Let’s see if allowing mass immigration from the Third World has worked any better in Israel than in the USA and Europe:

Via the Jerusalem Post:

Hundreds of police officers and refugees were injured as protests in Tel Aviv by Eritrean asylum seekers against the East African nation’s regime turned violent, Israel Police and local hospitals reported.

“Refugees” and “asylum seekers” are Liberalese euphemisms for illegal immigrants.

Turns out, open borders work out the same way everywhere. The only difference is, Israel is not ruled by treasonous scum set on national self-destruction.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announces his determination to correct the situation:

“The massive illegal infiltration into Israel from Africa constituted a tangible threat to the future of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. We blocked this threat by building a fence, which entailed overcoming the opposition of the security establishment and political rivals. When we blocked it, we completely stopped the infiltration…

“There remains the problem of those who entered before the fence was completed, some tens of thousands of illegal infiltrators who entered the country. We voluntarily repatriated 12,000 of them with various incentives and measures. We wanted more. We proposed a series of steps, including the deposit, but unfortunately all of them were rejected by the High Court of Justice. …

“We are seeking strong steps against the rioters, including the immediate expulsion of those who took part. …

“I would also like this forum to prepare a complete and updated plan to repatriate all of the remaining illegal infiltrators from the State of Israel…”

Assuming pro-Israel Israelis like Netanyahu are able to overcome leftist opposition, there will still be an Israel after there is no longer a USA or Europe in any meaningful sense — unless we dramatically change course.

Paul Joseph Watson has more:

On tips from Wiggins and KirklesWorth.