moonbattery logo

Aug 07 2013

Time Magazine Propagandizes Against Reproduction

By fundamentally transforming America, what liberals mean is that they want to eradicate America, so that it might be replaced by a different society made up of different people. If you doubt it, check out the cover of their flagship weekly, Time Magazine:


The article aggressively advocates childlessness. This fits smoothly with the liberal campaigns to promote abortion and to normalize homosexuality (if only in the weakest of minds). Not having children also allegedly protects the planet from imaginary threats that the liberal press has sacrificed much of its credibility to convince us are real. Plus it saves money!

The Nazis were impatient. They wanted the groups they considered undesirable to disappear immediately. Liberals learned from the failure of their fellow progressives. They are willing to wait a few generations for Americans to fade into nonexistence.

North America will still be populated, even if the liberal ruling class has its way. That’s where the push to erase our borders completely through amnesty comes in. After America is gone, its place will be taken by a gloriously diverse Third World hellhole consisting of peasants and their oligarchical collectivist rulers. The future will look like a cross between Zimbabwe, Guatemala, and the Soviet Union. Or at least, that’s a politically correct statist’s dream.

No one who wants to disarm you means you well. The same goes for anyone who does not want you to reproduce. The liberal ruling class that excretes publications like Time is the sworn enemy of every American, including those who consider themselves part of it.

On a tip from DaddyOD. More at Truthstream Media, The American Dream.

39 Responses to “Time Magazine Propagandizes Against Reproduction”

  1. Flu-Bird says:

    SLIME magazine just another leftists propeganda rag that should go the way of NEWSREEK

  2. Kevin the Mediocre says:

    The article also aggrandizes selfish narcissism; “you cannot live the hedonist’s dream life when you have to care for little parasites”… Our children have redefined our lives and our marriage, all for the better. They have also done things that the majority seem to consider “evil”: they bring our family closer to God, less focused on material things, and redefined our priorities regarding what true success in life is. Apparently that is contrary to the Obama-ized new reality of America.

  3. modd kenwood says:

    what an empty,selfish existence TIME is promoting…

  4. Peter Anastacio says:

    Yes, but of course according to Jeb Bush, immigrants are quite ‘fertile’ so what will the ruling classes do then? {tongue in cheek}


  5. Flu-Bird says:

    Remember this is the same news rag that named GORBCHEV the MAN OF THE DECADE back in the 1080s they named the occupiers scumballs their 2011 PERSON OF THE YEAR and named OBAMA the FINK their 2012 PERSON OF THE YEAR they featured that wealthy leftists scuball BLOOMBERG over the Gun issue offended WW II vets with the GO GREEN issue have compared humans and apes refered to religous fundalmentalists as crazy and grossed us out with their Ice Man front cover Its a wonder this ledftists rag still keeps going

  6. dan says:

    I’d rather be pro-active and start whacking Moonbats…
    but the civilized voice in my head keeps telling me to be patient,they’ll all die bye and bye.

  7. DJ says:

    That propaganda piece is part-in-parcel of the greatest crime being committed in the entire history of mankind. Moreover we are smack dab in the very midst of that crime and VERY FEW REALIZE IT’S ACTUALLY TAKING PLACE!!! Of course the crime I’m speaking of is the planned, deliberate, and systematic process of carrying out genocide against the entire White race.

    Some pertinent reading on the subject:

    Genocide by Stealth

  8. Alborn says:

    Having it ALL cannot be if you do not have children. Experiencing the love of a child is the most rewarding emotion that this life has to offer. And when that is your child the emotion is magnified by the feeling of knowing that you created the life with the help of God. So the notion that you “can have it all” if you choose not to have children shows how shallow your life will be. Sad but this is the same hogwash that was being pushed in the 60s and 70s. Which is why many baby boomers waited and had children later in life when all the stuff did not fill the void they felt emotionally. Same old leftist singing the same old crap. Life is about family and sharing not about self. The left are such hypocrites.

  9. Laurie says:


    Again, you guys are not seeing the opportunity to rid the world of liberals.

    In addition to “the liberal campaigns to promote abortion and to normalize homosexuality”, we now have the screaming leftists promoting being childfree. Great! That means – fewer liberals!

    Every liberal you meet should be *encouraged* to do one of three things:
    1. Become a homosexual. (And therefore can’t reproduce).
    2. Get an abortion. (And thereby won’t reproduce).
    3. Skip having kids. (And thereby won’t reproduce).

    Use rags like Time Magazine to support your case. Encourage the leftists to skip on the children so they can have the hedonistic lifestyle they so desperately want. When we do this enough, slowly but surely, the liberals will fade from the earth.


  10. DJ says:

    In essence, the Left does not deny White genocide is taking place, THEY ARE JUSTIFYING IT!


    STOP White Genocide!

  11. Father Confessor says:

    Oh, give me a break! Every argument you can make for breeding can be made against it.
    Children filling a void? You should look into why you have a void in the first place.
    Have multiple children? Do NOT ask the government for assistance. You don’t want to be hypocrites, do you?
    And as usual, the social cons roll out God to justify anything. Not all right wingers are, or have any desire to be, Christian.
    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Godless. Childless. Heathens.
    This is why social cons have lost battles for the rest of us.

  12. Restless says:

    They should be thankful their parents didn’t celebrate “the childfree life.”

  13. Strelnikov says:

    Gee, I’m glad my parents didn’t read something like this.

  14. DJ says:


    It’s only white liberals that are going along with the “child free lifestyle”. Conversly, non-white liberals are reproducing like rabbits.

    You seem to have completely missed Mr. Blount’s point.

  15. Comrade J says:

    Dear fellow Yankies,

    Let the dead bury their dead. They want to die out. Do not fear what they fear. Do not live for what they live.

    Yours (ours) is the future.

  16. Spartan24 says:

    The “child free” advocates will all look the same in a few years, tired wrinkled sad looking feminists with chopped hair and a superior attitude. They regret not having children and are meaner than hell to those of us who did. There are also those who think they don’t want kids and play around for their 20’s and 30’s and then desperate for a family they race to the fertility dr when they are 44 and hope for a miracle. That failing they adopt some third world cast off. Not that I have a problem with any of these its just the martyr attitude that goes with them.

  17. Gary Benson says:

    The tribe is behind this. Read “The Culture of Critique.” They HATE white Christians of European descent. They say that “Israel is for white men” while demanding that we continue to allow them to slam us with third world invaders. Whites are in BIG trouble. This Time article shows you just how much power the tribe has and how they can now opening and brazenly advocate white genocide.

  18. Steve G says:

    This isn’t Time’s first article to promote this.
    Back in 1987 there was a cover story was about the coming of the DINKs (Double Income No Kids).
    And all about how glorifying it was to have all your money to spend on yourself and no pesky kids to take care of.
    It featured childless couple bragging about going on cruises and long vacations and partying the weekends away.
    One couple said that they love being able to hope in the car and go away for the weekend any time they want and that the cats are fine to leave alone for a couple of days. Implying that you can’t just leave the kids alone whenever you want.
    I’d like to see Time go back and interview those same people and see if they feel the same way today. Those same cats are long dead, but they would be enjoying grandchildren about right now if they had kids in 1987.

  19. Steve G says:

    Can you imagine the firestorm if Time had put a Muslim couple on the cover.
    Implying that Muslims shouldn’t reproduce!
    Or even a black or Hispanic couple.
    I know it wouldn’t happen, but it’s fun to imagine such a cover.

  20. Jay B. says:


    Sure, go ahead and live your life spending all your time and ressources on leisure.

    You haven’t known happiness until you’ve held a child who calls you “daddy” (or mom, but I speak from my own experience). I was blessed with three and wouldn’t trade that joy for anything.

  21. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    What’s interesting is how Slime magazine chose to depict a couple, rather than a single welfare brood sow.
    See, those children of dependency are much easier to scoop up and raise in the image of Marx.

  22. Ghost of FA Hayek says:

    To the screwball troll masquerading as a priest;
    Absent “breeding” where will the future legions of tax paying slaves come from ?
    Try arguing against this, moron.

  23. Time to Close Our Borders says:

    I am a conservative , I have 2 children and I am raising them on Conservative values.If this article encourages liberals not reproduce I would think that would lead to less liberals…..I don’t see a problem here!

  24. Flu-Bird says:

    Hopfuly TIME will go the way of NEWSWEEK

  25. Gary Benson says:

    Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, white countries for everybody. ALL of the white countries are being slammed with hostile third world invaders in an effort to Holocaust proof the western world. It’s time for white people to WAKE UP.

  26. whotothewhat says:

    Funny all the couples I knew that decided not to have kids are all fat drunks and most of them divorced. The men hooked up with younger women so they could start having kids.

  27. Python says:

    The moonbats wont stop until the US looks like one of those post-apocalyptic movies. But then they’ll blame someone else for the mess.

  28. […] specific objectives of the drovers who use the media to steer the public herd’s opinions are known only to the oligarchy, but one thing is clear: we […]

  29. grayjohn says:

    I thought they went out of business…but if not it’s Time.

  30. Sam Adams says:

    Father Confessor says:
    August 7, 2013 at 9:06 am

    Oh, give me a break! Every argument you can make for breeding can be made against it.
    Children filling a void? You should look into why you have a void in the first place.
    Have multiple children? Do NOT ask the government for assistance. You don’t want to be hypocrites, do you?

    I’m going out on a limb here, but I’m guessing that you don’t actually have any kids.

    Never having kids is similar to never having eaten chocolate. Or being profoundly deaf and never listened to Beethoven. You can have a happy life as a single person or a married couple with no kids. You can have a happy life never having taken a ride in a car.

    Will you ever understand what you have missed by the choices that you have made? Maybe. But most likely not. You don’t have enough experience to know what you have missed.

  31. thrushjz says:

    I say let the childless white progressives that live in Berkely and Boulder stay childless…they’ll die out in a generation and then we won’t have to listen to their idiotic rants

  32. Bob Roberts says:

    Lib-tards anti-life, anti-sense agenda, as usual.

    The problem is the less children they have, the more time they have to pervert ours. Plus one would hope their kids would see the error of their parents’ ways and rebel, just as they did, only this time it would be rebellion TO common sense instead of away from it.

  33. Vabb says:

    If these liberal yuppies remain childless then they will die out in a generation and on an even more cheerful note, they won’t pass on their gene pool.

  34. Duke says:

    Why aren’t the two people black…, why are they both white?

  35. Sam Adams says:

    Duke says:
    August 8, 2013 at 6:07 am

    Why aren’t the two people black…, why are they both white?

    At risk of stating the obvious:
    1. Fewer blacks marry.
    2. Single black women already have children (or abort in higher percentages than whites.
    3. Because of racism, blacks don’t live a life of leasure, you racist!!!

  36. Nutcase says:

    What always blows my mind about leftists is how delusional they are in thinking the world is currently controlled by conservatives. In the article, the author whines about how there’s social pressure to have children when in reality, it’s become hip to say you hate children and don’t want to have any. What a bunch of cretins.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy