, because as previously mentioned, it doesn’t matter whether we vetted them or not, the asshole still comes out on top. If there’s one thing we need a victory over, its the culturally imposed grip of political correctness which Trump’s candidacy has begun loosening.

  26. Torcer says:

    Do candidates normally receive a ‘unity bounce’ Yes or No?

  27. Torcer says:

    Deathstroke Torcer, whether or not we vet them is irrelevant, because as previously mentioned, it doesn’t matter whether we vetted them or not, the asshole still comes out on top.

    No, it was entirely important that everyone become informed about who they supported because that indicates whether they can win in the general election and whether they will act properly when in office.

    Did it ever occur to you that the national socialist left WANTED Donald to be the nominee?
    Now, why would that be the case?

    Deathstroke If there’s one thing we need a victory over, its the culturally imposed grip of political correctness which Trump’s candidacy has begun loosening.
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2691957281

    Ecept when it was in Donald’s best interests to bow to political correctness..

  28. Torcer says:

    Large Portion of Polled Voters Uncomfortable With a President Trump | RedState http://www.redstate.com/sweetie15/2016/05/23/large-portion-polled-voters-uncomfortable-president-trump/

  29. Deathstroke says:

    I guarantee that people who support Hillary are NOT informed in the slightest and yet she is out on top over Sanders. And you know full well that she doesn’t give a damn whether or not her voting base is informed because demonstrates this in her actions. How can you say the socialist left wants Trump to win when Sander’s supporters have been ATTACKING people at Trump rallies?

  30. maudieNmandeville says:

    So, what’s your point? That we should vote for Trump, who contributed $2500 to Hillary on top of these speeches?

  31. Deathstroke says:

    Also, regarding whether or not Donald bows to the their interests, I’m not even talking about Trump. I’m talking about the effect that his campaign has had. Look at how it has undermined the progressi-tard narrative, because you now have a collective of people who are no longer afraid to stand up to the PC police. Its a start in terms of turning the country around.

  32. maudieNmandeville says:

    So, Cruz, Rubio, Kasich would have been tri-presidents? I don’t understand adding their votes together. BTW, Jeb! got 1.02, where’s he?

  33. Torcer says:

    No, it means that Donald didn’t get an absolute majority of the votes.
    Meaning it’s only a minority that supports him.

  34. Torcer says:

    Ah yes, the disingenuous tactic of pretending that which wasn’t said.

    Now, that referred to Donald – as in the sentence: Did it ever occur to you that the national socialist left WANTED Donald to be the nominee?
    Now, why would that be the case?

  35. Torcer says:

    Has Donald ever bowed to political correctness?.. Yes or No?

  36. Deathstroke says:

    Irrelevant. His supporters aren’t, and because of that, we know there are more of us out there willing to fight it.

  37. Son of the Rabbit People says:

    I’m a little confused. The poster’s creator claims he wants constitutional conservatism and is exposing phonies. Why does he list Mark Levin? He’s been holding the position the poster’s creator stakes out for himself longer. He hasn’t endorsed anyone for President except Ted Cruz. Maybe I’m not the one confused after all?

  38. maudieNmandeville says:

    Yes, but it would have been a minority no matter who won so it seems pointless. In fact, you could say he’s the major minority winner.

  39. pocketfrog says:

    He lists Mark Levin, and the others below him, as NeverTrumpers. The ones on the right are Trumpsters.

  40. pocketfrog says:

    There are plenty of strong arguments against Donald Trump, but this isn’t one of them. Nobody got an absolute majority – Trump got more than the others so he won.

  41. Torcer says:

    I don’t care if you want to dodge the Questions.

    Has Donald ever bowed to political correctness?.. Yes or No?

    Did it ever occur to you that the national socialist left WANTED Donald to be the nominee?
    Now, why would that be the case?

  42. Torcer says:

    Again, the point is that Trump supporters are in a minority.

  43. Torcer says:

    Yes, but there are several orders of magnitude difference between a candidate winning by an informed electorate and one that is forced upon the majority.

  44. Deathstroke says:

    And I don’t care if you keep pulling a Rubio when someone challenges your stance. Me telling you that the question is irrelevant is telling you that it doesn’t matter. In other words, yes he has, but so what?

    Also, its not the case that the nat’l socialist left wants him to win when the supporters of the candidate who is an ACTUAL SOCIALIST have actually gone to Trump rallies for the SOLE PURPOSE of harrassing and attacking Trump supporters at Trump rallies.

  45. Ed. G. Mann says:

    Then a large portion of those polled voters should have either voted or voted for someone other than Trump. Kind of late for remorse. Let them go marry a tree.

  46. Ed. G. Mann says:

    Again the point is that Trump is in the majority of the pack. The rest LOST!

  47. Ed. G. Mann says:

    Nope! The order of magnitude is who is the nominee!

  48. Torcer says:

    Deathstroke

    And I don’t care if you keep pulling a Rubio when someone challenges your stance.
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2693426096

    I don’t care what kind of childish tactics you want to use to avoid the question, because you keep on avoiding them:

    Has Donald ever bowed to political correctness?.. Yes or No?

    Did it ever occur to you that the national socialist left WANTED Donald to be the nominee?
    Now, why would that be the case?

  49. Deathstroke says:

    “…because you keep avoiding them.” -Torcer

    Really Torcer?

    Has Donald ever bowed to political correctness?.. Yes or No?
    “In other words, yes he has, but so what?”

    Did it ever occur to you that the national socialist left WANTED Donald to be the nominee?
    “…its not the case that the nat’l socialist left wants him to win when the supporters of the candidate who is an ACTUAL SOCIALIST have actually gone to Trump rallies for the SOLE PURPOSE of harrassing and attacking Trump supporters at Trump rallies.”

    How have I been avoiding your questions?

  50. Torcer says:

    Ed. G. Mann
    Then a large portion of those polled voters should have either voted or voted for someone other than Trump. Kind of late for remorse. Let them go marry a tree.
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2693446198

    So now that they’ve discovered what a poor choice they’ve made you don’t care because you’re gung ho for Donald, correct?

  51. Torcer says:

    Ed. G. Mann
    Again the point is that Trump is in the majority of the pack. The rest LOST!
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2693449939

    So it is okay for a minority to force their point of view on the majority? Yes or No?

  52. Torcer says:

    Ed. G. Mann

    Nope! The order of magnitude is who is the nominee!
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2693451955

    So it is okay for a minority to force their point of view on the majority? Yes or No?

  53. Torcer says:

    1. Did you answer Yes or No to that question?
    2. Are you denying that the national socialist left wanted Donald to be the nominee?

    ‘Proof there is a God’? Jim Messina senses divine intervention in GOP race http://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2016/05/04/proof-there-is-a-god-jim-messina-senses-divine-intervention-in-gop-race/ via @twitchycom

    Hoyer: Trump nomination would bring Dems ‘substantial’ gains http://thehill.com/homenews/house/273931-hoyer-trump-nomination-would-bring-dems-substantial-gains

    Report: 46,000 Pa. Democrats Become Republicans Due To Trump
    http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2016/03/10/report-46000-pa-democrats-become-republicans-due-to-trump/

    Trump doing better in ‘open’ primaries; Cruz sees success in GOP-only contests
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/03/07/trump-doing-better-in-open-primaries-cruz-sees-success-in-gop-only-contests.html?

    AMAZING! 60,000 Democrats Voted in Virginia Republican Primary http://disq.us/9albit

    20,000 Massachusetts Democrats switch parties before Super Tuesday http://washex.am/1oMiSTH via @DCExaminer

    Jimmy Carter: I’d pick Trump over Cruz http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/jimmy-carter-donald-trump-ted-cruz-218707

    Now, please answer the question instead of dodging it: Now, why would that be the case?

  54. Deathstroke says:

    1. “YES he has [bowed to political correctness], but so what?”
    2. If you’re broadening your definition of a left-wing socialist to mean all of the left, then I CAN’T DENY that THERE IS an effort by the left.

  55. Torcer says:

    Once again you are showing that you cannot answer that question and thus you try to dodge it.

    Answer the question please:
    Did it ever occur to you that the national socialist left WANTED Donald to be the nominee?
    Now, why would that be the case?

  56. Deathstroke says:

    Are you a troll? I AM NOT DENYING THE EFFORT BY THE LEFT TO MAKE DONALD AS THE NOMINEE. I AM denying the socialists want him as the nominee because of the violence they’ve been brought to Trumps rallies. The left wants Donald to be the nominee so they can put Hillary in office, which is ALL THE MORE REASON to vote Trump. Who’s left? How doesn’t that answer “Now why would that be the case?” You keep saying I’m “dodging the question.” How have I been dodging the question?

  57. Torcer says:

    No, you have to actually answer the question.

    They want Donald because he will be the easiest to defeat along with his inoculation of a whole plethora of predilections on the DNC side.

    That is the answer to the question you are dodging.

    Now, are you going to Deny the reality of all the references I posted?

    BTW, it’s often been my experience that those who use such pejoratives are quite often merely projecting.

    Definition of troll
    Pronunciation: /trōl/
    1 informal make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them: if people are obviously trolling then I’ll delete your posts and do my best to ban you [with object]:you folks taking this opportunity to troll me, you really need to reassess your values in your life
    1a person who makes a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting.
    informal a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting.
    Origin:late Middle English (in the sense ‘stroll, roll’): origin uncertain; compare with Old French troller ‘wander here and there (in search of game)’ and Middle High German trollen ‘stroll’
    http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/american_english/troll-2

  58. Deathstroke says:

    “The left wants Donald to be the nominee so they can put Hillary in office, which is ALL THE MORE REASON to vote Trump.” You literally aren’t even reading what I’m posting.

  59. Deathstroke says:

    Any vote that doesn’t go to Trump might as well be a vote for Hillary.

  60. Torcer says:

    1. How do you know just what I’m reading?
    2. I’ve heard that ‘logic’ for 6 months now – it’s wearing thing.
    2. Is it ever a good idea to do what the enemy wants you to do?

  61. Torcer says:

    Is it ever a good idea to do what the enemy wants you to do?

    Yes or No?

  62. Deathstroke says:

    1. I know I’ve repeatedly now that I’ve had to quote myself to show you that in fact I HAD been answering your questions for one.

    2. What choice do we really have? Do you want the pant-suit wearing Machiavellian?

    EDIT: There’s no one left.

  63. Torcer says:

    Deathstroke1. I know I’ve repeatedly now that I’ve had to quote myself to show you that in fact I HAD been answering your questions for one.

    No, an answer would have something other than a baseless opinion on your part
    Besides, I’ve heard that ‘logic’ for 6 months now – it’s wearing thing.

    Deathstroke 2. What choice do we really have? Do you want the pant-suit wearing Machiavellian?
    EDIT: There’s no one left.
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2693851003

    Is it ever a good idea to do what the enemy wants you to do?

    Yes or No?

  64. Deathstroke says:

    No it is not ever a good idea to do what the enemy wants you to do. But what is the alternative? Not vote? That plays into their hand too.

  65. Torcer says:

    Deathstroke No it is not ever a good idea to do what the enemy wants you to do.

    So by that answer it shouldn’t been Donald, correct?

    Deathstroke But what is the alternative? Not vote? That plays into their hand too.
    https://disqus.com/home/discussion/moonbattery/sabo_defends_nevertrump_with_latest_poster/#comment-2693931157

    Again, the mantra has been such for months.

  66. Deathstroke says:

    No it shouldn’t be Donald.
    But again I have to ask: what is the alternative? I’m not voting for Hillary. My vote was going to be Cruz until he suspended his campaign and the only guy left is Trump. I find it morally disgusting that she left four men to die and ordered the helicopters to stay grounded, than anything Donald has done thus far. So if its Hillary vs. Donald, call me a Cuck then, I’m not voting for someone who has a history of actually fucking our guys over and getting them killed, lies to their families about why they died, and then calls the families of those men liars when they learn what really happened and speak out about it.

  67. Torcer says:

    Write in Ted Cruz, Vote Libertarian..

  68. Ed. G. Mann says:

    Why didn’t all YOU LOSERS get together and vote for one person? Then YOU would have been in the true majority instead of adding up the numbers and saying SEE, we’re the majority.
    Go buy a beer so you can cry in it. You lost.

    Trump is within 50 delegates of the 1237 number. UP YOUR NOSE.

  69. Torcer says:

    Not to mention the myriad problems with Donald making him unqualified.

  70. Torcer says:

    My response is here:
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=72308#comment-2695003666
    Since I prefer to eviscerate those who cannot answer a basic question in a more public forum..

    Try to set better example than your hero and be unafraid to debate like an adult out in the open instead of old threads.

  71. Ed. G. Mann says:

    And now Trump HAS the nomination with 1238 delegates which means NO BROKERED CONVENTION. That makes it a MAJORITY no matter what you say.

  72. Torcer says:

    My response is here:
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=72308#comment-2695003666
    Since I prefer to eviscerate those who cannot answer a basic question in a more public forum..

    Try to set better example than your hero and be unafraid to debate like an adult out in the open instead of old threads.

  73. Ed. G. Mann says:

    You’re not proving anything with whatever is in that link. If you think that’s sharp, careful you don’t cut your clit off.

  74. Torcer says:

    Having difficulty following directions?

    My response is here:
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=72308#comment-2695003666
    Since I prefer to eviscerate those who cannot answer a basic question in a more public forum..

    Try to set better example than your hero and be unafraid to debate like an adult out in the open instead of old threads.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy