moonbattery logo

Dec 23 2016

Watch Newt Crawl

Maybe the past-his-prime Newt Gingrich was chagrined that despite chucking his free trade principles out the window to participate in selling Trump to the masses, he has not been offered a chance to run the White House from behind the scenes, or to play any other significant role in the administration he helped enable. Maybe he thought the charade had outlived its usefulness. Or maybe he really did think that Trump “should be marginally more dignified than talking about alligators in swamps.” In any case Newt, appropriately named after a squishy-soft creature that inhabits swamps, told NPR that the quintessential crony capitalist Trump would drop the rhetoric about “draining the swamp.”

But then he was called on the carpet. See if you can watch his sniveling apology without wincing on Newt’s behalf:

A “boo-boo”? Maybe Trump will reward this groveling submission by putting Newt in charge of federal daycare centers.

On a tip from TrojanMan.



28 Responses to “Watch Newt Crawl”

  1. KirklesWorth says:

    I wondered what the point of shaming Newt Gingrich was until I remembered that Torcer had to post a few anti-Trump articles the other day to which one was “updated”:

    Torcer: Gingrich: Trump doesn’t want to ‘drain the swamp’ anymore http://thehill.com/homenews/ne

    Chuck Schumer Just LOVES Trump’s Trillion Dollar Infrastructure Plan http://www.dailywire.com/news/

    Trump Is Already Ditching His Movement http://bit.ly/2haMF81

    KirklesWorth: Trump denies Gingrich claim that he’s dropping ‘drain the swamp’

    Gingrich quickly admitted he “goofed” after Trump’s tweet.

    “I goofed. Draining the swamp is in, @realDonaldTrump is going to do it, and the alligators should be worried,” he tweeted.

  2. Cecil Henry says:

    Dont you want to drain the swamp newt?? Or are you too comfortable in it?

  3. 762x51 says:

    You can’t “drain the swamp” in DC by hiring Mitch McConnell’s wife for your cabinet and refusing to go after the biggest offender there, Hillary.

  4. 762x51 says:

    “I wondered what the point of shaming Newt Gingrich was” run out of lint in your navel to work on, princess?

  5. Daniel says:

    I think you don’t fully appreciate why hiring her was an interesting move. McConnell would have a harder time working against his wife as she is tasked with carrying out Trump’s agenda. What’s more, if she fails is carrying it out, there would be an interesting if not dramatic response to that. I don’t see any losing in that. Placing McConnell into a position of conflict is a brilliant move in my opinion. Weakening ones opponents is the way.

    The only reason this could be viewed as bad is if there are secrets to be had and at the moment, there are no indications Trump intends to operate with a great deal of secrecy. His intentions are absolutely being telegraphed well in advance of his taking office and he is getting massive response to it all.

  6. daPenguin says:

    Don’t you mean gollum

  7. 762x51 says:

    The only way McConnell would end up “working against his wife” is if it directly affected her Dept. That is unlikely since Transportation is rarely in a controversial position. Simultaneously, she will be at cabinet meetings giving that snake McConnell eyes and ears into the cabinet.

    I think this a move that is too clever by half.

  8. sf says:

    There’s a nasty shock coming from the Left, called “National Popular Vote,” by which the Left plans to replace the electoral college system without amending the Constitution. On their website they feature a letter supposedly from Newt **endorsing** their scheme. http://sfsays.blogspot.com/2016/12/democrats-and-liberals-pushing-to.html

    If this is real, and accurately reflects his position, Newt shouldn’t have any role at all in conservative circles or policies.

  9. ramrodd says:

    Newt Gingrich: The Phony Rightwing..

    1. YEA to the creation of the Department of Education, which is unconstitutional
    (William Z. Foster called for a federal Department of Education in his book,
    “Towards Soviet America.”) Studies were to be cleansed of religious, patriotic
    and other features of the ‘bourgeois’ ideology. Students were to be taught basis
    of Marxian dialectical materialism, inter nationalism and general ethics of the
    new Socialist Society. See any articles by Charlotte Iserbyt.

    2. YEA to designating 68 million acres as Federal protected wilderness. Our constitution doesn’t call for any land “control,” but the communist manifesto calls for all
    abolition of property and land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. Federal Land grabs today are huge percentages of the 13 western states that are now federally owned.

    Note: The communist manifesto wants:

    1. Land controls
    2. Progressive Income Tax
    3. Termination of Inheritance
    4. Central Bank which is the Federal Reserve
    5. Control of Education In 1994 Newt voted:

    1. YEA to the National Endowment for the Arts
    2. YEA for 1.2 billion for UN peacekeeping
    3. YEA for the presidential line item veto
    4. YEA for 13 billion in foreign aid
    5. YEA for 166 million more for the IRS
    6. Led Congress into GATT with fellow CFR member Bill Clinton and then stated that i was a very big transfer of power. It was, because it overrode Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution. As well, GATT reduces the amount of money we can save for pensions. He jawed with President Clinton in NH that he was a huge fan of FDR and Woodrow Wilson, two of the most despised early communist leaning presidents. Remember Wilson gave us both the federal reserve and the 16th amendment, income tax.

    He also voted:

    1. China as Most Favored Nation for trade
    2. Voted to supply funds to subsidize trade with the Soviets.
    3. Voted to transfer 2.2 million acres in Idaho to Wilderness status.
    4. Voted for federal funding loan guarantees for greater trade with Red China.
    5. Voted for taxpayer funds being available to foreign governments through export/import banks.
    6. Is pro amnesty – Joe Galloway wrote in December 2010 that both Newt and Jeb
    Bush were pro-amnesty. Gingrich stated, “We are not going to deport 11 million
    immigrants.” How about 40 million Newt…send them home, they’re an invasion!
    7. Is pro foreign aid. In 1995 he voted for 31.8 billion in foreign aid, but wouldn’t vote to cut foreign aid by a measly 1%.Newt also backed a strong central government, strong environmental laws, national service programs, the United Nations Goals 2000 (which many Republicans voted for), federal financing of local police, and UN peacekeeping missions for our military.
    8. Gingrich is pro-Obamacare and even advocated it in the 90s on Meet the Press, and recently:
    9. He did a Global Warming ad with Nancy Pelosi that is coming back to haunt him, but in reality, he is a big environmentalist.
    10. Is pro-Gun Control – Newt is currently circulating a letter advertising a DVD called: “America at Risk” for which you may obtain a copy if you send him $35.00 or more. On page 3 of his six-page letter he says: “Today the choice is yours: You can either sit back and allow Barack Obama and the liberal elite to disarm our country, leaving us defenseless against enemies who explicitly desire to erase America from existence.”

    Yet, if you check on the voting list of those who voted “yea” on Public
    Law 101-216 in 1989 (an update to the General and Complete Disarmament Law,
    Public Law 87-297) you will find that Newt Gingrich voted in favor of section 2
    of this disarmament bill which reads:

    “(2) as defined in this Act, the terms ‘arms control’ and ‘disarmament’ mean ‘the
    identification, verification, inspection, limitation, control, reduction, or elimination, of armed forces and armaments of all kinds under international agreement to establish an effective system of international control’;”

    Should we trust a man who professes to be so concerned with our security and right to have armed forces, who also votes to give them away to the United Nations for a world army? The last thing we need is someone who professes to protect us, while at
    the same time, is planning to sell us out! See Bernadine Smith’s website for countless documents.

    http://newswithviews.com/Nelson/kelleigh121.htm

  10. 762x51 says:

    Except you and your Lord Fibtard, oh, BachaBaziMale and Tsccchhhiitt!!! for brains.

    You know, the usual A-holes.

  11. 762x51 says:

    Insults are all you are worth, turd eater.

    Does your ex husband pay you alimony, princess?

  12. 762x51 says:

    And yet you persist, going to great lengths to dredge up past posts and spin them out of context to make yourself look oh so superior. You and your master fibtard have that in common, a couple of smug, arrogant, sanctimonious, self righteous, impotent little bastards who can’t handle anyone disagreeing with their ideology which is based on your limited world view caused by exceedingly low intelligence.

    You are both one trick ponies and two of the most boring, obnoxious A-holes on the internet.

  13. KirklesWorth says:

    No, you are the one persisting. You are the one going to great lengths to call upon me to correct your lies. And everybody looks superior to you – I don’t have anything to do with it.

    You know all about “one trick ponies”, because all you have is progressive tactics, Alinsky’s rules, and pathetic insults. I however, have your own words to speak for themselves:

    762×51: I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    762×51: The Electoral College is what matters and there, tRump has almost no chance of winning, never did. That you Trumpanzees failed to take that into account is on you, not us. Doubling down on the mistake only compounds the mistake, it can never correct it.

  14. 762x51 says:

    ROTFLMFAO!!

    I post that “. . . you persist, going to great lengths to dredge up past posts and spin them out of context to make yourself look oh so superior. ” and you come back immediately with EXACTLY THAT.

    JerklesTw*t reguritates out of context post:
    “762×51: I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.”

    Here is the entire post which was to Dave Blount, NOT professional ex-wife jerklesTw*t:

    25 SEP 2016
    762×51 Dave Blount • 3 months ago
    The “quality” of my comments to posters, other than trolls remains unchanged from what it was nearly ten years ago. when I started coming here. I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.

    What has changed, is the “quality” of posters. The Trumpanzees are not here to have a meaningful conversation or exchange ideas or engage in intelligent debate. They are PROGRESSIVE fascists intent on ramming their ideology down our throats with the ultimate goal of subjugating us to their cult.

    As for the “broken window theory” I give you the latest in Trumpanzee “contributions”.to MB. http://moonbattery.com/?p=7656… These people are not juvenile gangbangers or hookers in search of a new place to hang out, smoke dope, turn tricks, etc. They are terrorists, determined to bring down society so they can remake it in their image. Terrorists get along just fine in areas where there are no broken windows, like Paris, San Bernardino, etc. They will not stop on their own, they must be driven out by force. This new policy sets an RoE that lets them run wild while tying the hands of regular posters leaving us defenseless against them. I doubt many of us will remain long to just come here and take their abuse. I don’t mind fighting back, but have no interest in being harangued everyday by those I cannot effectively oppose.

    The other two examples of how I was correct have already been documented previously so I won’t bore everyone with rehashing that YET AGAIN, ex-wife jerlesTw*t.

    As a liar, you are prolific but ineffective, as every man’s ex-wife, you are a perfect example.

    LMFAO, GFY.

  15. KirklesWorth says:

    What’s that laughing boy? You are going to repost your entire comment? Atta boy! Now I know you can click my links! And you’ve demonstrated even more how irrational you are without me even helping!

    And just to clear things up, you won’t be belligerent to those who AGREE with you, as you classify those who DISAGREE with you as trolls (not to mention other choice words) and somehow qualify as an exception to your “relevant comments” rule. How convenient for you! Kind of like the way you classify those who don’t follow your so-called “conservative” anti-Trump hatred as “progressives” without any proof. You are more indicative of a “troll” or a “progressive” than anybody else you accuse. Bravo!

    And then you even post the whiny bedwetting part:

    I doubt many of us will remain long to just come here and take their abuse. I don’t mind fighting back, but have no interest in being harangued everyday by those I cannot effectively oppose.

    Poor baby! Name some “abuse” that you have to take. Explain how you are “harangued everyday” by those you “cannot effectively oppose”. Was your “abuse” and being “harangued everyday” anything like how you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

    How often were you ordered to “go f__k yourself”? Was it anything comparable to this: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45

  16. 762x51 says:

    While it is mildly amusing to watch you perpetuate your smug sanctimonious fantasy of superiority, it is also boring as hell to see the same partial quotes intended to spin your fantasy into reality posted over and over again. Just like arguing with any other menstruating female. But then you aren’t here to add to the discussion, you are here looking for trouble, of course, once you find trouble, you can’t deal with it. Reminiscent of a dog chasing a car.

    Example, “your so-called “conservative” anti-Trump hatred as “progressives” without any proof.”, a statement you dare to make even though there has been a metric ton of PROOF documented on MB over the last 18 months. The proof has been documented, you merely refuse to acknowledge or accept it, much less address. Just as you have refused to acknowledge that tRump, oops, sorry,I mean Not Hillary has selected a group of globalist Progressives for his cabinet, just as Hillary would have done. Your cultist ideology will not permit you to acknowledge that reality so no discussion can be had with a rodent like you.

    Come on turd eater tell us all about how Cohn, Munchkin, Bannon and the Rothchild’s Ross are all good picks that aren’t something Hillary would have done. A liar like like you can’t address that reality, LMFAO!!

    Oh, and as I have observed several times already, the list of people who want to kill you is the list of anyone who has ever had the misfortune of interacting with you. Just as is the case with any other ex-wife.

    What’s the count up now? GFY.

  17. KirklesWorth says:

    What a diaper-wetting hypocritical baby! I had to change my response since I misread part of your response.

    “perpetuate your smug sanctimonious fantasy of superiority” – that would be you projecting.

    – “it is also boring as hell” – just like yours – tough luck buttercup.

    – “same partial quotes intended to spin your fantasy into reality posted over and over again” – that’s what the links are for baby – so people can look them up themselves instead of wading through your bloviating garbage.

    – “Just like arguing with any other menstruating female” – Sexist…and you are the one whining like a baby.

    – “But then you aren’t here to add to the discussion”, no that is you – your first useless comment in this thread was: “run out of lint in your navel to work on, princess?”

    “you are here looking for trouble” – that would be you (see previous reply). I am supporting our president-elect…you?

    “once you find trouble, you can’t deal with it” – that would be you, demonstrated by that very post. I can deal with it just great, thank you very much!

    Sorry, I don’t take orders…especially from a fascist like you. Read this statement again

    How convenient for you! Kind of like the way you classify those who don’t follow your so-called “conservative” anti-Trump hatred as “progressives” without any proof.

    I said “those who don’t follow” Einstein. You call people “progressives” at your ridiculous whim. I am not a progressive but you are too stupid to understand. You are the embodiment of a progressive – you walk the walk, talk the talk, and stink the stink.

    But please continue providing us with your brilliance.

  18. 762x51 says:

    Clearly you don’t see how phenomenally stupid you appear when you accuse of the cowardice you practice here everyday.

    You are a Progressive jerklesTw*t, you are just too dishonest to admit it. Nearly every post you have made amounts to the fact that you don’t like what you are being told and so you ignore it or claim it is false. You use terms like sexist and homophobic, etc. Just a dirty, lying, dishonest scumbag who adds nothing to the discussion. It’s why no one interacts with you except me and I only do it for entertainment value. I know I can mock and ridicule you all I want and you will never have the courage to do anything about it, you are truly that pathetic. It would be far more entertaining if your balls grew in and you could back up your idiotic BS, but no it’s just hot air from a twerpie little troll. I’ve better crap than you off the bottom of my shoe, princess.

    My comments to you aren’t intended to be substantive, you are just such a tool that nothing you say interests me.

    Now, get that count posted, every man’s ex-wife jerklesTw*t, GFY.

  19. KirklesWorth says:

    if “nothing you say interests me”, then why do you keep calling out for me to school you? Nobody is as brave as you Rambo, as your “military” stories have bragged:

    762×51: I actually HAVE been waterboarded, it failed to make me give them what they wanted.

    762×51: I’m used to something with a little more punch for hajji hunting.

    762×51: LOL, tell that to the hajjis i have smoked. What in the exact fuck do you know about about “going into battle”, LMFAO!

    762×51 as kirklesworthintheGround: A target rich environment, no RoE, man this is going to be more fun than killing hajjis.

    762×51: What we have, civi, is an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. You Progressives are enemies of the Constitution, domestic ones. Hajji is a foreign enemy of the Constitution. You both get treated the same.

    762×51 posting as kirklesworthFascistChickenShit (Guest): For the thousandth time, imbecile, I’m not interested in any exchange with you outside of a straight up gunfight. There is nothing you have to say that interests me unless it is to accept my offer of single combat which you are too chicken to do. I just enjoy demonstrating your cowardice for all to see. We all know you don’t have what it takes to implement your fascist desires which is why you support an a__hole like tRump. Fascists, Progressive, hajji, it makes no difference, are for killing, there is no other use for you.

    762×51: LOL, tell that to the hajjis i have smoked. What in the exact f__k do you know about about “going into battle”, LMFAO!

    And no, I don’t particularly like that you have threatened me that you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

  20. 762x51 says:

    School me?!?! ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Bitch, you couldn’t school pre-K

    More out of context quotes for your Alinsky Progressive propaganda, huh liar? Most of it said to others, not to you, but then deceit is your primary weapon, it’s really all you have, princess. That and your cult dogma is all you know, one trick pony UrkelJerk.

    All of that is true and I would take great delight in exposing you to all of it so you had some idea what the real world is like, you know, the one where jerklesTw*t ISN’T a legend.

    A candy ass like you wouldn’t last ten minutes but the laugh would be worth it. Some of it you wouldn’t be able to do, like when they have you on the waterboard and they shove the cattle prod up against your balls, since you have no balls, it just couldn’t be done. I’ll set it up with my C-Level Marine buddies and I’ll even go first. You won’t need a thing, we have all the equipment and no money changes hands, just my gift to you, and I promise you will learn things about yourself you didn’t know before. Come on tinkles, put your money where your mouth is for once in your life. Show everyone you aren’t just a blowhard Internet wanna be like we all know you are, or is that a professional ex-wife? You are just so effeminate it is difficult to tell, LMAO!!

  21. KirklesWorth says:

    More ridiculous regurgitated macho masturbations. Why do you only want to torture me this time – why don’t you threaten to kill me again? You are obviously too dense to comprehend, but I don’t take “suggestions” from idiots stupid enough to say:

    762×51: Not only is tRump a surefire loser but he will also cause the loss of the Senate and possibly even the House. The Trumpanzee Progressives have done what they set out to do, elect Hillary Clinton.

    And what else are you wetting your diaper about? Was it something on your “scary phrases” list like “ramming their ideology down our throats”, “ultimate goal of subjugating us to their cult”, “terrorists”, “defenseless against them”, “take their abuse”, “harangued everyday”, “cannot effectively oppose”, “are no longer able to fight back”, “strife”, “denigrate its cult leader”, “refuse to follow its cult ideology”, “surrender to it”, “vile rhetoric”, “daily diatribe”, “blind obedience”, “100% conformity”, “no dissent is allowed”, “marching in lockstep”, “someone so psychotic”, “progressive fascist”, “singled out for punishment”, “surrender to your cult”, “operation of evil”, etc.?

    762×51: RIIIIIGHT Saul, I’M fomenting it by forcing you Trumpanzee vermin to come here everyday and spread your vile rhetoric. You are a f__king imbecile. Go f__k yourself.

    762×51: The “quality” of my comments to posters, other than trolls remains unchanged from what it was nearly ten years ago. when I started coming here. I have always tried to make relevant comments and never have been belligerent to those I disagree with.

    What has changed, is the “quality” of posters. The Trumpanzees are not here to have a meaningful conversation or exchange ideas or engage in intelligent debate. They are PROGRESSIVE fascists intent on ramming their ideology down our throats with the ultimate goal of subjugating us to their cult.

    As for the “broken window theory” I give you the latest in Trumpanzee “contributions”.to MB. http://moonbattery.com/?p=7656… These people are not juvenile gangbangers or hookers in search of a new place to hang out, smoke dope, turn tricks, etc. They are terrorists, determined to bring down society so they can remake it in their image. Terrorists get along just fine in areas where there are no broken windows, like Paris, San Bernardino, etc. They will not stop on their own, they must be driven out by force. This new policy sets an RoE that lets them run wild while tying the hands of regular posters leaving us defenseless against them. I doubt many of us will remain long to just come here and take their abuse. I don’t mind fighting back, but have no interest in being harangued everyday by those I cannot effectively oppose.

    762×51: Another tRumprat from the Disqus sewer. As I just observed to Dave Blount on a different thread, we still have the trolls, but are no longer able to fight back. How fortunate for you.

    762×51: “The strategy entails stoking the grievances of alienated minority groups and playing them off against the core population.”

    A 100% accurate description of the Progressive playbook. But under the heading of thinking thinks through, I have always wondered how a “utopia” can be founded on alienation and strife? How do you “turn off” that alienation and end the strife after fanning the flames for many decades and multiple generations?

    The true legacy of Progressive ideology, once they have been eliminated, will be the many generations it will take to end the strife they have created for the sole purpose of enslaving the population. Look at the strife they have created here on MB just to try and gain power, a handy little microcosm of the operation of evil.

    762×51: It is one of the reasons I seek to drive him [KirklesWorth] out of here, he is scum.

    762×51: Apparently, your mission is to come to MB everyday and bore everyone with your petulant whining over our refusal to accept your Progressive fascist ideology. Try to grasp this, those of us who oppose tRump on principle are NEVER going to bow to your demands. Your daily diatribe against the blog and its owner make us wonder why you would continue to come here and read the articles you so dislike. There are only two probable reasons, either you are a paid troll or you are a true cult believer and drone. You aren’t smart enough to be a paid operative as your grade school ” enemy of my friend is a friend of my enemy” reasoning demonstrates. That leaves drone as your most likely motivation. Of course, drones are expendable which brings me to the logical conclusion of when are we going to get this gun fight started?

    762×51: It really defines you, the only reason you so hate me because I refuse to surrender to your cult and being the dirty fascist bastard you are, you just can’t stand that.

    762×51: That’s how fascists operate. It proves that Trumpanzees are Progressive fascists. Their demonstrated cult of personalty demands 100% conformity, no dissent is allowed, just like Progressives always do. Anyone not marching in lockstep is singled out for punishment, just like with Progressives.

    762×51: You can’t reason with a drone like wrinkledick which is why I don’t even try. He is all tRump, 24/7/365. His blind obedience demands 100% conformance from the rest of us, like all Progressive ideology.

    762×51: WARNING TO ALL MOONBATTERY POSTERS: The troll who calls itself kirklesworth is capturing your posts, specifically ones that disagree with him, or denigrate its cult leader or refuse to follow its cult ideology and saving them for later use. It has stated that it is here “to keep an eye on things”, meaning you and I. It is a fascist Progressive, who else would do such a thing? Be very cautious of what you say and how you interact with it. Who knows where it is sending the information it gathers here. I know everyone is as sick of it as I am, but we must not allow it to run wild, that would be to surrender to it.

    762×51: I’m sure everyone is sick of it. Remember what MB was like all those years BEFORE jerkles and his horde of Trumpanzees infested it?

    That quote he posted was from months ago, the first week of August. jerkles has been capturing all the posts here that he doesn’t like, ones that disagree with him, or denigrate his cult leader, etc so he can “report” us down the road. He is, in fact the Progressive fascist I have identified him to be. He just doesn’t like it that I was able to identify him so quickly.

    It’s true that once on the Internet, always on the Internet, but actually gathering that information for use against someone is afar cry from the concept of always on the Internet. Imagine someone so psychotic they copy your posts so they can “get you” for them later. It is one of the reasons I seek to drive him out of here, he is scum.

    762×51: I have read your posts and I have had this same discussion with you multiple times., but as you wish, here are some of your historical Disqus posts, for the MB ones we will need our resident record keeper and tRump Nazi UrkelJerk to research those.

    762×51: Yes, low, and you are so elite, the audacity of me to even speak to you, is unconscionable / sarc off.

    762×51: That is your entire MO and the central reason why no one can have a discussion with you. You are an a__hole.

  22. 762x51 says:

    You dirty, nothing, lying piece of shit. Just your edited lies and distortions and spin is all that mess is, minion jerklesTw*t. I have proved it repeatedly, just as I have proved your cowardice repeatedly.

    Now, say it to my face and see what happens to you, pussy..

  23. KirklesWorth says:

    LOL! Your words speak for themselves Rambo – why are you arguing with yourself? Why lie about me posting your comments verbatim? You are pathetic.

    In case I haven’t made this perfectly clear (which I have), nobody here takes orders, demands, requests, invites, etc. from you contrary to your violent fascist fantasies. Furthermore, nobody has any intention of getting within your firing range of your lying, loser, unintelligent, dishonorable, wannabe “progressive”-killing, Hillary-helping, wannabe “civil war” fighting, republican party defecting, progressive-helping, republican candidate hating, latent-homosexual, macho-masturbating, sadomasochistic, integrity-lacking, wife-insulting, so-called “conservative” face.

    You’ve already explained how you “have a bullet with your [KW’s] name on it” (This comment was deleted), how I will “soon pay the price” (This branch of the thread was deleted), proclaimed “see you on the battlefield” where “you [KW] will die” (This branch of the thread was deleted), that you “deal in lead” (This comment was deleted), and that “whether it is mine or someone else’s bullet, one will find you [KW]”, bragged “a mile is a long shot”, that you’d be “happy to give you [KW] a demonstration”, “I will inflict what ever ‘damage’ it takes to defeat my enemy, you [KW]” coinciding with “you kill the enemy” (This comment was deleted), and that “there is no chance I will spare you [KW], bitch” (This branch of the thread was deleted). Of course the pièce de résistance is your ridiculous lie that I am a “progressive” 2, that progressives are for killing, therefore you are entitled to murder me.

  24. 762x51 says:

    Right, because you are a pathetic pussy who can’t back up what he says.

    Now GFY, bitch.

Alibi3col theme by Themocracy