Orwell may not have said it, but it’s still true: “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” This applies not only to expressing valid but politically incorrect opinion, but to acknowledging indisputable objective facts. For example, you can be suspended by Twitter for pointing out that men do not have cervices. This runs contrary to mandatory LGBT ideology, which trumps not only biology but also feminism:

Background from NOQ Report:

Dr. Alessandra Asteriti is a professor at Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. She is a hardcore feminist who embraces the majority of leftist ideologies. At least she used to until the left started embracing anti-feminist ideologies such as women can be men and men can have cervical cancer. Claiming otherwise will get you suspended even if you agree with the other 95% of the progressive ideology, as Dr. Asteriti learned the hard way.

Her Twitter account is back up now. It won’t stay that way until she learns that being a 95% moonbat is not permissible. You must be a 100% moonbat 100% of the time to avoid the risk of cancelation.

Uh oh. MedicineNet had better get with the program. From its definition of cervix:

The cervix is the lower, narrow part of the uterus (womb). The uterus, a hollow, pear-shaped organ, is located in a woman’s lower abdomen, between the bladder and the rectum.

Let’s fix it for them, so that they can avoid trouble from the Silicon Valley Thought Police:

The uterus … is located in the lower abdomen of a person who may or may not be a woman, but who is described as a woman by hateful, unwoke, transphobic bigots regardless of how he/she/ze chooses to self-identify…

On a tip from Rapinhoe.

Imagine the Frankenstein story as told by a depraved pornographer. That’s the world we are living in now.

Via Christian Post:

Doctors at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston are seeking approval to perform a first-of-its-kind surgery to attach the penis of a dead man onto a woman who identifies as transgender.

Says plastic and reconstructive surgeon Curtis Cetrulo,

“It’s certainly pushing the boundaries.”

That’s what moonbats feel compelled to do, so long as there still are any boundaries other than those of political correctness.

Current female-to-male procedures are nightmarish enough. Breasts are surgically removed. In addition,

During phalloplasty operations, tissue is surgically removed from the patient’s forearm and thigh to construct a pseudo-phallus. These complex operations often involve several follow-up procedures.

Nothing more unnatural occurred on the Island of Dr Moreau.

Investigative journalist Jennifer Bilek is no fan of the new Frankenphallus procedure:

“Adding the sex organ of a dead individual to fulfill an attempt to sculpt a preposterous falsehood — that of changing sex — shows how malignant the propaganda of ‘transgenderism’ has become in western cultures,” she continued, when asked to comment on what has most contributed to the breakdown in medical ethics in this arena.

“We ought to be ashamed, but we celebrate it. These medical professionals should be brought up on charges and we laud them instead, as they stuff their pockets on young people’s pain and will stuff them again to cure necrosis bound to occur from attaching dead flesh to live bodies.”

You can see why Democrats want socialized medicine. Only taxpayers have enough money to keep pushing the boundaries. In the meantime, expect the cost of health insurance to continue to skyrocket.

On a tip from Dragon’s Lair. Hat tip: 'Nox & Friends.

If an exception to the proscription on cruel and unusual punishment might ever be justified, it would be for the extreme form of child abuse entailed in “transitioning” little kids from their actual gender to the other to create a politically correct trophy transsexual. This virtually guarantees a future dominated by psychological and social problems of the type that frequently culminate in suicide. Yet we have a presidential candidate so eager to pander to his identity politics constituents that he actually endorses this crime against nature and against decency.

In last night’s townhall, which was offered to the public in place of a presidential debate that might challenge Biden’s deteriorating cognitive skills, Mieke Haeck, parent of a “transsexual child,” demanded to know how he would advance her agenda.

Biden started by praising public displays of homosexuality, then focused more specifically on sexually engineering children too young to make these choices for themselves.

Via CBS News:

“The idea that an eight-year-old child or a 10-year-old child decides you know, I decided I want to be transgender. That’s what I think I’d like to be. It’d make my life a lot easier. There should be zero discrimination.”

“Discrimination” in this context is Liberalese for “resistance to the radical LGBT agenda.”

The former vice president then said he promises there is no reason … Haeck’s daughter should be denied any rights.

To be “denied rights” in this context means to be protected from exploitation.

Shameless as he is in his pandering, not even Joe Biden can avoid mild chastising from the thought police:

Some Twitter users pointed out that Biden was incorrect in saying a transgender child “decides” to be trans.

Are they acknowledging that little kids are not equipped even to grasp the bizarre depravity of LGBT ideology, much less to make a meaningful decision to devote their lives to pretending they are the opposite sex? No.

According to current liberal dogma, children are born transsexual. They are assigned the wrong bodies at birth by some sort of cosmic mix-up. As we learned when “sexual preference” was abruptly struck from the Newspeak Dictionary, it is offensive to suggest that people have free will.

On a tip from Mr. Freemarket.

An urgent update to the Newspeak Dictionary has emerged from the sideshow Democrats have made of Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation.

The term “sexual preference” was once the height of political correctness, implying that it is not normal and right to be attracted to the opposite sex, but merely a preference, like choosing between flavors of ice cream. However, progressives have realized that having a preference entails free will, which they fundamentally oppose.

Therefore, the word “preference” must not be used in the context of sexuality. Mazie Hirono has spoken. Since the laws of political correctness are applied retroactively, Amy Coney Barrett has been duly chastised for a vocabulary infraction.

Via Fox News:

“Let me make clear, ‘sexual preference’ is an offensive and outdated term,” Hirono said. “It is used by the anti-LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not. Sexual orientation is a key part of a person’s identity… So if it is your view that sexual orientation is merely a ‘preference,’ as you noted, then the LGBTQ community should be rightly concerned whether you will uphold their constitutional right to marry.”

This is why Democrats plan to pack the Supreme Court. If you can say with a straight face that there is a constitutional right for members of the same sex to “marry” each other, stuffing the court with leftist apparatchiks could just as easily allow Hirono et al to honk about the constitutional right to free college indoctrination and to never have to hear opinions that offend liberal sensibilities.

Barrett offered an apology for using the term, explaining that she didn’t mean to use the term in the way Hirono had described it, but that didn’t stop Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., from bringing it up.

“When you did use the term ‘sexual preference’ earlier today, rather than ‘sexual orientation,’ is there a difference, and what is it?” Booker asked.

Explain yourself to the Inquisition!

Those who do not want to be canceled are now required to pretend that sexual deviancy is an immutable characteristic. After the court has been packed by Democrats, this principle will be applied to pedophiles.

Ever eager to enforce far left vocabulary decrees, Merriam-Webster leapt into action, changing the definition of “preference” to conform to up-to-the-moment moonbat doctrine.

The Blaze reports:

Prior to the supposed outrage, Webster’s Dictionary listed the fifth definition under “preference” to link to the term “sexual preference,” the universally used phrase to refer to those with whom a person chooses to have sex.

Now, the definition has been updated to claim the word is “offensive.” In fact, Webster’s Dictionary claims the phrase is “widely” believed to be considered offensive, despite the fact that it was not listed as offensive until after Barrett used it.

“The term preference as used to refer to sexual orientation is widely considered offensive in its implied suggestion that a person can choose who they are sexually or romantically attracted to,” Webster’s Dictionary claims.

Merriam-Webster deserves a pat on the head from Big Brother, just as it did when it changed the definition of racism on demand from a black woman so as to bring it in line with the toxic concept of “systemic racism” that has been used to justify riots and to attack the foundations of American society.

On tips from Varla and Henry B.

Men are men; women are women. Deny it and you will soon drown in a morass of madness. In France, a guy wants to be legally recognized not as his daughter’s father, but as her mother. The country’s highest court has ruled on what he has to do:

To become one of the six-year-old girl’s two legal mothers, the 51-year-old transgender woman would have to adopt her, the Cour de Cassation ruled.

Born male, the applicant was recognised as a woman by French authorities in 2011. She then had a child with her wife in 2014, having not undergone the operation to have her male reproductive organs removed.

Not even René Magritte pushed surrealism as far as the phrase “her male reproductive organs.”

Either we acknowledge objective reality as real or we don’t. If we don’t, we are insane. Insane is not a safe or pleasant way to go through life.

On a tip from Lyle.

Even if this is the high-water mark for moonbattery, and after this year we turn back toward sanity, we will have nightmares about 2020 for the rest of our lives. Aria DiMezzo, a transsexual Satanist anarchist, has won the Republican nomination for Sheriff of Cheshire County, New Hampshire, running on the campaign slogan “F*** the Police.”

DiMezzo graciously observed that “totally oblivious” voters did not know what they were doing:

DiMezzo, the High Priestess of the Reformed Satanic Church, said [he is] running for the law enforcement position to oppose the “reckless” partisan electoral system that allowed [him] to become the Republican nominee.

“More than 4,000 people went into the voting booth on September 8 this week, and they all filled in the circle by my name despite knowing absolutely nothing about the person they were nominating to the most powerful law enforcement position in the county.” DiMezzo wrote.

His point is well taken: know who you are voting for.

On tips from Bluto, David R, ABC of the ANC, and Dragon’s Lair.

The liberal establishment has been fundamentally transforming Western culture into something very different, which we will neither recognize nor find appealing. Having to watch athletes express contempt instead of respect for America when the national anthem is played is an obvious example. The advertising industry is another.

These days, it seems every major corporation jockeys to position itself as even more woke than the others. The point of advertising is no longer to sell a product, but to throw elbows on behalf of political correctness. Burger King throws a sharp one:

Burger King has launched a new advertising campaign in Finland featuring its eponymous mascot sharing a deep kiss with Ronald McDonald, along with the English slogan ‘Love Conquers All’.

“Love” is Liberalese for “divergent sexuality.”

The image is front and centre on the landing page of the fast food chain’s Finnish website, with various outlets with a focus on advertising showing physical posters at locations such as public bus stops as well.

The idea appears not to be to convince people to buy one brand of junk food over another, but to make propaganda supporting the LGBT agenda still more inescapable.

Despite the characteristic paleness of Finland, the campaign specifically promotes nonwhites of the LGBT persuasion by featuring a gay pride flag topped with black and brown stripes, probably to kowtow to rioting Black Lives Matter militants.

In case you want to see the family-unfriendly image for yourself and it is no longer on the Finnish Burger King landing page, here it is on Instagram.

If this flies in Finland, expect to see it here. Soon afterward, companies like Burger King will push the envelop still further. The public may be subjected to posters featuring increasingly explicit gay sex.

Or, having conquered that hill, the social engineers may move in a different direction. The liberal establishment’s embrace of Netflix’s Cuties suggests a possibility:

On tips from Feet2Fire, Rapinhoe, and Frances J.

California provides a window into the single-party supermajority Democrat rule planned for our national future. America will be a great place to live — for pedophiles. California’s General Assembly marches on the next civil right frontier by passing this:

The bill — SB 145 — was introduced by state Sen. Scott Wiener (D), an openly gay man, and seeks to prevent gay adults who sodomize or perform oral sex with underage teenagers from being automatically assigned to California’s sex offender registry.

Progressives progress by increments. Mr Magoo could see what this progresses toward.

The bill passed the California state Senate by a 23-10 vote and passed the Assembly by a 41-18 vote, the San Fransisco Chronicle reported.

Not even close. Gavin Newsom is likely to sign it into law.

On the Senate floor, Wiener proclaimed of his bill:

“This eliminates discrimination against LGBTQ youth in our criminal justice system.”

Lightening the penalty for sexually abusing children “eliminates discrimination.” This illustrates what the concept of civil rights has deteriorated into.

Earlier, Wiener moved the ball forward toward utopia with legislation that reduced the penalty for knowingly transmitting HIV to a misdemeanor.

On a tip from Varla.

Under moonbat rule, that which is not forbidden is mandatory — or at the very least, government funded. This includes sterilizing children in the name of transgender ideology. In California,

A committee in the state Senate recently passed a bill designated AB 2218, which would establish a Transgender Wellness and Equity Fund to finance medical interventions for trans-identifying individuals. Such interventions could include puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones (testosterone for females, estrogen for males), and mutilating surgeries such as mastectomies and castrations.

Such “interventions” prevent normal development and are likely to result in sterilization.

The bill states repeatedly that the resources will be used for trans-identifying “people” or “individuals” – nowhere limited to individuals 18 years of age or over. In fact, the “findings” section of the bill gives statistics about the number of “youth 12 to 17” who are viewed as gender-nonconforming.

Clearly, the bill is intended to apply to children. Yet even at this point in our cultural decline, sterilizing children can evoke a negative reaction. Therefore,

Bill sponsor Assemblyman Miguel Santiago testified at the Senate hearing that “nothing [in the bill] talks about sterilizing kids. Nothing, I will repeat, in this bill points to anything to do with children.” Senator Susan Rubio chimed in that she had read the bill “very, very carefully” but “didn’t find anything about sterilizing children.”

That it does not specifically say “sterilize children” in the bill does not mean it won’t result in sterilized children. It probably doesn’t say “impose economic collapse” or “radically reduce our standard of living” anywhere in the Green New Deal. Progressives can never be forthright about the predictable consequences of their measures, or the frog would hop out of the pot before it comes to a boil.

On a tip from Troy H.