With liberals on the bench, the Constitution says whatever they want it to say. The blessedly reversed Roe v. Wade decision was an obvious example. Here’s another:

A Seattle court has ruled that a female-only nude spa lacks the “constitutional right” to bar males from their facilities. The decision comes after the spa sued the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC), which had forced them to change their sex-exclusive policy due to the complaint of a transgender patron.

The spa is willing to let in men, but only if they have had sex change operations. A guy calling himself Haven Wilvich finds these terms unacceptable.

Wilvich had sought a membership at the Olympus Spa in January of 2020, but had been denied on the basis that he had not undergone “gender reassignment” surgeries and his penis was fully intact. …

The spa requires nudity in some of the areas, and, as such, has been reserved for female clientele.

You can see why the spa was not likely to get a favorable ruling from liberal authorities:

The owner of the spa, Myoon Woon Lee, and the spa’s president, Sun Lee, are of Korean heritage and modeled the spa after the tradition of jjimjilbang. They are also Christian, and cited their faith as a reason why they did not wish to accommodate males in the facility.

Let’s hope they aren’t from North Korea. Imagine the heartbreak if they escaped that hellhole seeking freedom only to end up on the Left Coast.

“We firmly believe it is essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers and employees that we maintain adherence to this adaptation of a females-only rule,” Sun Lee wrote, also providing education on the cultural traditions of the jjimjilbang.

That’s fine with everyone, except liberal ideology dictates that men are female if they say they are. Consequently, WSHRC ruled that the spa is in violation of state “antidiscrimination” law by not letting perverts ogle the naked clientele.

The Pre-Finding Settlement required the spa to remove all references to “biological women” on their site, and provide staff with “inclusivity” training.

There is a reason that LGBTists denounce people with enough character to put up resistance as “bullies.” It is because they themselves are bullies.

Presenting Haven Wilvich, the bully on whose behalf women are no longer allowed to have their own spas:

On tips from Steve T and ABC of the ANC.

2 Responses to “Court Decrees Women-Only Spas Unconstitutional”

1. Court Decrees Women-Only Spas Unconstitutional – Whatfinger Community says:

   June 10, 2023 at 6:50 am

   […] Visit Direct Link […]

2. Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup - Pirate's Cove » Pirate's Cove says:

   June 11, 2023 at 6:31 am

   […] Moonbattery notes a leftist court declaring women-only spas unconstitutional […]