moonbattery logo

Dec 02 2011

Senate Approves Sodomy and Bestiality in Armed Forces

It doesn’t matter if liberals slash funding to our overextended Armed Forces to free up funds to finance poverty, because under Hope & Change, the military’s new priorities aren’t as resource intensive. An example of these priorities:

The Senate on Thursday evening voted 93-7 to approve a defense authorization bill that includes a provision which not only repeals the military law on sodomy, it also repeals the military ban on sex with animals — or bestiality. …

Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said the effort to remove sodomy from military law stems from liberal Senate Democrats’ and President Obama’s support for removing the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy.

“It’s all about using the military to advance this administration’s radical social agenda,” Perkins told CNSNews.com. “Not only did they overturn Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, but they had another problem, and that is, under military law sodomy is illegal, just as adultery is illegal, so they had to remove that prohibition against sodomy.”

Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional — or just “collateral damage.”

Liberals’ ability to browbeat the morally and/or mentally weak into accepting homosexuality depravity as normal is a loose string. Pull it hard enough, and soon all sorts of things come unraveled.

pervert
With perverts in charge, soon it will be, “Eek, a normal person.”

On tips from Hail The Amberlamps! and G. Fox.




29 Responses to “Senate Approves Sodomy and Bestiality in Armed Forces”

  1. Conan says:

    And they’ll wonder WHY recruitment numbers fall to nearly zero, which is what the leftists want anyway.

  2. Lao in Space's Shipboard Computer says:

    Wake up pretty bird, time to defend our comrades in arms. Here are your squawking points:
    http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201111160012

  3. Jeff says:

    93-7? Did our esteamed senators who are working so very hard on behalf of the American public they profess to serve (sarc off), even take the time to read the bill? The trouble with repealling formally what once considered to be immoral behavior is that in lowering the standard, you remove any reason to refuse the next special interest group seeking formal social approval for their behavior. There is no reason to deny a live-in heterosexual couple the same “rights” that are now being given to a married couple. If you say yes to a homosexual couple there is no logical or ethical reason to deny a heterosexual couple. There is no reason to condem adultery as being wrong. But, as Kipling would remind us, “the gods of the copybook heading with terror and slaughter return. I grieve: America is falling fast. Do not be deceived, God is NOT mocked. There will be a day of judgement coming very soon.

  4. FrankW says:

    I don’t approve of the action, but it seems to me once DADT was lifted and gays were allowed in it was forcing them to remove certain articles (mainly because it is perceived as impossible to have a gay sexual relationship without sodomy).
    From UCMJ ARt. 125
    “(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient
    to complete the offense.”
    If they did not repeal this portion (which included bestiality) they would have set a precedent for other sections of the UCMJ to be disregarded. They can add back the beastie wording later.
    Not agreeing with what was done, just understanding. It was likely procedurally simpler to remove the article than to rewrite it (committees and whatever).

  5. metprof says:

    Rectum-Wreckers everywhere jump for joy!

    Absolutely disgusting.

  6. Brian_Boru says:

    Here comes the draft.

  7. Sinister66 says:

    93-7 to approve.

  8. Isn’t that what they accused Gaddafi of having his men to do?

    At least in Libya they did it to the enemy rather than the guy in the foxhole next to them

  9. StanInTexas says:

    So let’s see.
    When Republicans try to get bills through that protect marriage or the 2nd Amendment, the Liberals cry out “What are you doing? What about JOOOOOOOBS. What are you people not doing your jobs???”

    But let Democrats push this through and the sounds coming from Liberals is “Do you REALLY think Nancy Pelosi will be on Dancing with the Stars next season???”

  10. Tom Stedham says:

    Can we at least get a definition of “sodomy” before we go on a tirade? One place says it’s “anal sex between men”; another says it’s “anal sex” with anybody; another place says it’s “any form of penetrative intercourse or cunnilingus between unmarried persons.” No mention of anal sex; just plain ol’ sex… Hmmm…

    So, unless you are against unmarried people having sex (and good luck enforcing that on the military!) then I’m not sure what the fuss is about…?

    Are people actually advocating that THE GOVERNMENT legislate what grown American citizens can and cannot do??? Wow, that’s a scary road to take, isn’t it???

  11. StanInTexas says:

    Are people actually advocating that THE GOVERNMENT legislate what grown American citizens can and cannot do???

    The government does that EVERY SINGLE DAY, Tom.Interesting how that only is a problem when it comes to homosexuals.

  12. Sinister66 says:

    Tom Stedham

    “Are people actually advocating that THE GOVERNMENT legislate what grown American citizens can and cannot do???”

    Kinda throws that whole less government intrusion idea out of the window.

  13. Sinister66 says:

    StanInTexas

    Democrats didnt have to push anything. It passed 93-7.

  14. StanInTexas says:

    Which party controls the Senate, internet-tough-guy?

  15. Jeff says:

    Tom Stedham;
    Yes, it is scary. What is scarier it the rational for doing it; usually as But,it is for your own good (implied is that the elites know what is best for you) and for your security. Our Founding Fathers did try to warn us about such abuses of power as well as once you seperate moralitly from law, then any thing is permissible. But hey, what did those Bible clinging dead white guys know anyway? So you are not sure what the fuss is all about? I take it you have never served in the military. I have for 29 years. With all due respect to you, I don’t think you would understand. The left is degrading and undermining our military. Any society that fixated on sex as we are is doomed.

  16. KHarn says:

    Two observations:

    First: I find it scary that someone thought there was a REASON to have such a law in place.
    Second: Previously, I kept asking LAO and other America-haters what they thought was “going too far”; now I will have to never ask that again. I KNEW the answer (“Nothing”) but I just wanted the idiots to admit it publicly. Well, they just did.

  17. A. Levy says:

    Well said Jeff.
    We knew allowing gays to openly serve was just a door opener that would allow for more of their radical leftist agenda to follow. It’s how gay activists and other leftists get around the will and wishes of We The People. This is just the beginning.

  18. rogerthat says:

    Now the dems can legally break it off it the military’s buttocks.

  19. karasukanzaemon says:

    This is just step one. NExt they’ll be MANDATING it and punishing those who don’t engage in it.

  20. RICH says:

    Are people actually advocating that THE GOVERNMENT legislate what grown American citizens can and cannot do

    There is a difference between civilian and military lifestyles. When I signed up for the military, I chose to have many of my freedoms removed. I gave the government domain over my life. Those who serve give up many of their freedoms, which ultimately, help to protect yours.

    You’re welcome.

    Now… if you have never served in the military, kindly butt out. Pun intended.

  21. IslandLifer says:

    @Jeff. Amen. I feel sorry for today’s active duty. I couldn’t imagine the horrors of having to live in the barracks with this going on. I wonder how many chapter 14s this has/will created.

  22. Sinister66 says:

    StanInTexas says:

    As I said, they didnt have to push anything. all but 3 democrats and republicans voted to pass. Thats D-48 R-44.

    They should have the bestiality portion separated and re-criminalized and add another trillion in bailout funds if Obama doesnt veto the whole thing.

  23. Sinister66 says:

    Heres the link on how the voting went.

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-218

  24. Profiler says:

    Well I Guess Logan Vaughn can now join the military…

  25. Witch says:

    I called my congressman’s office but they played dumb as though the article was a fraud:

    11 ”(6) INDECENT MANNER.–The term ‘indecent
    12 manner’ means conduct that amounts to a form of
    13 immorality relating to sexual impurity which is
    14 grossly vulgar, obscene, and repugnant to common
    15 propriety, and tends to excite sexual desire
    16 or deprave morals with respect to sexual relations.”.
    17 (d) REPEAL OF SODOMY ARTICLE.–Section 925 of
    18 such title (article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military
    19 Justice) is repealed.
    20 (e) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.–Chapter 47 of
    21 such title (the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is further
    22 amended as follows:

    Wish it was!

  26. beforethestorm says:

    Dang Hiram beat me to it! Where IS peta? I hear crickets.

  27. Berlet98 says:

    DADT Repeal Consequence: Now Pvt. Benjamin Can Make Love to Mr. Ed!

    Yet another installment from the You Can’t Make This Stuff Up Department: Sgt. Bilko may soon marry Pvt. Gomer Pyle and they may have a threesome with Arnold, the “Green Acres” pig or with Mr. Ed!

    The Internet is notorious for publishing and publicizing lies, innuendo, fabrications, in a word, trash, okay, two words, trash and crap. It’s therefore incumbent on a serious blogger to verify outrageous stories before commenting on them and spreading the news.

    One such story demanded more verification than usual since it involved an allegation that was so far beyond the pale of belief it bordered on the absurdly incomprehensible. As it turns out, very regrettably, the report is no longer an allegation but fact: The United States Senate has voted to approve the practice of bestiality in the military.

    That is not a misprint.

    Should the House of Representatives concur with the Senate and President Barack Hussein Obama sign the bill, men and women in Amrica’s armed forces will be free to engage in sexual relations with dogs, cats, chickens, horses, or with any other animal without fear of retribution under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

    The repercussions of the repeal of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell law governing homosexual conduct in the military advocated by the president and endorsed by liberals everywhere have now come home to roost.

    Before critics of that contention protest it as an unfair attack on gays, consider the timeline of the proposed legislation . . . (Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=8633.)

  28. oldguy says:

    What happens when sodomy is practiced in foxholes while facing Mecca?

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy