moonbattery logo

Apr 30 2020

The WHO and YouTube Censorship of COVID-19 Lockdown Dissent

After Google/YouTube censored the original video of frontline doctors Dan Erickson and Artin Massihi expressing skepticism that the authoritarian coronavirus lockdown is warranted, I replaced it with a version posted by Blue Collar Logic. Soon this version was also censored, so I went with BitChute.

Jason Siler of Blue Collar Logic tries to figure out why the video was banned, given that it did not violate any of YouTube’s community guidelines:

Siler names three groups that may have pressured YouTube to censor videos that question a hardline authoritarian stance on the lockdown: the CDC, the DNC, and the WHO. This is as good as confirmed regarding the WHO; YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki has openly stated that disagreeing with the World Health Organization can get a video removed:

“Anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy and so remove is another really important part of our policy.”

It is alarming enough that YouTube censors valid medical information at the behest of bureaucrats. Still more alarming is the nature of the bureaucrats. During the pandemic, the WHO has served as a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party. It parroted the early ChiCom line that there was no evidence of human-to-human transmission. Its Marxist Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus unconscionably denounced travel restrictions from China because “stigma.”

Earlier travel restrictions might have reduced the Wuhan coronavirus death toll by 95%. Unfortunately, the WHO is extremely influential and was able to delay them.

The Vigilant Citizen connects a few dots:

Every single time a treatment shows promise, the WHO and the media system that caters to it are quick to warn against them and even label it as dangerous.

Why? Because the WHO is banking on a single, universal solution: A Vaccine. …

And they say that a vaccine could take months or years to be available. So what happens until they decide that a vaccine is ready? A police state where high tech surveillance, bio-paranoia, and the forced quarantine of selected people at a moment’s notice. Big Brother is now a “savior” as the constant tracking of individuals and the people they come in contact with is portrayed as the only solution to save lives.

The WHO has praised China’s handling of the virus, which has entailed covering it up until it could spread (while containing its spread within China) and welding citizens into their apartments.

Maybe it is wrong to accuse this United Nations agency of being a tool of the ChiComs; maybe the ChiComs are a tool of the UN, establishing a template:

Through its Orwellian social credit system, its horrific re-education camps, its brutal suppression of dissenting voices, and its constant surveillance of its population, China has been a laboratory for a high-tech new world order.

Oligarchical collectivism imposed by a single global government is the hellish dream at the core of the United Nations. Maybe businesses are dying from the lockdown as much to advance this malevolent cause as to prevent the spread of disease.

On tips from Blackjack and Eddie_Valiant.



2 Responses to “The WHO and YouTube Censorship of COVID-19 Lockdown Dissent”

  1. […] post The WHO and YouTube Censorship of COVID-19 Lockdown Dissent appeared first on […]

  2. […] the degree of censorship that has been imposed recently regarding dissident doctors and mainstream conservative views, it is interesting to see what kind of people Big Tech puts in […]


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy