Copenhagen Punishes Elderly by Denying Them Meat

The jig is up for the global warming hoax. Even the UN’s IPCC has admitted that the assumptions upon which liberals base their hysterical prognostications of doom are “implausible.” But it looks like word has yet to reach northern Europe. In Holland, cities have been banning advertisements for meat so as not to offend the global climate. Denmark’s largest city is taking the next predictable step by beginning to ban its consumption.

Typically of progressives, they will ban meat incrementally. Also typically, they are starting with those least able to push back. Copenhagen’s municipal guidelines call for nursing home residents to be limited to 2.8 ounces of beef, lamb, or veal per week.

As the New York Post notes,

That is less than the amount of beef in a standard McDonald’s Big Mac, which contains two 1.6-ounce beef patties — for a total of 3.2 ounces.

With moonbats, never ascribe to insanity what can be explained as sheer malice. Not even Copenhagen City Councilkook Birgitte Kehler Holst of the lefty Alternativet party could really believe imposing vegetarianism on the elderly will improve the weather. Her motive is to punish:

“Everyone, including the elderly, must contribute to achieving our climate goals,” Holst said at [a] city council meeting, adding, “It is precisely the generation that has screwed up the most.”

Her elders “screwed up” by building Denmark into a wealthy country after surviving the Nazis. A high standard of living makes climate cultists angry.

On tips from Jack D, Brian Brandt, and patthedog.

Profiles in Moonbattery: Judge Zia Faruqui

The progressive approach to imposing Marxist rule pioneered by communists like Antonio Gramsci calls for infiltrating and subverting institutions. One key institution is the courts. Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui demonstrates what leftists have been placing on the bench.

Faruqui infamously apologized to Cole Allen for his alleged oppression while incarcerated. Via Fox News:

The magistrate judge who apologized to suspected would-be Trump assassin Cole Allen for his treatment inside a Washington, D.C., jail during a Monday emergency motion hearing has been criticized for his standoffishness with the Trump administration over the city’s crime crackdown, and praised for his career-long commitment to DEI.

“To me, it’s extremely disturbing that he was put in five-point restraints, a person with no criminal history,” Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui, who devoted much of his career to diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, said during the hearing, adding that Allen is presumed innocent.

Sure Allen is presumed innocent. But we all saw him on video.

Faruqui went on to grouse that January 6 defendants did not have to wear five-point restraints.

Barks the moonbat:

“At a minimum, I should be apologizing to him. We are obligated to make sure he’s taken care of. Mr. Allen, I’m sorry that things have not been the way they are supposed to.”

Faruqui is unsurprisingly hostile to ICE for enforcing federal immigration law.

Frontpage has more:

Faruqui is a Pakistani Muslim magistrate judge appointed by Judge Beryl Howell, a notorious leftist, under Barack Obama. While the Muslim magistrate judge, a member of the Muslim Bar Association of New York, had mostly flown under the radar until now, his political tantrums from the bench had begun last year as he fought to protect criminals.

He agreed to dismiss a federal case against Edward Alexander Dana, who allegedly threatened to kill Trump while in police custody. Just the guy to put in charge of the Cole Allen case.

If wacky activist judges are not purged from the bench, they will continue to eat away like termites at the judiciary until it collapses into farce.

On tips from MrRightWingDave and abcanc.

UN’s IPCC Admits Key Global Warming Assumptions Are Implausible

Amsterdam banned advertising for meat and fossil fuels just in time. The global warming hoax is running out of steam. Even the UN’s IPCC admits it is founded on balderdash.

Via the Daily Sceptic:

Activist climate scientists, journalists and Net Zero-obsessed politicians are in shock following an official admission from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a set of key assumptions promoting a climate ‘crisis’ since 2011 are “implausible”. The notorious set of always-improbable RCP8.5 ‘pathway’ assumptions which fed into computer models trying to measure an unmeasurable climate are no more. Since around 2011, these ‘business as usual’ assumptions have produced outlandish claims of future climate catastrophe which have been lapped up by lap dog journalists and politicians. The influential writer Roger Pielke Jr. called RCP8.5’s demise, “the most significant development in climate research in decades”.

Yet as Stephen Green notes, the revelation that the planet is not doomed after all has gone virtually unreported. This is because the liberal media has been exaggerating the IPCC’s implausible assumptions to whip up hysteria among the gullible.

The Climate Cult is a house of cards constructed on loose sand that has just been dug away from beneath it.

Not that the media will stop shouting hysterical lies. But ever few people will listen to them.

On a tip from abcanc.

Amsterdam Bans Advertising for Meat and Fossil Fuels

The global warming hoax is still alive and well in the Netherlands. In Amsterdam, public advertising for meat and the fossil fuels that allow modern civilization to function has been banned in the name of propitiating left-wing weather gods.

Via Daily Caller:

The ban results from efforts by Anke Bakker, Amsterdam group leader for the Party for the Animals, the BBC reported. GreenLeft, another Dutch political party, also supported the legislation, according to CBS News.

The most militantly insane moonbats are calling the shots.

Fish product, air travel, and cruises are also affected.

Elsewhere in Holland,

The Hague, another Dutch city, became the first city worldwide to ban all advertisements for oil and gas as well as aviation and cruise ships, encouraged by a call for such bans by the U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres, according to The Guardian.

The Dutch city of Haarlem became the first to ban all meat advertisements from spaces available to the public, The Guardian separately reported.

After banning advertising fails to perfect the weather, leftists will inevitably move on to banning meat and fuel themselves. The Dutch of the future will live on substandard diets as they shiver in the dark. The weather will remain unaffected.

On a tip from patthedog.

Chicago Alderman Wants Walgreens to Face Charges for Having to Close Stores

It isn’t easy to run a business where moonbattery-induced decay has taken hold. Twitchy reports on some of Walgreens’ trials and travails:

Back in 2024, Walgreens announced that it was closing a fourth location in Boston in a high-crime area. Rep. Ayanna Pressley at the time called pharmacy closings “disruptive, life-threatening acts of racial and economic discrimination.” In 2025 in San Francisco, a Walgreens store manager was convicted of assaulting a shoplifter who stole shampoo. Just this January, a Senate candidate running as a member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation to unseat Ed Markey expressed his desire for the government to seize the top 100 corporations, including CVS and Walgreens, and make them public property.

In Chicago, Democrat Alderman William Hall wants Walgreens to face charges for having to close stores due to rampant shoplifting by his constituents:

If Democrats prevail, running a business will be illegal. But crime won’t be.

On a tip from DCGere.

Blue State Taxman Comes After Those Trying to Escape

You can check out of Hotel California any time you like — but the taxman might never let you leave.

From the Daily Mail:

Americans moving out of California say state bureaucrats are demanding they explain why they left, or risk being taxed as residents.

Some have received letters demanding various evidence of their departure…

Last year, California collected about $275 billion in personal income, sales and corporate taxes. But that does not suffice when Newsom et al. are paying indefinitely for bridges to nowhere, trains to nowhere, 911 emergency lines to nowhere, et cetera.

Officials evaluate a taxpayer’s ‘closest connections’ to determine residency, looking at where they spend their time, where they own or rent property and where their financial and personal ties are strongest. …

Maintaining significant ties to California – even after a move – can trigger further scrutiny.

New York is even worse:

Under the domicile test, officials assess where a person’s closest personal and professional ties are located.

If those ties remain in New York, the state can still treat someone as a resident even if their primary home is elsewhere…

At this point it would be advisable for those who do not wish to be looted to avoid setting foot in California, New York, or anywhere else Democrats have consolidated power.

On a tip from 100 Bravo.