moonbattery logo

Dec 04 2019

Will UN Use Military Force to Impose Climate Crapola?

It sounds like the plot to a novel, but it makes perfect sense if you take liberal rhetoric at face value. According to their fanciful ideology, sustaining a modern standard of living will make it a few degrees warmer outside. Although the climate has always fluctuated, leftists hold that this would be a catastrophe unprecedented in human history. Imagine for a moment that you were crazy enough to believe this silly crap, yet instead of being incarcerated in a mental institution, you were among the useless bureauweenies running the United Nations. Would you not call for countries that refuse to stop generating energy by economically viable means to be brought into line by force? Otherwise, the planet will be doomed!

Breitbart refers us to prominent international relations professor Ole Wæver of the University of Copenhagen:

In an interview with ABC News in Australia, Professor Wæver cautions that what he sees as “climate inaction” might draw the U.N. into considering other means to ensure its goals are met, even if that leads to global armed conflict.

World War III would be just what the environment needs. Think how many carbon-emitting humans could be killed.

“The United Nations Security Council could, in principle, tomorrow decide that climate change is a threat to international peace and security,” [Wæver] says.

When moonbats frame the global warming hoax in terms of security, that means they are serious about using it to justify coercion.

“If there was something that was decided internationally by some more centralised procedure and every country was told ‘this is your emission target, it’s not negotiable, we can actually take military measures if you don’t fulfil it’, then you would basically have to get that down the throat of your population, whether they like it or not,” he says.

Wæver compares this to the European Union imposing debt solutions on Greece. The difference is, the big carbon emitters are large countries armed with nuclear weapons, namely (in descending order) China, the USA, India, and Russia.

The only one of these top four countries that has produced a smaller share since the Kyoto Protocol is the USA. Yet the UN may give some countries a pass and only pick on others, since this isn’t actually about either CO2 or the climate anyway.

Once again, we see that the global warming hoax is popular with progressives because it can be exploited to advance their agenda. Preeminent on that agenda is globalization — the concentration of total world power in the hands of an oligarchy.



Comments are closed.


Alibi3col theme by Themocracy