Now that people who identify as morbidly obese have joined the Cultural Marxist Coalition of the Oppressed, updates to the Newspeak Dictionary are in order. Feabie is a social network for people who fetishize obesity. It claims over 100,000 members. The abridged definitions below are from its Feederism FAQ:

Feedee

Feedees are men or women who like the idea or physical act of growing bigger, fatter and/or rounder. It’s a sexual orientation…

Feeder

Feeders are men or women who like the idea or physical act of helping someone else grow bigger.

Fat Admirer

Fat admirers, or FAs, are men or women who are sexually and romantically attracted to partners who are chubby.

BHM/SSBHM

BHM stands for big handsome man, and is an identifier for straight or bisexual men who are overweight (in the gay community, such men are known as “chubs”). SSBHM stands for super-sized big handsome man, and signifies a BHM who is significantly obese.

BBW/SSBBW

BBW stands for big beautiful woman, and is an identifier for women who are overweight—anything from a little curvy, to plump to chubby to obese. SSBBW stands for super-sized big beautiful woman, and signifies a BBW who is significantly obese.

Click through for full definitions.

Obesity is a major risk factor for a variety of potentially fatal diseases, including diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and cancer. This begs the question of whether feederism is unhealthy. The answer:

Sure, so is driving a car, living in North Philadelphia, rock climbing and taking Tylenol. But seriously, feedees who choose to put on weight assume some health risks, but there are ways to gain weight while maintaining relative health and fitness. For some feedees, the idea of becoming unhealthy or even immobile is part of the fantasy.

Homosexuality is also a risk factor for deadly diseases (e.g., HIV leading to AIDS, hepatitis, and human papilloma virus, which can cause anal cancer). You don’t disapprove of homosexuality, do you? Because if you do, you risk cancelation. Soon the same will apply to obesity.

On a tip from Mike B.

The purpose of Newspeak Dictionary updates is to control how we think by controlling how we talk so as to advance the liberal agenda. Washington State University’s Inclusive Language Guide provides examples, as reveal by Campus Reform.

To obliterate the distinction between male and female:

Words like “moms and dads,” “he/she,” “mankind,” “freshman and freshmen” as well as “upperclassmen and upperclassman” are all discouraged.

To destigmatize criminality:

The guide warns against mentioning past or present incarceration status, as well as “language that defines people by their crimes and sentences,” such as “felon,” “inmate,” “offender,” “convict” and “ex-con/ex-convict.”

To desanctify marriage by blurring its meaning:

The list also extends to romantic relationships, where the terms “husband/wife” and boyfriend/girlfriend” are to be avoided in favor of “spouse” and “partner.”

To promote the displacement of the American population via unlawful mass migration:

Another identity listed is national origin, and the words “illegal immigrant,” “foreign,” “first-world country” and “third-world country” are also discouraged. The site tells readers to “[r]emember that actions, not people, are illegal.”

The stated purpose of the guide is to assure no one says anything that could “exclude people” based upon identity. It’s still okay to say “Christofascist” and “bitter clinger” though.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.

Nothing could be more wholesome, constructive, and good than motherhood. This has been reflected throughout the centuries in reverent depictions of the Virgin Mary. Naturally leftists seek to destroy motherhood, hammering away with feminism and their antisacrament, abortion.

That which they hate, progressives erase. It was only a matter of time until someone like Governor Tony Evers (D-WI) stepped forward to delete the word “mother” from the Newspeak Dictionary.

Modernity reports:

Wisconsin has floated legislation that would replace the word ‘mother’ with the term ‘inseminated person’ in state documents. …

Evers introduced the amendment as part of budget recommendations for the 2025-2027 fiscal period in a bill submitted to the Wisconsin Senate’s Joint Committee on Finance.

Don’t forget to send your mom a card on Inseminated Person Day.

The amendment…

…also suggests replacing the term ‘biological father’ with ‘natural parent;’ ‘husband’ with ‘spouse;’ and ‘male’ with ‘person.’

The words ‘wife,’ ‘woman,’ and ‘female’ have also been erased.

However, women still have the freedom to bleat, “My body my choice,” so long as they aren’t referring to vaccines.

Social engineering through language reveals modern leftism’s roots in postmodernism. The academics who concoct moonbattery in their lavishly taxpayer-funded laboratories hold that objective reality is irrelevant if it exists at all; all that matters is the subjective reality that they can force to meet their specifications through control of language.

On tips from Dan F, Jack D, and seaoh.

Attention ladies and gentlemen: The words “ladies” and “gentlemen” are henceforth forbidden as thoughtcrime in Airstrip One.

The English Folk Dance and Song Society (EFDSS) is attempting to make centuries-old traditions more “inclusive”.

The charity, which is backed by the Arts Council, has created guidance that tells teachers and those hosting group dances to use “gender-free language”.

Barn and ceilidh dances often have defined male and female roles, with the caller, who guides participants through complex steps, using terms such as “men and women”, “ladies and gentlemen” or “boys and girls”.

The society’s guidance on inclusion and accessibility states that this vocabulary could offend “minority genders” and should be dropped to avoid anyone being “misgendered on the dance floor”.

Everything must center on sexually psychotic moonbattery, including English folk dancing.

There are not many ladies or gentlemen among moonbats anyway, so the words won’t be missed when ideological homogeneity has been achieved. As for folk dancing, it reeks of tradition and therefore will not be permitted in utopia — even if liberals might find men in skirts appealing.

On a tip from Steve T.

It is no longer politically acceptable to use the word “manufacturing.” This official Newspeak Dictionary deletion comes from on high. Presenting Rep Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Ranking Member on the Commerce, Manufacturing, and Trade Subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee:

In order to socially engineer more desirable demographics, manufacturing will henceforth be referred to as “womanufacturing.”

On a tip from Wiggins.

The word “chief” now constitutes thoughtcrime. It has been struck from the Newspeak Dictionary by an Expert, Dr. Dori Tunstall of the California Institute of the Arts:

Tunstall is also head of her advocacy organization, Dori Tunstall Inc., which is “dedicated to decolonizing and diversifying institutional processes.” She refuses to use the term “chief executive officer,” instead opting for “Lead Executive Officer” on her Instagram biography, where she invites others to “ask why we don’t say chief.”

Don’t ask. It will just start her sputtering about how the word somehow insults Amerindians.

However, according to Liberty University linguistics professor Dr. Jaeshil Kim: “The word chief comes from the Old French chef, meaning ‘leader’ or ‘head,’” and “[t]he term was applied to Native American leaders by European settlers, aligning with their existing use of the word for leaders in other societies.”

She concluded that the term “Chief Executive Officer” signifies “its original meaning of leadership and authority without direct reference to Native American cultures.”

Well then, the word offends transgender kindergartners. Or maybe it causes climate change. The important thing is that you are not allowed to say “chief.” The very arbitrariness of liberal language restrictions is the whole point — namely, to show who is boss.

The Kansas City Chiefs got what they deserved yesterday for being thought criminals.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.

Normally, the Newspeak Dictionary gets ever thinner as moonbats limit our ability to think by limiting our vocabulary. However, sometimes a new term is added. Introducing five-alarm fire, which can be defined as “a person or event seen as an obstruction by progressives.”

Agents are experiencing “terror” because cleaning up the FBI before it could finish deteriorating into an American KGB is a five-alarm fire:

So is asking for accountability from USAID, which has been shoveling massive amounts of our money at other countries:

Chuck Todd has joined Jim Acosta and Chris Wallace among the Democrat propagandists who have been flushed out of the mainstream media recently as it struggles to restore credibility and relevance. He agrees that DOGE leader Elon Musk is a walking five-alarm fire:

You just heard Chuck Todd accuse another person of helping to “destroy the trusted information ecosystem.” The lack of self-awareness among moonbats is absolute.

On tips from WDS 2.0 and Mr. Freemarket.

Postmodern liberals manipulate language to abnormalize normality and thereby impose depravity as the new normality. To this end, a new term has been deployed against people who do not imagine themselves to be members of the opposite sex: “nontransgender.”

Via Western Journal:

In an appearance Tuesday on the long-running left-wing daily news show “Democracy Now!” with co-host Amy Goodman, American Civil Liberties Union lawyer Chase Strangio, a woman pretending to be a man, blasted President Donald Trump’s executive orders and — in a prime illustration of transgender activists employing muddled language to conceal truth — used the phrase “non-transgender women” to describe the adult females whom, since the inception of our species, human beings have recognized as one of two sexes.

After social engineers have switched normal and abnormal in the name of LGBTism, this bearded lady will pass as a regular guy:

Don’t be surprised if she changes her name to Chase Normalio.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.

A top national priority is to end birthright citizenship, which is allowing the rest of the planet to bleed the USA dry via the welfare state. Sneak over the border or come in as a tourist or student, drop a baby, and presto: lips are affixed to the public teat on an intergenerational basis. As a devoted enemy of the United States, the New York Times is alarmed that Trump will try to put an end to this insanity. But Times propagandists distract from their own message with some unusual language:

Although prominent liberals like Ketanji Brown Jackson cannot define the word “woman,” it is used here to mean “adult human female.” Terms like “chest-feeder” and “person who menstruates” are usually preferred.

The term “unborn child” is particularly jarring, as according to liberal ideology the concept is an oxymoron. If a child has not been born, it is not a child, but a nonhuman clump of cells. To think otherwise would be to acknowledge abortion as cold-blooded murder.

The lesson here for those who want to avoid straying into thought crime is that context matters. A woman can be a woman if she is also an illegal alien put upon by Donald Trump. An unborn child can be an unborn child if it will help the woman onto the welfare and Democrat voter rolls.

On a tip Mr. Freemarket. Hat tip: Not the Bee.

The sort of moonbats who run Britain find Christianity “offensive.” Consequently, Sutton Council has erased the term “Christian name” from the Newspeak Dictionary.

Via Modernity:

A council in South London has instructed staff to stop using the term ‘Christian name’ and instead use ‘forename’, reasoning that it could offend some people.

We used to think of tyrants as hard cases. These days, tyranny is imposed by faceless legions of squishy-soft mollusks who bully under the banner of hypersensitivity:

The [council’s inclusive language] guide states that use of “incorrect” or “outdated” language can “perpetuate, contribute to, or cause bias, prejudice and discrimination” in addition to “hurt and offence when discussing other personal attributes”.

The morpheme “man” is also deemed problematic:

[The guide] asks that gendered language be avoided, for example “workforce” should be used rather than “manpower” and “chair” should be used instead of “chairman”.

Almost as dangerous as gendered language are ageist terms:

It also encourages workers to “actively avoid ageist terms such as ‘elderly’, ‘OAPs’, ‘pensioners’ or ‘youngsters’” and to steer clear of age-specific terms such as “mature workforce” or “young and vibrant team”.

Fundamental to leftism is the postmodern notion that those in charge can recreate reality according to their specifications by controlling language. In the artificial world social engineers are trying to impose, we are all the same age and of indeterminate gender. Christianity does not exist.

On a tip from Dennis G.

Phoenix’s iconic Squaw Peak — which moonbats have referred to since 2008 by its current government name, “Piestewa Peak” — will regrettably have company across the state line:

California Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2022 signed a bill into law that bans use of the word “squaw” in future place names and ordered the agency rename all places that used the term, including on streets, bridges, public buildings and cemeteries, the Los Angeles Times reported Friday. …

The California Advisory Committee on Geographic Names will work to implement approved replacement names by Jan. 1.

Why are we forbidden from saying the word “squaw”? Just because. The very arbitrariness is the reason. Every time someone says “Piestewa Peak” instead of “Squaw Peak,” they are bending the knee to liberals as their lords and masters. Tribal leaders play along out of habitual crybullying.

Speaking of Squaw Peak, until recently various trailheads near this popular mountain were named after Indian tribes: Apache, Navaho, et cetera. But this was changed, because per woke doctrine Indians have to be erased like the Land O’Lakes butter squaw so that no one offends them by acknowledging them as part of Americana. Acknowledging the South is also forbidden; consequently, nearby Dixie Peak now has the government name “Two Bit Peak.”

This moonbattery is also imposed at the federal level:

U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland also moved in 2021 to rename any geographic features or location names on federal lands that use “squaw,” including dozens in California.

Redundancy is a defining feature of Big Government.

Musk and Ramaswamy had better hit the ground running. They have a lot a work to do, if the bloat is so bad that bureauweenies are overpaid with our money to impose their ideology by deleting harmless words from the Newspeak Dictionary.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Normal progress entails terms being deleted from the Newspeak Dictionary, with the ultimate objective of reducing us to subservient grunts. But sometimes a new word is added. Introducing theydy:

It would be hard not to agree that she isn’t a lady.

As David Thompson suggests, this helps explain why résumés with alternative pronouns are wisely ignored.

On a tip from Steve T.

On a tip from Jester.

Thanks to social engineers, women are undergoing erasure. By the time they are done pruning the Newspeak Dictionary, there won’t be such a thing as men either.

The Daily Mail reports that the word “Englishman” has been banned:

The Geneva-based World Intellectual Property Organisation – which protects trademarks and patents globally – has also vetoed masculine terms including ‘forefathers’ and ‘brother­hood of man’.

The World Intellectual Property Organisation is yet another tentacle of the comical yet malevolent black hole for US taxpayer money called the United Nations.

Even ‘man’s best friend’ has been blacklisted – with ‘a faithful dog’ to be used instead.

WIPO’s Guidelines on Inclusive Language explain that “masculine-specific” terms might constitute microaggressions by suggesting that “women are not represented in certain groups or do not possess certain skills.” Yet you are not allowed to say “waitress” or “midwife” either, since women are getting erased too.

As Toby Young of the Free Speech Union observes,

“Banning certain words and phrases to advance a dogmatic political ideology is a hallmark of totalitarianism.”

It will all be much simpler when liberal utopia is achieved. Then permissible vocabulary will be reduced to a sheeplike bleating noise.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.