Just in case there is anyone who still doesn’t understand what the Liberal World Order entails (besides high gas prices), the United Nations spelled it out by touting the benefits of world hunger.

Via Climate Depot:

The UN Chronicle, which bills itself as “The magazine of the United Nations, Since 1946” originally published this essay in 2008 by Professor George Kent of the University of Hawaii: “Hunger has great positive value to many people. Indeed, it is fundamental to the working of the world’s economy. Hungry people are the most productive people, especially where there is a need for manual labour. … How many of us would sell our services if it were not for the threat of hunger?”

“More importantly, how many of us would sell our services so cheaply if it were not for the threat of hunger?”

For once, instead of the usual pious doubletalk about equity, we get some sincerity:

“For those of us at the high end of the social ladder, ending hunger globally would be a disaster. If there were no hunger in the world, who would plow the fields? Who would harvest our vegetables? Who would work in the rendering plants? Who would clean our toilets? We would have to produce our own food and clean our own toilets. No wonder people at the high end are not rushing to solve the hunger problem. For many of us, hunger is not a problem, but an asset.”

Asks the author,

Who would have established massive biofuel production operations in Brazil if they did not know there were thousands of hungry people desperate enough to take the awful jobs they would offer?

Biofuels are an economically inefficient boondoggle propped up with coercive funding by Big Government in the name of the climate.

Speaking of global warming idiocy, another benefit of world hunger is that according to the woke ideology of our globalist ruling class, food makes it be too warm outside. That’s why they plan for us to eat insects instead.

After people outside the liberal elite discovered the article (archived here), the UN said “just kidding” and deleted it:

The piece could have been satire as the UN now claims. The point would be that people should be given what they need at someone else’s expense by an all-powerful globalist government regardless of whether they are willing to work.

On tips from R F and Occam’s Stubble.

Comments are closed.