moonbattery logo

Mar 28 2013

Sequestrocalypse Used as Pretext to Further Reduce Border Security

Kudos to whichever Obama staffer came up with the sequestration concept. Not only does it allow proponents of endless government growth to scare low-information voters with absurd gestures like closing down White House tours, it also provides a pretext to open the door even wider to the torrent of future Democrats pouring across the border to collect their welfare handouts:

[T]his week the Border Patrol effectively cut some 4,000 agents from its force due to [sequester-related] budget cuts — 20 percent of its total manpower.

“This is best thing that could happen to smugglers and coyotes and drug smuggling organizations,” said [Shawn] Moran [VP of the National Border Patrol Council]. “They already know the border patrol is looking at staffing cuts.”

It is also the best thing that could happen to Democrats, who are counting on a demographic transformation to make Hope & Change irreversible.

Meanwhile, the federal government still manages to scrape up vast sums of money to shower upon our enemies, despite the tiny temporary decrease in the rate of growth of government spending effected by the Sequestrocalypse.

Any sensible definition of the word “treason” should cover this.

Border Fence
That agent probably isn’t still standing there.

On a tip from DJ. Hat tip: VDARE.



12 Responses to “Sequestrocalypse Used as Pretext to Further Reduce Border Security”

  1. Skyfall says:

    This is why I keep railing against saying Obama and his acolytes are stupid. They most certainly are not.

    If the economy tanks, it’s because of Bush. Sequester cuts are because of the Republicans. Someone shoots up a school: right wing gun fanatics to blame. The middle east in flames? America’s former policies to blame. Electricity and gasoline becoming harder to come by and more costly? Conservatives won’t support “green alternatives”.

    And on and on…and the suckers still buy it.

    Obama has the power to hypnotize an entire world…and he’s just getting started. His father is the father of all lies.

  2. the new rhodesia says:

    Border security kabuki theater. How will millions of welfare dependent vibrant diversities demanding their free shit get through if there is security. Will the muslimes exploit the wide open border? Naw they love the chicago dear leader messiah.

  3. Laurie says:

    .
    “…cut some 4,000 agents from its force”

    Excellent. Now there’s nobody to stop us when the Patriots take up positions along the border and persuade the illegals to re-think their actions and cross back into their own country.
    .
    .

  4. Flu-Bird says:

    And the SAND PEOPLE are preparing for a big invasion

  5. Sweep the leg says:

    Is it illegal to sit on your own property, in your own country, and shoot at people across the way while they are in THEIR own country?

    If so, why?

  6. irrelevant pop culture icons says:

    @Sweep It is illegal if you do it but not if they do it.

  7. Sweep the leg says:

    @ irrelevant

    Thanks for clearing that up ; ) I knew something was wrong with the system

  8. Vic Kelley says:

    You’re right – it’s treason.

  9. Dr.9 says:

    The words border and security should never be used in the same sentence. Our southern border was never meant to be secure. It’s been designed to be porous, so the millions of future Demoncrats can make easy entry. Does any rational person actually believe we couldn’t secure the border if we really wanted to? That it isn’t secure means only one thing. The govt. doesn’t want it secure.

    There are too many “important” people making mountains of money from the illegals, and they’re not going to let the elected lying crooks interfere.

  10. A. Levy says:

    The Viet Nam war.
    The war on poverty.
    The war on drugs.
    The “WMD” war in Iraq.
    The so-called “9/11” war in Afghanistan.
    The war on illegal immigration.

    Do you get it yet? These are all “wars” that were meant to be fought, not won. There’s no money to be made in winning wars, but an unlimited amount in fighting them.

  11. whotothewhat says:

    What the Government cut 4000 Border Agents!. The same agents that are not really allowed to do there jobs and really protect the border? A false premise to call them border agents. Greeters would be more accurate title.

    “Hello how are you today would you like a cart?”

  12. Huh says:

    Ya? Why would he bother? Can you think of a stupider job? US Boder Patrol. Sounds like an intro to a joke.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy