moonbattery logo

Aug 18 2017

War on History Continues: Lincoln’s Memory Attacked in D.C., South Side Chicago

Lincoln freed the slaves. He gets the thanks we have come to expect:

A ninety-year-old bust of Abraham Lincoln, our sixteenth president, was destroyed in a South Side Chicago neighborhood overnight on Wednesday.

The bust was wrapped in tar paper and set aflame.

Honest Abe has been caught up in the latest frenzy to destroy anything that reminds liberal social engineers and the mobs of idiot savages they mobilize of America’s heritage. It started with Robert E. Lee but predictably hasn’t ended with him. As noted earlier, the memories of Lincoln’s fellow great presidents George Washington and Andrew Jackson are also unwelcome in Chicago.

Nor is Chicago the only place where the Great Emancipator is under siege. In our nation’s capital:

Someone vandalized the Lincoln Memorial, the National Park Service said.

The words “F— law” were found written in red spray paint early Tuesday on a pillar at the monument that overlooks the Capitol building and National Mall, NPS said Tuesday afternoon.

America’s answer to Mao’s Cultural Revolution is well under way. If it is successful, we will start fresh with no history, no heritage, no culture. The leftists who control the media and education establishments will have a blank slate to draw upon.

Abe Lincoln says, “You’re welcome.”

On tips from TCS III, Byron, and J.

35 Responses to “War on History Continues: Lincoln’s Memory Attacked in D.C., South Side Chicago”

  1. Spiny Norman says:

    More than 100 million Chinese died in the so-called “Cultural Revolution”. Our current Antifa Mao-lings likely think that’s a reasonable goal – starting with the 67+ million who voted for Trump.

  2. JackisBack says:

    Blacks and Jews hate America. They are known by their deeds

  3. I hate to admit it, but the last 150 years have taught America one thing: Africans are neither happy nor productive in a European culture and technological economy.

  4. ICEvictim says:

    just the non-Israeli Jews

    between the Euroweenies and our own homegrown American Jews you’ve got all the reasons folks eventually turn on them

  5. ICEvictim says:

    I invite them to come attack me. I do so love a target rich environment. Like my BMT rifle instructor said: “Gun control is maintaining a steady sight picture.”

  6. Spiny Norman says:

    Most American Jews are Progressives FIRST and Jews…well, not even second, but only when it’s convenient. Few of them have seen in the inside of a synagogue since they were children. Ask any actual politically-conservative Jew (they do exist). They have nothing good to say about their Proggy brethren.

  7. octa bright says:

    The figure was probably closer to 3,000,000. The real killer was the “GREAT LEAP FORWARD” which best estimates indicate killed 40,000,000 to 45,000,000 people.
    That said, given the purges following the Civil War, deaths in the Civil War, and the other atrocities the PRC total may reach 100,000,000.
    I don’t disagree with your argument, but it is useful to get the details correct to maintain your creditability.

  8. Spiny Norman says:

    Okay, I’ll change it. Or just delete the comment altogether.

  9. Bosun Higgs says:

    One of the primary reasons the Republican party was founded…


  10. MAS says:

    Took away their slaves…

  11. Bosun Higgs says:

    Gold star for you. That’s why the left wants to erase that history—so that they can rewrite it with Republicans as the villains.

  12. MAS says:

    They already own the government, schools, and the media, it’s just a matter of time.

  13. The LIEberal Media ☆ ᵀᴿᵁᴹᴾ says:

    Beautiful Polish woman displays detailed knowledge of the blood-soaked history of islam:

    if ONLY we had a news network that would hire her on the spot!

  14. 127guy says:

    Churches are next. Mark my words.

  15. 127guy says:

    The missing lesson for our black friends is that they would be a whole lot better off free from stupid white liberals.

  16. Jodie says:

    Lincoln was adored by the left, when they were comparing Obama to him. (Which of course was absolutely ridiculous.)

  17. Hungjumper says:

    Now he’s the proper color to be hanging on the south side.

  18. MAS says:

    True but as old as the day the Church was established. The Church has always been a remnant that is as secure as the Lord (who owns her) is sovereign. When your church goes leftist, vote with your feet and seek out the true saints.

  19. Anonymous says:

    Well, he was an evil RethugliKKKan, you know… that and Chiraq residents (especially if some form of left/libtard) are just ignorant as dirt.

  20. 127guy says:

    Well said.

  21. Mohammad Izzaterd says:

    The following is what Lincoln said in an 1858 Douglas debate. He is a racist and now that we all agree that all racists are to be wiped off the face of the earyh, he and his memorials have to go. :

    I have no purpose to produce political and social equality between the white and the black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary.

    I agree with Judge Douglas, he [The black man] is not my equal in many respects – certainly not in color, perhaps not in moral or intellectual endowment.

    Abraham Lincoln, First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois August 21st, 1858

  22. 127guy says:

    Liberals are no position to accuse anyone of high-mindedness, most particularly the Church.

  23. 127guy says:

    Agreed – we were using the term differently.

  24. physicsnut says:


  25. Mohammad Izzaterd says:

    That’s the point I’m making! I am sure Lincoln said many wonderful things, but to the left, it doesn’t matter. Any slight of the other, expecially black, you must be wiped from history. I mock the left’s philosophy.

  26. Spiny Norman says:

    If you read the background and context of the Lincoln-Douglas debates, you’ll notice that Lincoln very often threw Douglas’ words back at him, in not-so-subtle mockery. The audience caught on to this pretty quickly, but few modern readers do.

    Most of the “See! Lincoln was a rayciss and supported slavery!” quotes are of this nature.

  27. Spiny Norman says:

    The Alphabet Networks are already there, and Rupert’s Mini-Me loinfruit are pushing Fox News that way. So yeah.

  28. Feet2Fire says:

    Honest Abe has been caught up in the latest frenzy to destroy…

    This story has been debunked by WGN (Chicago) and others. Apparently the bust was vandalized a long time ago and not since the Charlottesville mess.

  29. bobdog19006 says:

    …because Lincoln was a white nationalist and a racist, I guess.

    Just look at this hateful screed:

    “…That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.”

  30. sTevo says:

    Onesimus was a slave that had departed from his master Philemon.

    And, the apostle Paul had him return and to honor his master.

    Will the book of Philemon be ripped from bibles by the SJWs?

  31. The statue was a depiction of a white man. Nothing more, nothing less.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy