There is a big election coming, and for obvious reasons, the Democrat establishment is vulnerable. Time to intimidate the public with massive race riots like in 2020.

Did the police kill Dexter Reed just to be racist? Actually no; the scumbag had opened fire on them, wounding an officer. But that’s not how the mainstream media presents it. Via Breitbart:

• The Incredible Shrinking Washington Post: Police fire 96 shots in 41 seconds, killing [b]lack man during traffic stop

• USA Today: Seat belt violation ends with [b]lack man dead on Chicago street after cops fired nearly 100 bullets

• CBS News: Why did traffic stop, shootout with Chicago Police killed Dexter Reed escalate so rapidly?

• The Independent: Black man’s family demand answers after bodycam shows Chicago police firing 96 times in deadly shooting

• Associated Press: Deadly Chicago traffic stop where police fired 96 shots raises serious questions about use of force

• Chicago Sun-Times: Killing of Dexter Reed raises questions about Chicago police reform. ‘The message is, go in guns blazing.’

The liberals in charge had good reason to bestow large monetary rewards upon Black Lives Matter rioters in places like Philadelphia, New York, and Denver. They wanted to be sure their weaponized mob could be relied on when needed.

Even if hyping Dexter Reed gets insufficient traction because it is too obvious that the police did nothing wrong, it will at least help prime the pump for the inevitable next incident.

On tips from Wiggins and KirklesWorth.