The absurd Stacey Abrams — who once burned the Georgia flag on the steps of the state capitol — still refuses to concede the gubernatorial election held last fall.

Since that time, Abrams has turned “sore loser” into almost an art form. She’s made countless TV appearances where [the] interviewers treat her like a queen. Other outlets have published fawning puff pieces in major newspapers like the New York Times. We have seen nearly every 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful bend over backward to kiss the Abrams ring.

Abrams appeared on “CBS This Morning” on Monday. The anchors gave her the same type of softball questioning and adoring coverage she’s received since she first refused to concede.

During the interview, Abrams talked about her announcement last week that she was open to being the vice presidential nominee for any of the Democrats currently running for president.

Don’t be surprised if she ends up on the ballot. The Democrat Party has become a whirling circus of incontinent moonbattery, and a circus always has a prominent place for clowns.

Her claims that the election that she lost by 55,000 votes was somehow rigged remain unsubstantiated. Yet the fawning media refuses to call her out on this. This is not only because she is a sacred left-wing Woman of Color, but also because her fellow leftists believe that generating discontent by undermining faith in the electoral process can help them in future elections by undermining Republican officeholders and by driving turnout, especially among strategically aggrieved blacks. Eroding elections fits nicely on an agenda that also includes undermining the American system of government by packing the Supreme Court, disabling the Electoral College, abolishing the Senate, and even passing H.R.1.

On a tip from Dragon’s Lair.

Once the core population of America becomes a minority in its own country, this will never be America again, but rather some other nation — and not one with a happy future. That will mean the Cultural Marxists have won. With the old America irrevocably lost, the ensuing instability will provide them with an opportunity to impose their authoritarian conception of utopia. This has CNN propagandist of politically preferred sexual orientation Anderson Cooper more excited than popper night at a San Francisco bathhouse:

CNN’s Anderson Cooper said during an interview with Univision anchor Jorge Ramos that he found the demographic decline of white people “exciting”.

“The idea that, you know, whites will not be the majority, I mean, that’s — it’s an exciting transformation of the country, it’s an exciting evolution and you know, progress of our country in many different ways,” said Cooper.

Progress toward what? Dissolution. Decline. Eventually, eradication (see Zimbabwe and South Africa for details).

Ramos agreed that whites becoming a minority in America was inevitable and a positive development.

He would. Ramos arrogantly represents the movement to extend Latin America through North America. Explicitly speaking as a “Latino immigrant” to others sharing his identity, he has declared of the USA that this is “our country, not theirs” (i.e., their country, not ours). He has demanded that America surrender to the invasion currently taking place across the southern border.

Ramos’ movement will compete with others that vie for dominance, keeping whatever country replaces America in a perpetual state of civic discord for the foreseeable future.

Life will be hell for whites who are not part of the ruling elite when leftist demographic engineers get their way. If you think Affirmative Action is outrageously unjust here, check out what it is like in South Africa, where whites are an underrepresented minority.

Ironically, life will also be worse for those who displace us. After all, they didn’t come here to trade one Third World hellhole for another; they came to enjoy the benefits of living in a country mainly populated by white people.

Be careful; you are only allowed to acknowledge the demographic displacement of America’s core population if, like Cooper and the comparably odious Joe Biden, you endorse it.

No society ever failed to understand that when its population has been replaced, it will be dead. That is why so many heroes through the centuries have been willing to fight to the death to defend their homelands from invasion.

If anyone doubts that the “mainstream” media is fundamentally hostile to America, this video confirms it:

On a tip from Eddie_Valiant.

It isn’t only moonbats imported from Zimbabwe. The New York Times, flagship publication of the liberal establishment, concurs that having a presentable lawn is problematic. The following video connects lawns to global warming, colonialism, the hated (by moonbats) 1950s, and of course racism:

As Breitbart notes, neither of the women seen expressing the currently unconscionable desire to live in a white neighborhood have anything to say about lawns. Nonetheless, well-kept lawns are hereby officially associated with racism. They will be illegal in utopia.

On a tip from ABC of the ANC.

Fredo Cuomo is not the only CNN propagandist with behavioral issues, if we are to believe the guy who is suing Don Lemon for attacking him in a Hamptons bar last summer.

From Mediaite:

Dustin Hice claims that Lemon attacked him at Sag Harbor dive bar Murf’s in July 2018. …

“Mr. Lemon, who was wearing a pair of shorts, sandals, and a t-shirt, put his hand down the front of his own shorts, and vigorously rubbed his genitalia, removed his hand and shoved his index and middle fingers in Plaintiff’s moustache and under Plaintiff’s nose,” the suit says.

Hice said Lemon repeatedly shoved his fingers in his face and asked, “Do you like pussy or dick?”

Lemon’s aberrant sexual proclivities are a matter of public record. It remains to be seen whether the plaintiff’s allegations can be proven.

On a tip from Kate P.

If you want to see some fireworks, compare Chris Cuomo — dumber and less successful brother of the mafioso-like Andrew — to Fredo from The Godfather.

A video has surfaced of CNN’s Chris Cuomo using profanity and threatening violence after an individual referred to him as “Fredo.” …

“Punk ass bitches on the right call me Fredo. My name is Chris Cuomo. I’m an anchor on CNN,” Cuomo said. “Fredo is from The Godfather. He was the weak brother.”

Awkwardly following in the footsteps of his brother, who has absurdly claimed to be an illegal alien on the grounds of his Italian ancestry, Chris tried to play the race card, raving that “Fredo” is the equivalent of the forbidden n-word because it is racist against Italians, as if Italians were a race.

His interlocutor had a little fun by waving the red cape some more.

The man reacted to Cuomo’s explosion, remarking, “You’re a much more reasonable guy in person than you seem to be on television.”

The witless bull charged:

“If you want to play, then we’ll f***ing play,” Cuomo shot back, hurling a series of insults at the man and referring to him as a “punk bitch.”

Invisible wisps of steam streamed from his ears as Cuomo became completely unhinged.

“I’ll f***ing ruin your shit,” Cuomo ranted. “I’ll f***ing throw you down these stairs like a f***ing punk.”

Good thing he’s well connected. Otherwise he could get in trouble for threatening violence.

Get the children out of the room and be ready to wash out your ears. Then see what happens when you strike a nerve by calling Chris Cuomo “Fredo”:

At this point, few will be surprised to learn that YouTube censored this video, evidently for making a moonbat look bad.

I wonder if Chris has figured out that the main reason people are laughing so hard is because he got mad.

On tips from Sean C, DCGere, and Varla.

Today is 8/8, a racist day to be flying flags at half-mast in honor of the victims in El Paso and Dayton, according to a former FBI assistant director of counterintelligence:

Frank Figliuzzi, who is also an NBC News national security contributor, told MSNBC that the president might be dog-whistling white supremacists by choosing to fly the national flag at half-staff until August 8.

The eighth letter in the alphabet is H. Therefore, 8/8 spells HH, which could be short for Heil Hitler. Since liberals have sympathized with every opponent of America since Hitler, we are supposed to continue to take Hitler seriously, even though his movement died with him 74 years ago.

“The president said that we would fly our flags at half-mast until August 8, that’s eight-eight,” Figliuzzi said. “Now I’m not going to imply that he did this deliberately but I am using this as an example of the ignorance of the adversary that is being demonstrated by the White House.”

The adversary in this case is a pair of psychotic maniacs with vastly different political views; one was killed and the other is headed for Death Row. But in the MSNBC fever swamps, it is believed that America is under siege by a vast neo-Nazi conspiracy.

“The president is either getting really good advice and rejecting it, or he’s getting really bad advice,” he said.

Why would he reject the theoretical “really good advice” unless Trump is in fact in league with Adolf Hitler?

“Our chief executive is seen as almost a mentor, a radicalizer,” he said.

More evidence:

The president should have said “I condemn white hate ideology” rather than “the nation must condemn it,” according to Figliuzzi.

Very perceptive distinction. The FBI didn’t make this guy an assistant director for nothing.

Having been exposed, Trump may sneak away to join his Nazi cohorts hiding out in Paraguay. Then at last the warnings of the lunatics featured as experts on MSNBC will be validated.

On tips from Jack Bauer, cZwonderpig, and Varla.

It took a while, but the Washington Post finally managed to link Trump to the Russians. They did it through hamburgers:

It’s high summer — hamburger season. The char, the fat, the squishy perfection of processed bread sopping up the overflowing juices — doesn’t it somehow seem like Americans’ birthright? There’s a reason that President Trump chose to serve hamburgers — twice — as an all-American feast for some all-American championship college football players.

True enough, hamburgers are the USA’s national food, which is no doubt why WaPo seems to find them repulsive.

But peel back the oil-spattered pages of history, and you’ll find that the sandwich so closely aligned with the stars and stripes was once also embraced by the hammer and sickle. (Yep, like so much about this current administration, even Trump’s beloved hamburgers have surprising ties to Russia.)

From there the piece immediately deteriorates into utter nonsense, raving insanely about people eating hamburgers in the Soviet Union. The millions who starved under Lenin and Stalin would have killed for a chance to eat their first hamburger.

A Russia apparatchik visited the USA to learn about industrial approaches to food production. Afterward, luckier Russians could find a kind of meatloaf vaguely resembling bunless football-shaped hamburgers in cafeterias. Thereby, WaPo proves that not only Trump but also hamburgers are in league with the Russians. So stick to tofu and arugula like a good liberal.

On a tip from Bluto.

If there is a bottom to liberal self-parody, CNN will find it. The liberal propaganda service plunges ever deeper into guffaw-inducing moonbattery. Now we learn that since the color white is racist, robots are racist if they are painted white.

The following is not satire, but text actually extracted from CNN Business:

You see them in films like Will Smith’s “I, Robot” and Eve from “Wall-E.” Real-life examples include Honda’s Asimo, UBTECH’s Walker, Boston Dynamics’ Atlas, and even NASA’s Valkyrie robot. All made of shiny white material.

Is that so that you can see that they are clean and undamaged? Of course not. That explanation would not promote Cultural Marxism.

The reason for these shades of technological white may be racism, according to new research.

The “research” was conducted by New Zealand’s Human Interface Technology Laboratory and published by the University of Canterbury. Barks lead researcher Christoph Bartneck:

Imagine a world in which all the robots working in Africa or India are white. Further imagine that these robots take over roles that involve authority. Clearly, this would raise concerns about imperialism and white supremacy.

Just as clearly, more research — preferably lavishly funded by government agencies — will be required to determine how to avert such a calamity.

At least crash test dummies tend to be white too. Maybe their suffering can serve as reparations for the racism of white robots.

On a tip from R F.

I used to think that Snopes fact-checks Babylon Bee articles that are obviously satire because in addition to being moonbats, the less than savory dopes at Snopes are mental defectives. But it turns out they may have a strategic reason.

Snopes does not fact-check the occasional Babylon Bee articles that poke fun at conservatives, only those that get us laughing at liberals. This may be why:

Social media giants like Facebook often rely on Snopes.com to fact check stories posted by users. If a news outlet runs afoul of Mark Zuckerberg’s digital baby, it could drastically decrease the site’s social media clout, not to mention its traffic.

From Real Clear Politics:

In previous coverage, RealClear Fact Check Review reported that pieces deemed false by fact-checking outfits stand to lose as much of 80% of their Facebook audience. This is because the social media giant uses such verdicts to justify reducing the distribution of pieces deemed false.

Maybe they are not mental defectives after all, but rather liberal ideologues abusing their position of power to marginalize opposition.

Now this story might involve mental defectives:

On Thursday the FBI released a statement suggesting right wing conspiracy theorists are elevating as a national threat, and deep in their document, they quoted the far-left, often wrong Snopes as a source for the agency’s information.

On the stupidity scale, that is up there with letting the Southern Poverty Law Center, an infamous hate group, tell you who ought to be restricted for being a hate group.

On tips from Jester and Stormfax.

America was created by white men. Cultural Marxists want to marginalize or ideally eradicate them so as to facilitate creating a radically different society in America’s place. Sometimes they are candid about their hostility, as when CNN anchor of politically preferred pigmentation and sexual orientation Don Lemon yelped that “the biggest terror threat in this country is white men … and we have to start doing something about them.” Another example is Somali colonist Ilhan Omar shrieking the following when asked about Muslim terrorism:

“I would say our country should be more fearful of white man [sic] across our country because they are actually causing most of the deaths within this country … [W]e should be profiling, monitoring, and creating policies to fight the radicalization of white men.”

See for yourself what the Democrat Party would subject you to:

White men are the threat, not Muslim terrorists. If you don’t agree, then don’t vote Democrat.

The establishment media, being controlled by Cultural Marxists, predictably leapt to Omar’s defense, yelling in chorus that the video of her saying this was deceptively edited. Actually, the unedited video does not mitigate her malice in the slightest. In it, she goes on to blame America for Muslim terrorism:

“But I mean, I think, like I said, the focus of our policies should be about keeping Americans safe, keeping us domestically safe, and where we actually find a solution is looking at our foreign policy. Looking at how we are engaging with these the members of these communities and the kind of rhetoric that is being spewed out of leaders within our city halls, within our state capitals, and within our nation’s capital.”

In other words, if you don’t like Muslim violence, then comply with Muslim demands regarding foreign policy and don’t say anything Muslims don’t want to hear.

Here’s the unedited complete interview:

The media’s tactic is a lie, but it might work. It doesn’t matter that the edited version actually toned down Omar’s malevolence. Journalists know that most people are only half paying attention; it is only general impressions that count. If someone says that Ilhan Omar hates white men, a liberal can counter, “The video was edited!” We saw the same thing when the press made a scandal out of a video of Nancy Pelosi stumbling over her words that was slowed down slightly.

On tips from TCS III and KirklesWorth.

Mariano Rivera was the greatest closer in the history of baseball. He is also a class act who has done Yankee heritage proud. He was inducted into the Hall of Fame Sunday on a unanimous vote, the first ever. Moonbats want you to hate him.

From the odious Daily Beast:

[Rivera has] served at the pleasure of a racist president, taken part in thinly veiled propaganda on behalf of a far-right government in Israel, and gotten chummy with outright bigots and apocalyptic loons. None of this will be inscribed on his Hall of Fame plaque. It should, even if much of the sports world would very much like to pretend none of it exists.

This is what “served at the pleasure of a racist president” means:

Rivera’s crime here is that he took part in a nonpartisan listening session pertaining to the opioid crisis. If he were too much of a jerk to deign to enter the White House, like juvenile Red Sox manager Alex Cora, Rivera would get a pat on the head instead of scorn.

The Daily Beast denounces Rivera at tedious length for his devotion to Christianity and his support for Israel. Being a first-class guy off the field as well as on it earns you a smear job from the vermin comprising the liberal media.

Guy Benson sums up the disgraceful hit job:

Once again, Rivera has induced a weak swing and a miss. Perfect.

On tips from Varla and Byron.

Despite heavy Jewish support for the Democrat Party and the leftist agenda over the years, it is becoming ideologically mandatory among moonbats to oppose the existence of Israel, because like South Africa in the 1980s and early 1990s, it represents an island of Western Civilization in a sea of politically preferable savagery. CNN dutifully climbs aboard by validating hostility with this slanted headline:

House Approves Resolution Opposing Israel Boycott Movement in Divisive Vote

The key word here is “divisive.”

When is a 398 to 17 landslide vote divisive? When the media opposes the outcome.

The vote was on a nonbinding resolution opposing the BDS movement (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions), which entails leftists erasing Israel from the map with the same tactics they used to destroy South Africa.

Islamomoonbat Squad members Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib unsurprisingly opposed the resolution. So did race-baiting “civil rights icon” John Lewis, who at least has the excuse of cluelessness; he apparently thinks Hillary Clinton won the 2016 election.

On tips from Varla and KirklesWorth.