moonbattery logo

May 06 2017

Scientific Journal Proclaims It Is “Ethically Inappropriate” to Regard Breastfeeding as Natural

The triumph of moonbattery over science must be nearly complete. A prominent scientific journal warns that it is no longer compliant with politically correct dogma to regard mammals nursing their young as natural if those mammals are people:

It’s “ethically inappropriate” for government and medical organizations to describe breastfeeding as “natural” because the term enforces rigid notions about gender roles, claims a new study in Pediatrics.

“Coupling nature with motherhood… can inadvertently support biologically deterministic arguments about the roles of men and women in the family (for example, that women should be the primary caretaker),” the study says.

It is “ethically inappropriate” to assert biological reality in the face of moonbat lunacy.

It’s unclear whether they’re worried about how traditional female gender roles may limit women’s progress in the workforce, or whether this is part of the discussion about whether conventional views about motherhood exclude transgender people.

Regardless, 2 + 2 is still 4, and humans are still mammals.

Motherhood: no longer natural.

On a tip from Steve T.

19 Responses to “Scientific Journal Proclaims It Is “Ethically Inappropriate” to Regard Breastfeeding as Natural”

  1. SNuss says:

    “Ethically inappropriate”? What about “biologically normal”? Ethics have nothing to do with mammalian milk production, except in the minds of severely disturbed individuals, or Leftists (but, I repeat myself).

    BTW, my karma just ran over your dogma.

  2. Saxon Warrior says:

    Somebody yank these moonbats by the earlobes, smack them round the back of the head and make them write out one hundred lines – “I will not confuse reality with my own pathetic delusions.”
    I’m sick of listening to them. I really am. They need some old-fashioned discipline and a few kicks to the teeth!

    Why are sane people constantly having to put with these morons?

  3. PhiloTFarnsworth says:

    Scientific Journal Proclaims It Is “Ethically Inappropriate” to Regard Breastfeeding as Natural

    –I GOTTA ADMIT: in some cases that is 100% correct !!!!

  4. Sauer Thirtyeight says:

    Is “Pediatrics” a scientific journal? I thought it was some medical industry thing. Most of the medical industry journals are more about economics than science.

  5. Jester says:

    Looks like the Left is Eating Its Own again (or “Feeding” On Its Own again, if you like) 🙂

  6. DrEvil007 says:

    Reality is ethically inappropriate. Idiots doing idiot things because they’re idiots.

  7. NotKennedy says:

    Ethics is a cultural construct, for those without a profession. Even lawyers have explicit codes of conduct. Gender faggots and bottom feeders, not so much.

    As it were, ethics can readily become very complicated. There is a reason why practitioners are required to have regular training in the matter, to avoid finding yourself in a predicament or conundrum.

    Gynomastia does not include the development of milk ducts. If Bruce Gender can still “get off”, it is only because of a preexisting nerve complex.

    For my interest, I wish Bruce would get the hell off and let Larry Flynt try and market “her”.

    Show us your “lady bits”, Bruce!

  8. KHarn says:

    For years they have been telling us that there is nothing wrong with breast-feeding in public and WE should accept it as “natural, beautiful and normal”.
    But now… NOW they hit us with THIS crap!
    Excuse me, I have to cuss like a maniac and I don’t know when I’ll be back.

  9. Watchman59 says:

    Just when you think they’ve hit rock bottom stupidity they bring out the picks and jackhammers and go deeper.

  10. Tanjalknop says:

    Have you ever earned lots of money without offering for sale a thing and even without working on any mlm marketing sort of business without having to make an investment any-thing. I must share with you a job wherein all of tools is actually alloted to you and also it is a relatively easy in addition to really easy work. Not necessary to build your personal website domains and many more., all will be presented to you 100% free. Visitors definitely will browse the landing page so you are going to get compensated for that. Its as simple as that. I’m getting big profits from home from this work exactly like $20000 every month and sometimes more and if you also actually want to get paid same as that then follow these particular not very difficult directions by looking at this homepage …. ➤➤➤

  11. Honesty says:

    Undermines all the PC we have heard, will the PC police accept it

  12. 762x51 says:

    ““Coupling nature with motherhood… can inadvertently support biologically deterministic arguments about the roles of men and women in the family”

    Try to reproduce any creature from any Order of Class Mammalia without 1 Male and 1 Female in the mix, I triple dog dare ya. Even cloning still involves those basic building blocks and eventually fails due to genetic drift. The god complex of Progressives is boundless.

    Mammals are any vertebrates within the class Mammalia (/məˈmeɪli.ə/ from Latin mamma “breast”), . . .

  13. […] Peer my friends into the abyss of leftist Idiocy! H/T Moonbattery […]

  14. 762x51 says:

    “Even lawyers have explicit codes of conduct. ”

    Laws were originally a codification of the social mores and folkways that brought hominids together for shelter, protection, etc, eons ago. Essentially, right and wrong were codified into legal and illegal. The problem today is that lawyers have created an environment where right, wrong, legal and illegal have been legislated into four distinct concepts instead of two concepts with one formal legal definition for each.

    I haven’t even the slightest morbid curiosity about Bruce’s “lady bits”.

  15. Momster says:

    “Biologically deterministic?!?!” Who TF talks like that? Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious makes more sense than that word salad.

  16. […]  Scientific Journal Proclaims It Is “Ethically Inappropriate” to Regard Breastfeeding as Natural […]

  17. NotKennedy says:

    Haha, well yeah, it would be pretty morbid. Self mutilation tends to be that way.

  18. Frances says:

    Generally speaking, women lactate; men don’t. The female body was designed to feed offspring; that some women can’t does not invalidate the basic plan. But to try and deny the basic biology by which this happens – because some will feel excluded – is seriously idiotic.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy