moonbattery logo

Feb 09 2017

Term “Expectant Mother” Deemed Offensive to Transsexuals by British Medical Association

Karl Marx, who couldn’t be bothered to provide for his own wife and kids, saw the family as part of the repressive capitalist superstructure. To this day, destroying the family is a primary leftist objective. This entails attacking the concept of motherhood. One way social engineers accomplish this is by restricting language:

Update your Newspeak Dictionary accordingly.

On a tip from Mr. Freemarket.



22 Responses to “Term “Expectant Mother” Deemed Offensive to Transsexuals by British Medical Association”

  1. ICEvictim says:

    I refuse to participate in this insanity.

  2. Mr. Freemarket says:

    I participated in the revolt on November 8th. Apparently the left doesn’t like democracy when it doesn’t swing their way.

  3. Gailcnovak says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj392d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !mj392d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash392ShopStarGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj392d:….,..

  4. 762x51 says:

    The Nazi’s were not defeated by peaceful protest, they were defeated by war. That was after Neville Chamberlain tried the way you suggest. Evil cannot be defeated by peaceful protest.

  5. JackisBack says:

    The phone rings in the middle of the night
    My cisgender patriarchal parent yells what you gonna do with your life

    Oh cisgender oppressor you know you’re not number one

    But trannies they want to have fun
    Oh trannies just want to have
    That’s all they really want
    Some fun

    When the working day is done
    Oh trannies, they want to have fun
    Oh trannies just want to have fun

  6. 762x51 says:

    Completely off point and irrelevant, douche bag.

    The Soviet Union was not attacking us at that time.
    The Soviet Union was not inside the US at that time.

    Totally different facts than what was in the meme, idiot.

    However:
    We fought a number of proxy wars against the Soviet Union for decades prior to that speech. You may have heard of them, they were in the news, Korean War, Vietnam War, Angolan Civil War, Ethiopian Civil War, Afghan War(Soviet Invasion), Afghan Civil War, and on and on. So the evil of the Soviet Union was not defeated by peace, imbecile, it was defeated by WAR. You might want to read up on topic and learn some history, moron.

    The “Cold War” was far from cold, but that fact does not stop you from trying to spin your lies about it.

    GFY, RINO scum.

  7. KirklesWorth says:

    Spare me your bloviating bull. Your all-or-nothing false dichotomies are always a laugh. “Evil cannot be defeated by peaceful protest.” Bull. “BTW, Supporting a Progressive candidate DOES make you a Progressives, dumbass.” Bull. “Failure to confront evil is, in fact, tacit approval of that evil.” Bull. “The two cannot coexist and so one must die.” Bull. “One must die.” Bull.

  8. James McEnanly says:

    If Monty Python were writing today, they’d find many of their skits enacted as public policy.

  9. Vickiejferguson says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !sh202c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !sh202c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs502ShopStarsGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!sw22c:….,…….

  10. 762x51 says:

    MLK never defeated anything, he became a bigger symbol after being martyred, that’s what martyred means, than he was before.

    Interesting you perceive the British Empire as evil, just like your president, Barack Hussein Obama.

    Support of Progressive candidates means support of the Progressive agenda, imbecile. That makes you a Progressive, you are a complete idiot.

    If you are walking down the street and see a man beating a dog or a child with a stick do you confront him or just walk on by? Bad example, you are a coward and so would pass him by, but say a normal adult. They would confront the evil, not give it tacit approval. Just walking by without doing anything is tacit approval of the evil they are doing.

    Unconstitutional laws have no force and cannot be used against you. That’s not my opinion, stupid, that’s the SCOTUS, Marbury v. Madison, (1803). Obeying an unconstitutional law perpetuates the evil of that law. It provides TACIT APPROVAL of a law that is in fact null and void. Since the goal of PROGRESSIVES is to enslave, your TACIT APPROVAL of their agenda advances it and ensures the enslavement of you and your children. Did you grow up in Ethiopia?

    “”The two cannot coexist and so one must die.” Bull.”

    Lets give everyone the context of that quote, pissant:

    “You are a Progressive who will never stop trying to force others to your ideology. I am a Conservative who will never conform to your ideology. The two cannot coexist and so one must die.”

    Your Progressive ideology seeks to overwrite everything else, just as Islam does, you are just like hajji. Islam is not compatible with any other culture, neither is Progressive ideology. Progressive = slavery, Conservative = liberty. The two CANNOT coexist, my god, you are a mindless lemming.

    ” “One must die.” Bull.”

    Again CONTEXT, propagandist scum:
    “The fact is, you will never stop in your zombie like worship and idiotic proselytization until I either accept your cult or I die. I will never accept your cult and will oppose you until you die, obviously, one must die. Let’s find out who and get this over with.”

    And so you have not stopped your cult worship and idiotic proselytizing to this very day. I still will never accept your cult so let’s get this over with.

    Hey PriklesTwerp, I see your 5th column Progressive Retardlican Senate leader, Bitch McConnell, is back pedaling on repealing OBlowMeCare. He’s as big a traitor as you are.

    GFY RINO scum.

  11. KirklesWorth says:

    MLK never defeated anything, he became a bigger symbol after being martyred, that’s what martyred means, than he was before.

    Lying again (big surprise). Martin Luther King Jr. defeated segregation by being the leading spokesperson for nonviolent methods of achieving social change. Contributing to this success included: leading the African-American Civil Rights Movement, the Birmingham Campaign, the March on Washington, the Memphis Sanitation Worker Strike, the Montgomery bus boycott, being the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and being named Time Magazine’s Man of the Year in 1963.

    Interesting you perceive the British Empire as evil, just like your president, Barack Hussein Obama.

    Lying again – no such comment was mede by me. You ignored Gahdhi, so that point you’ve conceded.

    Support of Progressive candidates means support of the Progressive agenda, imbecile. That makes you a Progressive, you are a complete idiot.

    Lying and completely wrong. This will be addressed on a separate post.

    (Bloviations about man beating dog or child, “tacit approval”, etc.

    Lying again. You and your stupid false dichotomies and ridiculous sweeping generalizations. There are many reasons people don’t get involved – none of which involve “tacit approval”. People have fear of conflict due to upbringing, due to previous experience, fear of losing control, fear of aggression, fear of embarrassment, fear of getting hurt, fear of retaliation, lack of self confidence/self awareness, outside of comfort zone, etc..

    Unconstitutional laws have no force and cannot be used against you. That’s not my opinion, stupid, that’s the SCOTUS, Marbury v. Madison, (1803). Obeying an unconstitutional law perpetuates the evil of that law. It provides TACIT APPROVAL of a law that is in fact null and void. Since the goal of PROGRESSIVES is to enslave, your TACIT APPROVAL of their agenda advances it and ensures the enslavement of you and your children. Did you grow up in Ethiopia?

    What the hell are you talking about? You lied again:

    In Marbury v. Madison (1803) the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution.

    Marbury v. Madison, arguably the most important case in Supreme Court history, was the first U.S. Supreme Court case to apply the principle of “judicial review” — the power of federal courts to void acts of Congress in conflict with the Constitution. Written in 1803 by Chief Justice John Marshall, the decision played a key role in making the Supreme Court a separate branch of government on par with Congress and the executive.

    You are a Progressive who will never stop trying to force others to your ideology. I am a Conservative who will never conform to your ideology. The two cannot coexist and so one must die.

    The context changes none of the meaning of your statement and is therefore irrelevant. And I have replied previously, but I will respond again that I am not a progressive, liar – although you act like one. There is no ideology being “forced” on you, liar – although you are forcing youor ideology on us. You are a “conservative” as far as it suits you, otherwise you are a lying progressive.

    Your Progressive ideology seeks to overwrite everything else, just as Islam does, you are just like hajji. Islam is not compatible with any other culture, neither is Progressive ideology. Progressive = slavery, Conservative = liberty. The two CANNOT coexist, my god, you are a mindless lemming.

    I have no “progressive ideology”, liar – although you do. I don’t seek to “overwrite” anything, liar – although you do. And just to be academic, the two have been coexisting for centirues – “my god, you are a mindless lemming”.

    The fact is, you will never stop in your zombie like worship and idiotic proselytization until I either accept your cult or I die. I will never accept your cult and will oppose you until you die, obviously, one must die. Let’s find out who and get this over with.

    The “CONTEXT” doesn’t change the meaning, “propagandist scum”. And I have addressed that comment previously, but I will respond again that I have no “zombie like worship”, liar. There are no “idiotic proselytizations”, liar – except for you.

    And so you have not stopped your cult worship and idiotic proselytizing to this very day. I still will never accept your cult so let’s get this over with.

    Again, there is no “cult worship”, liar. There is no “idiotic proselytizing”, liar – except by you.

    Once again, you demonstrate your keen knowledge of Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, as you are once again demonstrating:

    762×51►Beckwith: (05/01/2016) Rule # 10 is really a variation on the Hitlerian axiom of “All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X”

    But you’ve already told everybody that Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals #5 is your favorite:

    762×51►CTsOpinion: (05/03/2016) They have no idea the level of ridicule I intend to unleash on them as their boy begins to show his real stripes and Progressive ideology. Old Alinsky “RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.” is about to go into overdrive.

  12. KirklesWorth says:

    Now I will school you on how people left of Reagan are not automatically “progressives”, “fascist”, “totalitarians”, “nazis”, “your enemies”, “targets awaiting engagement”, etc..

    First, you seem to have difficulty with the difference between “progressive” the adjective and “progressive” the noun. Let’s review the two definitions:

    “Progressive” pro·gres·sive prəˈɡresiv/:

    (adjective): (of a group, person, or idea) favoring or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.
    (noun): a person advocating or implementing social reform or new, liberal ideas.

    For example:

    ● Although Bill Clinton was more conservative (adjective) than Barack Obama, that didn’t make Clinton a conservative (noun).
    ● Although George H.W. Bush was more progressive (adjective) than Ronald Reagan, that didn’t make Bush a progressive (noun).

    Next, we will dispense with the false dichotomies:

    Whomever is not a conservative is a progressive = false.
    Whomever is not a progressive is a conservative = false.

    Next, we will acknowledge your correct observations:

    “It is not possible to be BOTH Progressive and AND Conservative, they are mutually exclusive, diametrically opposed concepts.”

    Next, we will dispense with your dubious claims:

    All leftists are Progressives, but not all Progressives are leftists” = false, all progressives are leftists
    “In the next ten days, tRump can undo 85% of the Obama presidency, he either will or he won’t. Not undoing it is tacit approval of it. = false – sweeping generalization [1].

    I will paraphrase from one of your previous statements, and my modifications are in bold italics:

    762×51►Hillary Forprison: (09/24/2016) Finally, you complete the circle by reengaging in the Trump is a “progressive” and supporting a “progressive candidate” makes you a “progressive” which I have demonstrated is a false argument because they both result in the same false premise. You have a circular reference in your calculations and the result is false. The reference is there because your entire position collapses without it, you cannot arrive at a correct solution by proceeding from a false assumption, but then, Progressives are not interested in correct solutions. They are only interested in forcing their beliefs on everyone around them.

    While some your pre-election theories may have had some merit, Trump’s post-election actions have demonstrated most of them wrong. I was right, Trump is not (or no longer is) a “progressive”, and I never was a “progressive” – Trump supporter or not. You are wrong. You’ve been wrong since the beginning, and you will continue to be wrong as long as you continue this disproven crusade.

  13. 762x51 says:

    Thanks jerkoffsTwit, it has been a while since you demonstrated for the other readers that it is pointless to try and converse with you because you just make up crap to fit your agenda and ignore everything that defeats it, just like every other PROGRESSIVE.

    Like dismissing my Marbury v. Madison example as if it just doesn’t exist. I knew you would rise to the bait and had some time to waste so I put all that together so everyone could see how you would respond if they actually tried to engage you in what you laughingly refer to as “debate”. Talking to you is like talking to Lanny Davis or James Carville.

    MLK, while a significant leader in the black community, did not defeat segregation. Segregation, as defined by Plessy v. Ferguson, 63 U.S. 537 (1896), began to be defeated by Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). a year before MLK became known as an activist during the Montgomery bus boycott in 1955. The Civil Rights Act of 1968, which was passed after his death is widely recognized as the “official” end of segregation though actual segregation continued on for many years afterward in some parts of the country. That is because you cannot legislate morality. Did MLK have a role in ending segregation? of course. Did he “defeat it? NO. If anything, his assassination had more to do with defeating segregation than his “non-violent” approach.

    Sometimes, princess, it’s hard to tell if you are lying to spin your propaganda in support of your agenda or just too shallow and uneducated to know the details of the FACTS. Claiming someone is lying, when the FACTS clearly show they are not, is not only dishonest but makes you look really stupid. Like your ridiculous claim that you never said the British Empire was evil when you just cited Ghandi, who was fighting to drive the British Empire out of India as an example of someone using non-violent means to defeat evil. Either you claim is correct and the British Empire was evil or it is WRONG and the British Empire was not evil. As always and like all PROGRESSIVES, you try and have it both ways. Dishonesty is your business.

    Either way, engaging you in civil conversation is pointless. You will go on worshiping your cult and wasting every ones time and I will continue to ridicule you because that is all you deserve. So back to that which you deserve.

    GFY, sellout RINO scum.

  14. KirklesWorth says:

    You are a weasely manchild. The body of a vet and the brain of an elementary schooler. Your infantile all-or-nothing false dichotomies is what children deal with while adults recognize and understand shades of gray. I guess even the military can’t drill wisdom into a vessel incapable of it. But let’s get down to the facts…

    I didn’t “dismiss” anything about Marbury v. Madison – I just posted two summaries that demonstrate you lied about it. You are the one trying to disengage from the debate by evading the fact that you were completely wrong about it.

    In regards to Martin Luther King Jr, I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that you are attacking a conservative cultural icon. And I suppose even Ronald Reagan touting Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy and acknowledging his success isn’t enough for you:

    Celebrating the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the sweeping vision of “I Have a Dream,” and attributing the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and 1965 Voting Rights Act to King’s leadership, Reagan proclaimed that because of Martin Luther King Jr., “The conscience of America had been touched [and] people had begun to treat each other not as Blacks and Whites, but as fellow Americans.”

    But thanks for confirming that Martin Luther King Jr.’s peaceful protests facilitated the Civil Rights Act of 1968 that defeated segregation even after, or because of, his assassination.

    No need to waste your time on your faux bloviations. You wouldn’t know a fact even when you “feel its recoil”. You can’t even get your Gandhi meme straight. You don’t put words in my mouth you buffoon – all I mentioned about Gandhi was “how he fasted for 21 days which encouraged the Muslims and Indians to end their war”. Anything beyond that is your manufactured lie.

    The one who walks the walk of progressives is you. The one who talks the talk of progressives is you. As I’ve stated before, you are a 2nd amendment progressive (a rare animal indeed) and a psychotic snowflake.

    No, actually engaging you in civil conversation is pointless. – but you are determined to push your progressive agenda and I am determined to expose your lies, frauds, stupidity, progressive propaganda, progressive tactics, and faux-conservativity. You have been the whiniest bitch here so easily triggered with even the tamest comments, yet throw your weight around like an obnoxious troll who thinks he’s so tough:

    1. How funny you consider having all the BS you and your kind have forced everyone else to endure being slung back at you to be bullying., 2. After all the months of abuse you A-holes dished out about Cruz being a GS shill because his wife worked there and Hillary is a Soros flunky so we have to vote tRump or else., 3. As unwelcome as I have tried to make him feel, he still persists in coming here daily to spew his ideology wherein you will convert or die, just as the Islamofascists do in other parts of the world., 4. But then you aren’t here to add to the discussion, you are here looking for trouble, of course, once you find trouble, you can’t deal with it., 5. Did you notice the bullying, the Trump or else attitude from the pro-Trump people?, 6. From there you are safe and everyone has to listen your whining abuse because a weasel like you can’t impose themselves on anyone in real life., 7. Go back and read the Trumpanzee posts for the last year. It was all you scum that were stinking up MB with your fascist crap, name calling, denigration, bullying, all are the well known calling cards of Trumpanzee intellectual feces., 8. I and tens of thousands of others have had enough of your kinds bullying and name calling, we will not pushed around anymore., 9. I doubt many of us will remain long to just come here and take their abuse., 10. I’m sure the other posters here will have no problem interacting with a pathological liar who wants to have free reign to abuse who ever has the gall to disagree with you and then threaten criminal prosecution if they won’t back down from your abusive BS., 11. SO what you are saying is, tRump can’t win without us, yet you insist on continuing to be rude, demanding, bullying and over all assholes., 12. They slither in here from the Disqus sewer and demand we all conform to there tRump cult of personalty, or else., 13. When we push back you start the harassment and insults and shoving people around until many, if not most readers left because of you vermin., 14. You are the aggressor, little boy, not me., 15. You can’t stand having anyone stand up to your bullying,, 16. You fascist assholes have been pushing people around in here for over a year, jackass. That you don’t know that is a testament to your troll intent to come in here and start trouble. I didn’t seek you out, you started with me., 17. You need to understand that this BS has been going on with these Progressive assholes on MB for over a year and I’m simply not going to stand for it any longer.

  15. 762x51 says:

    There is no debate between us A-hole, between your fantasy facts and puerile dishonesty, debate is impossible. There is only combat, provided your balls ever grow in.

    GFY RINO pissant.

  16. KirklesWorth says:

    That’s because you can’t debate. You are a compulsive liar, projector, and all around fraud. There isn’t going to be “combat” Mongo because you are a pathetic manchild who can’t even handle himself on a blog – your obsession with my genitalia notwithstanding. Your infantile attempts to bully me into a confrontation reeks of desperation and irrationality.

    But feel free to keep the conversations going – i look forward to seeing what you will contradict yourself on next.

  17. 762x51 says:

    There isn’t going to be any combat because you are a dirty liar and a coward who can’t back up what he says. Facing me would mean the end of your fantasy that you are more than a sniveling puddle of dog vomit, you aren’t.

    GFY. dirty RINO sellout scum.

  18. KirklesWorth says:

    “Facing” you would mean my death by your cowardly ambush murder. Your immaturity and psychosis renders you as one of the worst people in the world to meet. So easily triggered like a progressive snowflake and even more irrational. You aren’t even able to control yourself in the tame, neutral environment of a blog. All you have left are your pathetic threats and stupid insults – while I have a plethora of every morsel of “wisdom” you’ve excreted. Go ahead, keep making yourself look the fool.

    Take your own advice, dirty CINO sellout scum.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy