Normally moonbats delete words from the Newspeak Dictionary, so as to curtail our range of thought. But when it comes to anything sexual, they eagerly broaden our horizons with new vocabulary terms. Recently we learned the word “sapiosexual.” Now the Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics introduces us to hydrosexuality:

The article aims to transform narratives surrounding Utah’s Great Salt Lake, often referred to as “America’s Dead Sea,” by reimagining how brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) are perceived in science, culture, and art. It introduces the concept of hydrosexuality to bridge these realms, thereby enriching feminist blue posthumanities and feminist biology through art-based practices and queer advocacy. By navigating the environmental narrative of the GSL, the hydrosexual perspective challenges settler science by exploring the connections between the reproductive system of brine shrimp and the economy, ecology and culture. … Furthermore, this cultural analysis draws inspiration from low trophic theory and Queer Death Studies. This multifaceted approach is exemplified by two case studies in the arts, which gradually alter white humans’ perceptions and understandings of the brine shrimp, helping to reimagine the GSL in the context of rapid climate change.

Touched all the bases, didn’t they? Hydrosexuality, feminist blue posthumanities, feminist biology, queer advocacy, the narrow-minded evilness of settler science, ecology, trophic theory, Queer Death Studies, white humans’ presumably erroneous perceptions, even the global warming hoax. Plus there was something in there about “multilayered exploitation.” All this is just in the Abstract.

That’s why they make the big bucks in the Ivory Tower. They can cook up convoluted nonsense far beyond the comprehension of us little people down below. Not even the Babylon Bee can keep pace with them.

On a tip from Steve T.