Under moonbat rule, just because it is factually true does not mean you are allowed to say it. After all, it could be “disinformation” or even “hate speech.”

CBN reports on an alarming ruling from Belgium in the case of Great Replacement opponent Dries Van Langenhove:

Van Langenhove’s conviction was based on a lecture given in 2024 at Catholic University Leuven, in which he linked mass migration to “crime and a deterioration of our quality of life.”

This correlation is not hard to substantiate. So rather than argue, moonbats make it illegal to discuss.

Snarled the judge:

“Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

To his credit, Van Langenhove is a repeat offender:

It is Van Langenhove’s second hate speech conviction, and he faces another court case in September.

He claims there are a dozen active criminal investigations against him for hate speech and has already paid more than 420 thousand euros ($489,000) in legal fees.

Authorities want to prevent Europeans from realizing what is being done to them until it is too late to reverse it. Eradication by demographic displacement can still be avoided if enough people rally behind countermoonbats like Eva Vlaardingerbroek, who is attempting to force EU bureaucrats to acknowledge what is happening through the Save Europe Act:

On tips from patthedog and Straight Shootr.