moonbattery logo

Oct 23 2016

The GOP Needs Competition, Not Revival

With just over 2 weeks until the Trump train reaches the end of the line, it is not too soon to start asking where conservatives go from here. In the guest post below, JD Rucker makes a case for starting a new party:

Regardless of the outcome of the Presidential election, 2016 will mark a low point for the Republican Party. We saw the rise, fall, and rise again of the Establishment as the dominant force that fended off many Tea Party conservatives. We witnessed the rapid ascension of the alt-right; they are no longer seen as the fringe that we thought they were just a year ago. One does not have to be opposed to Donald Trump to realize that the GOP is much more comfortable with populism than Constitutional conservatism.

The end of this election cycle will yield three camps within the GOP. Some will attempt to regroup within the party to make it fit the Bush-McCain-McConnell Establishment model that has dominated for over two decades. Others will push for the “new GOP,” one that embraces a combination of populism, alt-right ideology, and a faux anti-Establishment bravado that will be more of a Steve Bannon rebranding effort than anything that’s actually fighting the Establishment. A good chunk of Republicans will push for conservative revival within the party.

The first two groups are going to succeed with their goals and will struggle for power against the conservative remnant in preparation for 2018 and 2020 races. They will give the outward appearance of conflict but will be walking in lockstep behind the scenes. This strange but predictable alliance will be centered around Trumpism 2.0. They’ll say that Trump had the right ideas but the wrong delivery. If he wins, he’ll lead the party from the White House. If he loses, he’ll lead a portion of the party from the media empire he is building. Either way, party power brokers will repackage the things that helped him win the nomination while tempering them with Establishment pragmatism.

These scenarios leave the third group, Constitutional conservatives, in the same place they’ve been in since 1989: on the outside looking in. The Tea Party gave us hope with the rise of many rock-ribbed Republican politicians like Mike Lee, Ted Cruz, and the Freedom Caucus in the House. However, these victories left conservatives with a much smaller share of the influence compared to their share of the vote. How is that possible? Why can’t conservatives get a foothold within the GOP? To answer those questions, we have to understand how they – Establishment and alt-right Republicans – perceive us.

We’re necessary evils in their eyes. More importantly, we’re captive audiences. They realize that we might complain until we’re blue in the face about moderates making deals with the Democrats that give them everything and leave conservative values out of the equation, but they know that we’ll still vote their way. We’ll vote for people like Kelly Ayotte over Maggie Hassan. It doesn’t matter that Ayotte scores an abysmal 30% on her CR Liberty Card. She’s pro-life with the letter (R) next to her name, so conservatives will vote for her.

That’s the problem. They don’t need to listen to conservatives. They don’t even need to pander to conservatives. All they have to do is say the word “conservative” during campaign speeches and we’ll reluctantly give them our votes. They just have to invoke Ronald Reagan’s name, claim to be pro-life, and declare that they’ll defend the 2nd Amendment and we’ll accept their candidate as the lesser of two evils.

A conservative revival is impossible in the GOP because the Republican Party knows we won’t vote Democrat. They know that we are stuck with them. They herd us around and keep us in line with fear of what a Democratic victory will do instead of giving us the conservative solutions we want.

We cannot allow this to continue. We need a new party that will allow both the Republicans and Democrats to do what they both want to do anyway: push further to the left.

Democrats are on a trajectory towards communism. They are getting bolder with their liberal rhetoric and more ambitious with their most liberal candidates.

Republicans want to land squarely in the middle. They believe that as long as they keep their actions aligned with populist views, they can overcome the occasional conservative infiltrator. They can handle the Freedom Caucus as long as most Republicans in the House are aligned with Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy. They can survive Cruz, Lee, or Rand Paul standing on their soapboxes as long as the soapboxes are kept small.

If they want the middle, let them have the middle. We will never be able to pull them back to the right without fear that a truly organized and empowered conservative third party is there to offer an alternative. On the other hand, if a third party can hold enough support to cause real pain for the GOP, they will be forced to either embrace us or fight a two-front war.

Imagine a third party that worked outside of the GOP but that endorsed a selection of conservatives in Republican primaries. If the conservative wins the primary, we would support them. If the party nominates a centrist, we’ll run the conservative against them through our party in the general election. That is tangible pain because it means that the GOP will have to split the vote on the right. By decreasing their chances of winning with their moderates, they’ll quickly learn their best chance of winning is with conservatives. Does that mean we’ll have to suffer through some Democratic victories? Yes. It will hurt in the short term. It’s the only way to save the country in the long run.

Some would say that it’s a destructive path because doing so would temporarily empower Democrats. It’s that fear that has always kept conservatives in line with the GOP. As a group, we’ve always accepted their lesser of two evils. It’s time to take the hits now in order to make a better future. Moreover, we have to understand that many GOP victories do not result in lesser evils. We gave the GOP majorities in both chambers of Congress, yet nothing changed. There was literally zero difference in end results than had the Democrats been in control. Republicans did not cut spending. They didn’t reduce government. They gave President Obama everything he wanted. If the Democrats had controlled both chambers, we would be in the exact situation we’re in today.

It’s a farce. It needs to end.

The only path forward for America’s future is through Constitutional conservatism that embraces freedom, life, and smaller government. This cannot be accomplished through the GOP. It cannot be accomplished through righteous but relatively powerless conservative movements like the Tea Party. It can only be accomplished when we band together to form a new conservative party.

If we’re successful, one of two things will happen: either the GOP will learn to comply and we can force conservatism onto them or we can have a true three-major-party system with Democrats to the far left, Republicans in the middle, and our party to the right.

The party cannot be fixed from within. They will continue their leftward lurch until conservatives are willing to finally “stand athwart history yelling, ‘stop!’” We will be launching our party immediately after the election. Raise your hand and prepare to be counted in the very near future. We have the strategy to succeed and thanks to modern communication technology, we have the resources to reach proper velocity before the next election cycle. Today is the day to act. Will you?

190 Responses to “The GOP Needs Competition, Not Revival”

  1. 762x51 says:

    The flaw in this reasoning is that it assumes that America, those 48 contiguous states along with AK and HI survive intact. It cannot and will not.

    I think you will see it split into at least five separate “republics” though I have no idea if or even why certain of those areas would choose a republic as their form of organization as they are far more comfortable with dictatorship. We have just two choices, save the geographic region called the United States and live in a totalitarian dictatorship which will govern it or save the Constitution and the concepts of liberty and individual freedom which took ten thousand generations to develop. Of the two, I choose the Constitution, it is far more important that the concepts it embodies survive, in say the Republic of Texas, than any random collection of states.

    The splits will likely occur along city vs rural boundaries as opposed to entire states splitting off. For example, the people of what is called “downstate” IL HATE the people and the City of Chicago. There has been a movement there for years to literally kick Chicago out of the state. The same scenario is repeated in nearly every state which is why this conflict will be so massive and so bloody.

    This is the evil wrought by the Progressives, it is why there can be no peace between us and why once battle is joined, no quarter will be called for or given.

    Clean up America, Kill a Progressive.

  2. […] The GOP Needs Competition, Not Revival Regardless of the outcome of the Presidential election, 2016 will mark a low point for the Republican Party. We saw the rise, fall, and rise again of the Establishment as the dominant force that fended off many Tea Party conservatives. We witnessed the rapid ascension of the alt-right; they are no longer seen as the fringe that we thought they were just a year ago. One does not have to be opposed to Donald Trump to realize that the GOP is much more comfortable with populism than Constitutional conservatism. […]

  3. Chantal says:

    Hillary is the final Nail in the Coffin . My state has already been over taken by anchor babies and Criminals . Stand and Fight or kneel and lick the hand that feeds you .70 years of liberal progressive policies have done considerable damage to our nation .

  4. You forget that the 2016 election is the “low point” for America. You spend so much time crying about Trump that you seem to forget the alternative – Hillary Clinton.

  5. SkankHunt42✓ᴰᵉᵖˡᵒʳᵃᵇˡᵉ says:

    Before anyone else (especially you Torcer 😛 ) posts another poll showing Clinton win:

  6. AlexMcQuade says:

    “The GOP Needs Competition, Not Revival”
    —you can’t bring it back from the DEAD !!!!

  7. God, the Crotch and NRO says:

    Some would say that it’s a destructive path because doing so would temporarily empower Democrats.

    There’s nothing temporary about it!

    Another four more years of open borders, and there’s no way in hell a candidate of the right, whether Republican or other party will ever get elected again, if there was ever any chance of it now. Demography is Destiny. You talk as if the electorate is a static quantity that you’re going to be able to come back and convince in the next cycle.

    Static is exactly what population isn’t! The majority of the population you’re going to be addressing in four years will have nothing to gain from constitutional conservatism. Just what are you trying to conserve at this point, anyway?

  8. SkankHunt42✓ᴰᵉᵖˡᵒʳᵃᵇˡᵉ says:

    keep posting those polls showing Trump loosing. they sure are believable:

  9. SkankHunt42✓ᴰᵉᵖˡᵒʳᵃᵇˡᵉ says:

    don’t forget the brain washed in public schools kids who will be eligible to vote in 4 years. i tried convincing Dave it’s nor or never. he still think he’ll get Cruz elected in 4 years. lolz

  10. Alphamail says:

    Not only was I Army Airborne I was a Los Angeles Police officer and between you and me that last comment was over the line and while you might like saying it, it threatens Dave being shut down by the Feds. This website allows us free and fairly open exchange and a great format to vociferously disagree. When you now encourage others to kill someone then you are an immediate threat not a friend. We have elections coming up that is a gift here in America and just because you don’t respect it doesn’t mean others don’t.
    I said I would stand with you in revolution if necessary, but not against a neighbor who is a democrat or progressive, I meant against an oppressive government who tries to take my gun, refuses to let me worship, or outlaws my right to disagree. I love this country, maybe not the people in charge, but I don’t intend to start shooting or blowing up anyone because I disagree with their opinion. One more threat like that and I will turn you in myself.

  11. TrojanMan says:

    “The majority of the population you’re going to be addressing in four years will have nothing to gain from constitutional conservatism”

    At that point secession will become necessary. Technically it is already necessary. Restore the constitution to the new republic.

    “Just what are you trying to conserve at this point, anyway?” Exactly the republic as it stands cannot be saved at the ballot box.

  12. Alphamail says:

    “The only path forward for America’s future is through Constitutional conservatism that embraces freedom, life, and smaller government.”
    Yes, yes, and yes……Amen
    BUT, it would be much easier to accomplish that change if you actually had the reins in Washington and some power with a core group of Constitutional conservatives helping build coalitions and forming a new party, and you had the police, the Supreme Court , and the military on your side. If Hillary is elected you will have no power, no freedom, and an even more monstrous government, and you lose ANY chance of even changing your socks with no base of operation, maybe no internet, and Hillary’s judiciary, storm troopers, and lying media telling America you are terrorists. You won’t have a chance and there will be blood running freely in the streets.
    This is a pathetic and horrific course for America. If there are 2 million #NeverTrump voters and they vote for Trump that would put us over the top and give us a powerful platform in DC to start change – but NO – let’s not vote so the baby killers and the e-mail liars and huge government corrupt Marxist can take our freedom for the next three decades. Not lifting a goddam finger to beat Hillary is putting every American in jeopardy – happy yet?

  13. SNuss says:

    Re: “A conservative revival is impossible in the GOP because the Republican Party knows we won’t vote Democrat. They know that we are stuck with them. They herd us around and keep us in line with fear of what a Democratic victory will do instead of giving us the conservative solutions we want.”

    This is exactly what the Leftist Democrats have done with the poor, and minorities. We need to take this election as the pivot point to mortally wound the establishment politicians in BOTH parties, and rebuild them. We need to convince the welfare class that being gainfully employed is better than the economic slavery that they currently live under. We need to expand the numbers of those people to whom personal initiative enhances their lifestyle, by getting out from under the thumb of Big Government. In essence, we would be revisiting our Revolutionary War, in a political, rather than a military, sense. If Hillary wins, it will take decades, or longer, to undo the damage. If not now, then when?

  14. Alphamail says:

    God bless you Dave

  15. FrozenPatriot says:

    Great stuff, Dave. Why not just join the Constitution party? There seems to be no difference between them and what you’re exploring…

  16. FrozenPatriot says:

    If half your speculation of a Hitlery term comes true, it’ll be a record yield of like-minded converts. Having ready and inexcusable examples of out-of-control statism is necessary to break the mental bondage of the fence-sitters, fudds, sportsball worshippers, and blue dog democrats.

  17. FrozenPatriot says:

    Ya, I hope we can all still be friends after this election cycle is over, even if we’re all in different internment camps…

  18. 762x51 says:

    LMAO, just where do you suppose those “in charge of this oppressive government” come from? Do you think there is a special government employee hatchery that spawns them for that single purpose? Clearly you haven’t thought through this fight and exactly WHO it will be against. WTF do you think CIVIL WAR means anyway? It means neighbor against neighbor, idiot. Your neighbor is just as anxious to “turn you in” for something you have said or done as you are to turn me in, BFD.

    Get a pencil and paper so you can write this down, I defy you to find a “threat” in anything I have said. All you weak kneed proggie snowflakes get so butt hurt over reality, to bad, so sad, I don’t care. A “threat” dumb ass, requires far more specificity than any thing you see here. Something like, “at 9PM on the 12th, I’m going to X house and do A, B and C to those who live there”. If you really did go to school at Benning, you should know about being dropped behind enemy lines. Where do think you are now? The enemy is not AT the gates, they are inside the gates and they own the house next to yours. Deal with it.

    This isn’t about opinions you moron, it is about the active enslavement of the American people by an enemy force who calls / called themselves PROGRESSIVES. The act of enslaving someone is, in fact, an act of war, I didn’t start it and I may not finish it, but I’ll be damned if I’m going allow it to continue and I don’t give a crap whether you like or not.

    So go ahead, “turn me in”, you stink just like that little fascist scumbag Urkeljerk that used to slither around here. When the SHTF, fell free to sit on your hands, that is what the other cowards will be doing.

  19. 762x51 says:

    While vying for special privileges and extra rations by turning others in to the “authorities”, no less.

    You believe this tool? He’s ready to fight an “oppressive government” but if you say stuff he doesn’t like he’ll turn you in to that same government.

    I say do it and let’s get this party started.

  20. TrojanMan says:

    At one point there was a Darrell Castle endorsement if i am not mistaken. I agree, instead of a new party just get the existing constitution party in gear. There is already an infrastructure for it.

  21. FrozenPatriot says:

    I’ll be voting for Castle. I’m reading a book right now by the 2008 Constitution Party nominee, Chuck Baldwin. Smart guy and would be a great president. Makes me feel even more idiotic for plugging my nose and wasting my vote on a GOPee establishment centrist…

  22. Alphamail says:

    All this secession talk and revolution BS would be totally unnecessary if you voted for Trump. You foolishly say that by not voting for Trump it doesn’t take away from Hillary and doesn’t affect the election… fantasy and a lie. If a million or two #NeverTrumpers voted for Trump it would send us over the top without question………..if we lose this election it’s because of YOU – plain and simple.

  23. TrojanMan says:

    Popular vote does not a president elect. How many never Trump are in the swing states? That’s the number that is relevant to your post which should be much lower than your 2 million.

  24. TrojanMan says:

    He is not on the ballot in Texas and I don’t think he is a write in either. 🙁

  25. TrojanMan says:

    I’m not going to any internment camp. If It comes to that they will have to drag my dead body out of my house. I only hope they have to drag it over their dead comrades I put down first.

  26. TrojanMan says:

    Trump will not limit government and return it to it’s proper role. You are a fool to believe otherwise. Therefore if you want to be free then secession or revolution becomes a necessity.

    The blame for a Hillary election lands squarely on Trump and those who got Trump nominated.

    Furthermore have you heard of the electoral college? I live in a red state so my vote does not count regardless.

  27. 762x51 says:

    Careful, you might get “turned in” by the Gestapo here. LOL.

  28. TrojanMan says:

    Common respect my ass. You lay blame for an impending Trump defeat on never trumpers. You bash those who don’t follow your Orange god. How’s that for respect? Are you bipolar?

  29. TrojanMan says:

    I am waaaaaay past the point of giving two sh*ts

  30. 762x51 says:

    As are all REAL Americans. What this clown doesn’t get is this isn’t July 1776, it’s April 1861 and the Ft Sumter event is right around the corner.

    I see Abbott has dumped the “Texit” idea for now but I bet he will have to deal with it in 2018..

  31. TrojanMan says:

    If i was him i would not publicly support it but form committees to explore it in secret. Come up with a plan and execute it when the time comes. In general I would support secession when it becomes necessary which it is becoming ever closer. Our founders told us that we not only have the right but the DUTY to throw of tyrannical governments. I just don’t know how much worse it needs to get to become a mainstream idea. Granted half of the American sheeple would be happy with a communist America which is why secession is preferable to revolution. Let the sheeple have their own hell hole.

    And for the Trumpians, he will NOT restore constitutional limits to the federal government.

  32. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    If Stalina is crowned supreme dictator, there is nothing left of the United States. The Supreme Court will be packed in a last extinguishment of any paper opposition.God will turn his back on this land and curse it. The Soviets after they murdered a quarter billion, had a culture of bemusement at the corruption and lies, the smoldering embers of the US will not even be allowed that.

  33. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    2024 when Stalina’s animated corpse steps aside for the next Democrat – a Muslim, or homosexual, transgendered Mexican… Yeah.. Constitutions, Christians and “white guys” are going to stage a comeback then..

    Cowards, fools, sloths, Acedia and vainglory – you created this.

  34. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    The FEMA Camps will be short stay.. don’t worry about forwarding your mail

  35. TrojanMan says:

    However you need to justify Trumps defeat. If you voted for Trump in the primary you need only look in the mirror to find the cause of a president Hillary.

  36. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    I live in the peoples new palestine of NY – I am a christian with traditional views – my vote doesn’t matter here

  37. Fiberal says:

    Fine. Go start a third party. Whose stopping you?

    Rucker’s blase’ thesis presupposes a democratic future; which is to say that this election is not entirely pivotal.

    Get a clue. There just aren’t the numbers. Any party, calling itself conservative or otherwise, might squirm and twist out of the collectivist destruction about to ensue, but will not have a future in the new demographic.

    Without the exit strategy that Trump now proposes, the US faces a post-election onrush toward an definitively-changed American population.

    The new-age of open borders, driven by the foreign-owned Hiliary presidency and a SCOTUS intent on on a progressive agenda, will become an entitlement haven for the entire middle-east, Mexico and South America – even as the tax base continues to erode.

    There is no discussion or thought about the carrying-capacity of the US.

    The morbid absence of this, as liberals tirelessly continue to point to the “hypocrisy” of an open border between the US and Canada – with a straight face.

    And BTW keep in mind that the IRS has been, and is today, extremely effective in suppressing the voice of 503 (c) (3) organizations; a small, sharp taste of the coming government-backed power to silence, that Hilary is salivating to get her claws into.

    Rucker is delusional; this time there’s no “temporarily empowerment” (sic) of Democrats.

    Once they’re empowered in November, they’re in for good.

    That’s it for America.

    So do yourself a bigger favor than picketing for a new conservative party. You had your chance with the Tea Party. But apparently, the allure of flat-screens, sports talk, Slurpies, Tramp Stamps and cigarettes was just too appealing.

    My suggestion now is to go to night school and learn how to speak the gibberish babbled by your brand new neighbors. You’ll get along better.

    But while you can, by all means have a party. And talk among yourselves about how wise, distinct and socially-pure you were while the enemy at the gate voted en masse for Clinton.

    Your daughters will thank you through their hijabs for maintaining your principles.

  38. TrojanMan says:

    ” I am a christian with traditional views” Ditto

    Move… I did. I lived in the people’s republic of Illinois until i got tired of living in the shadow of the Chicago democrat machine which dominates the entire state. I thought Texas would be the last best hope for freedom among the states. I still think it will be.

  39. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    A Stalina coronation will see Texas ceded back to Mexico. Hungary and Poland are shaping up to be the last bastions of Western Christianity. Christian Europeans are fleeing there., Christian Americans may soon too.

    I have no intention of staying here, but I have a elderly parent that lives here and cannot leave now.

  40. Dale McNamee says:

    I’m voting for Tom Hoefling ( ) for President…

    I’ve read his platform and his philosophy of governing and I agree with him !

  41. Alphamail says:

    That wouldn’t happen if you stood up to tyranny and voted for THE person who can beat Hillary, but you have such lust for revolution and blood, and you have zero regard on what that means to our families and neighborhoods, and you have such a mercenary attitude about whether Hillary is elected and what she would reap on our nation, you are disgusting. How in God’s name, with the people Trump has around him now could he hurt a frickin’ horse fly? So a progressive bitch who allows our men to be slaughtered in Benghazi is your default choice against a big ego who is accused of unproven groping charges?

  42. Alphamail says:

    You’re a real bigshot when you put this website at risk…You only think of yourself and all you do is want to shoot someone to orgasm over your demented romantic sense of combat. The progressives you want to confront are mostly low-information families in American’s neighborhoods who don’t know Biden from Ryan, and have been too busy living their lives and taking care of their children, that they think Hillary is a saint. You need to seriously consider that your irresponsible dangerous rhetoric is now totally inappropriate.

  43. Alphamail says:

    I’ve told you three times that I didn’t vote for Trump and hardly like him – he is a long-term benign candidate compared to your default choice who has killed our men in Benghazi and uses your tax dollars to slaughter babies and sell their body parts – and you believe Trump is worse than that. You don’t have the ability to differ good from evil – and your constant harping on combat and revolution prove it.

  44. TrojanMan says:

    You think Trump is benign?!?!?

    My default choice? You mean Evan or Darrell, those are my default choices.

    I am not harping on combat and revolution. I am harping on secession. If it brings combat that i cannot help if the Feds won’t let us leave in peace.

    I’m starting to think you are a rebranded KanklesWorth. Kankles is that you?

    Go vote Trump and be well.

  45. Alphamail says:

    How many phony rationalizations do you have to keep turning to, to ignore Hillary’s support of BLM, her passion for Muslim refugees and open borders, and her disdain for our military men and women, Elections can turn on ONE vote, but you offer zero support in defeating her. Votes don’t matter? That’s the BS lie you keep telling yourself so you can usher in revolution. With Trump revolution is impossible because you will keep all the rights you have and even gain back the ones you’ve lost. It’s a hard climb but we CAN get America headed in the right direction, but NOT if people keep focusing on Trump’s groping instead of Hillary’s corruption and felonies..

  46. TrojanMan says:

    Justify voting for Trump however you need to. Go do what you must as will I. Thank you for your kind words. I will treasure them always.

  47. Alphamail says:

    Jesus Christ is Lord not you. Three sentences and three declarations that you state as FINALITY. Who makes you the foreseer of our fate? That’s arrogance bordering on insanity and that’s the danger you pose – nothing comes true in the future unless you say so………You’ve been doing this for a month and so has Torcer. Do you ever use the words “if” and “maybe?” ……NOT

  48. Alphamail says:

    it’s not disrespect its the obvious truth..
    As a cop you understand that emotions can block reason, and you are so full of hate you have lost contact with logic and reason…… I’ll put it another way.
    The 101st Airborne was surrounded by Germans and were about to be slaughtered. Patton was leaving Italy with his tank battalions and had 3 days to cross France. As they were leaving, one battalion drove the opposite way. Patton screamed at the battalion commander and said, “What are you doing, we can’t win this without you – this is survival – that entire group of men will die if you can’t help us.” Can’t do it,” the commander said. “Why not?” said Patton.
    “Because we’re #NeverEisenhower,” he said.

  49. Alphamail says:

    You say you aren’t helping Hillary when you don’t vote for Trump. But you’re withholding votes instead of adding votes – it’s called math 101 – where is your logic? FYI – Evan McMullin worked in the Middle East with the UN to help Muslim refugees get into America – but I guess that’s not as bad as allegations of fondling…………when you’re scraping the bottom of the common sense barrel.

  50. Alphamail says:

    Cops, admirals and generals, Border Patrol, ICE, Focus on the Family, pro-life groups, the NRA, etc. support Trump…………..George Soros, Mikey Weinstein, De Blasio, Pelosi, Al Gore, Margaret Sanger (she’s dead but still voting), Bill Ayers, Don Lemon, Ariana Huffington, Barney Frank, Malik Zulu Shabazz, and #NeverTrump (by default) are voting for Hillary.

  51. TheBulletproofPatriot says:

    So, Rucker has proposed a solution. What is yours?

  52. TheBulletproofPatriot says:

    Funny how people like me, who have been warning against Trump since the beginning (because of his inability to win and not being a conservative) are suddenly at fault for Trump’s inability to win.

  53. TheBulletproofPatriot says:

    Bravo. Rucker is absolutely correct in this argument. Playing the long game is something conservatives should have been doing for decades rather than focusing on which 9 foot tall steaming pile of shit to vote for that will save us from the 10 foot tall steaming pile of shit.

  54. Dean Johnson says:

    I’m done with my so called republican and GOP’s! At least I can vote the Constitution Party and keep a very clean conscience so I can wake up each morning without shame!

  55. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    Looks like we can all agree that we hate loathe and despise Paul Ryan. Anyone in WI D1 PLEASE vote for his D opponent Ryan Solen!


  56. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    His solution is simple: Vote Trump and live to fight another day.
    I figured it out without any help, btw.


  57. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    Let us know how well that worked out in Venezuela.
    Once Hitlery is in, Game Over.


  58. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    Beats voting for ¡yeb! or Al Sharpton’s friend Rand Paul. Or the traitor K-sick. The only other candidate worth anything was Ben Carson. Sorry if I’m not a Cruzlim, he the lawyer with the Goldman-Sachs wife.

    Nor do I think any of them would stand up for themselves against the Hitlery machine and the defamations the way Trump is doing.

    The regular R politicians are a pack of dindus, dondus and wondus.


  59. FrozenPatriot says:

    The same was said about Obama 4 and 8 years ago and it’s not game over now. As for Venezuela, the opponents of the ragime don’t possess hundreds of millions of accurate, dependable firearms and the best trained warriors the world has ever known. Apples and oranges…

  60. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    Slovakia and the Czech Republic are part of the resistance. If they could bring in Austria they would have a contiguous area and could try to woo Serbia, which hates moslems.

    If only Russia could be convinced that her true enemy is islam rather than her European neighbors. a declining America under Hillary will reduce the power/threat the EU portion of Europe is able to project toward Russia. Maybe a post-Putin Russia, but who knows.. that guy looks like he may live forever.


  61. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:

    Cruz isn’t everything he’s cracked up to be either. Still I’d vote for him, unlike the neverTrumpers who refuse to cut their losses and thus help us prevent even bigger losses ahead.

  62. Alicia Clark says:

    That party already exists: the Constitution Party, Darrell Castle.

  63. Alicia Clark says:

    I voted for Baldwin/Castle in 2008, and I’ll be voting for Castle/Bradley this year!

  64. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    Add Mumia, the Philly cop killer who I will bet the house will be pardoned by the Usurper-in-Chief, supports Hitlery as does all of BLM, la raza, CAIR and the moslem brotherhood. Given Hitlery’s state of health it is a sure bet that Huma Abedin will be running the show for her and we all know what that means. Judging by the Wikileaks emails, Huma has a far better grip n reality and how things play than Hitlery. I find the idea of MB scion Huma Abedin being at the levers of power frigthening.

    But Ok you guys keep voting for the freaky fringers and let Hitlery get in.

    We all have held out noses for some God-awful POSs in the past and now we are our of sorts over Trump.. truly sad because I honestly believe he loves America and is trying.

    And he isn’t getting much help..


  65. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    So whom do you suggest should run against Hitlery in 2020 with a chance to beat her, who would vote for this person and where do the necessary votes come from?

    We KNOW that Cuckgress and the Senate haven’t done squat to stop Obama and even the the Gopers stay in the majority won’t do much to stop Hitlery. It doesn’t matter who wins either house is what i am getting at. Harry Reid is already making noise about eliminating the 60 vote rule if they take the Senate. Only Trump and his veto would stand in Harry’s way against massive Amnesty and entitlements for these newcomers. Besides, a Trump surging for a win might help a couple of people down ballot and thus chances are better the keep the Senate.

    Watch both houses suddenly grow a set if Trump is President btw..


  66. EVERYDAY PRESIDENT ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:


    Maybe he will maybe he won’t. He is a temporary bulwark against the forces of evil and will give people the time to prepare to fight another day.

    At the very least we won’t be seeing undocumented democrats obtaining citizenships and the right to vote.

    And we will see fewer illegals pouring in.


  67. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    With a Stalina coronation in America, God turns his back on this land and curses it and all of us who live here.

    Far more worrisome than a declining America, it will be a nuclear armed menace suffering terminal schizophrenic corruption. A rabid nuclear power, addicted to unsustainable debt, a worthless fiat currency and chaired by a murderous dictator who burned Christian children alive at Waco – The shining city on the hill is now a citadel of unchecked luciferians.

  68. Fiberal says:

    Take yourself out of the conversation for starters.

  69. Fiberal says:

    As I said below, I’m guessing that your daughters will thank you through their hijabs for maintaining your principles.

    Let me rephrase that:….. “principles”.

  70. TrojanMan says:

    Ahhh alpha/everyday etc is using multiple accounts. My guess is he is Krinkles.

  71. Fiberal says:

    Now we know how exceptional you are.

  72. TrojanMan says:

    You have an amazing ability to see into people’s minds through the internet. Perhaps you should join the physic friends krinkles.

  73. Artfuldgr says:

    given that i was one of the founders of MGTOW that is still going as a movement, let me say that you dont want to find out how small your representation is by breaking off and becoming your own party… sorry, but conservatives have been absent other than whiniing for about 50 years letting all things go and slide and to tell you the truth, its a party much like the old men at the end of wwii in germany… when they go, its gone… so go ahead… start a party no one will follow because you need young people to carry your banner and you lost young people 30 years ago…

  74. Artfuldgr says:

    they come from the idea that good men do nothing…
    which is what conservatives are
    do nothing good guys… which means nothing… except amoing their own groups where they pat each other on the back for having such great superior morals and ideas, but fail when it comes to insuring those things survive… survive against what? communist feminism, communist unions, the end of the feinstein laws, and more…

    absentee they now want to come back from their vactaion and take up seats they abandoned years ago…

  75. Artfuldgr says:

    The Civilian Inmate Labor Program is a program of the United States Army provided by Army Regulation 210-35 The regulation, first drafted in 1997, underwent a “rapid act revision”

    in January 2005; it provides policy for the creation of labor programs and prison camps on Army installations. The labor would be provided by persons under the supervision of the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

    The regulation also sets forth policy for the creation of prison camps on Army installations. These would be used to keep inmates of the labor programs resident on the installations. In January 2006, Kellogg, Brown and Root reported that they had received a contract from the Department of Homeland Security to expand ICE DRO facilities “in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs.” A February news article comments that the “new programs” mentioned could include the Civilian Inmate Labor Program. ICE has “joint federal facilities” with the Federal Bureau of Prisons

  76. Artfuldgr says:

    given my family has had a lot of experience living through what your talking about, good luck with that dream.. it doesnt work that way… then again, what would YOU do if they sat there with your mom, sis, or wife, and started sniupping their fingers off one knuckle at a time till you complied..

    your a fool if you think you can get around things once its that far gone… they are VERY good at it and have lots of historical precidence to copy from…

  77. Artfuldgr says:

    and with you being up against night vision, spooky or ghostrider, and more… your done before you even started…

  78. Artfuldgr says:

    in russian, a commitee is a soviet…
    and you dont know what he will or wont do..

    you dont even know him…
    all you have is a belief, and are upset others dont believe.

  79. Artfuldgr says:

    no, what he said is he wanted newspapers that lie and put clown faces on images for articles and run 6 page diatribes for one party, to be accontable.. the left twisted it, and because its what you want to hear that validates your hatred of your only candidate, you take the dem position as if it was your own.

  80. Artfuldgr says:

    complaining about red heads shows much naivette as to their historical games.. like Columbus being a red head. isabella a read head. a large portion of the royals are red headed. alexander the great, red headed… lenin – redhead… some US founders like jefferson too.

    more red heads have come close to taking over the world than any others…

    We are used to the abuse of others… which is what makes us so strong and independent… why bother to try to belong when no matter what you do, the others wont let you belong? you become very independent, which they dont like either, but it wins..

    and you dont get that with his red hair, he can never be like anyone else any more than i can with my red hair. we have been ostraicized and hated and negated all our lives byh others, so thats why he is immune to the pc bs… or the slings… he gets them regardless of what he does as i did with my red hair

    ndividuals and families in Britain are targeted for harassment and violence because of their hair colour. In 2003, a 20-year-old was stabbed in the back for “being ginger”. In 2007, a UK woman won an award from a tribunal after being sexually harassed and receiving abuse because of her red hair in the same year, a family in Newcastle upon Tyne, was forced to move twice after being targeted for abuse and hate crime on account of their red hair In May 2009, a schoolboy committed suicide after being bullied for having red hair In 2013, a fourteen-year-old boy in Lincoln had his right arm broken and his head stamped on by three men who attacked him “just because he had red hair”. The three men were subsequently jailed for a combined total of ten years and one month for
    the attack

    This prejudice has been satirised on a number of TV shows. The British comedian Catherine Tate (herself a redhead) appeared as a red-haired character in a running sketch of her series The Catherine Tate Show. The sketch saw fictional character Sandra Kemp, who was forced to seek solace in a refuge for ginger people because she had been ostracised from society.[86] The British comedy Bo’ Selecta! (starring redhead Leigh Francis) featured a spoof documentary which involved a caricature of Mick Hucknall presenting a show in which celebrities (played by themselves) dyed their hair red for a day and went about daily life being insulted by people. (Hucknall, who says that he has repeatedly faced prejudice or been described as ugly on account of his hair colour, argues that Gingerism should be described as a form of racism.[87][88]) Comedian Tim Minchin, himself a redhead, also covered the topic in his song “Prejudice”

    so hating red heads is normal.. and so you wont get far hating them because they already know your not going to like them for their hair… ha ha ha!!!! your insults dont work for the same reason that beating a dead horse dont work!!!!!!!!

  81. Artfuldgr says:

    “NUTS” 🙂

  82. FrozenPatriot says:

    I don’t have any names handy, but it’d better be someone principled with
    a relatively spotless past. The inflated scandal exploitation
    performed by the propaganda machine of the DNC (AKA the media) mixed with egregious flip-flops have
    scuttled the last three RNC candidates. Also, after what happened with Trump thumbing his nose at the party leadership while staging a hostile takeover, expect new rules from the RNC akin to the DNC superdelegates. They’re not going to let this happen again…

  83. FrozenPatriot says:

    Well that’s comforting. No big surprise that it happened during the term of the republigressive GWB.

  84. Artfuldgr says:

    a default choice is what you get when you do nothing, ie. you get hillary.. evan or darrel are not default choices by any definition, and adding “my” to it changes his point by changing it…

  85. Artfuldgr says:

    they would rather live in a hell of their own creation with hillary than be in something less evil with another that others chose

  86. Artfuldgr says:

    so what? you and i are nothings… but i do know that if a million people dont vote, then what? they dont counter a million votes FOR hillary… if they vote against hillary, they negate 1 million hillary votes… if trump loses by a tight margin, you guys will carry the blame because your the minority and the others are a majority who will hate you…

    all your doing is working to be hated..
    if you dont vote hillary, and trump wins, your hated
    if you do vote third party, and trump wins your hated
    if you dont vote trump, and hillary wins your hated
    if you vote third part and hillary wins your hated

    if you at least voted anti hillary, and he lost or won, your not hated by a majority that you would want to create a new party with…

    otherwise your just cranks in a marginal party that cant get any more traction than the CPUSA did when it abandoned running candidates in favor of the democrat positions which they said were indistinguishable from the CPUSA…
    and that was the 1930s. you think you guys wold have done more than almsot nothing since then… reagan was not your tour de force that saved things, that was the people again who stepped foward and put up a candidate that you didnt like then either.. and what happened?

  87. Artfuldgr says:

    you have no idea what he would do… at least i met him several times and know him as a person in some fashion… all you know is that your spouting leftisms choir chant of he made money, he must be one of them.. as if you suddenly change once you make money and get your secret decoder ring..

  88. Artfuldgr says:

    Cruz would hve been destroyed by now, and his wife in a straight jacket as she is too fragile for this kind of game

  89. Artfuldgr says:

    Goldman Sachs AND CFR…

  90. Artfuldgr says:

    same here… but at least i know that any business man who is doing anything here is under the thrall of the council (Soviet) and hates them… want to buiild a building? they control the height, the unions, by extension concrete, by extension permits, and abatements and can order you to give 10 out of 100 luxury units to section 8… yes, welfare get to live in luxry apartments and sit by the pool all day, write graffiti o the walls and chase away your clients.

    and THAT is life in ny real estate under the dem/banking machine of which real estate is not liked the way the old money hated actresses..

  91. Artfuldgr says:

    i would have moved, but me and my indonesian wife are the hated racists who cant get a loan for a home cause i am too pale…

  92. Artfuldgr says:

    texans would take over mexico if that happened… duh

  93. Artfuldgr says:

    Russia is the country that provided weapons in 1919 to ibn al saud… and he took the religious centers and so on…

    ie. russia created the house of saud… and runs the islamics as a group… been that way since before hitler and the grand mufti and even after that…

    study history… then you might not claim that russias enemy is their forward false flag army that will do the damage, get damaged, and leave them to fight in the manner of the old bond blofeld… (see scene with fighting fish)

  94. Artfuldgr says:

    you realize your describing soviet russia…

  95. Artfuldgr says:

    they want hillary so they can feel superior in their misery…

  96. CRC60 says:

    Hands raised.

  97. TrojanMan says:

    Listen, i have always said go vote Trump if you have to.

    “all you have is a belief, and are upset others dont believe.” Likewise. You have faith Trump will do these things… i dont.


  98. TrojanMan says:

    I know the constitutional role of the President. He can do nothing without a willing congress, even if he wanted to do the things he talks about which i think is all a ruse.


  99. Artfuldgr says:

    No Consequences From Media Peers for Reporters Caught Colluding With Hillary

    Colleagues yawn while star reporters like Thrush and Leibovich cooperate with Clinton campaign

  100. Alphamail says:

    Because of his “inability to win” and “not being a conservative”? Wow, are your priorities screwed up…!!!
    Those are your reasons to NOT vote for a candidate who is running against a person who has killed our soldiers and lied about it, supports the dissection and sale of baby parts, supports BLM and George Soros and his financing of thugs who are assassinating cops, and for someone who advocates open borders and a massive increase of 3rd world Muslim refugees, with even more decreased vetting.
    Sounds like the backass #NeverTrump agenda in a nutshell.

  101. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    We would be lucky for it to be merely a Soviet America. Our enemies have had 100 years to perfect their tactics of annihilation against us.

  102. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    Now, now.. you left out the “ethnic considerations,” the special considerations, the monetary considerations. Abatements are not for anyone considered middle class. The middle class must shoulder the burden until their backs break and a person of more favored political status can take their property at a huge discount. NYC is the forefront of the transformed America. Where others fear to imagine, we live and see daily what is in store for the rest of the former nation.

    Building laws are only fro the hoi poloi of unwanted masses and used to drive them out as all laws are.

  103. 762x51 says:

    Put this website at risk from what? From your beloved government? Are you really so stupid that you believe you can obey enough “laws” to placate totalitarians? Are you so ignorant that you cannot comprehend that “laws” today are in fact Rules of Engagement established by the enemy to prevent us from stopping them? Are you such a coward that you are unwilling to do as the founders did and “pledge our lives our fortunes and our sacred honor” to the cause of liberty? You may talk the talk but haven’t a clue how to walk the walk.

    I hear this same BS all the time from every keyboard warrior on the internet. A-holes like you who think they can win this war, that is what it is – a WAR, sitting at a computer in their underwear and denigrating those of us who are actually willing to do what is necessary to free this country from tyranny again. Tyranny that has been allowed to creep into power by impotent cowards such as yourself.

    You have no clue where my sense of combat comes from, jackass. My CQC training after shooting a target involves search and assess and a tactical reload if no threat is found, not orgasm. That is a construct found in the beliefs of the dirty Progressive scum who are the enemy. Proggies always want to tie guns to some weird sexual problem they perceive the gun owner has.

    My “dangerous rhetoric” that you perceive as being :totally inappropriate” is the language of someone who opposes slavery, that is the alternative here , idiot, SLAVERY! How many generations are you willing to consign to SLAVERY in order to avoid “dangerous rhetoric’? Your insistence that we only engage in polite discourse is the irresponsible dangerous rhetoric here. For over century, the timid fools that follow your way have stood by and allowed this disease to grow to the point we are at today.where the enemy is now ready to begin their endgame. We have spotted them 10,000 points, how many more shall we give them?

    Lemme ask you something there “airborne” How far? If you know the answer, then consider this, what you are proposing is that we allow the enemy to fully prepare their battle plan, lay all the infrastructure and position their forces as necessary to implement that battle plan, then that we adhere strictly to the enemy defined RoE thereby ensuring their victory. There is a term for the “strategy” you are proposing, SURRENDER. I know for a fact that they don’t teach that at Ft Benning.

    As I said before, feel free to sit in your hands and simper at the enemy while disparaging “dangerous rhetoric”. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of us are preparing for war. Too bad you weren’t around in 1776 to caution Jefferson and Madison and the boys about dangerous rhetoric, we could just resolve this over a spot of tea.

    Not only are you not a Conservative dedicated to the cause of liberty, you are an enemy collaborator, intent on “turning in” those who would do what you should have done, all in the name of your own special brand of “political correctness”. I was right, you DO stink like a dirty Progressive..

  104. Tom MacDonald says:

    Are you Trumpsters paying ANY attention to what your Dear Leader is saying? He is going to grant illegals AMNESTY. So, your argument that it’s over for us, due to new demographics is nonsense. Of all the Trump supporters I’ve encountered in various comments secrions, I’ve still not seen ONE with any common sense. This election was over when 12 million primary voters decided that a Democrat Con-man, Liar and Fraud was the best idea the GOP had. So, YOU own this loss.

  105. TheBulletproofPatriot says:

    You’re right. Voting for a progressive who can’t win is clearly a much better solution. We’re about to see how well that works out in two weeks.

  106. TheBulletproofPatriot says:

    Once again. Rucker has proposed a solution. You have bitched about it. What is your solution?

  107. TheBulletproofPatriot says:

    Or, vote Trump and be dragged down with the progressive machine as he becomes just the latest dirtbag liberal in office, but does so under the “Republican” banner, thereby destroying any credibility you may have had and rendering you a worthless opposition to the Democrats going forward. I’d much rather retain credibility for when a candidate with a history of conservatism longer than 10 minutes is up for election.

  108. AynRandWasRight says:

    “Vote Trump and live to fight another day”


    “Vote Trump and let the statist onslaught be conducted in your name rather than that of your adversaries.”


  109. SkankHunt42✓ᴰᵉᵖˡᵒʳᵃᵇˡᵉ says:

    yes, because Cruz will surely win after 4 years of thec*ntqueen.

    /sarcasm off

  110. helena handbasket says:

    Yeah, Darrell is surely a firebrand, isn’t he?


  111. helena handbasket says:

    Who said they’re going to call it “conservative”?

  112. helena handbasket says:

    12 million dems may have crossed over to give the R’s tRump as a candidate, that doesn’t mean I have to follow them over the cliff. (They’re not following tRump anymore. It was all Operation Switch and Ditch. They switched registration to vote for the Orange Menace and will now ditch him to vote for Killary.)

  113. helena handbasket says:

    You wanted him; you drag his sorry orange ass over the finish line. I only vote for conservatives, not lifelong libs who needed a different letter to put behind their names because his favorite candidate to donate to already had the “D” after hers.

    Really sick of all the winning, huh? LOL

  114. helena handbasket says:

    “at least i met him several times and know him as a person in some fashion”

    Melania married the boob and then found out his comments before he walked down the aisle, “I’m bored,” “Why am I doing this?” “I doubt this will even work out.”

    What a standup guy! Jsut the kind of righteous dud(e) I want representing my country.

  115. helena handbasket says:

    It tRump’s such a stellar candidate, why isn’t he running away with the whole thing?

  116. H_P says:

    I’ve already joined the Constitution Party this year for the very same reasons listed in this article.

    The problems most populists are concerned with are realizable through a Convention of States, which I support greatly in non-blue states.

  117. Fiberal says:

    Not everyone; just the brain-damaged, the anti-trumpers, the diseased and the haunted.

    Read my post.

    I recommended that you learn a new language in order to get along with your colorful new neighbors.

    Because if you aren’t multilingual, your children will be.

  118. TrojanMan says:

    Trump is so amazing he can turn any state blue… even Texas!

  119. Alphamail says:

    If you actually were in combat I’ll give you credit that these deranged rants of yours are PTSD.
    And to answer your ignorant question in a roundabout way, it is a federal crime punishable by years in federal prison, and fines, to advocate the killing of mass groups of people on the internet – if they want to pursue it. And, the site where that type of Black Lives Matter rhetoric is advocated will automatically be shutdown. So if anyone should ever do something like that here, some responsible person needs to step up and tell the idiot who isn’t thankful for the web platform he’s been given, to STFU.
    Get a clue Mr. Arrogance, if it’s humanly possible!

  120. Alphamail says:

    So your default vote goes to Hillary because you insanely believe 12 million people cro————-JEEZE FORGET IT….I can’t even regurgitate that kind of conspiratorial junk……….Trump draws 10,000 people, Hillary draws 300…Guess they have two more weeks to fake the enthusiasm.

  121. Fiberal says:

    The statist onslaught (whatever you mean by that) is here in any event, and will be intolerable under Clinton, her foreign owners and her SCOTUS lesbian farm.

    So just to be clear, the fear of Trump turning to some improbable liberal policies, against what he has been promulgating, esp with respect to the SCOTUS, hinges on your certainty that he is a liar and will act on heretofore undefined liberal initiatives.

    And this conjectural certainty of yours outweighs the absolute certainty of Clinton’s maniacal destruction of the U.S.?

    Or do you just not understand the problem?

  122. Alphamail says:

    You really are Hell in a Handbasket. I didn’t vote for Trump and don’t even think he’s the best candidate Repubs could put forth…but you obviously don’t know who he has surrounded himself with now, or you don’t have a clue what kind of person your default vote is supporting.
    You are spewing pure conjecture on who Trump is – contrary to everything he is advocating, versus the greatest REAL THREAT that America has ever seen.
    What Trump MIGHT BE versus what Hillary IS. Go figure.

  123. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    Excellent article. We tried for good governance for decades, and it’s clearly only the nuclear option will suffice. #GOPXIT!

  124. Fiberal says:

    Sounds like you have your hands full.

  125. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    Young people were with Sanders on the left and Cruz on the right. Actually, the old boomers that are dying off are Trumps base. The stench of trump is generational and the GOP owns it. Besides, I would rather have an opportunity for real change advancing foundational principles than bleeding out under the current uniparty facade.

  126. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    You got conned by the Don. Blame yourself.

  127. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    Trump is every bit the danger she is and antithetical to every principle I claimed to have. Conservatives might as well slit their own wrists voting for sleazydonald.

  128. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    I hope my nevertrump vote ensures he never leads the free world. Nevertrump are exactly the type of Patriots needed to advance foundational principles. Hold your nose trumpers are scared, obedient party slaves.

  129. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    Donald Trump will not be President. Get your Sean Hannity tough guy act out of here.

  130. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    Umm, that is not his solution. Trumpism is a cancer and it will be purged.

  131. Stagester says:

    Why then are they going to get less than they did last election and aren’t even on the same number of state’s ballots? The Constitution Party is a failure. Come on board with someone that has it together.

  132. Stagester says:

    #1 Trump is going to lose HUUUGEELY
    #2 Trump is a waste of air
    #3 Trump won’t stop anything (see #1)
    #4 The Establishment has won the GOP
    #5 There is no other way forward than a 3rd party

  133. Stagester says:

    They don’t that’s the problem.

  134. Stagester says:

    There is a 3rd stay home. This isn’t a choice between two evils you can always stay home. Better of two evils is still evil. Time for a change. Remember what Einstein said. Keep doing the same thing expecting different results make you a fool. Stop being foolish. Trump isn’t winning anyway.

  135. Stagester says:

    Not Trump. Who knows if she even makes it through her term. It’s you Trumpets who put her in now we all have to live with it.

  136. Alphamail says:

    Again, Trump is now surrounded by a good number of real conservatives;:The Family Research Council, Franklin Graham, the NRA, the national Fraternal Order of Police, ICE, the Border Patrol, black ministers, pro-life groups, et al, ad infinitum, etc., and so on, and he is for a Border wall, a moratorium on Muslim immigration, and is for stopping unrestricted 3rd world immigration.
    Hillary wants YOUR money to pay for Planned Parenthood and the slaughter of babies and the dissection and selling of their bodies to sell their brains and eyes; she calls half of Trump supporters deplorable at the same time she says she dislikes Catholics and says Christians basically believe in a myth; she supports open borders and Huma Abedin and the Muslim Brotherhood and has said in certain situations Sharia law could be used in American courts. Sharia allows the rape of the wife, the killing of their children for the sake of honor, sex with children as young as five or six, and the raping of infidels; and Hillary says she will put gays on the Supreme Court and we “need to get used to it.” Homosexuals in America already hold higher legal status than Christians and are suing Christian businesses right and left (and winning) and while Christians are on the verge of being jailed for saying “faggot,” the left is now offering up the idea that we need to legally ban the word “Amen” as homophobic.
    Hillary will take your guns away, Trump is pro 2nd Amendment. Hillary is pro-Common Core – the Marxist central government approach to educating our kids – Trump is against it. Hillary is for a carbon tax to support phony global warning – Trump is against it. Trump is pro-police – Hillary supports Black Lives Matter when one of her main supporters, George Soros, is paying hourly wages to BLM protestors and rioters when they confront our police. Hillary is for NAFTA and continuing our trade deficits with China – Trump will renegotiate NAFTA and lower the Corporate Tax rate to help small businesses. Hillary will raise your taxes – Trump will revamp the IRS and lower your taxes. Hillary will re-structure Obamacare – Trump will abolish it. Hillary believes the VA is fine and only needs a little tweaking -Trump says it is broken and it needs to be fixed because our vets are not being properly cared for and vets are dying as a result.
    Hey, I could go on for 15 more minutes – the bottom line is you don’t have a clue and you drank the DNC and #NeverTrump Kool-Aid, and your default vote for Hillary – by not voting for Trump – is in FULL SUPPORT of the orange pants suit daughter of Satan and what I just wrote. You are conservative you say? What you are is a low-information uncaring irresponsible voter who – by not voting – supports a new Marxist government.

  137. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    I know who Hillary and her donor are. Hitching your wagon to sleazydonald has damaged the witness of the church and any other organization engaging in moral relativism because of an R. Trumps a big government liberal that doesn’t know what the heck he’s doing.His scampaign is over and those that didn’t/don’t repudiate him have likely cost us the Senate.
    How much has to be destroyed for you to stop pushing trumpski?

    Trump called for 45% tariffs and defaulting on our debt. That means a worldwide economic spare me anything about Hillary because trump is batshit crazy and my chess vote would actually be for her.

  138. Fiberal says:

    I would like to do just that, but you need so much correcting that I just can’t.

    Tell the truth here: you will be long gone from this site once DTrump wins.


    Your “priinciples” will require it.

  139. EX-GOPJohnt says:

    Put on your big boy pants and dump trump. We don’t play for team trump and the alt-right deplorables. I thought trumpers liked conspiracy theories..his scorched earth campaign certainly had no problem attacking the character of other candidates.
    I am hearing trump has Alzheimers. People are saying it.

  140. 762x51 says:

    Oh dear, years in “federal prison” ? LOL! What part of I will not surrender did you not understand?

    See what I mean? You think that kind of “law” isn’t there to shut down resistance to them? What you are selling is the same crapola that the Hajjis sell when they say we can’t attack their Mosque’s when that is where they meet to plan, coordinate, arm, store weapons and carry out attacks against us.

    Since you mentioned BLM as a comparison to me, tell me genius, when has your beloved government taken even a single step against that group? They march in the streets of NYC chanting about killing cops, has ANY of them been arrested? Yet, WE can’t say anything against them, oh no, that would be wrong. You are insisting we comply with totalitarianism, dumbass. evidently you like being a slave, I don’t. So stay safe and sit back and watch civilization die under the totalitarian dictatorship you so fear. The non-cowards will be out opposing it while you sit on your couch watching NFL thugball and eating Cheetos.

  141. Alphamail says:

    “Spare you anything about Hillary ?”
    And you say Donald has damaged the witness of the church? How? Is that why The Family Research Council, Franklin Graham (Billy Graham’s son), a growing number of black ministers, pro-life groups, and his evangelical running mate Mike Pence support Trump?
    Hillary and her Marxist party is TAKING AWAY your witness as we speak…! In four years you won’t have a damn witness OR a church to go to, and the REAL church – the Body of Christ – will be persecuted and imprisoned, or worse.
    If Le Pen wins in France, she says she will outlaw Christianity in France – Hillary is worse. Did you hear what I just said? Hillary is WORSE.

  142. Alphamail says:

    ALERT: For all you idiots who didn’t get the reason behind this particular comment – it was posted explicitly to HELP 762×51 and deflect backlash on Dave….and the puss bag that is 762×51 is too stupid to see the help, and appreciate it, All of you are sending in comments without understanding why it was written.

  143. Alphamail says:

    I protected your fucking butt from your original criminal post that Dave had to delete and I wrote a deflecting innocuous comment that I am taking heat for now from everyone – including from your thankless and virtually clueless ass. Your sordid megalomaniac dreams don’t allow you to see what is going on right in front of your face.

  144. Jake_Arr says:

    I am an independent conservative since the Republicrats left me. I eagerly await a new constitutional conservative party (by whatever name is chosen) after the coming shit storm clears. The GOP has been polluted and mutated as noted in the above well written article. I will be voting my conscience this year and let the chips fall where they may.

  145. Alphamail says:

    To add to what I’ve already said:
    We need to make a truce, and you would be blessed by God to make a truce with yourself. IMHO it would be a blessing to you, to go back to old times when you were pleasant and probably a great and wonderful guy to have a beer with, and you didn’t carry the weight of being angry with nearly every outside force over which you have no control. If you are realistically bent on having a duel, I will fly to wherever you live and meet you by this coming weekend…! My rules are, that we duel over who can drink – weapon free – the most beer in a couple of hours (if I lose at least I’m not dead).
    You don’t know who I am, but you need to know that almost no human being alive has done what I have experienced in over 70 years and who has the accumulated knowledge exclusive of books. I appreciate your desire to live your dreams vicariously if you didn’t have the opportunity to actually live them in reality, and it would be a joy to share them with you over a beer so you could experience the real joy of what they would have been like.
    I am obviously reaching out to you, to abandon your staunch position on how bad America is, and to remember the love you had for just living a carefree life as a kid, and to remember it’s really the same place, except that it’s chalk full of corrupt politicians who are failing at their jobs and have forgotten to serve us, but who would be easy to replace if we reduced the vitriol and worked together..
    That’s my comment – take it or leave it – and if you don’t like it we’re back to square one…..if you hear me we can eventually get together on ways to solve our nation’s problems without blowing up the damn place.

  146. Fiberal says:

    I understand.
    You use the word “conscience” to cover for your inability to comprehend.

    “Voting my conscience” sounds ever so lofty. So heroic in the face of overwhelming adversity.

    And my goodness! the strength to “let the chips fall where they may” —That’s so absolutely ……what?…..Churchillian!

    However, it is also an immutable rule of societies, that those who cannot exercise their free will to think, must accept the terms demanded by those in power, regardless.

    Congratulations. You don’t choose to be a moralist; you choose to be irrelevant.

  147. 762x51 says:

    Right so lets all just surrender and be slaves, sounds like a plan – FOR FAILURE!

    LMAO!! Do you have any idea what it takes to get a Spectre gunship off the ground? Besides the air crew there are mechanics, armors, loaders, fuelers, ATC. It also requires JTAC on the ground in the target vicinity to lay down effective fire then there is that issue of “collateral damage” that your boy Betamale is all squeamish about. Point being ALL of those groups would have to be willing to abandon their oath to the Constitution in order to get one in the air. Any group refuses, the ship stays on the ground. Additionally, the instant the government uses a weapon like that on American citizens, they will lose.

    Also, what makes you think I don’t have night vision?

  148. 762x51 says:

    I hope he is doing that, 2018 is a loooooonnnnggg way off. Al lot of people are going die before we get there so an exit plan will be a necessity by then.

  149. 762x51 says:

    Let’s see, those same people have had 50 to 100 years to fight against and prepare for what is happening now. What makes you think they will do what they should have been doing for several generations in the next four years?

  150. 762x51 says:

    Could be, but more likely Fibtard is jerkles. Both are arrogant little cowards who fancy themselves better than everyone else. Plus Fibtard disappeared about the time jerkles appeared.

  151. TrojanMan says:

    An annoying troll like Krinkles would not just simply walk away. I think his stench still permeates this site.

  152. 762x51 says:

    AWWW, did you whine and snivel and moan until you got it deleted? Aren’t you a good little Nazi? Or is it you are offended because it was directed at Progressives of which you are a clear collaborator?

    I see that list of forbidden words and phrases is growing ever larger under Progressive control as predicted, just like NewSpeak, the language gets smaller every day. Your special brand of political correctness stinks just as much as Hillary’s breath.

    Now about this “puss bag” business. I don’t suppose you have the courage to prove that statement, none of the other Trumpanzee have any, just like your cult leader.

    Better get teacher to delete this post as well, we all know you need someone else to fight your battles for you, coward.

  153. 762x51 says:

    So I posted something the other day, probably been deleted because the Progressive vermin can’t handle me any other way, but I used IL as an example. How Chicago is HATED there by the “downstate” residents and that there has been a sentiment there for years to kick Chicago out of the state.

    Can you corroborate that?

  154. 762x51 says:

    “Sorry if I’m not a Cruzlim, he the lawyer with the Goldman-Sachs wife.”

    tRumpoid – he da candidate wit da Goldman-Sachs Campaign Finance Chairman. LMFAO!

  155. 762x51 says:

    Well that and their collaboration with 12,000,000 Democrats who voted for tRump in the primaries. Unless they want to claim those Dems were voting for Cruz, LOL.

    Without those Democrat votes, tRump would have finished behind Rubio, how funny is that?

  156. 762x51 says:

    Exactly, tRump supporters created this entire mess.

  157. 762x51 says:

    tRump is all of that, just like Hillary. Imbecile.

  158. 762x51 says:


    tRump the messiah, LMFAO!

    Let’s see if you can grasp some basic numbers, dimwit.

    General election voter turn out:
    2000 – 54.2%
    2004 – 60.4%
    2008 – 62.3% 131,000,000 voters
    2012 – 57.5% 126,000,000 voters

    Out of ~227M eligible voters only 126M voted. What that means is that 93,000,000 eligible voters did not not vote in 2012. Most of them were Republicans turned off by the Progressive Mitt(ens) Romney. we know that because the Democrat candidate (Obama) won, because Progressives in the Republican Party nominated a Progressive candidate, just like they did in 2008 when the progressive John McCain lost to Obama the first time.

    Romney lost to Obama in 2012 47.2% to 51.1% or 61M votes to 66M votes. In order to win Ronmey would have needed about 5% more votes or 6.3M.

    Currently your brilliant pick for GOP nominee is losing to the worst candidate to run for office in history by 5.1% in the RCP average.

    Averages are what smart people use to get a clearer picture of reality. It’s too complicated for you to understand just know they give a better picture of what is really happening.

    So if the voter turnout remains around 126M as it was in 2012 AND your boy needs MORE than Romney, say around 6% for a photo finish, he will need at least 7,500,000 votes, not one or two million.

    This election was lost the day you vermin forced tRump on everyone else but then Progressives never can take responsibility for their actions.

    BetaMale, professional tRump toady.

  159. 762x51 says:

    Unlike your cherry picked poll, here is an average. Only smart people use them so I understand how you could have missed it.

  160. 762x51 says:

    Asking Progressives to take personal responsibility for their actions is pointless. They have been gearing up to blame everyone but themselves for months now. A clear demonstration of their lack of character and personal ethics.

  161. 762x51 says:

    Why ask? Surely a professional phony like yourself knows off the top of your head?

    Being an unprincipled douche, you cannot possible grasp our reasons for not supporting your idol. Give up, it simply is beyond your unscrupulous character to fathom.

  162. 762x51 says:

    You can’t because it goes against your agenda and Progressives ALWAYS advance the agenda, even when reality says otherwise, LMFAO!

    If tRump draws so much more than Hillary, the election should be a piece of cake so why don’t you stop annoying people with your crap? Oh wait, i know, as a Progressive, you like to have it both ways and as a fascist, who demands others only do and say as you approve, you cannot resist forcing yourself on everyone else. Good thing you do it from behind a keyboard, in person, you wouldn’t stand a chance.

  163. 762x51 says:

    Umm, stupid, tRump already reneged on all that crap as Blount has documented here. The NRA a conservative group?!? LMFAO, you are a true dupe or a true believer in the Progressive agenda. The NRA has sold gun owners down the river more timers than I can count, idiot.

    Your cult leader IS Hillary, only he looks better in a pants suit, LMAO!

  164. 762x51 says:

    10 mijnutes? Has it been that long? My how time flies.

    Seems like only last year he was pro-abortion and just three years ago he was funding the Gang of Eight Amnesty.

    Wait . . .

    What you are describing is judging a politician by his ACTIONS not his WORDS. That is what smart people do and tRumps actions are anything but conservative. So we can either take his actions for the last half century or his word for the last year, they lead to two entirely different pictures..

  165. TrojanMan says:

    Yes I can. I was born and raised in “downstate” Illinois. We always loathed Chicago. There is a huge desire to kick Chitcago out of Illinois. We were just tax slaves to the Chicago machine. Once they wanted to raise taxes state wide to pay for Chicago transit. People of southern Illinois rarely go to Chicago let alone use it’s transit system. I was in my low 20’s before i went to Chicago for the first time living in the state my entire life up until 2.5 years ago. Springfield might be the capital but the state is run from Chicago. There is such a disconnect from the hard working farm communities south of I80 vs Chicago. Never forget to separate Chicago from Illinois when speaking ill of it. Outside of Chicago the rest of the state is mostly filled with red blooded american patriots. I still have most of my family enslaved there and have been trying to get them to escape to no avail thus far.

  166. 762x51 says:

    “The statist onslaught (whatever you mean by that) “? SO Fibtard, is it that you are too stupid to understand the expression or you are an enemy collaborator onboard with the statist onslaught?

    Tough call, ordinarily I would go with you are too stupid to understand the expression. But since you are a proven enemy collaborator, I guess we know the answer.

    Or do you just not understand the problem? LMAO!

  167. 762x51 says:

    Oh Fibtard is the original Trumpanzee. He started pushing non-tRump supporters around here at MB months ago before the hordes of tRump swine invaded. I scared him off and he has been hiding ever since until two days ago. He can dish it out but can’t take it and is too much of a coward to do anything about it in the real world.

    Feel free to abuse him as much as you want, he deserves a all of it.

  168. 762x51 says:

    Why don’t you, coward?

  169. 762x51 says:

    I thought it was spelled YUUUUGGGELY? But then,I don’t speak NY Progressive, I just lead them to the left one or two wind dots.

  170. 762x51 says:

    Sounds like you have your mouth full.

  171. 762x51 says:

    Now we know how exceptional you aren’t.

  172. 762x51 says:

    Yeah, not like other great orators, tRump, Obama, Hitler . . .

  173. TrojanMan says:

    “but you need to know that almost no human being alive has done what I have experienced in over 70 years and who has the accumulated knowledge exclusive of books.”

    Hubris, arrogance, conceit, haughtiness, hauteur, pride, self-importance, egotism, pomposity.

    Age does not equate to wisdom.

  174. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    Wow.. just wow. No point in even discussing this with you.

  175. 762x51 says:

    Oh BS, you were all butt hurt because I was advocating attacking Progressives, there was nothing protective or innocuous about it. You don’t like the push back you have gotten, too bad, so sad, I don’t care.

    You see a call to arms for liberty from oppression as sordid ans can only salve your ego by labeling me as a “megalomaniac” when I have never, ever even remotely suggested any of this benefit me in any way other than to re-institute the Constitution and liberty. That is a strawman argument, a favorite of Progressives everywhere. If you think those same things aren’t being said all over the Internet you are even more ignorant than I thought.

    I have talked to thousands of people during the last five to ten years. Ten years ago, when I mentioned the possibility of civil war, most were kind of like, they could see a possibility of it but didn’t really think it was going to happen. Today, the reaction is almost universally a nod that it is happening now. Even her, I have talked of it and warned of it almost daily for that same nine or ten years and the reaction was the same. Many don’t say it, but they absolutely believe it. You, as an enemy collaborator, hate that I am saying it because it brings it to everyone’s attention. You must control what I say in order to control me.

    Dave didn’t delete the post, incidentally, you liar, but your whining got the words you didn’t like deleted, good little fascist that you are.

  176. 762x51 says:

    Oh, I should abandon MY position? How about you abandon your position? My position is not that America is bad, idiot, it is that it is occupied by an enemy force. The enemy in Anbar Province or the Hindu-Kush can wait, we are essentially killing the wrong enemy today. That is how you win wars, by killing the enemy.

    I don’t give a crap about what you claim to have seen or done, I have seen and done for myself, so thanks anyway. We cannot “work together” because you are going in the wrong direction.

    Progressives always pull this crap, you push, gain a little then claim you want to make peace. Later, of course, you will push again, gain a little more ground then claim you want to make peace. That is how Progressives have wormed their way to the point where we will have to blast them out. Totalitarianism can only be defeated by force of arms, it cannot be voted out of power. Making peace with the enemy is not my way. I will not live on my knees in tRumps authoritarian dictatorship any more than I will in Hillary’s. You wanted a war, you got one.

  177. 762x51 says:

    Exactly right again, which leaves only civil war, what I have been telling you for almost ten years. Shallow learning you have there.

  178. 762x51 says:

    So when your parents told you that you could be anything you wanted to be, you choose A-hole?


  179. THOUGHTCRIMINAL2084 says:

    Guerilla War, if it is to survive. Civil War II with standing armies will be over in a week

  180. 762x51 says:

    tRump was ALWAYS on board with amnesty ever since he funded the Gang of Eight Amnesty Bill. Trumpanzees are people who believe a politicains word, not their actions, stupid, huh?

    tRump has, in fact, walked away from every position he started from, thereby negating his entire candidacy. They own this loss alright, lock, stock and barrel.

  181. Alphamail says:

    It isn’t ego, it just happens to be things that I have done – no big deal. But every single one of my friends and family have pushed me for years to write a book about my life. I laughed at first, because I’m nobody special and I may even screw up more than you do. But I can’t run away from my lifelong curiosity and all the things I have done, and I look around it’s amazing that what I just felt at the time was a normal life has turned out to be about three lives in one. When I was about 7 years old, another boy 11 years old died while saving my life. After that I decided to try and live one life for both of us, and whoever hears my complete life story usually says I have done it for five people. My life is lived nearly ego free because God is my Father and to be arrogant or prideful desecrates the gift he gave me at the expense of another human being, and any haughtiness or conceit is impossible for me because any behavior like that would dishonor a young boy who gave away his life so I could live my life. So you have no clue who I am, and it is obviously impossible for you to believe I can say those nonchalantly as just a matter-of-fact without ego, but I’m not ‘allowed’ to. I don’t usually ever say it in the manner I said it to you, but I said it with anger in your case because you and Captain 762xLoonyTunes are about the most belligerent off-the-rails duo in web history and you are NEVER wrong – predicting this-and-that as if you were God Himself. You two are condescending, thankless, arrogant, and foul-mouthed jerks to people, and that’s just when they have an opinion – when they disagree with you – you two become complete a**holes. When you act like other people don’t deserve an opinion, and you scoff at them because you know what is going to happen ahead of time, and then you try that BS on me – good luck – I don’t get pompous, I just tell you the simple truth. Between you and 762xBB-gun and the wholly unethical Torcer, I’ll save my responses to genuine caring people from now on.

  182. TrojanMan says:

    Thank you for the kind words KirklesWorth.

  183. 762x51 says:

    Not every one is a gutless coward like you Fibtard. We will fight, you haven’t the courage to even comprehend the subject, little man.

  184. […] The GOP needs competition, not revival […]

  185. BikerHoop says:

    … those who cannot exercise their free will to think, must accept the terms demanded by those in power, regardless.

    Yessiree. Consequently we have the drones supporting Hillary Trump and Donald Clinton.

  186. […] at Moonbattery, Dave Blount was kind enough to post an article I wrote about the new party. In it, I detail why […]

  187. TXGRunner says:

    The term “conservative” has lost all meaning. We have compassionate conservatives, kinder gentler conservatives, neo-conservatives, paleo-conservatives, common-sense conservatives, and constitutional conservatives. I read an article the other day where the author claimed to be a progressive conservative?!?! What is that?

    We cannot conserve what no longer exists. If Burke sought to conserve the traditional ways and resist the tide of the radicals, can we agree the radicals from Rousseau to Jefferson to Marx to Wilson to Roosevelt to Obama to Clinton finally won?

    John Adams argued in his A Defence of Constitutions (written before our Constitutional Convention), mankind is intrinsically predisposed to become corrupt, greedy, and authoritarian. Therefore, the only solution for self-government guaranteeing liberty under the law is to divide the power.

    Federalism works because power is divided, dispersed, and balanced between branches and between the federal and state governments. Therein lies the failure of how we ended up here — we lost our balance of powers when the federal government used tax money to “buy” the states acceptance of federal expansion. Similarly, an expansive executive bureaucracy relieved congress of accountability for new regulations (backdoor legislation) and the increasingly powerful executive used patronage and favors to buy the acquiescence of members of congress.

    Fortunately, Adams offers us the way forward: re-establish proper balance of powers.

    This is an easy sell to those who’ve never read Locke, Burke, Adams, or Bastiat: “power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Everyone sees this in their life, every day. If the goal is to end duplicity, corruption, cronyism, corporatism, and get the money out of politics, the solution is to divide and disperse the power. Balancing one power against another is the check on corruption we seek. That is federalism.

    In lieu of “conserving,” we need to establish a proper balance of powers using the federalist approach.

    Therefore, I am a federalist. I look for new party built upon the federalist philosophy with the prime directive of establishing divided and balanced political powers to secure our “unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”

  188. AynRandWasRight says:

    I understand that I just watched an ad with Trump’s idiot daughter advocating GOVERNMENT MANDATED paid maternity leave. And I’ve heard Trump himself do the same.

    I understand that Trump has extolled the virtues of single-payer health care on multiple occasions.

    I understand that Trump has advocated the most economically illiterate, statist idea I’ve ever heard – a 35 percent duty on items coming in from Mexico and China.

    I understand that I’ve heard him mention virtually NOTHING about Federalism, Separation of Powers, Limited Government or anything that would mark his as anything other than a big government type..

    I understand that he once proposed a 14 1/2 percent “wealth tax.” That he wants to “open up” libel laws. That he supports another huge infrastructure boondoggle. That he “loves” (his word) eminent domain for private purposes. That he thinks the government should punish companies for moving their plants.

    In short that he’s a statist. Just too stupid to realize it – like his followers.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy