The liberal claim that Charlie Kirk was a racist is absurd to us, but not to speakers of Liberalese. In this dialect, “racist” is a synonym for “fascist” or “Nazi” — all of which mean “someone we hate.” The term “racist” differs from the others only in that it implies hating the person for racial reasons.

Once again, prominent Democrat Jasmine Crockett displays the hatred of Caucasians that is fundamental to modern liberalism:

Only two whites voted against honoring the great Charlie Kirk. No wonder Jasmine doesn’t like us.

Her fellow black leftists antiracistly join her in attacking his memory:

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus condemned a bipartisan resolution to memorialize conservative organizer Charlie Kirk on Friday, saying the measure validated Kirk’s beliefs, and legitimized “racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American” ideals.

They support their incongruous accusation with this:

The caucus outlined some of Kirk’s past comments that they said they “strongly” disagreed with, listing “his belief that the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which ended racial segregation, was a mistake; his denial that systemic racism exists; his promotion of the Great Replacement theory; and his offensive claims about Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Michelle Obama, and Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee lacking adequate cognitive ability.”

Note that none of these commonsense positions require having any particular opinion of blacks in general. However, to escape being denounced as a racist by liberals, you must believe that every single black is highly intelligent — even Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Only five members of Congressional Black Caucus voted in favor of honoring Charlie Kirk. Forty-two CBCers voted against it. Eight others voted present or did not vote at all. They do not wish us well.

On tips from abcanc and David Kight.