Our chromosomes prove liberal gender theory to be a steaming crock of moonbattery. Yet Jonathan Starling — whose bio describes him as a “socialist writer” with a degree in “Ecological Economics” — presents them as evidence that the male–female binary is actually a spectrum.

Via the Royal Gazette

It is entirely possible for someone to be genotypically XX yet have the “appearance” of being male in terms of phenotype (how the genes – genotype – appear) – that is, without doing a chromosomal test one would never know. This particular case, de la Chapelle syndrome, occurs in approximately one in every 20,000 people, and they have “typical“ body and pubic hair, penis size and erectile function – although they produce no sperm in their ejaculate. Equally, it is entirely possible to be genotypically XY yet have the ”appearance“ of being female, as in Swyer syndrome, which occurs in about one in every 100,000 people – and, while uncommon, such persons can indeed become pregnant and give birth. And these are only two such examples: one in every 500 people have XXY; one in every 1,000 are XXX; one in every 1,000 are XYY; one in every 50,000 are XXXX; one in every 50,000 are XXXY; and one in 2000-5000 people are just X; and this is not an exhaustive list of possible sex genotypes.

For the sake of argument, let’s say all this is true. By the same reasoning, the number of fingers on a human hand is a spectrum because 1–2 American infants per 1,000 are affected by polydactyly. Rare cases of cornu cutaneum prove that humans are a horned animal.

The “I” in LGBTQIA+ stands for “intersex” — a condition that affects 0.018% of the population.

A major objective of moonbats is to convince us that the freakish is normal and that the normal is therefore freakish. The harder they try, the more definitively they prove that their ideology is a teratism.

On a tip from Mike B.