moonbattery logo

Dec 22 2016

Schumer Loves Trump’s $Trillion Infrastructure Plan

Hold tight to your wallet, now that both parties have rejected the free market in favor of Keynesian Big Government prodigality. Unsurprisingly, Chuck Schumer — the leftist personification of bloated government to whom Trump donated more than to any other Senator — is on board with Trump’s Obama-esque stimulus plan:

“We think it should be large,” Schumer told ABC News’ Jon Karl and Rick Klein during their “Powerhouse Politics” podcast. “He’s mentioned a trillion dollars. I told him that sounded good to me.”

Schumer has highlighted infrastructure as one issue that Democrats can work with Trump on, casting some of the billionaire’s positions as “surprisingly” progressive and populist.

Anyone surprised that Trump is a progressive has not been paying attention.

Trump’s infrastructure plan is more in line with Democrats than members of his own party. He said during the campaign that he would “at least double” Hillary Clinton’s proposed $275 billion infrastructure plan. …

Trump’s influential son-in-law, Jared Kushner, told business leaders at a breakfast last week in Manhattan that Trump is closer to Schumer than to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) when it comes to infrastructure spending.

“More in line with Democrats” is a refrain we are likely to hear many times over the next 4 years.

Democrats always back massive unaffordable spending, so long as it doesn’t help the military. As for Republicans, they haven’t stood up to Trump yet and aren’t about to start now:

According to several [Republican House] members, there has been informal talk of accepting a bill that’s only 50 percent paid for, with the rest of the borrowing being offset down the road by “economic growth.” It’s an arrangement Republicans would never have endorsed under a President Hillary Clinton…

Meanwhile, the national debt is closing in on $20 trillion. People are starting to figure out that the government will never pay it off, although it may try by inflating the currency, thereby rendering our money increasingly worthless.

The country is like some desperate, self-destructive fool who quit his job to go on a cocaine binge financed by a credit card that will soon be maxed out and canceled.

Chuck-Schumer_New-Americana
Likes the way this is playing out economically.

On tips from 762×51, Torcer, and TrojanMan. Hat tips: New Americana, Hot Air.



79 Responses to “Schumer Loves Trump’s $Trillion Infrastructure Plan”

  1. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Damn, here we go. I still feel better about him than I would about Hillary. Regardless, a key question is how much pork will be in this package, how many boondoggles, what percentage will actually go to useful infrastructure. I would like to think the GOP will block it, but I’m willing to bet they are as hungry for pork for their constituents as the Dems are.

    However the money is supposed to be spent, there are enough moonbats in the gov apparatus to make sure plenty gets funneled to “community organizers,” like before.

  2. MAS says:

    “I would like to think the GOP will block it, but I’m willing to bet they are as hungry for pork for their constituents as the Dems are.”

    Damn straight they (mostly) are, gotta have those airport terminals and bridges named after you. Not to mention the backdoor campaign funding…

  3. TrojanMan says:

    “Conservative” sure does not mean what it used to at least in the fiscal sense. That was a risk of nominating Trump. Conservatism will be linked to whatever Trump does for better or worse unless Republicans can grow a spine and reputiate him when he lurches leftward.

    Any Republican that supports and votes for this when it comes down the sewer is not a conservative. After all Republicans are the ones who are supposed to be fiscally responsible. If your willing to sell out your fiscal principles your moral principles will soon follow.

    The only way this should be supported is with the exact same amount being offset by cuts in other places preferably with entitlement cuts. No more new debt. However I have heard that song and dance before.

    Oh WTH… Let’s just max out the credit card and tell China to go stick it right?

  4. Stosh says:

    Maybe he is figuring to pay for it with the money that he doesn’t send to “sanctuary” cities and the 50% cuts in the budgets of the DOE, EPA and Education Dept….

  5. TrojanMan says:

    Sounds great but can we make the cuts first then spend the money?

  6. daPenguin says:

    hmmm infrastructure jobs = union jobs = more money in dem coffers. thanks trump I am sure that this will solve everything!! /sarc… oops I forgot, the trumpets want us to not talk about this because he is not president yet.

  7. MiloMason says:

    “Schumer Loves Trump’s $Trillion Infrastructure Plan”
    —Up-Chuck Shumer will soon HATE IT – once he learns that most of that money will go to build desperately needed INSANE ASYLUMS to house the lunatic-left !!!!!
    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/24e21f027e035ea16c3b615bad64a9a8edda811a3c310baf7803575667006c70.jpg

  8. Fiberal says:

    This is going to be a very long administration for you guys.

  9. Torcer says:

    Are you somehow exempt from the ravages of those kinds of policies?

  10. KirklesWorth says:

    You mean “criticize the man for that which you disagree” to this extent? (disclosure: May was a big month for Torcer):

    Here is the list of Torcer recommended articles to Dave Blount for the month of May with “Donald”, “Trump”, or “Orange” in the title:

    1. Fox News Reaps the Reward for Devoting Itself to Promoting Trump: Surpassed by CNN
    2. Rapists for Trump
    3. Trump Accuses Cruz’s Father of Involvement in JFK Assassination
    4. Proof That Mainstream Media Is Selecting Trump as Nominee
    5. The Last, Desperate Hope: Stopping Trump at the Convention
    6. Epic Rant on the Disaster Trumpsters Have Wreaked
    7. A Foretaste of How Dems Will Use Trump to Destroy GOP
    8. Trump Admits He Was Lying When He Linked Rafael Cruz to JFK Assassination
    9. On the Day After Cruz Dropped Out, the Predictable Trump Flip-Flops Began
    10. After Abandoning Self-Funding Pose, Trump Picks Steven Mnuchin, Who Has Worked for Goldman Sachs and Soros Fund Management, as Finance Chairman
    11. Trump Refuses to Condemn Supporters for Sending Death Threats to Reporter
    12. The Donald Tries to Exploit Cinco de Mayo, Gets Guacamole on His Orange Face
    13. Trump Floats Partially Defaulting on the National Debt
    14. Donald Trump Says China Remix
    15. Petition to Block Trump at Convention
    16. Trump Proposes Printing Our Way Out of Debt
    17. Trump Already Running to the Left of Hillary Clinton
    18. Paul Manafort Describes Trump Presidency in Four Words
    19. Trump Threatens Our 401(k)s
    20. Trump’s Promised Ban on Muslims Becomes “Just a Suggestion”
    21. Brad Thor’s #NeverTrump Stand
    22. Report: Trump’s Tariffs Would Cost Each American Household $6,000 per Year
    23. Trumpster Sings Worship Song
    24. Trump Crows Triumphantly That He Has Turned Georgia Into a Swing State
    25. Casino Magnate Buys Trump
    26. Trump Media: No More Reliable Than the Liberal MSM
    27. How Trump Pretending to Be His Own Imaginary Spokesman During Interviews Shows He Is Like Founding Fathers
    28. Melania Trump on Jewish Reporter Menaced by Trumpsters: The Reporter Provoked Them
    29. Unofficial Trump Consigliere Roger Stone: President Trump Should Shut Down CNN
    30. #NeverTrump Writer Confesses to the Error of Her Ways
    31. Meet Jan Brewer, a Likely Choice for Trump’s VP
    32. Trump’s Laughably Bogus Supreme Court List
    33. Top Trump Surrogate Admits That We Will Get Virtual Wall and Virtual Deportations
    34. Trump Favors Free Trade This Week
    35. Trump Loses a Delegate
    36. Trump: Who the Hell Cares if There’s a Trade War?
    37. Trump and the 2008 Housing Market Crash
    38. What They Sell Out When They Sell Out to Trump
    39. NRA’s Trump Endorsement
    40. Trump Campaign Emails Battle Plan to Enemy Camp
    41. Trump Begins to Court Muslims
    42. Mitch McConnell Pledges Fealty to Trump
    43. Trump Rallies Mob Against Judge in His Fraud Trial
    44. Major Endorsement for Trump’s Foreign Policy

  11. Fiberal says:

    KirklesWorth’s list is quite a response to your question. So just what kind of discretion have you exhibited?

    Meaning that you were, are now and will always be a never-trumper with one mindless mission in life– to criticize Trump.

    You are with her.

    (BTW can you try and clean up your grammar? It’s painful to read.)

  12. TrojanMan says:

    IMO this is more of an indictment of Dave’s preferences than Torcers. How many more articles did Torcer recommend that Dave did not post and what was their topic? We could assume they were all bashing Trump but I highly doubt it. At that time Hitlery had the nomination locked up and the hot topic was Trump so it would only make sense that there would be more Trump articles. I recommend articles all the time and Dave does not post them all, not even close. I email many articles to Dave that I don’t post in the comment section. Furthermore it is Dave that writes the headlines.

    Moral of the story, we all wish Hitlery a wonderful time in hell. She will fit right in. We obviously have differing views on our PE.

    Finally, I think Torcers question was valid to Fiberal and of course it’s his perogative to answer it or not.

  13. 762x51 says:

    But not for a Progressive fascist POS like you, fibtard.

    You’ll fit right in as butt buddies with Chucky Schumer and the other globalists in Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary’s circle of henchmen.

    Maggot.

  14. 762x51 says:

    Oh hell, you just disagreed with Substitute English teacher, his Royal Heinous Lord Fibtard of Swineherd. You are in for it now. LMAO.

  15. 762x51 says:

    Even if fibtard did answer it would be a lie, that is all he is capable of doing.

  16. 762x51 says:

    Exactly. They always “promise” the cuts which then never materialize.

  17. 762x51 says:

    That is like feeling better about diarrhea than explosive diarrhea.

    Feeding the beast (Big Government) is NEVER going to fix the problem, regardless of how the money is “supposed” to be spent or how good the intentions. This is just more Obama from Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary.

    I asked before the election how much difference there would be between tRump and Hillary, the answer is starting to materialize, not much.

  18. 762x51 says:

    “CLEAN UP YOUR GRAMMAR!!!

    Another decree by Substitute English teacher, his Royal Heinous Lord Fibtard of Swineherd.

    You smug, arrogant, condescending puddle of dog vomit. No wonder the voices in your head don’t like you any more than the rest of us, except for your loyal minion jerklesTwerp. He only does your bidding because you both are cult loyalists.

    Hey fibtard, I’m still waiting for you to “pick me up so you can say this crap to my face”, runt. LMFAO!!

  19. Kristinajbuckner says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj425d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !mj425d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash425DirectDataGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj425d:….,…

  20. sdharms says:

    watch out who you believe. would chuckie schumer have a reason to separate Trump from his supporters?

  21. […] Schumer Loves Trump’s $Trillion Infrastructure Plan […]

  22. KirklesWorth says:

    Calling me to change your diaper again? So be it.

    Your psychotic obsession with murder is well demonstrated, and everybody knows that you want to assassinate anyone who easily schools you on your pathetic comments. You’ve already explained how you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

  23. KirklesWorth says:

    Yeah, Fiberal was clearly a fascist by saying:

    762×51: Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.

    Oh wait, that was you. It must have been the time Fiberal said:

    762×51 as kirklesworthintheGround: A target rich environment, no RoE, man this is going to be more fun than killing hajjis.

    Oops, that was you too. I remember, it was when Fiberal said:

    762×51: No a__hole, I mean when we start killing you dirty Progressive motherf__kers. That clear enough for you?

    My mistake. I must be confusing Fiberal for a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims (1) progressives are for killing 2 and that (2) Hillary and Trump, and democrats and republicans are all progressives, your enemies, and your targets 2 that it finds killing “tons of fun”.

  24. 762x51 says:

    LMFAO, you lying douche bag. You can manufacture all the Tssscchchiitt!! you want about me A-hole. If that were true, you would have called the cops by now, turd eater.

    Mutual combat is not murder, liar. But a sissy like you thinks it is, what a effing tool you are.

    SEE YOU ON THE BATTLEFIELD CHICKEN Tssscchchiitt!!

    GFY

  25. 762x51 says:

    Yes he is, a dirty little fascist **uk, just like you jerkoffsworth.

    What you lack is context, as always, jagoff. The RoE that your Progressive leader Comrade Cockroach Obama has forced us to fight under the last eight years makes it no fun at all. No RoE equals fun, but you wouldn’t know that from hiding under your desk, you sniveling scumbag.

  26. KirklesWorth says:

    Your bold (or bald)-faced lies are hilarious! Too stupid to click links and too stupid not to incriminate itself. You can sit and spin on it all you want for all I care…the proof is all there that you want to murder me, and you just reinforced it again.

    762×51: Once again, there is no chance I will spare you, bitch. Should we meet on the battlefield, you will die. This branch of the thread was deleted.

  27. KirklesWorth says:

    Keep sitting and spinning – your “RoE” are laughable! Just because you are foolish behind your desk doesn’t mean you get to assassinate those who school you. Your just want to get me on your “battlefield” so you can fulfill your promise:

    762×51: Once again, there is no chance I will spare you, bitch. Should we meet on the battlefield, you will die. This branch of the thread was deleted.

    You can’t prove one iota that I am a “progressive” yet I’ve got your murderous threats:

    762×51: I have a bullet with your name on it, any time you think you have what it takes to impose your fascist dreams, elitist f__ktard. Go f__k yourself. This comment was deleted.

    762×51: However, you still cannot impose your fascism without violence. Eventually, whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you.

    762×51: I don’t have to “fantasize about sniping people from a mile away” if you’d like me to prove it to you, I’ll be happy to give you a demonstration.

    Or the death threat you made to Tom:

    762×51: Putting you in the ground will be a public service.

    Or the death threat you made to Smith and Wesson and Me:

    762×51: You don’t mean a thing to me, you’re just a target awaiting engagement and when that time arrives all I will feel is recoil.

  28. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    “That is like feeling better about diarrhea than explosive diarrhea.”

    Yeah, that sums it up pretty well in many ways. Though, I’ve always thought Trump will be a mixed bag rather than pure bad. We will see, but I don’t think he’ll administrate like a proggie in all ways. Proggies consistently and reflexively side with anyone whose interests are in conflict with those of the USA, never miss an opportunity to undermine individual liberty. I don’t see that in Trump. I think he is pro-America in his own way. We really need a Reagan, and Trump isn’t that. In some ways he’s more like a JFK era Democrat.

  29. 762x51 says:

    I imagine that anyone who has ever had to deal with wants to murder you, jagoff. Prix like you just cry out for it.

    For example, your cult leader has selected Gen James Mattis, USMC, Ret., as his SecDef. The General was no doubt thinking of you when he said “‘There are some assholes in the world that just need to be shot.’”

    Did you ever figure out which of the people you already know who will be looking to settle a score with you when the shooting starts? It must be a long list.

    GFY

  30. 762x51 says:

    Perhaps, time will tell. His cabinet does not look good so far. Only Gen. Mattis and Kelly measure up as real Americans, the rest are globalist elite A-holes.

  31. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    John Bolton is tapped for a high level job in state, too. His head seems to be screwed on pretty straight. I wish Bolton would be sec state, but that’s not to be.

  32. KirklesWorth says:

    Just keep doubling-down Einstein. You’ve already explained that you are a wannabe-genocidal-executioning-fascist who casually claims (1) progressives are for killing 2 and that (2) Hillary and Trump, and democrats and republicans are all progressives, your enemies, and your targets 2 that you find killing “tons of fun”. Therefore using these ridiculous claims you somehow justify the extermination of over 135,000,000 Americans – and those are just the ones who voted.

  33. 762x51 says:

    Absolutely, Bolton would have been the correct choice. LOL, maybe it will be like with tRump where Pence will probably do most of the heavy lifting while Globalist Progressive Elect Not Hillary is out making a “deal”.

    https://youtu.be/Kqw0Gz9GahM

  34. JeffersonSpinningInGrave says:

    Worth considering, though I don’t doubt that Schumer wants more government spending for it’s own sake.

  35. Torcer says:

    Fiberal KirklesWorth’s list is quite a response to your question.

    Perhaps YOU can answer the question instead of palming it off on someone else.

    Fiberal So just what kind of discretion have you exhibited?
    Meaning that you were, are now and will always be a never-trumper with one mindless mission in life– to criticize Trump.

    Need I remind you that repeating a lie never proves it true.

    Fiberal You are with her.
    http://moonbattery.com/?p=79398#comment-3065478902

    1. Based on what factual evidence?
    Be sure to include plenty EXCERPTS and Links in your answer.
    You keep on repeating that lie, and you have yet to back it up – why is that the case?
    2. In addition, It should be clear that I am vehemently against the ideology of Socialism – so how do you reconcile the with that often repeated lie of yours?

    BTW, here is that question that you dodged once again: Are you going to criticize the man for that which you disagree?

  36. Torcer says:

    That’s just another means by which she and other can dodge difficult questions.

  37. Torcer says:

    Most of what I post is by sheer random chance of the vagaries of the news cycle.

    One does have to wonder why those around here of a particular mindset have not fully comprehended what has been taking place or that they should realize that the binary choice argument has evaporated.

    They should also realize that at best, Trump has 2 years to prove his worthiness and that he will need as much of everyone’s support as he can attain.

  38. KirklesWorth says:

    Most of what I post is by sheer random chance of the vagaries of the news cycle.

    You mean the “sheer random chance of vagaries” posted by RedState and a handful of other anti-Trump sites both liberal and conservative – that’s why so many look to WeazelZippers for more objectivity.

    “One does have to wonder why those around here of a particular mindset have not fully comprehended what has been taking place or that they should realize that the binary choice argument has evaporated.

    An over-burdened sentence that would read simpler as “The Trump supporters were right”.

    They should also realize that at best, Trump has 2 years to prove his worthiness and that he will need as much of everyone’s support as he can attain.

    And the others should realize that they shot their wad and lost, so not many people are going to take stock in what so-called “conservative” Hillary-enabling anti-Trump losers think about what Trump should do.

  39. Fiberal says:

    Once again, the fascination with men’s butts.

    Very little of the feces you throw on your screen comes in the absence of a casual reference to men’s butts.

    You are currently in a homosexual panic aren’t you? Admit it. You’ll feel better.

    Was that the reason you couldn’t get into the military?
    Caught in a homosexual act?

    And about that “maggot” reference; I would appreciate it if you are going to try and goad me, you wouldn’t copy my terminology. That doesn’t work. Try something about men’s butts.

    You ..Twink.

  40. Fiberal says:

    Jerkoffsworth

    jagoff

    butt buddies

    You really have a thing for men. You do realize that, don’t you Twink?

    All your repressed homosexuality just falls out behind the keyboard when you think you’re anonymous, doesn’t it?

    Kind of like those dark 25 cent video booths you go to with other men standing around. No one knows.

    What a Twink

  41. Fiberal says:

    I have some insight for you, Twink.

    The reason that you seem to think that I’m small in stature is because a lot of adult homosexual men like small boys.

    Your fantasy image of me is a projection, Twink.

    As your psychotherapist I am going to advise you on this: Namely, stop your gay activities for a while. You are currently in a homosexual panic and need to clean up.

    Your sexual perversions are driving your hostilities. Your gayness also explains all your military delusions; in other words, you are having a reaction formation.

    Trust me, Twink. I know the medical aspects of your condition. Look these terms up.

    Just stop doing what you’re doing with other men and boys.
    Think of it as going on a diet.

    .

    (I’ll send a bill to your hair salon.)

  42. Fiberal says:

    Hey! that was all right!

    Thanks Trojan… I have to admit, I could identify with them.

    I guess that’s why I find it like that so funny.

    Good won.

  43. TrojanMan says:

    Funny wasn’t it not, no?

  44. KirklesWorth says:

    Oh, there’s no end to its renaming cleverness! Behold the plethora of latent homosexual fantasies (aka wishful thinking and projection) and psychotic threats in this glorious list:

    1. GoFuckYourselfKirklesworth, 2. kikrlesworthcumguzzler, 3. kirklesDouche, 4. kirklesjerkDoucheBag, 5. kirklesjerkTheMoron, 6. kirklesToadStool, 7. kirklesworthASSHOLE, 8. kirklesworthAsslickeR, 9. kirklesworthBathHouseWhore, 10. KirklesworthBlowsDonald, 11. kirklesworthCausedCivilWar, 12. kirklesworthDarkensDoor, 13. kirklesWorthDickSuckeR, 14. kirklesworthDoomApproaches, 15. KirklesWorthDoucheBAG, 16. kirklesworthEatsIt, 17. kirklesworthEatsShit, 18. kirklesworthEnablesHillary, 19. kirklesworthEnemaBag, 20. kirklesworthEnemyProgressive, 21. Kirklesworthevilagenda, 22. KirklesworthFACSISTFUCK, 23. KirklesworthFascistAsshole, 24. kirklesworthFascistFucktarD, 25. kirklesworthFascistTrumpanze, 26. kirklesworthGetsHis, 27. kirklesworthGooseStepping, 28. kirklesworthHomeWork, 29. kirklesWorthInfowarsTroll, 30. kirklesworthintheGround, 31. KirklesWorthisaDick, 32. kirklesworthisaLIAR, 33. kirklesworthisAPussy, 34. KirklesWorthisDishonest, 35. kirklesworthisHillarysBitch,
    36. kirklesworthIsMeaningless, 37. kirklesworthJackhole, 38. kirklesworthLeaves!!, 39. kirklesworthLicksASS, 40. kirklesworthLickstRumpAss, 41. kirklesworthLonesPenis, 42. kirklesworthLovesDick, 43. kirklesworthMentalMidget, 44. kirklesWorthMoron, 45. kirklesworthPettyTyrant, 46. kirklesworthProgOperative, 47. kirklesworthProgressiveAsshole, 48. kirklesworthProgressiveParro, 49. kirklesworthProgressiveParrot, 50. KirklesworthProgressiveTroll, 51. kirklesworthProgtard, 52. KirklesworthRentFreeHead, 53. kirklesworthRino, 54. kirklesworthSandyVaginA, 55. kirklesworthShitbag, 56. KirklesworthSpreads4Donald, 57. KirklesworthSSspy, 58. kirklesworthSucksDick, 59. kirklesworthSuckstRump, 60. kirklesworthSuffering, 61. KirklesworthtakesaStrapon, 62. KirklesworththeCull, 63. kirklesworththelittleBitch, 64. kirklesworthTrumpOperative

  45. 762x51 says:

    Say it to my face and see what happens to you, maggot.

    If you can pull your face away from tRumps crotch that is, maggot.

    GFY maggot.

  46. 762x51 says:

    Say it to my face and see what happens to you, maggot.

    If you can pull your face away from tRumps crotch that is, maggot.

    GFY dirty little maggot.

  47. 762x51 says:

    Say it to my face and see what happens to you, maggot.

    If you can pull your face away from tRumps crotch that is, maggot.

    GFY dirty little faggot maggot.

  48. 762x51 says:

    Educating you has become a full time job. I’ve just never run into anyone who is dumber than you princess jerkles.

    The “tons of fun” post was a take off, a paraphrasing really, of a quote from the guy who your cult leader has selected to be the next SecDef, Gen James Mattis.

    ““You go into Afghanistan, you got guys who slap women around for five years because they didn’t wear a veil. You know, guys like that ain’t got no manhood left anyway. So it’s a hell of a lot of fun to shoot them. Actually it’s quite fun to fight them, you know. It’s a hell of a hoot. It’s fun to shoot some people. I’ll be right up there with you. I like brawling.” – Gen. James Mattis USMC, Ret.

    I see that being an idiot as well as an A-hole is part of your profession. You actually have no clue about anything really, all you know is Not Hillary, LMAO. You think I’m the only out here who thinks like that? HILARIOUS how ignorant you are about the world.

    Hey princess, you are going to Tssccchhhiiittt!!! when you find out about Rage Points, useless, candy assed puke. ROTFLMFAO!!!!

  49. 762x51 says:

    Criticizing the cult or its leader is forbidden, right SS-Rottenfurher JerklesTw*t?

    Better get it all recorded in your records so you can report us, TWERP.

  50. Fiberal says:

    Face
    Rump
    Crotch

    Apparently, you just don’t have much else on your obscene mind.

    Say it to your face?
    Do want to expand on that? I would be interested to know just exactly what you have in mind.

    But let me help you out here. Because again, it does not appear that you have thought these things out very well.

    Perhaps you should be a little more careful. Keep in mind that you have dozens of retrievable, archived threats sitting on this site. You are aware are you not, that you can get 5 years for every one of the threats you’ve made over the web? That’s 18 U.S. Code 875 (c). I would strongly suggest that you look it up.

    Suppose I am, or someone here, is eventually served with a subpoena ordering an appearance for questioning regarding threats made over the web by you. Just how do you think we would handle that?

    And it may be anyone at all that sees your threats, and are offended; or just interested, who could take it upon themselves to advise or initiate prosecution. Such actions could come from all kinds of legal offices or attorneys.

    You won’t know until it’s too late, but you may already be in some trouble.

    So use some common sense. It may be time to start reversing all this and stop taking everything so seriously.

    Just a word to the very, very unwise.

  51. 762x51 says:

    Like you would know anything about RoE, jackhole.

    You never schooled me on anything, you’ll need about 100 additional IQ point before you can come close to that, you mindless automaton.

    I have proved repeatedly that you are a Progressive from your support of Globalist Progressive Elect No Hillary to your butt hurt over my statements of what Progressives are good for. You prove it nearly every time you vomit something onto this page, princess.

    Again, your lies do not make truth, either have me arrested for “murderous threats” or STFU, TssscchhhiiTTT!!! for breath. Suing you blind would give me great pleasure, not as much as fighting you, but still a small consolation prize.

    Now, GFY

  52. 762x51 says:

    Yeah, you can’t have a conversation with either Lord Fibtard or jerklesTwerp which is why I no longer even try. Mocking is really the best they deserve though not all they deserve.

  53. 762x51 says:

    Umm, is English your second language, idiot? SAY IT TO MY FACE. Which words don’t you understand?

    WOW, 18 U.S. Code 875 (c), LMAO, do it jackhole, I dare you.

    There are no threats here or anywhere else. An offer of single combat is not a threat, I’ve explained that to you many times as well as your lapdog jerklesTw*t. I have never, ever said anything like “I’m coming for you”, or “I’ll come to your house”, etc. No, the “OFFERS” have ALWAYS been to meet in a neutral location for equal, mutual combat. That is not a threat, period. So you go ahead Lord Fibtard of Swineherd, do your worst, Once I sue your ass for it, I’ll donate your house to homeless shelter or halfway house, your neighbors should appreciate that.

    Besides, you hardly come to the issue with “clean hands” so go for it.

    You lying sack of Tsscchhhiiitttt!!!

  54. 762x51 says:

    One other thing maggot, you can count on being served with a civil suit within 72 hours of any contact I receive relating to a criminal investigation.

    You may want to look up the laws involving the use of “fighting words” before proceeding, maggot.

    I’m sure the other posters here will have no problem interacting with a pathological liar who wants to have free reign to abuse who ever has the gall to disagree with you and then threaten criminal prosecution if they won’t back down from your abusive BS.

    GFY.

  55. KirklesWorth says:

    Sit and spin it to yourself laughing boy.

    762×51: <a href="Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.

    762×51: No a__hole, I mean when we start killing you dirty Progressive motherf__kers. That clear enough for you?

    762×51: I didn’t start this, the Progressives did and with them there is no room for reason. Hillary = Progressive. tRump = Progressive. Election of either one = civil war. Get used to it, you are making it happen.

    762×51: You overlooked the most likely alternative, civil war. Regardless of which “party” wins in Nov., there will be a civil war, it is inevitable now. The “sour grapes” argument is even dumber than the, “if you aren’t for tRump you are for Hillary” argument. It is all unprincipled people have though. Makes no difference to me, both sides are Progressives which means both sides are enemies of the Constitution, therefore both sides are targets. That I have to lead one a little more to the left than the other is irrelevant.

    762×51 as KirklesWorthisDishonest: Killing enemies of the Constitution is tons of fun.

    Nobody needs your “education” when you come up with compost like this:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.

    762×51: Now, about those electoral college numbers that you have avoided addressing TWICE now. Once more, here is the current data, we are looking for your explanation as to how your cult leader will overcome the substantial deficit he now faces. You keep saying “Trump is the only candidate that can defeat Hillary” yet he is failing to do so by empirical observation. Now a loyal, deluded Progressive would deny the data, in effect, shooting the messenger. You have spent months telling us how superior you are, being a filthy elitist and all, now it’s time for you to prove it. Let’s go jerkelsworth, show us how superior you are. Just don’t try logic because you simply have no grasp of it. ROTFLMAO!!

  56. Fiberal says:

    It will be amusing to see a defense attorney try and make these arguments to a federal judge sitting there reading your graffiti.

    “Fighting words” Are you really that stupid?

    Okay. Now that we’ve established that you are absolutely a full-blown psychotic moronic half-wit, I’m good to see you just keep it up. Its actually a lot more fun to see a rabid, spitting Twink trying to form a thought.

    BTW. Like I said, you haven’t thought any of this out at all: a DA would handle prosecuting you. On the other hand, your frivolous ‘civil suit’ would be out-of-pocket.

    That’s a pretty high fence for a gay old man on a hairdresser’s salary.

  57. Torcer says:

    Which is why I’ve blocked one of them – life is too short to have to deal with their all to repetitive and false arguments day after day after day..

    Note that in addition to utterly FAILING to substantiate the false claims that were made, she was unable to come up with a cogent response to this inquiry:

    It should be clear that I am vehemently against the ideology of Socialism – so how do you reconcile with that often repeated lie of yours?

  58. Tchhht!!! says:

    Just imagine twinkle toes going up in front of gun hating progressive judge , prosecutor, and jury trying to explain his blatant desire to kill all progressives. Imagine then that the prosecutor caps off his case with the fact that twinkle toes there is racist to boot. Man, I would pay good money to see that.

  59. Fiberal says:

    I gave the idiot a heads up.

    All it will take is someone tired of his nonsense. Imagine a bored DA coming along and seeing some of those posts.

    Its like posting your social security number over and over again and not expecting anything bad to happen.

    The guy would be a complete chapter in a eugenics textbook.

  60. KirklesWorth says:

    What do I care about your RoE when you’ve already explained how you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

  61. bobdog19006 says:

    That is the archetypal photo of Chuck Schumer. I don’t recall seeing one better. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e9e7b71868ecba2fd98b32476c99d8a2f70d90db534429af95fa317e4fd2a399.gif

  62. bobdog19006 says:

    No school today, apparently….

  63. bobdog19006 says:

    762, you’re not jousting with three trolls. It’s the same guy.

    The only way to win the game is not to play. Block the asshole.

  64. KirklesWorth says:

    Calling for me again? But once again you need correcting – it is that you are too dumb to have a conversation. All you have are your progressive tactics and Alinsky rules to mindlessly follow – you certainly don’t follow your own claims:

    762×51: I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy