Common ground has been discovered between Muslims and moonbats beyond their shared goal of destroying Western Civilization. Both are hostile to man’s best friend.

Mohammad is said to have disliked dogs so much that he ordered them all to be killed, then changed his mind and declared only black dogs should be killed. Al-Hakim, a Muslim ruler of Egypt, ordered the killing of all dogs in 1005. Dogs are widely considered unclean in Islam, resulting in Muslim cab drivers refusing to take fares who require seeing-eye dogs.

Now dogs are also unclean in the liberal religion:

Mother Jones … highlighted new research, originally published by The Guardian, that concluded dogs have “extensive and multifarious” environmental impacts, disturbing wildlife, polluting waterways and contributing to carbon emissions.

Other than being racist or failing to affirm LGBTism, there are no crimes more serious than producing the carbon emissions that make the crops grow but that liberals regard as offensive to the weather.

It pinpointed how canines are disturbing native wildlife, particularly shore birds.

Too bad lefties are not as concerned about the many eagles they kill with their money-laundering wind turbines.

Among the crimes dogs stand accused of committing against the environment,

[I]ntel showed that insecticides from flea and tick medications kill aquatic invertebrates when they wash off into waterways.

Won’t someone please heed the pleas of oppressed aquatic invertebrates? The liberal media will.

Dog feces, meanwhile, can leave scent traces…

This ground-breaking discovery can be confirmed by stepping in dog do and failing to clean it off your shoe.

Most unforgivable are dogs’ crimes against the climate:

A 2020 study found the dry pet food industry had an environmental footprint that is around twice the land area of the UK, with greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to the 60th highest-emitting country.

Speaking of the UK, the moonbats in charge there floated the idea of killing all cats because Covid hysteria. Dogs will need defending if the notion catches on among progressives that they pose an existential threat to life on earth by causing global warming.

On a tip from Varla.

Comments are closed.