The New York Times is the flagship publication of the liberal establishment. Generations have passed since it could be taken seriously as an objective source of information. Times reporter Walter Duranty started propagandizing on behalf of the Soviet Union over a century ago. He received a Pulitzer for hiding Stalin’s atrocities from the public; the NY Times refuses to disavow the prize to this day. Yet not even the Shady Gray Lady is biased enough to suit other propaganda platforms in the increasingly radicalized — and increasingly desperate — “mainstream” media.

Gripes CNN:

The Times has been far too distracted as of late by worries over President Joe Biden’s age, allowing it to steal attention away from the larger and far more serious danger posed by a second Trump administration.

That is, the danger to the liberal agenda.

Media moonbats are especially enraged that the NY Times put out a poll admitting that the American people do not like Joe Biden. The poll complicates Democrat strategy by confirming that Biden is likely to lose a fair election.

Hilariously, the conspicuously far-left NY Times is accused of conservative bias for touching on the topic of Biden’s obvious decrepitude and senility:

“That they even asked this question [i.e., whether Biden is too old] is evidence of the bias — the agenda — in their poll,” Jeff Jarvis, the Leonard Tow Professor of Journalism Innovation at the CUNY Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism, posted on Threads.

CNN even criticizes itself for not being sufficiently devoted to suppressing information that undermines the Democrat party line:

CNN and MSNBC can’t even seem to arrive at a firm policy over how to cover Trump’s live remarks (at times, both networks have boasted about how they don’t air his lie-filled speeches live, and at other times, such as on Monday, they both did just that).

No doubt letting the public hear the speeches of the opposition candidate would constitute conservative bias.

Moonbats can largely avoid hearing the opposing point of view by sticking to MSNBC. Following Trump mopping up on Super Tuesday, its election panel quickly cut away from his victory speech:

[Militant moonbat Rachel] Maddow was unapologetic about her network’s deliberate decision to cut off the former president’s speech. …

“I will say that it is a decision that we revisit constantly in terms of the balance between allowing somebody to knowingly lie on your air about things they’ve lied about before and you can predict they are going to lie about,” Maddow explained.

“And so, therefore, it is just irresponsible to allow them to do that.”

It is “irresponsible” to allow the public to hear what one of the two presidential candidates has to say, because if the opponent says it, it must be a lie.

A legitimate news source would let us hear the speech, then fact check it for inaccuracies. However, the purpose of the liberal media is not to inform but to provide an echo chamber, egging on liberals to climb ever further out on a limb.

When Trump wins, the limb will break and dump them to the ground — provided we have a fair election.

Here is the speech MSNBC doesn’t want the public to hear:

On tips from Barry A and ABC of the ANC.

One Response to “Desperate Lib Media Goes Into Information Lockdown”

1. Desperate Lib Media Goes Into Information Lockdown – altnews.org says:

   March 8, 2024 at 10:05 am

   […] from Moonbattery: […]