Ivanpah: $2.2 Billion Up in Green Smoke

Democrats have wasted a staggering amount of other people’s money in the name of the global warming hoax. Consider California’s Ivanpah Solar Power Facility:

The solar power plant, which features three 459-foot towers and thousands of computer-controlled mirrors known as heliostats, cost some $2.2 billion to build.

Construction began in 2010 and was completed in 2014. Now it’s set to close in 2026 after failing to efficiently generate solar energy.

Guess who picks up the tab?

In 2011, the US Department of Energy under President Barack Obama issued $1.6 billion in three federal loan guarantees for the project…

The extravagantly expensive green energy gesture relied on natural gas to stay operational as long as it did. The boondoggle presumably served mainly to launder taxpayer money for Democrat donors — an Obama specialty. As noted previously, it incinerated birds in flight by the thousands each year, no doubt including eagles.

Observes Steven Milloy, senior fellow at the Energy & Environmental Legal Institute:

“No green project relying on taxpayer subsidies has ever made any economic or environmental sense.”

But at least the climate will know that moonbats meant well.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Trump Schools United Nations on Green Economics

The moonbats at the United Nations ought to be friendlier toward Trump, considering that he was kindly enough to provide them a valuable lesson in the economics of the global warming hoax:

Truer words were never spoken:

“The primary effect of these brutal green energy policies has not been to help the environment but to redistribute manufacturing and industrial activity from developed countries that follow the insane rules that are put down to polluting countries that break the rules and are making a fortune.”

The result is not only stratospheric energy prices and depressed economies in Europe but an increase in supposedly harmful greenhouse gases globally.

Cold kills a lot more people than heat. But heat would kill even fewer if global warming hoaxsters would stop driving up the cost of air conditioning with their nonsensical policies.

Study Finds Global Warming Is Not Making Sea Rise

Remember when Al Gore prophesized that sea levels would rise by up to 20 feet in the near future, all because of global warming caused by failure of Big Government to suppress normal human activity? A new study finds that it is not going to happen:

The research found that the average sea level rise in 2020 was only around 1.5mm per year, or 6 inches per century, according to the paper’s authors, Dutch engineering consultant Hessel Voortman and independent researcher Rob de Vos.

In contrast to what is often breathlessly reported, Voortman found there has been no acceleration in the rise of sea level. What rise there has been has not been consistent between locations, indicating that it is not a global phenomenon.

The Dutch have an interest in how much the sea is actually rising, given that a quarter of the country is below sea level already. However,

Voortman was shocked that no researcher before had performed an analysis of real-world local data.

This is because promoters of the global warming hoax do not live in the real world. They inhabit a make-believe realm of leftist ideology and weaponized hysteria.

The study was also unlike any of its kind in that it was carried out with no external funding, said Voortman, who has spent the last 30 years as a hydraulic engineer working with flood protection and coastal-infrastructure adaptation projects around the world.

Regarding the funding of other studies, follow the money and it will lead you to those who stand to benefit from the global warming hoax.

On a tip from Jack D.

Editor Fired for Research Undermining Hoax

The reasons researchers have gone along with the global warming hoax are not admirable but can be understandable. Many want government funding from a Deep State that aggressively pushes the hoax for the sake of securing more power. Others just don’t want to be fired:

Marty Rowland PhD has been fired from his position as Special Issue Editor at the American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES). The reason he was given for being fired was his publication of our paper, Carbon Dioxide and a Warming Climate are not problems. The paper has been cited 23 times according to google scholar. It was first published online May 29, 2024, and is already in the top 1% of all 29 million papers followed by Wiley’s Altmetric tracker. It is the #2 paper published in the 83-year history of the AJES.

Undermining the narrative is not permitted. Where moonbats have subverted it, science is not about science. It is about moonbattery.

This has happened before:

His firing for publishing a skeptical article is reminiscent of Wolfgang Wagner resigning over a perfectly reasonable, but counter to the “consensus” paper, by Roy Spencer and William Braswell in 2011, the paper is here and the story is here.

Draining the Swamp in academia will be as monumental a task as draining it in DC. It is also as crucial.

On a tip from Jester.

AP Denounces Dogs on Behalf of the Climate

Dogs may be man’s best friend, but that doesn’t mean moonbats return the loyalty or the affection. The Associated Press discourages dog ownership on the grounds that canines offend the weather:

Dogs are big meat eaters, and meat is a significant contributor to climate change. That is because many of the farm animals, which will become food, release methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Beef is especially impactful, in part because around the world cattle are often raised on land that was illegally deforested. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas, cutting them to then raise cattle is a double whammy.

Not having a dog is listed as one of the three top ways you can please the weather gods, along with generating electricity by inefficient means and avoiding air travel.

Jiaying Zhao teaches psychology and sustainability at the University of British Columbia and therefore qualifies as an expert. Instead of dogs, she wants us to bond with rabbits:

“I can adopt 100 bunnies that will not be close to the emissions of a dog, because my dog is a carnivore,” she said.

When they have achieved sufficient political leverage, moonbats will impose this insane religion by force. The perceptible effect on the allegedly problematic climate will be nil.

On a tip from Steve T. Hat tip: Pirate’s Cove.

Climate Anxiety Gets the Better of Ella Emhoff

Will anyone be surprised to hear that Kamela Harris’s stepdaughter Ella Emhoff is crazy as an outhouse rat?

There is good news across the board lately, the Trump Administration having taken us off the course that was leading directly to national ruin. But on the downside, Miss Emhoff is not adjusting to it well.

Ella is particularly disturbed about the climate, which has wreaked havoc on her precarious mental equilibrium:

As any Democrat can explain, the climate crisis that has reduced this poor woman to a neurotic wreck is the fault of Trump supporters.

Parenting matters.

On a tip from Wiggins.

Ecomoonbattery and Mental Illness: A Vicious Circle

Round and round spins the vicious circle. Those with psychiatric problems are prone to liberalism. Climate gullibility is particularly correlated with mental illness. Liberals’ erroneous and often hysterical beliefs exacerbate their neurotic state of mind, making them still more susceptible to moonbattery.

AP reports on behalf of the climate cult:

Anxiety, grief, anger, fear, helplessness. The emotional toll of climate change is broad-ranging, especially for young people.

This is because the younger people are, the more likely they are to take liberal B.S. seriously.

Activists, climate psychologists and others in the fight against climate change have a range of ways to build resilience and help manage emotions.

Like most liberal solutions to problems caused by liberals, they are likely to make the problem worse:

Feeling isolated? Find ways to connect with like-minded people and help nature, said climate psychologist Laura Robinson in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Ecomoonbat circle jerks are unlikely to help climate kooks achieve a reasonable perspective.

More advice:

Work locally to convince more residents to give up grass lawns… Help establish new green spaces, join projects to protect water, develop wildlife corridors, or decrease pesticide use to save frogs, insects and birds.

Protecting put-upon insects helps moonbats tormented by neurosis to take solace in their self-righteousness. But it won’t make them any less crazy.

On a tip from Barry A.

Gas Prices in California Could Go Up 75% Next Year

The goal of the Democratic Party is to use open borders and the welfare state to do to the whole country what it has been doing to California. This gives an idea of what that would mean for gas prices:

California is set to lose two major oil refineries, bringing the total decline in refining capacity to 21% in three years.

The refineries are closing because Gavin Newsom et al. oppose energy production on the grounds that it offends the climate according to their ideology.

California’s gas prices are already much higher than in neighboring states, with a gallon of gas creeping up to $5/gallon, as much as nearly $2 a gallon more than in cheaper states. The national average price, according to AAA, is $3.15/gallon.

This is largely due to taxes. Where you have single-party rule by the Party of Big Government, you have excessive taxation.

Due to those refinery closures, prices may rise by as much as 75%.

That would mean $8.43 per gallon. No doubt liberals regard this as a small price to pay to signal their virtuous obeisance to the weather gods — although it is doubtful that even liberals believe this will have any perceptible effect on the weather.

But why complain about $8.43/gallon? One study found that driving an EV is the equivalent of paying $17.22/gallon. EVs are slated to become mandatory in the erstwhile Golden State.

On a tip from WDS 2.0.