Dog Names and Racism
According to our state religion, the key feature of American society is racism against blacks. Finding actual examples of racism against a group that is treated obsequiously has proven so difficult that academics have been reduced to denouncing racist reactions to dog names:
Academics recently applauded a Social Psychology Quarterly study purporting to show a disparity in the time dogs were adopted based on racial associations with the animals’ names.
“White” names, according to the study, resulted in shorter adoption times compared to “Black” names.
The correlations were largely concentrated around pit bulls, “a breed that is stereotyped as dangerous and racialized as Black,” according to the study.
If you regard pit bulls — which often kill people — as dangerous, you too are a racist, so repent.
Academic responses to this moronic study provide insight into the level of uselessness much of academia has attained. For example:
Fascinating research that supports the resiliency of racialized names and the pervasiveness of antiBlackness. Must read work. https://t.co/5me6YhsbYh
— Dr. Nef (@NefWalker) June 7, 2022
“Dr. Nef” (a.k.a. Nefertiti A. Walker) makes her living barking woke jabberwocky at University of Massachusetts Amherst, where she holds the title Interim Vice Chancellor for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and Chief Diversity Officer. Her Selected Publications list includes “The tipping point: The intersection of race, gender, and sexual orientation in intercollegiate sports” and “Hegemonic masculinity and the institutionalized bias of women in men’s collegiate basketball.”
Academics draw six-figure salaries — lavishly subsidized by taxpayers — to spew poisonous nonsense that makes us hate each other.
On a tip from Franco.
YOUR SUPPORT IS APPRECIATED
Donations buy time to produce more content. If you enjoy this site, please consider donating through Cash App to $moonbattery or through PayPal by clicking the button below: