Under moonbat rule, that which is not forbidden is mandatory — or at the very least, government funded. This includes sterilizing children in the name of transgender ideology. In California,

A committee in the state Senate recently passed a bill designated AB 2218, which would establish a Transgender Wellness and Equity Fund to finance medical interventions for trans-identifying individuals. Such interventions could include puberty-blocking drugs, cross-sex hormones (testosterone for females, estrogen for males), and mutilating surgeries such as mastectomies and castrations.

Such “interventions” prevent normal development and are likely to result in sterilization.

The bill states repeatedly that the resources will be used for trans-identifying “people” or “individuals” – nowhere limited to individuals 18 years of age or over. In fact, the “findings” section of the bill gives statistics about the number of “youth 12 to 17” who are viewed as gender-nonconforming.

Clearly, the bill is intended to apply to children. Yet even at this point in our cultural decline, sterilizing children can evoke a negative reaction. Therefore,

Bill sponsor Assemblyman Miguel Santiago testified at the Senate hearing that “nothing [in the bill] talks about sterilizing kids. Nothing, I will repeat, in this bill points to anything to do with children.” Senator Susan Rubio chimed in that she had read the bill “very, very carefully” but “didn’t find anything about sterilizing children.”

That it does not specifically say “sterilize children” in the bill does not mean it won’t result in sterilized children. It probably doesn’t say “impose economic collapse” or “radically reduce our standard of living” anywhere in the Green New Deal. Progressives can never be forthright about the predictable consequences of their measures, or the frog would hop out of the pot before it comes to a boil.

On a tip from Troy H.

Comments are closed.